Thank you

Thanks

Now the timestamp on the video is 9:09 for the cadenza. . .

@@pianoplayingfishkeeper2094 Friska ends in 8:07 and the cadenza will start in 8:09

true

rat 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

I wasn’t a rat, I am a mouse so you better call yourself that…

Fr

@@johnmcrafter4122 anz

@@Franz_Liszt_Korean liszt

I agree with your sentiment but you have to know that this does not happen out of nowhere. It takes months of practice and preparation to produce a perfomance like this. I speak as a pianist myself so I know what it takes.

@A S Traum doesn't need to hype, he simply presents his artistry because he IS an exceptional Concert Pianist.

Yeah, I was also waiting for that!😁

Ah, so you are the generous number that everyone are talking about, the opposite of zero huh

@@jianhaunicholastan8349 wdym

@@trebleclef9844 His name is 1.

@@ashermay6513 \ok

And which versions did you hear to come to this conclusion?

@@arcanios806 when I say the word 'version' I'm referring to many different artists interpretations of the rhapsody, far too many to pick out any 1 in particular. Why, don't you belive me? I'm 56 now and have been a classical pianist for over 40 years. It's fairly easy to listen yourself to a few on you tube and make up your own mind 😊

@@markoartz101 Why are you reacting like this? I never questioned anything you said; I just wanted to know which performance you are thinking of. Because this one lacks very much. I would really like to know which pianists you are thinking about when saying this.

@@markoartz101 40 years, damn. You have my respect.

How good would you say Valentina Lisitsa’s interpretation is?

wait, some youtube piano things are not actually pianists? do you mean that they don't make appearances as themselves in real life, or that they are in fact computers?

@Block the games Traum is a Concert Pianist and Yes, he is an exceptional Pianist.

@@Traumfanblueheron I see you everywhere on all his videos

DON'T DEMEAN OTHER PIANISTS PERHAPS NOT AS TALENTED AS THIS ONE IS WITH SNIDE QUIPS ABOUT NOT BEING "ACTUAL."😖😫😡👎

@@miltonmoore8369 Absolutely agree, but the OP's first language isn't English (according to their channel); their vocab selection isn't going to be ideal.

kinda hard to hear the pedalling in his playing because of the reverb sometimes tbh...

yes.

넹 파워 미칩니다. 직접 들어보면 진짜 깜놀.

Exactly why I love Traum's performances.

AMAZING, TRAUM!!

Incredibly traum! When are we going to see your take on the 4th Chopin Ballade or maybe some more Beethoven Sonatas?

Finallyyyy

Is this your own cadenza Traum?

Awesome Traum! When will we see Feux Follets? I can’t wait!

So true, well said!

It only gets worse as you get better.

It always feels like your repertoire goals are moving further away, the more you learn. But at some point it’ll reverse. For me it was quite sudden when I realized that i was capable of learning the piece I always thought I’d never learn. As long as you keep challenging your capabilities, it’ll come at some point

I started this piece when I was 13, and 20 years later I’m still struggling at playing it😂

Yes, indeed, Traum is an exceptional Concert Pianist and he created this channel due to Covid lockdown. We have been blessed by Traum's beautiful artistry and many are inspired by him. The Cadenza is not Traum's original, it's by Eugen d'Albert. Have you watched the Traumian channel where Traum demonstrated his superb techniques playing on his Yamaha upright? There's also the Traum Radio Channel where he premiered with Beethoven/Liszt's Transcription of Symphony #8

He's Sung Chan

Actually it was pretty bad with a lot of mistakes.

@@arcanios806 Calling it “pretty bad” is just rather arrogant to be honest. I’ve heard many great pianist performances which have minor mistakes in them, but people are still allowed to enjoy interpretations of pieces, and so you replying to different people’s positive comments calling it bad is not painting you in a positive light, especially considering how the consensus on this interpretation has been widely regarded in the comments as a good one. To imply that you know that it’s bad and that everyone else is wrong takes a lot of hubris. If you don’t like it, don’t listen to it, and perhaps upload your own interpretation of it to correct all of the mistakes he made. Have a good day.

@@ashermay6513 So first of all: for you the many decide what is right and wrong, yes? So if the majority has this opinion, it must be true?! Sounds like a pretty dangerous thing to say... The interpretation is rather bad. That isn't an opinion, it is a fact. Did you hear other interpretations of this exact peace, then you know this as well. It is just so strange to see all this praise to such a performance while other pianists are basicly ignored.

@@arcanios806 I never said that, but you may continue to vilify yourself by putting words in my mouth. People enjoyed it, for the most part. That means what? Most people thought it was good. You are flatly saying that it is objectively bad, but who are you to say that? I’m not saying it is objectively good, because musical expression is a very subjective thing. My sister makes the claim that all classical music is objectively bad, just because she doesn’t like it. I have known others to claim that a piece is bad simply because they don’t like it. As I said, it takes hubris to suggest that you’re the arbiter of what’s good and bad. And of course people aren’t going to talk as much about other pianists on here. Comparing interpretations takes away from the value one can draw from them. If I listened to Pisarenko’s rendition of Six Moments Musicaux Op. 16 No. 4, and then went into the comments and started talking about how bad I thought it was and instead spoke about how much better Lugansky’s was, that’d be quite scummy. But you’re not even doing that. You aren’t saying you think it’s bad, you’re claiming that you, of all the people who heard it, possess the knowledge to objectively say that this rendition is bad. That’s just silly. Just say you don’t like it and move on. Bringing negativity to people’s positive remarks about this interpretation (which admittedly I did enjoy for the most part) is not doing you any favours, and pretending to have the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a rendition is “good” or “bad” is, again, just silly.

@@ashermay6513 Very well said! Thank YOU.

wow 2 bucks

Great

@@trebleclef9844 better than nothing

@@flossdojo5151No. Nothing is better than donating this measly amount.

@@user-po1uk2of6g shut up man, they just wanted to support the KZfaqr and probably didn’t have that much money to spare

Outro is Mozart's piano quartet no 2, E Flat Major, k 493, mvt 3, quite a contrast to HR2

@@Traumfanblueheron Oh thanks, didn t know the exact piece