Jasher, the book of Susanna, Enoch, etc etc all book missi from the Bible bc of the Vatican doesn't want you to know the truth

@@cb90222 Maccabees as well

Acts of Paul sounds like a great Narnia book!

@@timrodriguez16 Or DUNE

@@cb90222 they are all easily available online.

Agree 💯

Mind = heart

May you please share your testimony?

me too

I too am a new believer and I love Mike Winger. He clearly does thorough research on ever topic he presents, and presents the information simply.

💯

That is so helpful to know ! I frequently witness to catholics and they throw alot at you these sources and knowledge is so helpful

I really want to read the Didache now, even though I'm not a new Christian... But I have finally forsaken the hyper charismatic movement 😊

_The Didache_ is a great read indeed.@@malenejensen2995

thanks so much, I couldn't get the names just by hearing

Praise YHWH 🙌🏾

Same thing happened to me !

Wow, you found the search bar!

@@AveCaesar2112 do you not feel at all embarrassed over how whiny you sound?

@@AveCaesar2112 Don't think he searched, but that it showed up in his recommendations

Haha

Candice Knuth-Winterfeldt I wear shirts like that. It’s pretty nice! I’d wear that!!

Looks like a Western shirt. He wears it well.

How many plaid shirts do you suppose he's gotten in the mail since you posted this? ha ha ha

Jesus: Don't make me angry Mr. McGee. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.

🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

I guess now we know why Joseph is missing from the Gospels. 🤣

Yup. The religion for breakfast yt stream has an entire show about it.

What is the omen

Your brain died with the "talking snake and donkey and someone living inside a fishes belly" Gospel!

Your brain died when it killed God

@@cardcounter21 well that’s not a gospel…

@@cardcounter21 The talking snake was either just Satan in a different form or Satan possessing a snake, and not an actual snake, the donkey could not talk on it's own and was only able to talk through the power of God, and Jonah was likely made to be able to live inside the giant fish/whale through the power of God.

@@thebirdaplierphd.memeology3411 _The talking snake was either just Satan in a different form or Satan possessing a snake, and not an actual snake_ So why did God punish all snakes for what Satan did?

Yep

The gospel might have been the inspiration for that part

Thought of that episode as well

@@Strongtower Yay! 😊

There is one. Not joking about that haha

@TheGoodOlRebel Yes. Its all about how Pilate became a believer after the crucifixion, what he witnessed after the death and resurrection, and the letters he sent afterwards telling the world of christ.

@TheGoodOlRebel sorry haha. I thought you were the OP

Pilate is a Saint in the Coptic church!

So in other words they don't make you feel as nice and fuzzy inside?

@@reviewtechUSSR1 In other words their useless for people like you and you don't like it.

@@reviewtechUSSR1 No 🤦‍♂️

@@ifeanyichukwu3644 Yes. Sorry I'm right and you're wrong.

@@reviewtechUSSR1 Nope. You are wrong, extremely wrong

Please do.

@@med4699 he's not going to ... because it goes against his secret "christian conversion agenda"

@Caleb Lewis ...I was raised Christian...but I will admit...I left Christianity because of the hypocrisy...and secrecy __ie : the "book of Enoch" + the "greed, racism & feminist narcissism" that they hide (not all)...but at some point...I simply had enough...no offense

@Caleb Lewis Psalm 32: 1-3 "Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered. Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity...:" The gospel is truly or actually very good news. God chooses to not impute (ascribe) sin to his elect. God chooses to cover our sin. Like He covered Adam with animal skins in the Garden of Eden. The early church did not accept Enoch. We have plenty of early writers before 200 AD speaking of the accepted books and Enoch was not considered scripture. It was read along with a lot of other books like we read other materials today. But Enoch was never considered scripture. That I know of. I don't think we can add it today with an honest look at church history. Throw away church history at our peril. Which book will be found interesting next? Or removed -because there will be more put forward. That is what history tells us.

Book of Enoch just prove the Bible,not disprove:)

Maybe, but then only by principle, being, about him as a child. The rest she clearly gave the finger to. Lol.

I was thinking that too.

Do you have a link to it? I can’t seem to find it lol

A lot of people say many things. Ermans claim of being an historian isn't true. He says he is to give himself cred.

The infancy gospel OF Thomas finished me with laughter. These gospels are pure comedy.

Yes, the Gospel of Thomas is without a doubt a pseudepigraphic work, but so are some of the writings in the Bible, such as the pseudo-pauline epistles. To use the word "forgery" to describe this kind of ancient literature is a loaded term because ancient scriptural authors did not see it the same way. Using the name of a famous legendary figure was simply a way to get attention to the writing and did not have the kind of unethical baggage that the term "forgery" has to modern ears. The Book of Enoch is also clearly pseudepigraphic... and yet JUDE, in his epistle, quotes from it directly in the context of it being authoritative. Jude says that "Enoch prophesied" those words in the Book of Enoch, and yet the Book of Enoch was written centuries after Enoch. So...the Bible itself sets a precedent for embracing pseudepigraphic "forgeries."

@@eugenesanders3094 false. flat out wrong.

@@canabiss8297 No, everything I said was truthful. Sorry if you're upset by facts.

@Pro Semite It is the NT epistle of Jude that quotes directly from the pseudepigraphic Book of Enoch, in the context of it being inspired. Jude clearly believed that the Book of Enoch was the inspired word of God & authoritative.

Adria on the vine did that ego come from Jesus? Humble yourself and pray, seek truth.

Adria: Satans job it to deceive, confuse and divide. After reading most of these “rejected” books and closely comparing them to the KJV Bible. It’s pretty clear that SOME of these are heresy and others (that were part of the original texts before the 1611 version King James changes) were widely accepted as inspired. So if the devil can convince people that they ALL are heresy, he’s done his job confusing and dividing. When you read these books you have to pray first and ask God to open your eyes with deep discernment and then you’ll KNOW if they are from God or not!

Jude quotes from Enoch directly in the context of it being authoritative. Peter alludes to it also. It is an indisputable fact that early Christians (even biblical authors) considered the Book of Enoch to be inspired. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church still includes The Book of Enoch in it's canon today.

@@eugenesanders3094 yes, I agree. I believe that because the book of Enoch is somewhat reliable, Mark didn't include it in this study but I'd like to know why wasn't it included.

from what i have researched in the past it wasn't added because they couldn't 100% guarantee it all written by enoch and they thought people may have added on to it

James The Lesser doesn’t matter, for they both still are apocryphal.

@@fbnflaviusbroadcastingnetw6786 I would like to know why

@@fbnflaviusbroadcastingnetw6786 Yet Jude Quotes Enoch. Peter alludes to enoch especially in the areas where he talks about the Angels who rebelled being bound in chains of darkness.

I have heard a lot of well respected gospel loving Christians use the book of Enoch a lot so maybe that’s why. Who knows?

@@adalynroseprescott8927 I've read the entire book of Enoch, and honestly, I don't see why a number of people fear it so much. For a book that wasn't penned by Christians, it has the clearest portrayal/prophecy of Christ that any discerning Christian would notice. It has one of the clearest arguments against abortions and even prophesies about abortion in the end times etc.

+WhipdaDash thank you!

As old as i am (30) i been searching for months why Book of Enoch and the others were completely rooted out. Knowing that i am a very Big Revelation of John fan and seeing this controversy surround one quote left me down and confused. Digging and delving deep in the modern history of man..one Quote kept me thinking. "any thing that is added or taken out is, those people will not inherit the Kingdom of God." Now giving the idea i didn't go Verbatim but i could not wrap around my head because 21st Century Christians seem to lose any logic beyond what they see.I Just have to give credit to the world we live in for such ignorance and people like you is what i like to see who aren't afraid to challenge the status quo of this world. Truly i thank you for this it answers alot and gives me more Curious Questions.

+WhipdaDash I'm glad I could help in some way.

Michael Arango So? That too is apocryphal.

FBN Flavius Broadcasting Network Which book didn’t he cover?

Maccabees?

@@MunchJinkies macabees are a historical book but are not inspired

The letter of "Polycarp the Philippy", better known as the letter of "Polycarp to the Philippians".

There's a playlist. Evidence for the bible

Who is Lilith? Is there any warrant for calling Lilith Adam’s first wife, or is this just the baseless chatter of woodland creatures? Are there appearances of Lilith in the Bible? Dan Ben-Amos, Professor of Folklore and Asian and Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, explores the figure of Lilith in the Bible and mythology in his article “From Eden to Ednah-Lilith in the Garden” in the May/June 2016 issue of Biblical Archeology Review. - - His analysis shows that Lilith is an intriguing figure who has taken on many shapes over the millennia. Lilith is first mentioned in ancient Babylonian texts as a class of winged female demons that attacks pregnant women and infants. From Babylonia, the legend of “the lilith” spread to ancient Anatolia, Syria, Israel, Egypt and Greece. In this guise-as a wilderness demoness-she appears in Isaiah 34:14 among a list of nocturnal creatures who will haunt the destroyed Kingdom of Edom. This is her only mention in the Bible, but her legend continued to grow in ancient Judaism. During the Middle Ages, Jewish sources began to claim her as Adam’s first-and terrifying-wife. How did Lilith evolve from being a wilderness demon to Adam’s first wife? Interestingly enough, this story begins at the beginning, in Genesis 1. The creation of humans is described in Genesis 1 and in Genesis 2. The first account is fairly straightforward: “So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:27). The second account describes how God formed man out of the dust of the ground and then creates woman from the man: “Then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being. … So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then he took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man” (Genesis 2:7, 21-22). In the post-Biblical period, some ancient Jewish scholars took the stance that Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 2:21-22 must describe two separate events, since it appears that woman is created differently in these accounts. In her Bible Review article “Lilith” in the October 2001 issue, Professor Janet Howe Gaines explains this reasoning: “Considering every word of the Bible to be accurate and sacred, commentators needed a story to explain what seemed to them to be a difference in the creation narratives of Genesis 1 and 2. God supposedly creates woman twice-once with man, once from man’s rib-so there must have been two women. The Bible names the second woman Eve; Lilith was identified as the first in order to complete the story.” Accordingly, Genesis 1:27 describes the creation of Adam and an unnamed woman (Lilith); Genesis 2:7 gives more details of Adam’s creation; and Genesis 2:21-22 describes the creation of Eve from Adam. Lilith’s creation is recounted in The Tales of Ben Sira, an apocryphal work from the tenth century C.E. Dan Ben-Amos explains that although this is the first extant text that records the legend of Lilith, her story probably existed earlier: [Lilith’s] story seems to hover at the edges of literacy with sporadic references. … [I]n the post-Biblical period, the sages identify the lilith several times, not by name, but as “the First Eve,” indicating that her full story was well known in oral tradition, yet barred from the canonized Biblical text. Finally, in the tenth century C.E. in Babylon, an anonymous writer, who was not bound by normative traditional principles and who included in his book some other sexually explicit tales, spelled out the Lilith's adventures in paradise. The Tales of Ben Sira relates that God created Lilith from the earth, just as he had created Adam. They immediately began fighting because neither would submit to the other. Recognizing that Adam would not listen to her, Lilith “pronounced the Ineffable Name and flew away into the air” (The Tales of Ben Sira). The angels Snvi, Snsvi and Smnglof were sent to pursue Lilith, but when they reached her, she refused to return with them to the Garden of Eden. “‘Leave me!’ she said. ‘I was created only to cause sickness to infants. If the infant is male, I have dominion over him for eight days after his birth, and if female, for twenty days’” (The Tales of Ben Sira). As a compromise, she promised that whenever she saw the angels’ names or forms on amulets, she would leave the child alone. She also agreed that 100 of her children-demons would die every day. The Lilith legend continued to grow and change over the following centuries, which is reflected in various artistic depictions of her. While some portrayed Lilith as a beautiful woman, others showed her in a more sinister light.

It's not a banned book. That's from the Jewish Talmud, the oral traditions of the Jews that were passed down and written much later. This was the stuff Jesus talked about when he condemned the traditions of their fathers. Not even worth worrying about.

@@stacy2point0 Nice one.

@Daric , Yes you are correct... but I was just answering a question that was asked about Lilith.

Read The 2nd book of Adam and Eve chapter 3:9: "But I rejoiced over the birth of thy son Seth; yet after a little while I sorrowed greatly over Eve, because she is my sister. For when God sent a deep sleep over thee, and drew her out of thy side, He brought me out also with her. But He raised her by placing her with thee, while He lowered me.” This is Satan deceiving Adam to believe that a SECOND woman was taken from him as Eve was. Could these stories come from such a source since it is all deception it would make sense as it was a made up story of the devil meant to confuse!!

I laugh every time I read about talking donkeys and snakes!

you just read that into it completely

Here you go. kzfaq.info/sun/PLZ3iRMLYFlHuhA0RPKZFHVcjIMN_-F596

@@MikeWinger Pastor Mike, thank you for all you do

I just thought the same thing lol

What about....The book of. Nicodemus?

Yeah those are popular now days

To my knowledge they are both Jewish literature that Jesus likely read they aren’t inspired so thus not apart of scripture but, they are still interesting History/historical books.

Don’t forget that canon Biblical scripture is always quoting each other and exalting the deity of Christ and our Heavenly Father’s love and creation.

Check out Wesley Huff. He's a Bible scholar and I think he'd help you.

Jude quotes from Enoch directly in the context of it being authoritative. Peter alludes to it also. It is an indisputable fact that early Christians (even biblical authors) considered the Book of Enoch to be inspired. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church still includes The Book of Enoch in it's canon today.