amazing. not just your teaching ability but also your ability to write backwards so easily
@collinjackson3535 Жыл бұрын
The recording is mirrored so it’s actually backward, then just flipped for the video.
@sennedebacker3717 Жыл бұрын
@@collinjackson3535 he literally talks to a student during his class, meaning there are students in the room, how would they be able to read it if it was backwards
@coolcapybara111 Жыл бұрын
@@sennedebacker3717 pretty complex 💀
@VictorScotts-ss7tg7 ай бұрын
Writing backwards is not his ability. Its mirroring+flipping. His wedding ring is on his right hand. So ask you. How?
@roberto48984 ай бұрын
😂
@arunsharma42214 жыл бұрын
very well explained sir. Even I don't know English properly but I completely understand your lecture. Thanks 😘
@islamicchannellll4 жыл бұрын
such astonishing explaining for the center of mass concept. Great teacher
@GoodMrSquare Жыл бұрын
thanks mr anderson my test is in 2 hours and this is the first time im learning this👍👍
@ShoTime017 Жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation and lecture, like every other video you've made!
@manuboker13 жыл бұрын
BEST PHYSICS LECTURES EVER !!!
@mohammadfallahzade2110 Жыл бұрын
Thank You Mr.Anderson !
@playboiyt3783 Жыл бұрын
Ur so good at it Respect from India
@mukotamir19794 жыл бұрын
A must watch vid for serious physics Trs. Well done
@yoprofmatt4 жыл бұрын
Howard, Great comment, thanks. You might also like my new website: www.universityphysics.education Cheers, Dr. A
@hemanth._gowda5 жыл бұрын
Sir what wonderfull lecture Can plz .. demonstrate it completely in practical
@pravinmerpravinmer4824 жыл бұрын
I very empress and enjoy your video very well. Your explanation is very different. Thanks sir _from india
@user-ef8sm6hc9o2 ай бұрын
Thanks sir for this season 😊
@karolina6thatgirl2 жыл бұрын
I love how this video is like 7 years old, and even now I was like, how does he do that? the writing?? so obviously I looked in the comment section to find if anybody else was confused about it too - and there was :D learning glass - it is genius! You explained the topic very well and clear sir, thank you very much!
@yoprofmatt2 жыл бұрын
Wow, great comments. I really appreciate that. Cheers, Dr. A
@thestudiousguy52522 жыл бұрын
@@yoprofmatt you are really helping pass my school, thank you. Do continue the good work
@ShewitMulu3 ай бұрын
Amazing
@Roundsie446 жыл бұрын
HOW ARE YOU DOING THIS? ARE YOU WRITING BACKWARDS ....IS YOUR CLASS IN FRONT OF YOU? ARE YOU LEFT-HANDED
@yoprofmatt6 жыл бұрын
Secrets revealed here: www.learning.glass Cheers, Dr. A
@yusufklc78215 жыл бұрын
@@yoprofmatt l think about a year and it was real question for me
@shivakrish41984 жыл бұрын
nope its just changing the side with mirroring method
@pktb14664 жыл бұрын
Its magic
@callmeMagda3 жыл бұрын
Writing normal on a glass board, and mirroring it when editing the video .?
@atruety4 жыл бұрын
Love from india
@MrInfokumaran7 жыл бұрын
Hi Matt, Do you have any videos to find the center of mass for a cuboid, with objects of different sizes are mounted inside the cuboid. Typically an electrical panel with various Electrical protection components mounted?
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
You would first need to know the centers of mass of every object you wish to add up. Then you would create a spreadsheet, with columns titled x, y, and z for the positions of the center of mass of each component, and m for the mass of each component. Create another 3 columns for m*x, m*y, and m*z for each product of mass with the position coordinate. Add up columns m, m*x, m*y, and m*z, and at the bottom of the column, store the totals. The center of mass of the assembly will occur at position xbar = sum(m*x)/sum(m), ybar = sum(m*y)/sum(m), and zbar = sum(m*z)/sum(m). (xbar, ybar, and zbar) will be the coordinates of the total center of mass. It is essential that you use the same origin point for keeping track of x, y, and z, prior to adding them up. It is arbitrary where you assign the origin to be, but you have to make sure it is consistent for all components you add up. Also, some CAD software can do this for you. You can assign a density to each solid body you design, and for an assembled group of solid bodies, it will calculate the position of the center of mass of the assembly.
@borishloitongbam49394 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir
@nibro_tic49625 жыл бұрын
thank you professor
@yoprofmatt5 жыл бұрын
You're welcome. Cheers, Dr. A
@markkennedy9767 Жыл бұрын
Can you explain mathematically why we can always find a line through a lamina (eg a horizontal line y=a in some coordinate system on the lamina) such that the moments on either side of this line sum to zero. It's intuitively obvious physically (hanging plumb lines etc) but I just can't prove this mathematically. The mathematics involves the integral of all the moments of every point mass of the lamina on either side of such a line, putting this integral equal to zero and solving for the coordinate of the centre of mass. But why can we always assume we can put such an integral equal to zero in the first place.
@timrooney63334 жыл бұрын
I am confused by your solution as it only accounts for 2 out of the 3 dimensions of each rock I've had to dig out in order to plant shrubs. They all certainly had a height, a length and a width. Together, these 3 dimensions helped me estimate the volume of material that I had yet to remove or if I could quit digging. Maybe your rock is uniform in one dimension? I must agree that in any case, if you can balance that tater-rock on one end like you did, the center of mass may be discovered somewhere above the point at the base. So, how can I tell where the center of mass is actually located? Love your work BTW!
@alexandergarcia64794 жыл бұрын
he said a rock just to put a name to the gerenric object, as you say, a rock is 'living' in a 3 dimensional space, so you should considerate 3 dimensions, this is a idealization of a body whit infinitesimal thickness, but finite mass, like a plate or a cd for example (we can make this kind of assumptions sometimes)
@eeol7772 жыл бұрын
The rock only has to be balanced twice. The first time the rock is balanced it must necessarily account for two axes, call them 'x' and 'y', The second time the rock is balanced on its 'side', it must necessarily use the third axis, call it 'z' and either the 'x' axis or 'y' axis, it doesn't matter. The intersection of the two vertical lines that were determined from the two times the rock was balanced must necessarily meet at the center of mass for the rock.
@pdfgovardhanb80932 жыл бұрын
nice
@ahsanraza1352 жыл бұрын
Watching this video hours before my terminal exam
@mnogoetashka51215 жыл бұрын
You sound like Sal Khan :0
@vze1lat74 жыл бұрын
who gave thumbs down to his videos?
@axelandersson63143 жыл бұрын
Literally Travis
@theguywhodoes6790 Жыл бұрын
This is a great video for the derivation of the formula and understanding of the concept. However, there is one thing that I am struggling to grasp if someone could help me understand. Why do we multiply the mass by the position?.
@NZC_Meow9 ай бұрын
To get it's moment relative to the y axis
@1light4love3 жыл бұрын
HA!! I've been thinkin about my Karins this whe section of our own class lecture. I knew it🤓😏Been practicing my Physics for years now, ya'll 😎 Like a pro. 🤪
@yoprofmatt3 жыл бұрын
Light *4* Love, Karen! Thanks for the comment, and keep up with the physics! You might also like my new website: www.universityphysics.education Cheers, Dr. A
@GREENPANTHER-163 жыл бұрын
Thanks 👍
@SquatSimp2 жыл бұрын
How did he write everything in reverse order to his students to view the board properly?
@yoprofmatt2 жыл бұрын
Horizontal flip. See www.learning.glass Cheers, Dr. A
@oneinabillion6543 жыл бұрын
Hi, so what will be the limits for dm? I can't grasp the idea of differential mass. Pls help
@f3ralp1g3on6Ай бұрын
I've seen on the internet that you redefine m as a product of density x volume so dm = ro*dV and then you get volume integral.
@mersadkabirzad10025 жыл бұрын
Hi Ilike your teching so Iam a student of mechatronics, can I have contact OF you?
@darelkolly16574 жыл бұрын
How do we determine the limit of integration to get the x and y positions
@eashwarr98584 жыл бұрын
Darel Kolly consider the max values x can take and min values x can take
@user-lc6jq1hi1r2 жыл бұрын
integrate over the whole object, just like eashwar said.
@alanmalcheski88826 жыл бұрын
oh good lord, that squeak sounds just like a mouse in distress. Yt has really outdone themselves, today. I'm beginning to believe that only an AI could do what it does.
@aalokduhoon9551 Жыл бұрын
well tell us how to find the c of mass of a fluid which have a very high density
@albertbatfinder52402 жыл бұрын
I knew about the experimental method and was hoping to learn a geometric method. But he stopped short. Very unsatisfying. The square with masses on the corners was also unsatisfying. He basically said “to find the centre of mass, you impose a coordinate system with its origin on the centre of mass”. Which sounds like circular logic to me. I was expecting something like, I dunno, finding the area and computing where half the area was on both sides. Which is essentially the experimental method.
@yoprofmatt2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback. I'll expand in a future video. Cheers, Dr. A
@adityaadit20044 жыл бұрын
How to find M on non-uniform shape? Is it just the initial mass?
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
Initial isn't a relevant term here, since we are talking about a property of a snapshot of the configuration of a system at one point in time. To find the center of mass of a non-uniform shape, you will have a density term when you define your infinitesimal term dm. The value of dm will equal density (rho) multiplied by an infinitesimal volume unit dV. The dV term could equal dx*dy*dz, if you were doing an integral in all three Cartesian coordinates, and it would become a triple integral. Or it could be an equivalent infinitesimal volume in either spherical or cylindrical coordinates if convenient for you. Or it could simplify if you were taking advantage of symmetry to make the calculation simpler.
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
For instance, consider a non-uniform brick of L=0.2 m in the x-direction, and H and W = 0.1 m in the other directions, whose density is a linear function of the coordinate x, and uniform in the two other coordinates. Suppose rho(x) = J*x + K, where J and K are constants. At x=0, rho = 1000 kg/m^3, and at x = 0.2 m, rho = 2000 kg/m^3. From this data, we can solve for J and K to get J = 10000 kg/m^4, and K = 1000 kg/m^3. To find the center of mass of this brick, we define dm to be a rectangle of sizes dx, dy, and dz, and a density rho. Thus dm = rho(x)*dx*dy*dz. The total mass is given by integrating dm, from x=0 to 0.2 m, and from y and z both from 0 to 0.1 m. M = triple integral rho(x) dx dy dz Since density doesn't vary with y or z, we can pull out these integrals and treat them as constants. M = integral dz * integral dy * integral rho(x) dx integral dz from 0 to H = H integral dy from 0 to W = W Thus: M = H*W * integral rho(x) dx from 0 to L Plug in rho(x) integral J*x + K dx = 1/2*J*x^2 + K*x + C Evaluate from 0 to L, and notice that the constant of integration cancels, we get: M = H*W*(1/2*J*L^2 + K*L) That's our answer for total mass, now onto center of mass. We know in advance that the y and z centers of mass will equal W/2 and H/2 respectively. So we can simplify our integration to just finding the x center. Call the moment of mass G, about the origin. Center of mass will occur at xbar = G/M. G = integral x *H*W*rho(x) dx Pull out H and W: G = H*W*integral x*rho(x) dx Plug in rho(x): G = H*W*integral x*(J*x + K) dx G = H*W*integral (J*x^2 + K*x) dx G = H*W*[1/3*J*x^3 + 1/2*K*x^2 + C] evaluated from x=0 to x = L G = H*W*(1/3*J*L^3 + 1/2*K*L^2) xbar = G/M xbar = H*W*(1/3*J*L^3 + 1/2*K*L^2) / (H*W*(1/2*J*L^2 + K*L)) Simplify: xbar = (L*(2*J*L + 3*K))/(3*(J*L + 2*K)) Plug in J = 10000 kg/m^4, K = 1000 kg/m, and L =0.2 m: xbar = 0.1167 m By inspection, we also know that ybar = 0.05 m, and zbar = 0.05 m.
@kadhir57382 жыл бұрын
Matt talking about centre of mass Me wondering how he's able to write everything reverse🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
@yoprofmatt2 жыл бұрын
Not reverse. See www.learning.glass Cheers, Dr. A
@amanbajracharya74032 жыл бұрын
So the students were looking at the inverted "things" on the board?
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
Students who see him teaching in the flesh, will see him writing backwards on their side of the glass board. The way he films the learning glass, he uses a mirror to reverse the image, before the camera captures it. He projects a live feed onto a screen, off to the side, so his in-person audience can see what his virtual audience sees.
@user-zi9jt5ci6w2 жыл бұрын
doctor strange teaching physics!
@kouratamoa81992 жыл бұрын
How about finding the center of mass of an irregular shape of laminating paper by calculating 🙏♥️
@yoprofmatt2 жыл бұрын
Great idea. Here's one that somewhat related: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r6uRa9Ghs7zJmps.html Cheers, Dr. A
@manzoorahmed20943 жыл бұрын
Sir what dm mean in formula ?
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
dm means infinitesimal mass unit. We are splitting up a continuous rigid body into an infinite number of infinitesimal mass units at every position in space, throughout the body's shape. We accumulate the sum of the position vector r*dm, for each of the particles that make up the rigid body, and then we divide by the total mass. d[ ] means infinitesimal quantity of [ ], where "[ ]" represents any variable you choose. The lowercase d stands for difference, and has a full time job in Calculus of indicating infinitesimal quantities for derivatives and integrals.
@oneinabillion6544 жыл бұрын
I have a hard time understanding the centre of mass equation. Are there any proofs?
@mibrahim42454 жыл бұрын
the thing is that on the center of mass the torque from both sides cancel out ... if the object is sitting on a point that's not directly beneath the CM, one side of the object will have higher mass and will cause greater torque than the other side, so the object will tilt to some direction ...
@qaiserminhas5195 жыл бұрын
Sir if we again rotate this rock horizontaly than where is its center of mass lie?
@Sara-te9yx4 жыл бұрын
It's the same. You are just looking at it from a differnt position.
@sofiashahin46033 жыл бұрын
How cld u write the opp way
@hkalra88165 жыл бұрын
How is this guy writing???
@yoprofmatt5 жыл бұрын
Poorly. Cheers, Dr. A p.s. See www.learning.glass
@ajaysnehi43015 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir
@yoprofmatt5 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome. Cheers, Dr. A
@yamaan933 жыл бұрын
@@yoprofmatt the tech behind the learning glass was a lot less impressive than expected. I thought there was some weird light physics going on reflecting the image to the other side 🤣
@NZC_Meow9 ай бұрын
Sir, idk why I i feel as if you're from the Netherlands...