Thanks Rui, really appreciate the comments 👍😊

We'll be glad to have you on board 👍

You're so welcome!

Thanks Bryan 👍

👍🏼

👍

Thanks, see you soon 😊👍

You're welcome 👍

Cheers Ellie, thanks for the comments 👍

Hi there is too much to that for a KZfaq video but we cover it in depth here www.theschoolofphotography.com/courses/lightroom-course-online Thanks

Thanks Chuck 👍😊

Hi, you want at least 16gb. Hope that helps

Hi Sheila, yes good question and a thought a lot of people have. ACR is pretty much the same as the develop module in LR but lacks the rest of what LR offers. Lightroom just makes a really quick and easy workflow. Hope that helps 👍

👍

Hi, yes sure, check this out www.theschoolofphotography.com/courses/lightroom-course-online Hope that helps 👍

Just personal preference

You're welcome 👍

Good luck 👍

Thanks for sharing 👍

Hi, yes there has been an update in Lr, click here for more details kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y9Bkm7iEm8DegGw.html You can now do some face retouching in Lr but it is limited in comparison to Ps. Hope that helps 😊

👍

photoshop or photoshop elements which is( IMHO ) better for entry level photographers

Yes but I find not by much. It's each to there own when it comes to that. Hope that helps 👍

Thanks for sharing 👍😊

Yes Camera Raw is pretty much the same as the develop module in Lightroom

@@theschoolofphotography So you don't need LR!

Wow, there's one I haven't heard in a while. I haven't used bridge since Lightroom come on the scene but good to see there is life still in it. Thanks

Hi, thanks for the comments. You can't do everything in Lightroom I'm afraid, in the video is an example of the difference.

They are automatically linked. When you right click on a photo while editing in Lightroom there is the option to edit in Lightroom.

Hi yes as Bryan says, right click and select open in photoshop. More in depth info here www.theschoolofphotography.com/courses/lightroom-course-online

Thank you, I pay for both , but have only used Photoshop up until now, for about three years....it's taken that long to get used to it.

Much better to do in Ps. Thanks

@@theschoolofphotography 🙏

This was great, I been tryin to find out about "lightroom cc sync settings not working" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Ever heard of - Piyamilla Aphonic Prestige - (just google it ) ? It is a smashing one of a kind guide for discovering how to use these lightroom presets to edit your photos without the hard work. Ive heard some great things about it and my partner got amazing results with it.

👍

👍

Well you can be the best

Right! Why use any software for our photos? Why don't we take pictures like we used to without any alterations afterwards? Why go back and change the past/history? Isn't that cheating? Isn't that ruining photography? Photography was something that required skill years ago and now we can fix our "mistakes" or what we don't like afterwards. Please forgive my ignorance. I'm new to digital world. I used to shoot film years ago, and I'm thinking about getting into digital world of photography, I just have a hard time with changing what we actually capture. Thank you.

Well that's just one ideology...Post production is another. You can take great photos without post edits.. But you're effectively at the complete will of well "reality" your photos will always be grounded in reality (not that that's a bad thing) but it's simply the truth. Post edits allow you break free of that "reality" scope as well as save bad photos or make "ok" photos appear "great". I solemnly believe you shouldn't place limits on your self especially in a creative atmosphere it's well and fine to have a preferred way of doing things or have a taste for what you feel is best. Of course good edits start off with a good photo, someone who does post production should always strive to take the "perfect" photo because that means less "destructive fixes" and a cleaner canvas to edit/add. Which means less work ultimately.

@@EEEBA1 I also started in film with a bathroom darkroom. And we used masks, burning in, over/under developing, and many other tools in the production of our images. We didn’t consider it cheating, lazy, or unskilled. Quite the opposite.

Thanks for the comments and liking our channel, I'll try and take a look soon 😊

Single app Photoshop or Lightroom...23 Euro/Month, but Photography plan include Photoshop and Lightroom for 11,99/Month ;)

I come from both eras in photography and basically all being digital does is help us to achieve better photographs like some of the professionals of the time shooting film could only achieve. I have worked in B&W printing and you can mask off overexposed areas to get detail in clouds and bring details out of shadows. In the past, we have extensively used filters over lenses to get great sunsets or capture perfect soft and dreamy skin tones. I agree that if pushed too far then maybe the results can be too unrealistic. Printers in the past adjusted colour and saturation etc, so in reality, all Digital allows us to do is to enhance what the sensor pics up (Which can be unpleasant and unrealistic) My Canon 850D for instance captures a dull almost grey centred image with lots os scope for getting the full detail out of the image to get full white and black tones and a nice spread of colour. It is only something that a professional printer worth his or her salt would have been able to do in the past by exposing different amounts of colour onto the film. The great advantage in the digital age is being able to eliminate items like a stray piece of rubbish ruining a shot taken on holiday or getting rid of that spot on your nose that appeared on your wedding day. When I was young I did not have access to specialist printers and if I could take 28 pictures a month I was lucky. I hope this gives you some inspiration into taking up photography again. You will be able to take as many photographs as you like and also edit them to the limit that suits your requirements. I never look back to using film, so sad that I was unable to enjoy photography due to the cost of developing photos all of those years ago. If you have a reasonable smartphone why not start your digital world with that, as there is a lot of apps like Photoshop and lightroom that are free to use for basic edits, the world is your oyster :)

Photography itself is an ilusión of what really is out there. If you capture the exact colors and lighting, you won’t have anything interesting. You have to manipulate to create art. There’s no difference.

Thanks for sharing, maybe you could share what you use for Lightroom and Photoshop. I'm sure others would be interested.

The School of Photography I use Affinity Photo and, on rare occasions, Gimp.

@@theschoolofphotography I subscibe to the Adobe basic plan but am considering moving completely to Capture One 12. Find it just as good and more intuitive than LR and catalogues to be less complicated. Soon Adobe will be doubling the subscription fee to new users and I fear eventually to all users.

Thanks for the comments 👍

I use the vibrance tool on Photoshop to add or subtract " emphasis " in my pictures , including skin tone

@@dovidell can't you just use the adjustment brush in lightroom for that?