Trans Applebees manager* lol

Bahahhahahaahahah

Lol!!!

Holy shit malice is a Applebee's manager 😳

🏆

Violence can solve every problem, but it always breeds more violence.

@@Nugschris Yes, you need to pay insurance for it to cover claims. That example seems pretty basic. Regarding the gay cake, you missed the point: they will still bake you a cake (i.e. they won't deny you resources) -- the question is whether they decorate it the way you want, and the courts have ruled in favor of the customer (good lukc having that outcome in a totalitarian regime). The gay cake issue is a tough free speech issue in that it would be unreasonable to expect a bakery to decorate a Nazi cake. Capitalism doesn't deny resources out of hand; you need to provide a business case for an owner of resources to exchange them. Nobody can arrest you for demanding/owning assets.

💯

@@Nugschris "If you are gay they will deny your wedding cake." That sentence doesn't make sense. However, given the fact that I know what it is you're trying to say my response is, so what?

@@Nugschris Insurance is not a "resource." Insurance is a service, and like all services it has to be paid for. The insurance company doesn't magically make health care appear. If it doesn't have people paying for the service it will go out of business... and that will ALSO deny care to people. And your gay wedding cake analogy is even worse. That cake isn't a resource either. It's baked by someone, and you would force them to bake it against their will. You may not agree with their views, but you are free to go elsewhere to get your cake.

Capitalism already does that

That guy is fucking crazy. Cultural Marxism is just a repackaging of Cultural Bolshevism. You’re literally using Nazi talking points.

@@donjulio420 lol no, wiki grouped the 2 in like 2018 (and then changed it again to conspiracy theory). if you know someone decent w the way back machine, wiki rationally laid it out in like 2016 or 2015

@@lifes3ps Wikipedia's been hijacked for a while. I feel good every time I click no when they beg me to donate

Or you could just invite someone who’s actually honest about Marxism

@@samsca8529 great reply by not saying how or where he's wrong/dishonest. just argue by assertion. something a marxist would do

And if any of these so called 'democratic socialist' supporting shape shifters were living in Sweden they would be saying it is a horrible country.

@@paulemerson2902 Yep. Ignorant Marxist cucks that know nothing about the world and history.

And is one of the most dangerous places on Earth for women due to mass immigration. 🥂

It’s a mixed economy/social democracy

m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Zs6flJylvdS-iGw.html

thats the point!

It’s the fuck me pumps.

An ex Soviet spy said the Hoover picture was a fake made by the KGB, if it was it was a monumental Troll. He gives me an extra sat in the restaurant on Twin Peaks, he'd just sit at the table staring forward and not moving while the scene played out around him.

Gay FBI director vibes?

A festive weirdo 😂😂 "The problem with white gloves is the blood, you need a new pair every time" 💀

not sure if you are talking about the USA because a million people died and no one got any help besides a check.

What are you talking about? Other than a brief period of high unemployment, levels dropped down under 4%. People only "laid about" when they were told to isolate.

It was illegal to not work if you were able bodied in the USSR

The classic university student response is "that's no real communism/socialism". I've suggested the same thing to peers during discussions but theyd rather live in Neverland.

That's because Cuba has a dictatorship.

Somehow *your* "lived experience" will be illegitimate to them because it doesnt validate their views

why do you blame communism and socialism when the usa has cuba in an economic blockade for decades and is responsible for misery there as it is responsible for misery of the north koreans? pretty stupid to blame the victims and not the obvious aggressor.

@@mjakotka because those murderous systems are to blame. any more self evident questions? to begin, Cuba is not under a blockade. Thats just hyperbole on your part to support a weak argument. The US has an economic embargo on the Cuban communist dictatorship. The embargo that was placed on the Cuban dictatorship by the US Government AFTER the communists stole hundreds of millions of dollars in US industry from US companies in the 1960s? Let's dive into that topic. The embargo has exemptions for food and medicine. Still, Cubans die every day on the island due to a lack of those necessities. This happens because most of the economy in Cuba is controlled by el ”MININT” (military) They buy goods from all over the world including the US. For example, during the first half of last year, the Cuban government purchased 123 million dollars in chicken from the US. Source: White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki speaking to the press July 12, 2021. The MININT first supplies the government elite. Then they supply the hotels and hospitals that only foreign tourists Have access to. Only to sell the leftovers if any to the Cuban ppl at 10x retail prices in currencies that your everyday Cuban on the island doesn't have access to. Euros and dollars. Moreover, the embargo places severe restrictions against entities controlled by the Cuban government and is nonexistent against private Cuban nationals. In other words, the only ones blocking the Cuban ppl from doing business with each other and the world are the Castro-Canel tyranny. The tyrants in Havana are in this position not because of the embargo but rather because they have terrible monetary policies and never pay their debts. Therefore, nobody around the world wants to give them credit. Also, communism is unproductive and incompatible with today's global free enterprise. Finally, your 1970s talking points don't stand up to logic and the facts of the matter.

Lex is a Rockstar

Thank you

Yeah the original Russian Revolution was actually a peaceful transition

Lenin gets Syphilis.

Its the lipstick

how did he not get lipstick on his teeth? lol, what's his secret?

Through rational public and private discourse where one can debate the merits or lack thereof for the differing views. Only by shining a light on the fallacies and, if any, the pros of the commie worldview and countering with relevant facts and rationale. Freedom of Speech and assembly...this is the way.

Blue pill = societal norms/misleading or false info that is widelly disseminated by powerful institutions Red pill = deeply unpopular but real truths which are suppressed/censored and banned by reveal reality as it truly is Black pill = the bleaker 'truth' that there is no winning/pessimistic defeatism which 'embraces or acknowledges inevitable destruction' White pill = Opposite/hopeful or encouraging set of facts which offer a more optimistic alternative perspective (typically dealing with same subject matter but interpreted more positively)

@@codyvandal2860 🙏 Thank you

Red pill is understanding the media is lying to keep some unsavory people in power. Blue pill is believing in “fiery but mostly peaceful protests” while the entire city burns behind you. It’s a reference to the Matrix when Morpheus offers pills to Neo. Black pill is thinking things will not get better. White pill is thinking things will get better. Hope this helps

i mean for one thing they never really expected the name modernity or modernism to stick the way it has to that particular time. when nietchze wrote about the modern world he just meant his contemporary world really, same for flaubert's painter of modern life and so on. postmodernism in as much as you can say it has a specific meaning is just a response to the thought, art etc. of that period. we have post-punk but punk still exists.

It appears to me that you don't know what any of what you mentioned means.

There were two revolutions in Russia. The first one was quite bloodless as revolutions go. They formed sort of a coalition government, tried making it work, but it was weak and ineffective. That's when the Bolsheviks came in, staged a coup and dismissed the constitutional assembly after a referendum in which the people overwhelmingly voted for the Socialist Revolutionary party instead of them. The rest, how they say, is history.

@@tommythecat4961 The Tsar and his family were literally executed, with the blessings of Lenin himself. There is nothing peaceful about executing the old regime, including their 5 children.

@@tommythecat4961 What about the election in the soviets? Wasn't the constitutional assembly superfluous, sterile and had no authority amongst the masses, and the soviets did?

@@Zayden. historians are divided on the subject. Another problem was that the Socialist Revolutionary Party was divided into left and right, with the left allied to the Boksheviks and the right against. But when people voted, the SR was not divided into left and right on the ballots, so the Boksheviks called the election unfair and ignored the results. Thing is, those were chaotic times, Russia was in a civil war, a mess. But I just wanted to answer the OP, many people don't know about the February Revolution, which, as I said, was quite bloodless compared to the carnage that came after (whites against reds, etc).

@@tommythecat4961 The October Revolution was also peaceful, with soviets overwhelmingly voting to become the new government, and soviets represented a majority of the masses. The civil war didn't break out until June 1918, over 7 months after the Bolsheviks led the workers to power.

As far as I know only the royalty was killed, right? I believe they even spared the children

@@ignatiushazzard Well, Dissolution of Tsardom isn't the same as the Revolution itself, that one I think was the moment they murdered them all. Not that I have a tear to shed for the Tsar.

@@PedroElPolako you weren't there, the Tsar was better than what came after him

@@okyouknowwhatever Never said it was better but they absolutely had it coming

@@okyouknowwhatever Nicholas had a God complex, sent millions into their death for nothing.. For aa Serbian anarchist killing theArchduke.. He was toppled peacfully, in March.. and the October revolution started in October..Russia was the most backward country in Europe at the time, having abolished serfdom 50 years prior.. in 40 years from getting rid of the Tzardom, they went to space and had nuclear bombs, one of the two superpowers on the Globe..

I've never fully understood the appeal of either of these beta soibois but I'm still trying.

What is the subject matter, area of expertise, or field of study and inquiry as part of your magnum opus which you're going to discuss, debate, and resolve as part of your appearance ? I'd like to know in advance so that I may have my notes ready. I pray that you'll convince Lex to conduct his interviews as part of a live streaming event so that the audience may submit questions to you.

No

​@@ArchimedesDaVinci oof, my bad. I was stoned AF when I wrote this, so I wouldn't take it too seriously. That said, I'm a software consultant , and worked on a variety of projects. I'd likely keep up with Lex on tech level. Done Q and A before to large corporate audiences, so likely not to shit myself (too much). Magnus opus? I might be working on it right now for all I know. Making a personal app to make it easier to organise meetups with a large group of friends or family. I'd really like it if it could be used to bring other people together. All that said, sobre me knows its more important to actually BE a person worthy of being invited on this podcast than it is to actually be on it. Allow me one ego filled comment 😉

You're just a paperclip, you'll never been anything more!

Because he just got done makin out with ya motha.

& is it Covid-related?

Why not

Don't YOU?

he is gay , that's why

Chavez made Venezuela better

to trigger smooth brains who think it matters.

Because he's clearly gay/trans/confused about who/what will find him attractive... a really sad, angry lesbian who never got his chance on The View. 🤔

@Jamie DeLorenzo Marx wanted the state to act as administrator. Basically a collection of civil servants carrying out the will of the people. Democracy basically. He said nothing of central planning or vanguards. That came later with Lenin who admitted that what he created was actually state capitalism. Eventually, capitalism would fall and the state would become obsolete as democracy in the workplace would take over. Although Marx didn't actually write a lot about the state or what would happen after the revolution. Most of his writings were about capitalism, historical materialism, sociology, etc. If you're not aware of how this relates to the sciences then you have problems beyond your comprehension of Marx.

@Jamie DeLorenzo It represents the will of the people because the people get an actual say on policy. Saying anything doesn't make it so. What a vapid statement. Through worker democracy. How would you define hunter-gather society? Your critiques are laughable and show a fundamental lack of understanding when it comes to conflict theory, historical materialism, dialectical materialism and so on.

@Jamie DeLorenzo Central planning is not the same as worker democracy. You don't know what you're talking about.

@Jamie DeLorenzo Communes are centrally planned? Stop. You're embarrassing yourself. Cooperatives play by the same rules as any other company. Rules that are dictated by the market. There is no central planning. Nice to know you're against the concept of democracy though. Although not at all surprising.

Good explanation but just one note: Marx didn’t think we would eventually snap our fingers and abolish the state. That time would come gradually and naturally, just like the introduction of feudalism to replace slave economics, or capitalism to replace feudalism

Lmao so not true

Honestly

Very true but to clarify. Today in many Western societies (& particularly in the US) Leftist ideologies are preached by & adopted by nearly always those among the privileged class who inherently lack a true understanding or real connection with the modern working class &/or the "oppressed." Of course they get some foot soldiers among the "proletariat" but the vast majority are always privileged today & there is a reason for this. This is due to the massive disconnect which the modern Leftist movements have, particularly in the US. The reason for this is because they have lost nearly all of their grassroots movements & have ideologically taken over the institutions of the privileged which include universities, corporate news media & tech corporations. These have become their primary centers of propagating Leftist thought. Evidence for this can be seen in changes of the basic make up of voters & ideological positioning in the US found through research polling over the past 6 years. Voters for the political right on avg earn less income than their counterparts, are more likely to work blue collar jobs & are far less likely to have attended university thus preventing them from attaining higher wages. Voters on the left are more likely to support the use of radical tactics such as suppressing rights & the use of force to enforce their policy positions. So basicly the modern socialist movement has largely become the movement of the privileged elite who believe they can dictate what is best for the working class & oppressed while falsely claiming these are the very ppl they represent. This massive disconnect is already starting to play out & will lead to some very hard times in the future.

@@Dang3rMouSe I'm one of the working class socialists and most of what you say here is right. Except the new "left" from the 70s onward and the democrats are not socialists. They disavow every successful socialist experiment. They only use Marx's words to soothe their guilt and in doing that rob them of their revolutionary soul. And Democrats aren't even the left. If you want to understand what happened to the working class socialists movement in the country look into what happened to Eugene V. Debs and Fred hampton

Probably because "blue collar" people don't have much of a platform and are ignorant, in denial or just don't want to bitch about how bad they're getting fucked over.

How so?

Yup and Bakunin predicted it.

Depends where he'd be.. if in Europe pre-ww1, then probably just "anarchist", like Gavrilo Princip

who is not flawed?

@@peterblacksmith3817 I'm not saying people don't lack flaws. I'm saying Ayn Rand's are so glaringly obvious that it's hard to overlook them without invoking nonsense like cognitive dissonance. It's like who cares what her favorite holiday was? Caring what her favorite holiday was is like a Communist caring about what Pol Pot's or Mao's favorite holiday was, and I'm sure neither of us gives a shit about that either for the exact same reasons. She's a philosopher, but that doesn't make her a good one. For example, I think anyone who is going to sit there and agree with her interpretation of private property rights as they apply to groups like indigenous tribes in the United States while at the same time claiming that they subscribe to some kind of "objective" morality system is a prime example of a person whose tongue wags out of both sides of their mouths. There's a reason people grow out of Ayn Rand and why people don't take Leonard Peikoff as seriously as people like Michael Sandel, Paul Bloom or Sam Harris. It's not even everyone else's standards. It's the standards in which Objectivism presents itself as a closed system that it fails. How many times does a system need to fail itself in order for you to admit it failed? And this doesn't even bring up the super obvious critique. It's like Frank Fontaine says in BioShock about the Sad Saps. "... somebodies gotta scrub the toilets." kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d7aco5imz9icqas.html

@@peterblacksmith3817 LOL. What a dumb question. "Who does not breath air?" No wonder Musk is popular.

@@ollaitsrealgood you're not saying that because no one rational would ever think such a thing. This is lex's crowd....not the smartest bunch.

@@user-mm8vw1ow1x LOL. 'Thats so deep". NOT.

yes

At that point the majority of the people wanted to do what ever was necessary, which is crucial. When such a program is agreed upon by the overwhelming majority it's more of an act of commonwealth/welfare rather than top down socialism. There are key differences between commonwealth and socialism. With today's Socialist there are many Marxist and democratic socialist aligning. When that occurs the divisive cultural marxist rhetoric and policies are able to be created that illuminates the supposed "suppressors", even if they're just as poor or even poorer. The democrat party will lose more and more support, until they publicly denounce the Marxist rhetoric and policies. Once they do they'll become the socialist democrat party on the national level (it'll be more of a commonwealth stance). They'll play a key role in a basic income based off the traditional fiat (which may become a cryptocurrency currency). We're also seeing a parallel economy based off of cryptocurrency and free market capitalism which offers the incentives for innovation in new technology products and production processes. Matured products, I believe we'll see the end of planned adolescence. As for the Republican Party, it's being reshaped into the new National Populists Republican Party. National populism has some overlappiings with liberal/civic nationalism. Nationalism isn't an inherently bad thing. We're also seeing the faltering of the unipolar liberal international order. There's a new multipolar international order rising. Which encompasses the rise of civilization states. There's a lot of moving parts, and we're at an extremely unique time in history.

@@scalp340 No. He didn't.

@@sleazypolar A lot of the things FDR did came from his predecessor Hoover, who was president when the depression started.... And FDR basically confiscated people's gold for christ's sake, which didn't help anyone. Fuck outta here!

@@scalp340 try to eat gold broski, see how far you get

Haha holy shit you're delusional if you think Trump or Lake are best for anything in this country.

@@wullahblack6452 the point is not whether their best or not, it's that the establishment is actively shutting people down they do not like!.. with trickery and shenanigans! It doesn't matter if they're good, for some reason the establishment, neocons, warhawk Democrats, and uni party in general is scared of them!!! Do you get the important part of the comment now?

@@littlegreenbud2067 They aren't scared of them. They both just lost their elections. Why would neo cons be afraid of Trump? His policies were exactly the same as Dubya and Obama. Why do you think they supported everything he did? He literally is part of the uniparty!

Calm down, son. You’d starve without a McDonald’s coupon.

No one above imagined sky daddy? :(

Who's god? There are thousands.

@@Nugschris you kinda miss the point. who do you pray for?

@@Nugschris finally someone gets it. People with thier ant brain can't describe God.

He can, does, and you should 🙂

He could dress up in a bozo the clown suit and I would take him more seriously than 90% of people.

The look matches the crazy ideas... they exist in harmony.

Ideas dont get better or worse regardless of who says them or what they look like.

Oh but he does lol that's his thing. You shouldn't disregard someone's opinion just for what they look like or side they are on, as long as they are genuine in my opinion.

Found the anti-semite

Death…

Are we not in Corporate-Communism now? I don't have $40 million per political party to donate.

They both pretend to be for statelessness? Interestingly, creating anarchy (statelessness) is the fastest method of taking control of a country. Whether statelessness is achieved through collapse, force, or votes, it always ends in a power vacuum ripe for exploitation.

@Bob the Slacker yep we might as well collectivise agriculture at this point. Start communes and take everyone land. We're practically communist already. Brilliant!

It is not about equity in that sense. Also, fun fact: Einstein loved socialism.

Those assumptions come from the western cannon. We've gotten to far away from our roots. As we progress towards a new direction (different than today's"progressive way) we'll be getting back to our roots.

it's not about just some arbitrary choices of system to implement and see which one works the best. Marxism sees society as having necessary laws governing its stages of development/maturity. Capitalism emerged out of the decay and crisis of feudalism, but now it has exhausted its potential and will be superseded by socialism and communism: a planned economy, workers' democracy and eventually classless society, this is the next stage in the development of society that will come about through the elimination of capitalism and building of a global socialist planned economy.

@@Zayden. how foolish.

double digit iq post

yeah it so flawed system that the usa is trying to strangle Cuba to this day. how can you say that the “no other system…” when you and all your minions are trying your best to destroy the opponent? why so afraid?

@@mjakotka Do some research. It's been tried in lots of countries with the same results every time. Death. Mysery. Starvation. Authoritarianism. It's killed over 100 million people. Communist countries don't need America to be oppressed. They do it to themselves with brutal governments who steal any hope of a better life from their people.

Struggling to take political argument with the strange outfits funny though

What are THE anarchist traditions you’re referring to?

@@OneTribe.Community some commie BS I’m sure

Isnt "anarchist tradition" somewhat of an oxymoron?

@@OneTribe.Community socialism

Anarchists have a centralized code of ethics? Doesnt that sound... authoritarian?

I mean nothing much has changed... we're still overworked and underpaid... the ability to buy a home and create a family is a thing of the past... but today we're distracted by the toys that capitalism created to ever fix that.

@@aztech101la let's be fair, the poverty rates, working conditions, wages and hours have improved dramatically from 100 years ago, and continue to do so. There's still a long way to go and injustice is rampant, but we've come far. These things take time.

@@tommythecat4961 yes but the market itself didn't make those improvements... it's only through government intervention that we have better working conditions, hours, and wages... it's the socialist approach that created these improvements.

@@aztech101la absolutely I think government intervention is fundamental, but the free market provided the funds that allowed the reforms to be implemented. I'm not a big fan of capitalism, it has many contradictions and injustice is inherent in it, but it does produce. I think the Nordic model is a good approach, you get the best of both worlds... But it's a complex issue about which whole books have been written, well beyond what can be expressed in a yt comment.

@@tommythecat4961 I'm with you on the Nordic models. Anytime anyone in Congress proposes those ideas like Bernie did the right immediately labels them a full blown socialist and brings up how the Nazi party had socialist in their name. People who would benefit from those concepts always seem to vote against them. It's an ugly circle in the US how do we change it?

Maybe because he’s talking to someone who lives in their own reality.

@@justin2956 just because you don’t agree with him

Look at who he’s talking to. Lex said one thing about the guy in lipstick and he/she got defensive and tried to start being “witty”

@9:50

Bruh just say communism will be more practical as technology improves.

Open-source has been a huge inspiration for me. The fact that so much of the world has been built on free and open collaboration is amazing.

@@billjohnson6863 Yeah. The main issues plaguing attempts at communism (authoritarian use of force, corruption, efficiency etc) is sidestepped by open and voluntary productive and distributed organization of freeware, made possible over large scales by technology.

Not at all. Achieving socialism is a question of the arrangement of political and economic structures it will never be achieved through anything else especially if that change is centered on individual advancement.

@@chins9217 I am not talking about socialism... But open source development is very much a practice based on participatory democratisation of productive capacity and free distribution of both tools and products. By each according to (voluntary application of ) ability... With that being said, this will if course also require organisation to build the material foundation and infrastructure for applied physical production associated with open hardware, required resources etc, but this too can arguably be achieved without much involvement of the state.

Same reason Lex is wearing a santa outfit

@@ScandinavianHeretic which would be?

@@Ezekiel336-16 The usual reason you wear a santa outfit.

@@ScandinavianHeretic So, you're saying they're talking about Marxism and Communism during Christmas (while one is wearing red lipstick)

@@Ezekiel336-16 Seems that way, doesn't it.

🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣

People feel safe, comforted in the Bossom of the Fascist masters. . Safe, and yet they know if they step beyond their allocated place in society they'll be punished / destroyed by their fa!illy / friends/ Govt. . And they'll punish / destroy others who they believe are close to have moved outside societies norms. .

LOL. "Socio-Fascist". And you still trust Elon Musk? This insanity is how Iraq happened folks....

@@java4653 Yes socio-fascism, that's what wokeness is they've demonized us by falsely claiming we're deplorables fascists racists etc. Elons rocks, it's now confirmed that the DNC, FBI, DOJ, DHS etc conspired to target suppress and censor us the American people violating our rights and interfering with an election. They're internal enemy is the majority. If you express anything outside of their view they'll use weaponised legalism to destroy you in every way possible. Do you know anything about fascism? Why has the institutions left this out a whole section of political theory? Idiotical subversion!

@@projectw.a.a.p.f.t.a.d7762 "It's now confirmed'...nope. That's the coup attempt, that's Russia, the NRA & the Republicans. Musk was at the World Cup with members of Putin's inner circle buddy....which means you are helping kill Ukrainians & undermine the USA with this crap. It's McCarthyism all over again. Why do you hate America?.