Agree, would like to see Christy cover the Allan Bryant case x

Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.

And her question at the path ‘Is that you Luke?’ not ‘Is that you Jodi?’ seeing as that’s who they were ‘looking’ for, is curious. At no point in their statements do they say they even knew Luke was on his way yet thats who they mentioned🤔 And they redirected Luke back the way he came. Mia found her and the family lied.

He was named before he was charged, after he was charged they stopped naming him. The press are scum but they didnt do anything wrong

@@ourwilliam2405 ah was that what it was! Because i remember teletext or whatever service it was at the time said that he had turned 16 that day so they could name him but your right everyone who followed knew it was him that had been accused.

@@DUNFERMLINEBOY1 teletext 😀😃😄 the press have a way with words, When Sandra talks about the press she fails to mention the press were within the law, Twats that they are but were within the law

No one seen him at the crime scene though. Imo jodie was killed by her brother, not just my opinion lots of folks opinions

But in true Scottish bullsh*t judicial system. If he gets out system sues for millions in compensation, the Scottish government take money back off him as bed/board for every day they incorrectly locked him up for! I mean you couldn't make this up.

Most people think he is guilty.only a bunch of halfwits are buying sandras cherry picked version of events.

@@NancyBearsso why wasn’t Joseph covered in blood ?

Because she wasnt in tracking mode, when Luke met the family, they walked back down the path, he asked the family if they had something belonging to Jodi, they didnt, he told Mia to seek Jodi, that command put Mia in tracker mode.

Ludicrous. Why would they have had anything of Jodis, they thought she was at a house. @@karenshaw2991

Why do you think he's innocent If I may ask?

Imagine the comment if I did not look at the case or evidence 🙄 🤷🏼‍♀️ that’s like being a mechanic and covering your eyes while working . Don’t be a clown 😉🤣

@@christysreadings3468 I find it ironic that you think I’m being a clown, yet you expect people to believe you can solve crimes with special powers. I encourage everybody to watch the Derren Brown documentary on psychics, mediums etc.

@@marconeill9510 at what point of any the crime videos have a claimed I have solved anything? Calling you a clown? I evaluated the evidence 🤷🏼‍♀️🤣 now go and have a good weekend and get off the keyboard 🥳

I trust very much in my work , I respect your opinion but I also believe Luke Mitchell is innocent and I will continue to use my ability on this case and if you do not like it maybe do. It watch . Or if you think you could do a better job do your own video . Look forward to seeing it👀👀

Maybe you should highlight the case then - or do you just pass comment on anyone else who does . And to ref Tom and Gerry on such a serious case . Shame on you 😊

@@ronm9101 Forensics was far from perfect but the cops got there in the end when It all fell into place for them, The elimination process was superb

Sandra leans case is facts & documentation from the case files which were hidden.

@@crowdcontrol2 they've sifted through them at great lengths & that's how they've found the corruption, lies & hidden evidence. The bullsh*t from the police in the files is truly shocking. Maybe you're happy with botched policing of a brutal crime scene & framing of a 14yr old young lad but we're not & it's all coming out. Have a watch at this witness statements piece from files & timing. Its impossible. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eNGHpqyCmsm1p2g.html

@@kerrytk5768 she's lived and breathed the case and sticks to hard facts

@@kerrytk5768 Luke Mitchell went before a court of Law with 20 Chapters of evidence against him, which is a Lot for a sole defendant. The High Court Judge & Jurors - Saw & Heard that evidence & found him Guilty, Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. And after only 5 hours adjudicating due to such a Strong case. The general public know Nothing of that Actual evidence. The biggest & longest trial in Scottish history, 42 days. He has had all the appeals he will Ever get & the Innocence Project rejected his application due to the Overwhelming evidence that showed Exactly what he did to this poor girl. He was also convicted that same day for being a long term drug dealer. He sold his drugs to fellow School kids, no matter who they were or how old they were. He carried his skunting knife daily to cut his hash. The knife that Disappeared, with The jacket And his balaclava. His behaviours in totality were so sociopathic Before this murder, the kids called him the savage. His own Brother testified Against him & he nor their father have had Anything to do with him since the trial Nor have they spoken to that so-called mother since. They sure as hell have Nothing to do with this Shameful campaign, which is nothing but a nefarious marketing ploy to sell their books about Nothing & getting away with it Still because they know damn well that the public are totally in the dark about the Facts presented at Trial. Only the naive & the ignorant fall for it all. His highly sadistic Premeditated crime was so heinous & wicked it's likely that he'll Never get out. Sandra Lean & now Scott Forbes wrote books of BS to line their Own pockets & all the plotted media hoo ha for over 3 years on utube videos has some people hypnotised because that's the Whole Aim. Of Course they blame the cops, that's how Both lowly Con Artists rake in the hard-done-by members of society in particular. He tried to stage the scene as if a maniacal fiend had come across Jodi & somehow got her over & through that broken section of the stone wall & went berserk with a knife, yet she never made a sound. It's a Fact that most of the cuts were After death. He cajoled her with pot to Their place in the woods & knocked her out, had to, he was a simpy punk, the severe contusion on her brain told That story. The witness noticed the bulge in a pocket of the jacket. That had to be something substantial in the pocket to stand out in a jacket that was big & bulky for that twerp. Lean nor now Forbes, have Ever spoke about the contusion on Jodi's brain & it was substantial. They don't want Anyone to know that Jodi was knocked out cold. The bruising & abrasions were all to her head, neck & face areas Only, being punched & kicked when she was on the Ground. Their various BS stories saying that she was 'fighting for her life' are Not True. He thought he was smarter than the cops & told his mother that after the initial police questioning that night. She stated that Publicly in her interview with James English. He was Not & neither was She. She who worked hard to cover it all up. The crown put forth that he went back. In total he couldn't account for 3 hours. The police didn't know what time Jodi was attacked or died when speaking to him that night yet his false alibi was for that exact time frame of her death. What a Very telling Coincidence. Luke was Not home in that time frame of 5 to 5.30 & so, did not know if his brother was or not. Luke had left to meet Jodi before his brother got home from work. They reeled that poor lad into it the Next Day when the mother had sobered up. Their statements changed every time the cops went back to tell them info they found out, didn't match. They changed the alibi 3 times within the 1st week. Lean & Forbes have Never told that Fact. Jodi's grandmother, her sister & boyfriend realised they'd repeated to the cops what Luke had Told Them about the actions of the dog & so they amended their statement about that detail, that was All. Now I see that Lean has a big banner & posters as her next hoodwinking ploy, "MIA FOUND HER". The dog did Not climb over & through the V in the wall & so into the woods, ONLY Luke DID. It was proven that his torch did Not have the scope to have seen the body which was behind a big log & amongst bushes - on that pitch dark, rainy, starless night, At All. Lean always uses the wording of 'case papers' to Pretend that she had all the documents & all the statements from the trial, she does Not & Never has. She had paperwork from his defence lawyer for the appeal process from way back at that time, Nothing else. Over 40 police & seasoned investigators worked this case very carefully for a Long time. The police did an Excellent job to put that scumbag psychopathic child killer Exactly where he needs to be.

Please check facebook and Instagram for full videos. It is designed for an online sesh in lock down. I would advise not to watch if not your thing

If you are so educated on this case I would make your own video . And if you don’t have a platform build one and make your point known 🤷🏼‍♀️ but guess what you don’t call the shots on my platform darling 😎

@@christysreadings3468 ive only asked you some questions. You said you had studied the case. No need to go all defensive. Its ok to share info on a public platform. Could you answer them? Please. Im asking you becuse youve studied the case. Peace out.

@@ourwilliam2405 I think the above video validates my opinion . Good luck building that platform 😉

@@ourwilliam2405 I think the above video validates my opinion . Good luck building that platform 😉

@@christysreadings3468 I dont want a platform, Cant you answer the questions?

Hello Tom , I hope your next emails to channel 5😉 my opinion and if you don’t like it well... don’t watch .

That’s shite Tom he was questioned with no adult at 1st.

@@stuartdempsey.doesitmatter7845 It is not shite. It is a stated fact that he was interviewed in the presence of an adult. In any case he said nothing incliminating, so does it matter in the scheme of things.

@@christysreadings3468 Hello Christy is this not a discussion forum and are we not permitted freedon of speech and expression. What would the other side say about you censoring opinion that differs from yours. :)

This is not about C5, it is about you stating as fact something that is not true, and that is wrong.