Either it's rigged or I'm psychic

@@jamesjfj1342 ?

until you win that amount and are forced to share it out. then it's different.

Because more people wouldn’t play or get excited. There are other games where you can win £500,000 or even less than £20M like Lotto and Thunderball. This is Euromillions, where the jackpot is more extreme. People are only complaining because they’re not winning

It's to encourage the working class to keep playing.

@@dennistonrockstone is it rigged?

@@dennistonrockstone I believe I may have been setup if it is rigged

Most of them like to go public to show off to the less fortunate.

@@jamesjfj1342 I believe it's rigged as well but to prove it is nearly impossible

Point is, it benefits nobody else knowing they won. Hats off to previous big winners who stayed quiet. I just think its distasteful for anyone to brag about money.

No ones bragging.

Their 15 minutes of fame is more important.

Not toooo bitter are we !

If someone feel down because of someone celebrating good news, it’s actually on them. Don’t you know that celebrating others can bring your blessings

If they done that they'd have a lot less workers filling jobs. Nobody would work

@@retardedamericans1 Ai is taking 70% of jobs by 2050 .welcome to a Universal basis income

Like it always goes to a middle aged couple in the shires😊😊

@@marleyite yeah a middle aged couple in the shires with already a £600,000 + house and a high yearly work salary and that's before winning the lotto.

@@ssbN77 : Agreed.

I’ve always thought the lottery is rigged. It’s always a middle aged white couple, living in a rural area, and already had money to begin with in a nice house.

If everyone was filthy rich, nobody would work. The country would collapse. This rich/poor divide is not right but MUST exist whether we like it or not. It enables the supply/demand chain.

@@tomtaylor92 if 184 people had been given one million pounds, the majority of that money would have been spent in the U.K. benefitting the economy. Giving out 184 million to one household is an invitation for a good proportion of that to be spent overseas. One million pounds does not make somebody “filthy rich”. You can spend that much on a moderate house near London these days.

@@yesman2755You would not be benefitting the economy if you made thousands of millionaires every year based on your theory. How can you say majority of it would be spent in the U.K when it is the European Jackpot? If that was the case it wouldn't just be U.K winners. If anything more money will be spent in the U.K by one winner of £184 mil as they will buy a house, sort out friends and family and spread the wealth. & for the record 1 million pound to some people would make them filthy rich, not everyone wants a moderate house in London - you can buy a 5 bedroom house in North Wales for less than 300k and invest the rest.

@@yesman2755 based on your theory, inflation would rise and the economy would eventually collapse as more millionaires are made. It's just not that simple.

I get your point but the game wouldn’t make sense. You’re likely to have the same people winning again and again. It would ruin the fun. There are other games where the price is less than £20M, including Lotto. So if people don’t agree with large sums, they should stick with lower jackpots