That video was mad funny

​@@guanglaikangyi6054 "What do you think Mr. Gorzo?" 'OUAGHIGHAIHAIGHSIHITISBĞŒÆ'

"As an Anarchist, he would make a small meal for a guy like me."

He probably wouldn't address their actual arguments either.

Love that guy

They do it all the time. They serve govment.

Beccause they are unironicly fascists (AKA National Socialists). That's not a smear, one of the definitions of actual fascism is a union of State power and the Free Market, with the power of corporations being restricted and guided by the State.

Giant corporations represent consolidation of power, socialists' favorite thing ever.

Well, you don’t get what socialism is then. It’s just state control of the corporations. Socialists don’t in fact hate corporations, they just hate that the government doesn’t own and run them.

Well it's simple the only way they can live without working is if the giant corporations are redistributing wealth into their bank accounts

Yup. Remember when The Boys made fun of the Marvel Girlboss "Girls Get It Done" schtick, only to turn around and do the exact same thing?

6? You mean 12 right

@@crim1188 Ultra extended director's cut

@@gs4011 Remember when they made the female character calling that idea out a literal nazi?

@@TheSlammurai Subtle. Like a shotgun vasectomy.

Apparently, good taste is inherently problematic and, quite frankly, racist /s

I knew it! COMMUNIST! 😂

It hurt itself in its confusion!

When you insert races into a fantasy setting without any idea of where that race came from or how they got where they are it's 100% DEI message BS. Diversity has explanations these people haven't given any thought to how these races got where they are or why they haven't been integrated It's weird for a foreign trader to be black but if your neighbor is black and you aren't what the hell is going on? Is your race randomized at birth? Why aren't your races mixing, are you racist? If you're in an isolated community without significant immigration you should be the same mixed race or massively inbred.

Sorry black people in media upsets you so much.

Yea, but didn't you see when Legolas slid down the stairs on the shield? 😏😏😏

If you don't like all elves you are a racist

I saw something similar to that Galadriel scene when Vaush's porn folder leaked

Real talk, review bombing isn't a real thing. The term is useless.

Why is it mean?

"Nice is different than good" as Sondheim wrote in his musical "Into the Woods" (basically what would happen if Jordan Peterson wrote fairly tales) so it would also make sense that mean is different than bad.

@@gottesurteil3201 It's as simple as the line between cruelty and practicality; functional morality relies on the premise of, "Do better than you have to, be better than you have to, be more patient than you have to be." It's all about giving people an opportunity, sufficient leeway, to do something the right way themselves. Being practical sometimes means people are hurt in order to prevent worse hurt, like letting a girl know you do just want to be friends; her feelings will be hurt now, as opposed to much worse later on. So cruelty is when the malice IS the goal, as opposed to an interpretation of your behavior the wounded party has. This is pummeling the girl with your testimony to see her cry, or in the case of debate, insulting or belittling people simply because you want to see it happen. Both are mean, but only one intends to be mean against all other options Being mean will often lead others to (tactically, for their own good) assume you're malicious, but the lack of being mean allows the many human predators among us to invade spaces and harm those attempting to be good by using their innocent intentions as room for a sort of sneak attack. It's far better to be purposeful and mean, all day long, than it is to be unimposing and victimized for it.

"yeah this is mean" What are you, 12?

@@Wolf_ManJack We are indeed too nice these days. Being rude is often treated as worse than being bad, so if someone is politely screwing you over, you're supposed to just smile and take it, because calling them what they are would be "causing a scene."

She was the Mistress of Magic. She was older than Gil-Galad, who talks down to her in the show. Most ironically, she was one of only two elves who saw through Sauron's disguise when he pretended to be an elf and helped to create the rings of power.

Of all the characters that appeared on the show only Sauron and probably not Gandalf were older. They bring in the Grey Havens, I think that is what it is called, elf that would be a third person older than her. I guess they assumed they could get away with it because not as many people would be that familiar with the timeline. Hell I am not I just know coming over from Valinor would make you old in the second age.

"I can fix her"

BigBunjeeee Gang rise up

How does that reflect on him? Why bring up gossip, essentialy? Criticize the person's shit takes, praise his good ideas and logic. everything else is fallacy and gossip.

@@morganseppy5180 I am making a reference to a funny video. I'm not here for debate bro cringe.

And he stores all his money in his Steam wallet

I'm a bad person for liking this comment and I can live with that

@@vincetyler8416 its ok mate be the villain. I love being a villain

@@Fauwkes Is it villainy if its against a socialist?

@@ManCheat2 nah

@@vincetyler8416 doesn't make you a bad person to laugh at fools

Lucky you lol

His wife spent all of his money on crack

Glad to see it took you longer than me. I’ve known of this guy for years and every time I see his name my blood boils.

U mean Mauler or the other one?

I hope and EFAP don't cover him, 1h is pure pain 6h will be suicide

Yeah, that's kind of the whole point of Tolkien's work, the sheer mountain of history he wrote that wasn't included in his published books (the rest being published from his notes posthumously).

the only underdeveloped thing here is Xanderhal's brain

@@marcogenovesi8570assuming that he has a brain might be too generous.

it’s “look at them gough”

@@atpyro7920Gough? From Dark Souls?

@@WaifuWielder sure, let's gough with that

Holy shit, you’ve got him nailed.

Fringy seems to love animals and gets annoyed when ppl talk negatively about them (e.g. calling pidgeons 'flying rats') Then again, he's Australian, so every animal that can't instakill a human is probably a 'neat li'l critter' to him.

Fun fact he bought a six thousand dollar PC only to brick immediately by installing a shit ton of malware

Dunning Kruger is a VERY real phenomenon

I second this. Mauler spends a good 25 hours a day on different podcasts, it's impossible to keep up with sometimes, so clips like this are definitely welcome

So he is just a racist straight up. Good to know.

He’s a corporate shill, get money from them

@@gbalfour9618 Nah, why would they waste a cent on him, he'll do it for free because the "wrong" type of people are criticising it.

@whiskeyhound True, still say he’s getting paid but your right doesn’t need to be money; praise from who he admires is payment

@@gbalfour9618 I guess you could call it getting paid, I'd rather keep the people getting amazonbucks and political morons like xanderhal as separate but equally as stupid and corrupt groups.

Yeah. Man looks like some form of genius or something when you look at most of his opposition. It's like an adult arguing with a baby.

most political commentators can't handle real arguments and complex thought, they rely on fleems

He seems more able than most to really focus purely on the argument made rather than get entangled in all the personal bullshit and ego that so often takes over. Perhaps, that's also why he spends most of his time not engaging in politics whenever he can avoid it, because so much of it turns into petty nonsense that he has no interest in.

A&S have way too many bad takes to salvage decent highlight content. They may be able to make a "lowlight" channel that would be overflowing with content.

It's part of the Efap EU so it counts, longman is in many places at once due to his longness

My rationale for keeping that part in the title is because it still included MauLer (same with the time that he, Fringy, and Rags went on their show and discussed why they don't talk about politics on EFAP). However, if it causes enough confusion, I can remove it from the title

@@ViolentMessiah666 Longman's longness is truly unfathomable

​@@EFAPHighlightsEUFAP?

It wouldn't be made today because no one would write it like that. Not saying it is bad far from it but writing quality doesn't quite reach that. At least in my probably limited experience.

I saw that video BigBunjeeee is a great creator.

I love that little autist.

MentisWave would have a field day with this guy

All commies are lolcows by default

All socialists are lolcows by default

To be fair it’s a deliberately vague thing to call people solely because you have no way to logically counter their arguments, making it a fake thing to say anyway

it's not real, that's why he repeats it so much. To convince himself and his audience that they exist

I assume he just reused the line from the other videos

Any show with Mauler becomes EFAP automatically, that's the rules

​@@marcogenovesi8570... And what's the expectation of that rule... Or something I can't remember it exactly.

He would if his girlfriend didn't blow it all on narcotics.

Unless he got his paypal back, he doesn't make a cent, also doesn't have any life savings due to that.

@@whiskeyhound and that's a good thing

It’s an interesting one because The King absolutely flattens her and is about to I always assumed snap her neck. Then merry a male hobbit stabs him with a special sword so she can then strike the killing blow But would it even be done that way today or would she defeat him easily with no help?

Who would expect a hobbit to be their doom bringer?

@@Shiro_Amada he was no man.

Yeah, that's the thing; it's not that something happened, it's that the same thing keeps happening over and over again. Making Nick Fury black? Sure, Samuel L. Jackson is awesome, why not? Repeated race and gender swaps, always to get rid of white people/men? Now it's annoying. Especially when they not only do it, they shove it our face--look, look what we did, we included more melanin and vagina!

Reminds me a little of how Organized Chaos seems to see characters in movies. Whenever Rags criticized Black Widow for the obvious "Why didn't she call the Avengers to prevent this villain from literally mind controlling the entire world?" and OC seemed to take it as some kind of criticism of Scarlett Johansson's star power and ability to carry a movie. He heard that criticism and translated it into "Why do you think that a movie about a woman needs male superheroes in it to be successful, dude?". It's as if he doesn't see films as stories or as a medium of creativity, but just as popcorn-flicks with famous actors to shine their faces at the camera

​@@TOONYBOY it's all stories about wizards in space, for kids -- OC, coping about the movies don't make sense

@@marcogenovesi8570 Whenever they try to use that argument, they'll almost always try to make up a flaw with the older thing that either doesn't exist or is explained, or is already accepted to be a flaw by the actual fans anyway

Just WB Kids in general

You're going way too obscure and long ago, he probably doesn't know what Futurama is.

I’m going to rewrite the lyrics to “Somewhere Out There” so it references us watching Sitch & Adam at the same time

@@METALFACEROZEE ✊

Me too! Who doesn’t?

​​@@henryjenkins2839Xanderhaul doesn't. Always be inclusive to shitty opinions.

In a single comment, you cut through the bullshit and voiced the irritation that I feel, as do others, so much with these media outlets. They’re just the same parasitic, para-social, dishonest organizations they’ve always been; they’ve just jumped onto more targets than celebrity beef and victim stories.

Yeah, that's one of the more unfortunate changes in the movies, as it does make the Witch King seem kinda wussy.

@@billjacobs521 That was what really confused me in the films, I'm only up to The Two Towers in the books. WK says "No Man can kill me", which I just took to mean he was immortal, that no Human could harm him because of Sauron's magical protection or something, but when Eowyn says "I am no man!", my first thought is "Surely that's not what he meant? Why would being a woman mean he's mortal or something?" Either WK was referring to his skill and power, in which case Eowyn being a woman wouldn't change anything and just seems like a really out-of-place line. Or WK was referring to a magical protection/immortality against humans, but if Sauron's made that protection so that it only applied to men and not women, that makes him look like a severely poor world-conqueror

@@TOONYBOY As Sitch explains, there was a prophecy about Sauron that no man could kill him. He though that meant he was invincible, that he would never be killed, but actually the prophecy was referring to the fact that he would be killed by a woman. Apparently this is because Tolkien read MacBeth and thought the way the "no man, born of a woman" line in that story's prophecy was circumvented (by the killer technically not having been born because a c-section was performed on their mother) was stupid and that person should have been killed by a woman.

@@TheRedHaze3 Yeah, you're still born in a C-section. It's a shame the whole prophecy aspect wasn't in the films. Surely they could have just worked in the necessary information in the scene where Gandalf introduces him to Pippin (I say that like they're having breakfast or something, you know the scene I mean). Also, where did that prophecy come from and why did the WK believe it?

@@TOONYBOY Not sure, I'm just going off what others have said. You can probably find out by looking at Sauron's page on the LOTR wiki.

and most of the time it's hollywood saying "we can do it better" that caused many of the attempts to fail there are so many book series that received mangled adaptations that only got one movie because the stories were changed so terribly ROP falls into this as well

*put

He’s a good socialist, sharing money with a poor druggie

bruh really? hilarious.

It's amazing how Americacentric American internet lefties are. Especially considering how much they seem to hate America and being American lol

Well that's because the argument "isn't meant for you". I swear some mfs make unfalsifiability into a sport and it's so lame. Like if I say something super stupid and racist, I'm genuinely interested to know what an Indian guy on the other side of the world thinks about my statement; this need to make statements as obtuse and "you can't disagree with me it's my experience" as possible hear makes everything so boring

@@samwallaceart288 Nah. I will get called a liberal, conservative on multiple occasions and I have to ask for clarification and often they don't bother to actually engage in the discussion anymore. This political grouping stuff just poisons the conversation from the beginning.

@@jeroenceulemans3715 oh yeah. I've been called leftist for liking Last of Us and a white supremacist for liking Joker in the same day lol

I try to avoid Euro centric political labels like the plague, especially when discussing media. I mostly adhere to pre WW2 American ideology(stronger States rights, less powerful central government with little to no overreach, etc) but I still get roped in with moderately right to alt right for one reason or another. It really ruins the core point of a discussion when your opponent, whatever their alignment, are simply looking for something to "get rid" of you over or worse, completely slander you and your position.

Yet TNG went downhill once Gene died. I don't know a ton about the behind the scenes stuff of Star Trek but I'm pretty sure they couldn't get rid of him; it was in the contract that he had to sign off on every episode or they couldn't legally run it. It's why he was brought back for TNG in the first place.

@@billjacobs521 Gene was removed during the shooting of Captains Holiday in season 3, but his influence was being curtailed before that. I’d argue the show didn’t go downhill until season 6 when they pulled the best writers for DS9. To my mind, season 4 is probably the strongest season, at least based on the episodes I appear to have rewatched a lot on Amazon. His lack of interest in the movies thanks to TNG was credited with why Wrath of Khan turned out so well by the crew there, so I’m guessing there’s something to it. Edit: if he was having seizures on set (apparently he would stand with his eyes rolled back, twitching for sustained periods), they probably had him declared medically incompetent and got his son to approve things.

@@billjacobs521 I mean that requires the most rosy of rose-tinted glasses to not notice how wonky Season 1 was.

That's what "proto-hobbits" means, my dude. But I do think it's funny that Galadriel talks about needing redemption but won't mention why.

@@billjacobs521 um no, "proto" means original or primitive version of a thing. They're not primitive or original hobbits, they're just, regular plain hobbits. What happened is they wanted hobbits & wizards in the 2nd age for memberberries even tho they shouldn't be there for thousands of years then realised Warner still holds licence on "Hobbit" from when they made "The Hobbit" so they can't say it on-screen

​@ViolentMessiah666 just so you know, a subspecies is derived. There would have to have been protohobbits to have been derived from. Modern hobbits are mixed, as Gandalf chose bilbo for his heritage. While you aren't incorrect about the show's motivation, you're complaint is inaccurate. And honestly adjusting the timeline is fine if it improves the adaptation. Obviously it didn't, but agian the complaint is as lazy and intellectually bankrupt as the show itself. You don't need dogma, the show could never have been a 1 to 1 adaptation because of the medium. It will always be its own thing.

​@@alexs7670 You've missed his point. Yes, there assumedly must've been a "proto-hobbit" that the three breeds (because Tolkien would not have called them subspecies) of hobbit all descend from. But it cannot be the Harfoots, because the Harfoots _are_ one of those three. They are no more ancient than the Stoors or the Fallohides.

"Review bombing" is just another one of those phenomena people like this have invented to assuage their egos. They can't fathom that such a vast swath of average people genuinely dislike their (obviously genius, morally unquestionable) storytelling, so they have to convince themselves it's an orchestrated "hit". What's always amusing is that in the very same breath, they'll label all of their detractors as unstable, extremist conspiracy theorists lol

Her being a female is more of a dramatic irony. It's a bit vague in the book how much it actually does mechanically. The deep context is it's a jab at MacBeth, where it's prophesied he'll be killed "not by a man of woman born", and Tolkien thought obviously it should be a woman then, but then it's actually a guy who was born by c-section, and as McB dies he clunkily explains how he's not _technically_ of woman born, cause she was already dead when he was pulled out-- and Tolkien thought that ending was fucking stupid and made it an actual woman in his version.

@@samwallaceart288 Ohh ok. That's pretty neat. I also thought the way Macbeth dies was dumb lol. It's nice knowing Tolkien agrees with me on that lol.

@@RealMrBruh The Ents marching on Isengard was also a MacBeth reference; Tolkien really wanted _the trees themselves_ to march, not guys with leaves on their heads

lolbert? Xander is a socialist im pretty sure.

Fixed 👍

🍞=☠️

Efap considers shad a friend, and he's been dropping off his mask as a despicable man-child the kind EFAP would have clowned upon like NoBullshit. But nevermind that, I thought it was fine to be friends with people regardless of their politics(?) are you saying jay should Not be friends with xhander? maybe he's a good friend despite his sh*t politics

Don't call him a Socialist, because he is not. He is an unemployed dude in his mid-late 20s.

If we solve the problem, they’ll have nothing to bitch about.

@@abeaconintheofficeso a socialist

@@Fauwkes Oh, shoot can you see what I wrote? I can't. I think my comment was banned.

@@abeaconintheoffice socialist not having a job, yeah. The people republic of youtube doesnt like socialism being criticized

You should leave that comment on one of Mauler's videos so he can see it

Hes in the camp of “girlfriend spent all my money on crack.”