@@dizzydisciple No, it’s a paraphrase... and a bad one.
@PETERJOHN1012 жыл бұрын
@@LandonChapman Professional translators call it a gloss. The word paraphrase works, though.
@sarahfaith3164 жыл бұрын
"2 Minute and Eighteen Second Apologist"
@sittingwithhope18904 жыл бұрын
Right?
@777Skyworx4 жыл бұрын
the 18 seconds are free!! :)
@DanielApologetics4 жыл бұрын
YES!
@davidswander4 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget, Brian Simmons had an in-person encounter with Jesus where he saw the 22nd chapter of the Gospel of John. I mean if he had a special unverifiable visit with Jesus, we should believe anything he says! 🤣
@davidswander4 жыл бұрын
Michael Kevin Millet He talked about it in an interview w/Sid Roth. He said Jesus didn’t let him open the book yet.... 🤥
@c.w_4 жыл бұрын
LOL 😂 How is this different to Joseph Smith, Muhammad or any of these other false teachers that Paul warns about?
@davidswander4 жыл бұрын
Brian Simmons is dangerous by his own confession!
@_Raymond Жыл бұрын
you sound like an atheist
@davidswander Жыл бұрын
@@_Raymond Strong argument.
@honeydew14254 жыл бұрын
Watching later. Off hand yes! Be very concerned. Revelation warns of adding to and taking away. Just saying...
Brian Simmons makes claims that are absolutely outlandish. The version is bad enough but his claims are even worse.
@Wgaither14 жыл бұрын
Can’t believe I used do deliver mail to this false teacher in West Haven CT , over twenty years ago
@rogerburgan4 жыл бұрын
we are right cuz we are edumacated
@brandondaniel42663 жыл бұрын
The world is So lost I have come to realize that there are 2 churches in the world The roman Anti Christ and The Western/American "Church" which simply testifies the things Rome says its quite a revalation to me
@randystevens16903 жыл бұрын
And the Wise, will become Fools. Simple Translation. Mic-Drop.
@HagerVids4 жыл бұрын
When is The Wingman having you on his channel?
@Arpan-kd6fw4 жыл бұрын
Just a query... Should a mature Christian reading from the passion translation or referring to it be careful of its repercussions during teaching?
@kriznimm4 жыл бұрын
The passion is only a reference translation of the new testament ONLY its rhema word Google what is rhema and logos and the difference But read NLT as your base translation Along with NASB ESV NKJV no NIV OR KJV the passion translation is this man s understanding of Jesus’ heart it is not a scholarly translation
@TheMissjaneperry3 жыл бұрын
Any Christan of any level should never read it
@erodigie3 жыл бұрын
@@kriznimm No KJV???
@markrogers754610 ай бұрын
So.... it should have never been called a "translation".:
@aunilahtinen50226 ай бұрын
@@markrogers7546Yes, because it is Simmons Fiction !
@kriznimm4 жыл бұрын
If Jesus , Paul, Peter, John and in the Old Testament GOD Himself used hypercharismatic words like ´releasing’ etc etc Why do you have a problem with it, sir? Are you telling me the above Person and persons are wrong according to biblical scholars or are you telling me you are unwilling to be wrong according to biblical scholars? Dig deeper. True Treasures await. But, you dont want prosperity because thats not of God right? 😅 Beloved, I pray that you may prosper in all things and be in health, just as your soul prospers. 3 John 2 Shalom to you and yours.
@tyd34074 жыл бұрын
You can do all things through a verse out of context. That verse does not mean God wants everyone to pursue earthly riches. Rather desire spiritual things. Money isn’t evil of course, the love of it is. *cough* Kenneth Copeland *cough* aka leader of the prosperity movement. So run that by us one more time?
@duaneburcham84453 жыл бұрын
The problem is that he is changing what God said. There is a strong biblical warning about that. When you add buzzwords of your movement in order for the Bible to support your movement, you have blundered your way into heresy.
@Newseason3923 жыл бұрын
@@duaneburcham8445 THat person is not saved. You are losing your time.
@kwpctek91904 жыл бұрын
Well that was an easy 2 minutes! Passion was an easy target for him, but I still don't know why he'd settle for the heavily Calvinist influenced ESV over the NASB (he's blogged against determinist Calvinism before..). I'd like to ask why the change-over was made from the days of Chuck Smith? There's a super detailed ESV video review available called "Analysis of the ESV Bible" and still further, there are ample reason's to trust in the origins of the TR (120 hours of text history lessons can be found at "from this generation forever" over on blogspot). These days it's like the Bible is a moving target.. Time to put on the brakes, do your homework and return to what God allowed to be established long, long before these German "Higher textual critics" got a hold of Uncial imposter texts and started mass-merging them with the base Greek texts 120 years ago .. Gosh golly, the Nestle-Aland Greek still hasn't got it figured-out yet, and they're now on their 28th version of a Greek horror show, enough is enough.
@fatalx9164 жыл бұрын
Stay away from most or all modern translations. KJV only!
@alexanderolkhovskiy82724 жыл бұрын
I’m with you on this one brother! Amen
@kristyong43864 жыл бұрын
Except for one thing... that was translated from the same manuscripts that the modern day bibles are.. I'm not saying all modern translations are good, but some are. How do you expect people to understand it, it uses many words that don't mean the same thing today. The KJV is just a translation, so we all really should just read the original Hebrew or Greek then?? The bible gets translated into many different languages so people all around the world can read Gods word.. This is okay yes? So why is it bad to have it translated from old English to modern English? It's like a Chinese person saying I can't read your bible I need it in my own language.. well I say I can't understand the old English I dont speak like that , hence I use modern English translations.
@alexanderolkhovskiy82724 жыл бұрын
Kristy Ong it wasn’t translated from the same manuscripts, at least if it was it would say the same words, but the modern translations don’t. For example in the KJV in Matt 12:40 Jesus says that the prophet Jonas was in whale’s belly, in other (per)”versions” it’s says anything but that. Go to Genesis 1:21 and you will see that great whales are called great whales by God, and all the other creatures are called names by Adam, so God already set out this particular type of fish to be in the prophecy. Now, if it’s Jesus’ words, why does some modern translator have audacity to change the names of the fish, is he more intelligent or more skilled in that language just because he’s got a degree or something? I’ve seen someone say that he apparently had a revelation concerning this prophecy but the fish was a shark, i would be really concerned if people took it seriously being from God because my God doesn’t mistake a whale for a shark. There are a lot of examples where words like hell, satan etc are missing dozens of times but that’s just one of them. No, off course you don’t need to read from Greek or Hebrew because we don’t have the originals, but more importantly because God already provided his perfect words for English speakers in the King James Bible. And all the other nations just need to translate from the King James. For example i was born in Russia and Russian Synodal Translation is as much covered in tares as the modern English ones if not more. For example when talking about Mary mother of Jesus it spells She with a capital because as the Catholics, Orthodoxy thinks of her as a divine person and worships her. And off course there are lots of examples as well which point out that even that and other Russians translations weren’t translated from the same manuscripts because they simply don’t say the same thing.
@alexanderolkhovskiy82724 жыл бұрын
BBaptist Apologist18:27-28 can you send me a pdf?
@kristyong43864 жыл бұрын
@@alexanderolkhovskiy8272 So let me get this straight you are stressing out over some translations saying great fish/huge fish instead of whale? Because that's pretty much the only thing that's different between the verses. How exactly does this affect our core beliefs or change the gospel message?? I still think if you are going to be worried about the EXACT words I believe God inspired the initial Greek and Hebrew writers and since God doesn't make errors we should all be reading that.. it's THOSE texts God inspired every other single bible translated from that are just that translations.. yes some are awful e.g. Passion translation and The message .. I wouldn't read them if I were paid to, I strongly believe they are distortions and aren't Gods word. But some of the others are really good!