the most desired wish i have is that all those guys speaking so tough on such ambiguous subjects would actually come through with all this talk and basically i hope the dude's homeless now

I'm pretty sure he said somewhere that he would do a bullet speed run after this.

I need to see this tooo

How can you do that?

@@dennisbob3905 When you go to create a game there are "More" options, then choose custom game. Set the time controls to whatever you wanted and there is also a + or - for opponents rating range.

I always do -25 to +400

- 25 to infinite

It did look suspicious. I, however didn’t find the rook trade that suspicious…..although it WAS the best move, lesser players will usually trade to reduce tension, and he was up materiel, which players of all levels will reduce when up material. The was 1300 recently… is a little fishy, but not a universal indictment. My verdict, very suspicious, but none of us can say for sure.

@@seanburk2424 Nobody goes from 1300 to 2000+ in a month. Chess doesn't work that way.

@sean try again bud. He was banned for cheating. It was obvious - very obvious and he got banned as a result.

@@astros7242both can be true. He was a cheater, but to me the rook move wasn’t all that suspicious. Quite frankly it’s already a little suspicious when anyone is bearing our boy Nelson. But I respect your opinion, if you found it suspicious, as did Nelson, then it was most certainly suspicious to both of you. I saw it before he played it, so it didn’t set off any alarms for me.

Highly probable he’s a cheat. In my mind it’s a veritable certainty. Friggin’ arse.

account is already closed lol

@@apapods it concerns me that he has been cheating for a month and now only has been baned

@@STUDYHARD-tx2nn Sadly, I think a lot of cheaters get away with it until they happen to beat a speed runner unknowingly.

@@Trewq79 yeah

It's more about the rating i think, playing good games is so much easier below 1800-2000, 1. players aren't observant enough to report, 2. Cheaters easily win with playing worse moves from time to time so the system doesn't catch them as easily. Say you use engine for 50% of moves you win 99% of games at 1000 elo, at 1500 you need to use it 75%, at 2k like we saw here he uses it for every move and gets banned 3 days later

What is this inside joke?

There were a few other ways (sacing only one rook) if you look at the review

@@heraldofv3379 Really? I'll look into that. I don't know how the check mate could be stopped without sac'ing 2 of black's rooks to draw away both the king and pawn needed to make the check mate that CV was talking about.

@@SgtMajorSkull Im pretty sure in the review stockfish says to sac the rook (before giving the two checks if thats the problem) migh have to sac the second in little to no time tho

@@heraldofv3379 Yes, sac'ing the 2nd rook would be needed to stop that check mating pattern. But of course then the 2 rooks would be sac'd for 2 pawns and the game would still be lost. But just saying as far as stopping the check mating pattern that Chess Vibes was talking about.

youtube

When can he play Rh5? If he plays it after a3 it doesn't stop the checkmating idea. If he plays it after b4, the bishop no longer defends the h5 square, so it's just a hanging rook.

I think you're right but it's 3 premoves.

@@88mphDrBrownno, it was four premoves

@@timm439 g4 was a normal move made on his turn after Ka7, then he premoved g5, g6, g7.

Wait, it's pinned. Never mind

In case your question wasn't answered in some other way the answer is you plug the moves into an AI engine like Stockfish. No human on Earth can beat Stockfish.

fug u mean lmao

L read the other comments

@@chreeshawn lol don’t cry man..L

@@blazegaming5289He literally was cheating.

@@blazegaming5289 His account was banned for cheating.

@@ChaennieMashups I mean if he’s cheating then he’s an idiot, but being an influencer with 400k following base you do not do that you report and move on.. before anything was discovered Lopez who I like cause he lost said he’s cheating, then he said he started not too long ago he was cheating, I believe this channel was under 1500 a month ago too so my point as influencers respect the people giving u content!

Lol, dude was 1600 a month ago and now has been banned.

Normally, I would agree with you. One of Nelson's flaws is that he can be overconfident (e.g., spending valuable time engaging with chat instead of playing, or wondering aloud whether someone was cheating when he loses due to his own mistakes). However, here, Nelson's suspicions were absolutely warranted. First, his opponent took about 15 seconds each move, regardless of how (un)complicated the position was. Also, the opponent was rated 1300 after thousands of games until about a month ago. Then, suddenly, his rating spiked by 700 points. The user's account was banned, so the app's admins apparently agreed the user was cheating.

​@@zthomasacknelson doesnt always accuse people of cheating. he accuses people of cheating based on their performance and playstyle. he won one game against a person he suspected of cheating. it doesnt always mean he has to lose to suspect players of cheating.