I assume the large wasted space was largely for gameplay reasons, so the third person camera didn’t get stuck in the walls
@Valavaern3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, kind of like how all of the player ships in SWTOR have 15-20 foot ceilings.
@oninoni3 жыл бұрын
@@Valavaern Star Trek Online does the same thing
@Valavaern3 жыл бұрын
@@oninoni Yeah, that's especially awkward when you're in a Defiant or a Sabre, and your ceilings are taller than your ship is~
@orbiter1ful3 жыл бұрын
Gotta love the CF6-50 turbofan sounds on antimatter engines hahaha
@duaneclarence87582 жыл бұрын
Despite the limitations of the technology of the time and a probably rushed development cycle, I still find it inexcusable that there was no known bathroom aboard the SR-1 Normandy.
@thomasp506 Жыл бұрын
I always just assumed that there must have been another deck accessed via the elevator (but not modelled ingame) that housed all of these essential things. The thing that really bothered me was that the elevator seemed to be the ONLY way to access other decks, with no hatches or ladders to use in the event of power loss (until the SR-2 fixed it).
@avaavalon24673 жыл бұрын
would you do a analysis on the Normandy SR2 i belive it would fix a lot of the problemxs you had and if you have a rule against doing the same ship twice it is a technically a entirely new ship
@MethLord2 жыл бұрын
Wasted space in Normandy bothered me too.
@chengong3882 жыл бұрын
matter-anti-matter thrusters are also tetrawatt lasers, using these to do atmospheric flight would kill anything in a large radius wouldn't it.
@jonskowitz3 жыл бұрын
EVERYTHING about eezo breaks thermodynamics and conservation of energy so falling sideways hardly matters 😉
@hokutoulrik73453 жыл бұрын
Yup, eezo was Mass Effect's handwave for interstellar travel.
@DyslexicGamer Жыл бұрын
No need for bathrooms when you can simply just shit and piss in the airlock blowing the whole mess out into space with a special nonstick floor to make sure there's no mess left behind
@ShawnMeira3 жыл бұрын
You should do an analysis of the SR2
@WrenPhoenix3 жыл бұрын
I like your breakdowns, any chance you will just join up with SpaceDock full time?
@ruka81063 жыл бұрын
Yes
@gort55832 жыл бұрын
I guess having no toilets meant getting the job done quickly so as to get back to base, quickly!
@Korxil3 жыл бұрын
First!
@originalzo38733 жыл бұрын
I hate this ship I like behemoths but I love your delivery
@critical_shot92923 жыл бұрын
Why do you hate it?
@originalzo38733 жыл бұрын
@@critical_shot9292 I literally said I like behemoths big ass ships
@critical_shot92923 жыл бұрын
I love big ships too, more to look at.
@whyjnot4203 жыл бұрын
Questions for the sake of discussion (meaning, I don't want to start an outright argument): So, regardless of setting or context a massive ship is always preferable? Shouldn't the context the ship functions within dictate size? Do you still consider massive ships to be capable of being so-called 'hero ships'? A little context using the real world: I love battleships and battlecruisers, and utterly adore the Alaska class of large cruiser. But I readily admit that ships of such a scale as those are not ideal for all circumstances. There are times when you need corvettes, frigates, destroyers and the like. There are also times when those small ships are utterly awesome, a great example of this being Taffy-3 and the Battle off Samar.