Luke Mitchell is 100% innocent . They both need justice and being from the area we all know who the real culprit is . Well done for highlighting this .
@karenshaw2991 Жыл бұрын
The biggest miscarriage of justice in Scotland, i also think the Detective in charge of the case at Lothian Borders Police should be charged.
@weejeannie13393 жыл бұрын
I’m absolutely stunned at this case watched the documentary and the podcasts need to keep on this case till Liam is back with him mum. As a mum it has really broken my heart ❤️
@govang5191 Жыл бұрын
A Long Walk To Justice Book by Scott forbes,
@rhonacameron98912 жыл бұрын
Free Luke Mitchell
@sharonhalley46662 жыл бұрын
I didn't know you were doing these cases but just watched them all, very chilling but very interesting. I think he is innocent xx
@rhonacameron98912 жыл бұрын
Another fantastic blog Christy sending love to you and your family your such a beautiful soul 🥰❤️
@darrenneil4533 Жыл бұрын
The statements changed because with no connection or forensics they had nothing, so they had to make something of nothing. The first lead and suspect is always the person who found the body, then it’s close family members and friends. Luke Mitchell was both of those things, so he was a victim of circumstances at that point.
@shepherdLoki Жыл бұрын
I'm not a believer but You've done a great job in highlighting this X
@Gillywillydingdong3 жыл бұрын
Loving you covering these cases 🙌🏽💜 similar cases to the Allan Bryant case, will you be covering his case too? xxx
@sharonbrown13512 жыл бұрын
Agree, would like to see Christy cover the Allan Bryant case x
@pamelawilson502 Жыл бұрын
Luke is 100% innocent
@colin98042 жыл бұрын
Just started watching ur blog, n personality I think ur bang on the 💰
@Lou-xq9br2 жыл бұрын
I remember watching this on Facebook... I hope actual justice is done soon for all 💜💜 Also #justiceforRhys 💚💚
@karenshaw2991 Жыл бұрын
100% innocent, juctice for Luke and Jodi.
@bethryan90778 ай бұрын
Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
@user-xq1eo6wi9r Жыл бұрын
The grandmother is the strangest. Why did she say she couldn't remember what clothes she wore? Especially when they would be covered in blood, and she encouraged the moped boys not to hand themselves in. However I think the condom guy did it but the family are behind him getting away with it.
@brianstewart3206 Жыл бұрын
And her question at the path ‘Is that you Luke?’ not ‘Is that you Jodi?’ seeing as that’s who they were ‘looking’ for, is curious. At no point in their statements do they say they even knew Luke was on his way yet thats who they mentioned🤔 And they redirected Luke back the way he came. Mia found her and the family lied.
@chrisshak5216 Жыл бұрын
The escape from the wall is impossible.
@annzwarych35773 жыл бұрын
Luke Mitchell is innocent! True miscarriage of justice ❤️🇨🇦❤️
@paulinemccallum71873 жыл бұрын
The truth will come out
@DUNFERMLINEBOY12 жыл бұрын
Remember it wasn't Police Scotland back then it was the old Lothian and Borders Police. I hadn't realised Luke was named before his 16th Birthday! (of course now its 18 before they can be named, unless an exemption made by the judge as was the case in the Alisha McPhail Murder by Aaron Campbell)
@ourwilliam24052 жыл бұрын
He was named before he was charged, after he was charged they stopped naming him. The press are scum but they didnt do anything wrong
@DUNFERMLINEBOY12 жыл бұрын
@@ourwilliam2405 ah was that what it was! Because i remember teletext or whatever service it was at the time said that he had turned 16 that day so they could name him but your right everyone who followed knew it was him that had been accused.
@ourwilliam24052 жыл бұрын
@@DUNFERMLINEBOY1 teletext 😀😃😄 the press have a way with words, When Sandra talks about the press she fails to mention the press were within the law, Twats that they are but were within the law
@quxxiplayz53453 жыл бұрын
Very interesting Christy xx
@rossmrmojorisin9579 Жыл бұрын
Mark cane is the guilty man, but he will never be jailed as he is dead. Its a shame.
@shepherdLoki Жыл бұрын
No one seen him at the crime scene though. Imo jodie was killed by her brother, not just my opinion lots of folks opinions
@danaleigh33992 жыл бұрын
Can you please do the allan Bryant case
@ajbee94683 жыл бұрын
Imagine how much compensation Luke and his mother would be entitled to from the Scottish justice system. That's why they don't want a retrial. Luke would be acquitted and they would have to pay out millions. I think the Jones family lost a daughter and didn't want to lose anymore children so it was convenient for them to point the finger at Luke. I think the motive was sexual, without naming names I think Jodi was getting abused by individuals related to her. She had been grounded for a period and that was lifted, meaning she would be out the house and her abuser/s would not have easy access to her as she would be out with her friends or Luke. Jodi's mum said she changed clothes after school so she must have come into contact with the DNA found on her, between her bedroom and scene of the murder. It's shocking when you consider there was up to five profiles. Something that bothered me if the police were prepared to take all lukes clothes, why didn't they take all Grannys clothes or forensically examine her washing machine? Luke seemed very mature for his age and I think that was part of the case against him at the time. He was 14, but looked and seemed older than his years. However that is no excuse for the way police treated him, he was a child and should have been treated as such. I hope Luke gets his day in court and gets to take the stand this time as an adult. It's a terrible miscarriage of justice for Jodi and Luke.
@kerrytk5768 Жыл бұрын
But in true Scottish bullsh*t judicial system. If he gets out system sues for millions in compensation, the Scottish government take money back off him as bed/board for every day they incorrectly locked him up for! I mean you couldn't make this up.
@karennavara87013 жыл бұрын
Innocent definatly x
@karennavara87013 жыл бұрын
I think the police have a good.idea who it was ..I think most of easthouses &dalkeith also no theres a big silence around this xx
@neondemon76173 жыл бұрын
Most people think he is guilty.only a bunch of halfwits are buying sandras cherry picked version of events.
@joannecowan7321 Жыл бұрын
Brother guilty and so is moped boys
@ourwilliam24058 ай бұрын
@@NancyBearsso why wasn’t Joseph covered in blood ?
@ronniejones41832 жыл бұрын
I wonder why the dog never picked up the scent on the first pass of the v break ?
@karenshaw2991 Жыл бұрын
Because she wasnt in tracking mode, when Luke met the family, they walked back down the path, he asked the family if they had something belonging to Jodi, they didnt, he told Mia to seek Jodi, that command put Mia in tracker mode.
@bethryan90778 ай бұрын
Ludicrous. Why would they have had anything of Jodis, they thought she was at a house. @@karenshaw2991
@rhonacameron98912 жыл бұрын
Definitely inicent
@ourwilliam24052 жыл бұрын
Why do you think he's innocent If I may ask?
@marconeill9510 Жыл бұрын
Hold on a minute, if you’re psychic, why do you need to look at the case or the evidence?
@christysreadings3468 Жыл бұрын
Imagine the comment if I did not look at the case or evidence 🙄 🤷🏼♀️ that’s like being a mechanic and covering your eyes while working . Don’t be a clown 😉🤣
@marconeill9510 Жыл бұрын
@@christysreadings3468 I find it ironic that you think I’m being a clown, yet you expect people to believe you can solve crimes with special powers. I encourage everybody to watch the Derren Brown documentary on psychics, mediums etc.
@christysreadings3468 Жыл бұрын
@@marconeill9510 at what point of any the crime videos have a claimed I have solved anything? Calling you a clown? I evaluated the evidence 🤷🏼♀️🤣 now go and have a good weekend and get off the keyboard 🥳
@ShandyBol2 ай бұрын
Well, that's more than 2 and a half years passed and still no one person out, three in. Your video is riddled with mistakes: the arranged meeting place, witness descriptions and timescales, to name a few. Much of it isn't correct. It's not only disrespectful to get so much wrong, but for you to use your 'psychic' ability as a pass to outright speculate on this case for entertainment isn't respectful. If you had any respect for Jodi, you'd maybe consider taking this down
@christysreadings34682 ай бұрын
I trust very much in my work , I respect your opinion but I also believe Luke Mitchell is innocent and I will continue to use my ability on this case and if you do not like it maybe do. It watch . Or if you think you could do a better job do your own video . Look forward to seeing it👀👀
@mcooper593 Жыл бұрын
What the heck are you in about? The Luke Mitchell case is a very serious and you are presenting it like it’s Tom and Gerry. 😖
@christysreadings3468 Жыл бұрын
Maybe you should highlight the case then - or do you just pass comment on anyone else who does . And to ref Tom and Gerry on such a serious case . Shame on you 😊
@travelswithlizzie Жыл бұрын
Innocent
@PFinty3 жыл бұрын
The case was a shitshow and they did not have enough to convict him.. But i really think he is guilty. Sandra Lean's version of Luke and the events is fully romanticised apart from the hard facts i can't give anything she's saying any weight .. Luke had problems
@ourwilliam24052 жыл бұрын
@@ronm9101 Forensics was far from perfect but the cops got there in the end when It all fell into place for them, The elimination process was superb
@kerrytk5768 Жыл бұрын
Sandra leans case is facts & documentation from the case files which were hidden.
@kerrytk5768 Жыл бұрын
@@crowdcontrol2 they've sifted through them at great lengths & that's how they've found the corruption, lies & hidden evidence. The bullsh*t from the police in the files is truly shocking. Maybe you're happy with botched policing of a brutal crime scene & framing of a 14yr old young lad but we're not & it's all coming out. Have a watch at this witness statements piece from files & timing. Its impossible. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eNGHpqyCmsm1p2g.html
@shepherdLoki Жыл бұрын
@@kerrytk5768 she's lived and breathed the case and sticks to hard facts
@bethryan90778 ай бұрын
@@kerrytk5768 Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.
@paulinemccallum71873 жыл бұрын
You live say
@ThomasRobertson-ox5ur Жыл бұрын
Deffo inicent
@janetdavidson92593 жыл бұрын
Innocent 100%
@rain7bow4373 жыл бұрын
What was the actual point of this video? Half of it is you just sat there arguing and swearing at people on your live feed.
@christysreadings34683 жыл бұрын
Please check facebook and Instagram for full videos. It is designed for an online sesh in lock down. I would advise not to watch if not your thing
@ourwilliam24053 жыл бұрын
So the dog stopped at the V and signalled that the body was there? So the dog went over first? Did his torch reach 40 yards? How could he see behind the tree? The condom was found 50 yards away.Youre calling him a sex offender but Jodi wasnt sexually abused. A guy gets a skinhead. Was his hair on the body? Luke and Jodi had each others DNA on them but Findley fought the corner to not use it as evidence because they were a couple. She only lost 5 litres of blood, most of it was post-mortem, She was hit over the head ,maybe knocked out a little then knifed from behind thats why there was less blood. I could go on and on. If i were you Id take down this becasue youre really all over the place.
@christysreadings34683 жыл бұрын
If you are so educated on this case I would make your own video . And if you don’t have a platform build one and make your point known 🤷🏼♀️ but guess what you don’t call the shots on my platform darling 😎
@ourwilliam24053 жыл бұрын
@@christysreadings3468 ive only asked you some questions. You said you had studied the case. No need to go all defensive. Its ok to share info on a public platform. Could you answer them? Please. Im asking you becuse youve studied the case. Peace out.
@christysreadings34683 жыл бұрын
@@ourwilliam2405 I think the above video validates my opinion . Good luck building that platform 😉
@christysreadings34683 жыл бұрын
@@ourwilliam2405 I think the above video validates my opinion . Good luck building that platform 😉
@ourwilliam24053 жыл бұрын
@@christysreadings3468 I dont want a platform, Cant you answer the questions?
@1ernhw3 жыл бұрын
Christy I have watched your video and I am disappointed. You have stated many facts that are incorrect. Lets just go to the first fact that you stated, Luke was interviewed without an adult being present. Wrong, a male adult social worker was present at all times during the interview and there are also a large number of other inaccuracies in your broadcast. Very disappointed.
@christysreadings34683 жыл бұрын
Hello Tom , I hope your next emails to channel 5😉 my opinion and if you don’t like it well... don’t watch .
@stuartdempsey.doesitmatter78453 жыл бұрын
That’s shite Tom he was questioned with no adult at 1st.
@1ernhw3 жыл бұрын
@@stuartdempsey.doesitmatter7845 It is not shite. It is a stated fact that he was interviewed in the presence of an adult. In any case he said nothing incliminating, so does it matter in the scheme of things.
@1ernhw3 жыл бұрын
@@christysreadings3468 Hello Christy is this not a discussion forum and are we not permitted freedon of speech and expression. What would the other side say about you censoring opinion that differs from yours. :)
@1ernhw3 жыл бұрын
This is not about C5, it is about you stating as fact something that is not true, and that is wrong.