Why is the Su-35 Tough for Patriot Missiles to Hit

Рет қаралды 305,113

Күн бұрын

Not all aircraft are built for the same kind of fight. When facing a modern air defense system, some jets are like nimble boxers, dodging and weaving with incredible agility. Others, while powerful, might be more like brawlers, tough and effective, but not as quick to slip a punch. This difference in strengths can make a world of difference when it comes to surviving a sophisticated missile attack.
Take the Su-34 and Su-35 case, for example. Both are Russian jets that trace their roots back to the legendary Soviet Su-27. At first glance, these machines might seem like twins from the same hangar. But recent events, like the one reported by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense on March 2nd 2024, have shown a surprising difference in how well they handle threats like the advanced Patriot surface-to-air missile.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

Пікірлер: 554

@NDR-hn3ue Ай бұрын

*Please cite source for the 12 "Downed" SU -34's because the reports were NEVER verified*

@zksstalstawidlo9015 Ай бұрын

Ukrainians say that 😂

@ikman4006 Ай бұрын

SU-34 is a Ground attack derivative of the SU-27, not related to Su-35. Ground attack and CAS missions are always more dangerous, some losses are inevitable. Still Ukrainian “victory” figures are Inflated.

@D3adf1y Ай бұрын

latest photos don't show missile damage

@karatepopsicle Ай бұрын

At times like this I just think, what would the "brilliant mind" of John Kirby say?

@NDR-hn3ue Ай бұрын

@@zksstalstawidlo9015 That one is suspect

@AntonioRomero-te4cb 26 күн бұрын

The Russians build beautiful, tough fighter planes.

@alexandergolidnichuk5779 4 күн бұрын

.... as beautiful as their cars 😂

@tabletlenovo9440 3 күн бұрын

@@alexandergolidnichuk5779 western weapons like patriot and etc are ZERO compare to RUSSIAN!!!!

@falcony100 3 күн бұрын

@@alexandergolidnichuk5779 airplanes no cars...... do not generalize

@alexandergolidnichuk5779 3 күн бұрын

@@falcony100 Cars are more complex in design and assembly than airplanes - Is this what you wanted to write?

@falcony100 2 күн бұрын

@@alexandergolidnichuk5779how?.. nothing is simple inside a modern plane, neither the frame the engine or the avionics without taking into consideration all the physics behinds every design.

@umeshchittirai Ай бұрын

It won't be surprising if west start calling you pro Russia 😂

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

either that or drop ratings on Google/youtube

@jean-lucpierre8636 24 күн бұрын

It's not easy getting the truth these days. You can trust the media, especially not the western ones.

@user-wl4yz2zn5q 17 күн бұрын

The spark igniting WW3 was preventable... Exposed by CNNs Diana Magnay, Bama and Joe's CIA led coup Ukraine puppet govt should not have used our munitions to target the ethnic Russian children in the Donbas and the Separatist regions igniting WW3. All the Separatist Regions wanted was freedom. But, Obama and his puppet UKR govt murdered them all including prime minister Alexander Zakharchenko killed in Donetsk cafe explosion! "Misery in Ukraine as deadly conflict drives civilians from homes" Diana Magnay and Laura Smith-Spark, CNN 5 minute read Updated 4:19 PM EDT, Tue September 2, 2014. Ukraine signs shale gas deal with ExxonMobil. Reuters, Sep 30, 2011 - Ukraine's state-run energy firm Naftogaz and U.S. oil and gas major ExxonMobil have signed a preliminary agreement on exploring and ...2011. And Bama and Joe carried out their DOUBLE TAP INITIATIVE intentionally targeting first responders including women and children! Obama a ‘war criminal’ Cornel West: “...immorality of drones, dropping bombs on innocent people. It’s been over 200 children so far. These are war crimes.” Politico 15 Feb 2013. During his presidency, Obama approved the use of 563 drone strikes that killed approximately 3,797 people. HARVARD POLITICAL REVIEW. "Obama’s first strike on Yemen killed 55, including 21 children, 10 of under age 5. 12 women, 5 pregnant among murdered." Double-Tap Warfare: Should Obama Be Investigated for War Crimes? Double-Tap Warfare: Should President Obama Be Investigated for War Crimes? Florida Law Review, Vol. 69 > Iss. 1 (2017)

@mrblurblur2003 6 күн бұрын

West are bad losers

@watchinglistening 2 күн бұрын

ONLY ALCOHOLICS AND THE GANGSTER CRIMINALS COULD BE PRO RUSSIAN! SINCE POOTIN "TOOK POWER" I HAVE CONSIDERED RUSSIA A TERRORIST STATE! WHO COULD DENY THIS CONSIDERING THE RUSSIAN ARMIES MURDEROUS ATTACKS ON SYRIAN AND UKRAINIAN CITIZENS! P. S. BEING "ANTI RUSSIAN" YOU MIGHT END UP POISONED WITH A DOSE OF NUCLEAR TOXINS!

@krc306 Ай бұрын

Can be fitted with hypersonic shovels

@user-bk6gx7sg3j Ай бұрын

Yes it can. It has more powerful engines that the Su34 and its avionics suite is more advanced

@jimmeryellis Ай бұрын

? You what?

@alexanderc.broche4017 Ай бұрын

THE RUSSIANS SHOULD START ARMING ALL THEIR MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS WITH ONLY THE KINZHAL AND ZIRCON MISSILES OR MAYBE SOME SMALLER LESS EXPENSIVE MISSILES WITH HYPERSONIC CAPABILITIES

@alexanderc.broche4017 Ай бұрын

@@user-bk6gx7sg3j THE RUSSIANS NEED TO PUT IN THE LASTEST AVIONICS JAMMING CAPABILITIES AND PROJECTING COUNTERMEASURES SUITE ON ALL THEIR PLANES ✈️ INCLUDING THE SU-25 GRACH-FLYING TANK “FROGFOOT” HEAVILY ARMORED MILITARY AIRCRAFT FOR CLOSE AIR SUPPORT FOR GROUND TROOPS

@saintsuniverse Ай бұрын

😂😂😂and washing machine chips

@danamoradi6031 Ай бұрын

Beautiful aircraft

@whynot6795 29 күн бұрын

Nice copy.

@amjadkhan-qx9yi 22 күн бұрын

@@whynot6795 all US copied of Russian jet 😂😂😂

@AlBundy310 Ай бұрын

Well... one is a bomber, the other is a fighter...

@oldguy217 Ай бұрын

yes, Like comparing a lancaster to a spitfire.

@user-bk6gx7sg3j Ай бұрын

That is absolutely correct

@user-bk6gx7sg3j Ай бұрын

What happened to Ukraine's navy? Ukraine is benefitting from the fact that Russia cannot attack NATO satellites- yet

@nissekarlsson3172 28 күн бұрын

I thought both were bummers.

@oldguy217 28 күн бұрын

@@nissekarlsson3172 Guess you thought wrong huh !!!!

@british_772 Ай бұрын

Wow, I was just wondering how powerful the Su-35 was, and thank you for the useful information.

@MrDrifter762 Ай бұрын

I'd go find a few other channels to get the "useful information"

@GameC3nt 24 күн бұрын

"useful" 💀

@antoniohagopian213 Ай бұрын

Su-35 doesn't have canards, the Su-30 and 37 do.

@poulidisnikolaos5528 Ай бұрын

Your're right.

@user-bk6gx7sg3j Ай бұрын

Su30Sm, Su34 and Su37, have canards

@alexanderc.broche4017 Ай бұрын

@@poulidisnikolaos5528 TOTALLY RIGHT I KNOW THAT SOMEONE DIDN’T SLEEP DURING THIS VIDEO AND PAID ATTENTION

@timothyseeger5296 Ай бұрын

The SU-35 has 3D Vectored thrust though.

@buzzmeanytime Ай бұрын

@@user-bk6gx7sg3j can you please explain what our canards? Thank you.

@JRvonP Ай бұрын

Wel one is a bomber that has to operates close to the frontlines the other can keep a safe distance... that mey be the most decisive factor

@user-xq8vv7pq6j Ай бұрын

The simple truth is that Fullbacks are far more likely to operate over Ukraine than Flankers.

@Alejandroiutub Ай бұрын

They operate side by side. SU-35 covers the SU-34, the SU-34 is a bit bigger though, a bit less maneuverable but still performs remarkably well for a bomber.

@Scott767300 Ай бұрын

Depending on where you read, patriots don’t actually hit much….

@bocko159 22 күн бұрын

Patriot isn't even the equivalent of the S300

@AfromemeGod. 2 күн бұрын

True Saudis would agree

@yusripp 23 күн бұрын

To do tight high g evasive manuever is taking toll on the pilot. Most of time patriot launch a volley of 2 missile upon lock. So to evade those 2 missile is quite hard. And if su35 manage to do this, it was a very good feat.

@stevendlamini7323 29 күн бұрын

You're the first to tell the truth,we're always told of how best is the F35 and Patriots miss8

@GegeDxD 29 күн бұрын

They talked the same stories about the F117, then it gets downed by half century old technology.

@jordank2028 27 күн бұрын

F35s would down every single su35 in an air to air combat. It's not even a question. What point are you trying to make? Also take into consideration that it's not Americans using the Patriot missle system in Ukraine. American military is obviously going to be the most effective with American aircraft and defense systems. Furthermore if you want to talk about bullshitting, communist Russia is the king of over exaggeration their equipment and capabilities.

@maksimer6612 7 күн бұрын

@@jordank2028да но есть маленький такой нюанс , как объявила недавно сщетная палата США 70 % в небоеспособном состояние ! Ну ладно есть же сателлиты но и у них проблемы ноу хау этого чуда это невозможность долго пребывания в сверхзвуковом режиме крейсерского полета , ну ладно он же стелс ?! Но и тут ноу хау отваливающееся буквально в полете стелс покрытие ! Как писал оди блогер ф 35 по своим возможностям не дотягивает до ф 117 80 годов !!!!! Ну ладно есть же ф 22 рэптер и ввс США заказывает.....ф15 ?!?!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😅

@noimnotarobotcanubeleiveit7024 3 күн бұрын

F35 now referred to as paperweight in congress

@georgequek7996 24 күн бұрын

Where are these F-35B, F-35A, F-35C fighter jets hiding in the West and america man??🙈

@toddbrackett4277 5 күн бұрын

The F-35 is not operated by Ukraine genius 😂

@Markdmarque Күн бұрын

@toddbrackett4277 conveniently 😂😂...The only western fighter jet will be 1970's vintage F16's 😅

@toddbrackett4277 Күн бұрын

@@Markdmarque, do you think that Block 50 Vipers existed in the 1970s?

@vadim-2068 Ай бұрын

Su-35S - UFO 😎💪

@thabelomulidzwi6360 Ай бұрын

Unknown flying objects 😊

@Anyfantis0 Ай бұрын

The SU-35 is an exceptional fighter but you totally neglected to mention that Ukraine uses PAC-2 Patriot batteries, not the newest 360radar batteries, not even PAC-3. I recommend people check LTAMDS Radar for Patriot.

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

Russia destroys those Radars anyway, cuz that's the Joke, son... That's why Z is whingeing for more $$$ & more Systems for Russia to Target & Destroy.

@toddbrackett4277 5 күн бұрын

The SU-35 might be on par with the F-15 fleet of the 1980s.

@Anyfantis0 5 күн бұрын

@@toddbrackett4277 and the F-16 is the best single engine multirole there is, minus stealth. That is because compartments and weapons are still being modernized and adjusted for it, and the same applies for the SU-35. The 80s are more relevant then ever, the 80s will carry out the bulk of aerial warfare, not the niche F22s and F35s.

@indo_pasifikchanel1964 Ай бұрын

su 35 terbukti di medan laga mampu mengatasi situasi sulit di.tengah rapatnya pertahanan udara ukraina

@albrightomar5892 Ай бұрын

Not just Ukraine but also Nato air defences

@AnmolX-jw8jr Ай бұрын

@@albrightomar5892no hate but when please give a example. Btw I don't know when that happened?

@seasong7655 Ай бұрын

The missile definitely has the advantage. It doesn't have a pilot inside limiting the g-forces and also has lower mass meaning less inertia.

@ironmonkey1512 Ай бұрын

Having subsystems to allow it to turn that quickly increases weight reduces range etc...

@user-fy3bd2lk9j Ай бұрын

скорость ракеты гораздо больше самолёта, поэтому и перегрузка у ракеты намного больше, она просто развалится в воздухе, если попытается резко изменить направление движения.

@sallehsallehnewton3258 Ай бұрын

@@user-fy3bd2lk9jhe's measure inertia by kg lols..

@dmitry5233 Ай бұрын

and also 6 to 10 times faster than a jet on average...

@derekedge2089 Ай бұрын

Modern variants of the R-37 missiles have a second stage of burn once the missile runs on its terminal guidance. It's certainly not out of the question. nPython IR missiles have crazy performance. Based on publicly available info they have been modeled into gaming to perform up to 540°turns in certain situations. Missile tech getting pretty serious@@kamilhorvat8290

@IllusionaryFed 27 күн бұрын

It's like that scene in Top Gun Maverick when the enemy G turned that Missile

@ChosenOne6666 Ай бұрын

The missiles on outside of the jet give off a signature that is picked up on radar from MASH.

@Lipi19821 Ай бұрын

those are not missiles...those are electronic warfare pods/jamming etc...

@ChosenOne6666 Ай бұрын

@@Lipi19821 You have severe reading comprehension problems.

@jarrodwilson2382 Ай бұрын

Exactly get your facts right an that Iron dome does not seem to be working just an expensive waste of money

@ChosenOne6666 Ай бұрын

@@jarrodwilson2382 WHAT!!!!!! ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

@jimmeryellis Ай бұрын

I thought thst MASH was a film (movie) from the Korean war times.

@borise4104 Ай бұрын

They said that G-turns are only for airshow.

@user-lw2hu6gx1f Ай бұрын

When was the last time Patriot Missile targeted and hit Su-35 ?

@user-bk6gx7sg3j Ай бұрын

When the last one was not yet destroyed by the Russians. The Ukrainian, or rather the NATO, operators, have fired all of their anti air missiles at all the Russian aircraft, without much success

@keithbell6104 25 күн бұрын

@@user-bk6gx7sg3j Keep believing what your government is telling you , and why havent you took Ukrine yet ??

@user-bk6gx7sg3j 25 күн бұрын

@@keithbell6104 What is Ukrine?

@gerrywhelan5761 23 күн бұрын

@@keithbell6104"Yet" for if what Putin is praying for happens, Trump been Elected, its Game over for Ukraine, as without US support, which Trump has promised to change, Ukraine will be in deep trouble.

@mohamadmdallal3148 10 күн бұрын

@@keithbell6104 bro the red army taken half of the country despite the whole world is fighting with Ukraine?? Do you think war is like a Call Of Duty game ??? lol

@Shan-sg7mm Ай бұрын

True justice will depend on who is making the video😂😂😂

@pavol4989 Ай бұрын

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🏆🥂

@whynot6795 29 күн бұрын

russians. Thats why fairy tale looks like truth

@TURKWING Ай бұрын

Both Su-34 and Su-35 have Ground Radar Geolocator and ECM Khibiny module on wingtips. But Patriot Radar is not AESA only Phased Array. To evade Patriot Pac2 missile, 3D Thrust Vectoring on Su-35 and Patriot old Radar are key factors. When Su-35's MWR alerts pilot, pilot can do zero or very low air speed mode (like unflying object) using 3D Thrust Vectoring to deceive the radar and lost target lock via TVM. Why 2 numbers Su-35 were hit? Aircrafts are not everythig. Pilots (manned or AI) can differ.

@alfretwell428 Ай бұрын

Low speed flying as a way to break a target lock will only work on pulsed Doppler look down radars. The key here is look down radar it will only work on a radar looking down from higher altitude ie an airborne radar. Patriot is ground based so this technique won’t work, if fact reducing speed will just put the target aircraft in a position of being less able to use rapid manoeuvres to evade final interception.

@TURKWING 26 күн бұрын

@@alfretwell428 Patriot radar also uses Doppler filter. Otherwise, radar scope will be filled up with geographic clutter (mountains, hill) and also even birds. So, doppler filter is not in use only for airborne radars.

@bluelithium9808 Ай бұрын

Not bad for broke washing machine parts.

@alexanderc.broche4017 Ай бұрын

NO BAD AT ALL IF YOU LOOK AT IT THE BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SU-35 IT IS A VERY HUGE POWER MILITARY PLANE IT IS AFTER ALL A FIGHTER/BOMBER WITH A VERY STRONG RIGID AIRFRAME AND POWERFUL ENGINES MADE TO CARRY EXTREMELY HEAVY ORDNANCE PAYLOADS BOMBS 💣 AND MISSILES AND BE ABLE TO LAST A LONG TIME

@pavol4989 Ай бұрын

❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓👎😵‍💫

@brucemcglasson Ай бұрын

It's a piece of junk.😂

@prashanthb6521 26 күн бұрын

There should be a limit for self-delusion.

@bocko159 22 күн бұрын

@@brucemcglassonyou are delusional 😆

@user-zb6uf3us1w Ай бұрын

SU34 is also a very maneuverable jet it’s a bomber that can go head to head in to a dog fight with fighter jets such as F-18 F16 and F15.

@squireson Ай бұрын

'Lotta adjectives here without the necessary qualification that manoeuverability means little without a _very _*_well trained pilot_* to use it. More likely the Su-34s have proven vulnerable because of their mission profiles : high altitude glide bomb runs as opposed to the Su-35s hanging back or staying low. ---- Best way to beat a Patriot is to break line-of-sight from it's ground radar *as early as possible.* The nose radars of the PAC-2 missiles don't have great range and are mostly for accurate terminal guidance.

@mightymoyan4788 Ай бұрын

The graphic used the DDE 599........Full Send It

@jg3000 Ай бұрын

SU 35 doesn't have canards. One of the prototypes did though. SU 34 has canards.

@rascott2935 Ай бұрын

no plain can outturn a missle. there must be some electronic war fair involved, that's like claiming a tracker trailer can outturn a go-cart.

@gerrywhelan5761 23 күн бұрын

They use both, but fighter jets have out manoeuvred missiles for years, while a missile is far faster than the jet it is less manoeuvrable, very high speed means difficulties in making very sharp turns in the last second, like stepping out of the way of a fast car at the last second, it cannot react in time.

@freesimba5168 4 күн бұрын

It's not outrun, it's out manoeuvre. Missiles don't really chase the target aircraft. They aim to rendezvous with the plane, by calculating the speed and flight path. To out-manoeuvre the missile has to be at a certain distance/ range, too far or too close doesn't work. A very high skill high risk action.

@derrickdupreez4209 20 сағат бұрын

It is obvious that the SU-35 developers have done their homework plus I think their pilots are quite brilliant, the SU-34 however although riskier to fly in Patriot range when operating together they form a formidable attack

@ericg2167 Ай бұрын

I think it's not the hardware but the pilot. The pilots desire to live and experience is the key to survival.

@brealistic3542 Ай бұрын

He shows a Su35 dropping flares! Lmao even the stinger manpad has a very good chance of taking one down. That's why Russian pilots do not do direct close in air support. It has anti- flare software and is being constantly improved.

@johndyson4109 Ай бұрын

There's NO Carnards on the 35.. He said there was?

@mohamadmdallal3148 10 күн бұрын

What is Carnard !!?

@SbangFPV 3 күн бұрын

5:42 I wish I could get SU-35s PID tune on my quadcopter drone. Locked!!

@filipgenov Күн бұрын

Cars, computers, TVs and washing machines - Su-35 is made by the same pool of brilliant russian engineers, what could possibly go wrong?

@3zea-un7do 4 күн бұрын

Soon after this things will become SU35 SU34 flying turtles highly maneuverable thrust vectoring armed with hypersonic shovels 😂

@andrewpearce8006 2 күн бұрын

Imagine the stupidity of thinking a super maneuvering jet could maneuver around something travelling either Mach 3.5 or 5.5 projectile. I guess it would be like saying a snail can out maneuver a bullet.

@buzzmeanytime Ай бұрын

YOU BETTER do a G turn if you want to be live!

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

Whike stationed at Potosi West of Vegas, we went into the Karnak for Buffet & there was a Sega Testing room & I jumped on a ball turret sim anrbspent most if the next 60 seconds dounf corkscrews once the other jet showed up. I survived but wish I had video of that ball going round & round - not even any G-Force either!

@greybuckleton 3 күн бұрын

Dropping the payload shouldn't reduce the pilots reaction time. He has a second man for that. The Strike mission profile certainly exposes the aircraft more however, and pilots are not going to drop the payload at the first sign of trouble. A lot of SU-34 were probably shot down while evading with a payload still attached.

@randomguyontheinterweb Күн бұрын

I'm surprised you didn't mention the trust vectoring on the 35

@toddbrackett4277 5 күн бұрын

The SU-34 and SU-35 operate in completely different configurations and fly different profiles. The use of SU-34s weighed down with massive glide bombs flying in a predictable pattern only works in an uncontested environment. We saw the damage that a single Patriot battery caused to the SU-34 fleet this winter. The SU-34s have been used to good effect over the past few months only because Ukrainian defenders ran out of Patriot Missiles to convert them into scrap metal. The SU-34s are making hay while the sun shines but they won’t survive long when Vipers are hunting them.

@SmiileySmiiles Ай бұрын

I think the future of drone fighters will be able to turn a lot more aggressive.

@ghetinknotabush8602 2 күн бұрын

Just wait till you see what an SU-34 does to F-16!

@noimnotarobotcanubeleiveit7024 3 күн бұрын

You have to stand next to the sukhoi to appreciate the size. They dwarf the mig29. And the extra airfoil surface and engine mean they are no less maneuverable

@tonelloable 3 сағат бұрын

My favorite at the moment is SU 57

@user-yb4sz1te7r 27 күн бұрын

Very agile and highly manoeuvrable fighter aircraft in the world.

@guinveregodn138 27 күн бұрын

I shouldn't believe on that videos said patriot missile can destroy any plane

@mohamadmdallal3148 10 күн бұрын

An amazing video, thank you for posting it. I have few points tho: 1- you have my upmost respect for being biased on your video. When it comes to anything Russian, western tends to say stupid things. 2- we always forget that Russians are fighting in Ukraine the whole NATO countries with cutting edge technology air defence systems! We’ve seen some casualties but we also seen many casualties in these air defence systems! 3- comparing that war with any war that US air force had, we will see that none of them had a decent army equipped with air defence or capable fighters to know the exact strength of them. 4- wondering how both S-400 vs Patriot would react when fighting 5th gen or good fighters like F-18 or SU-34 !!??? Only time will tell and. I think the clash will eventually soon happen since Russian army is taking control and momentum day after day.

@christopherjohnferrer3771 Ай бұрын

I want them so bad in War Thunder. Need that CAS plane, to replace my sub-sonic premium Su-25bm.

@user-fq7vs8dl5k 15 сағат бұрын

Well, something is shooting those jets down.

@strangevideos3048 26 күн бұрын

Thanks God we have Russian Telegram to see everything from other side .

@jamesmiller2735 7 күн бұрын

Su-34 are bombers, and therefore, they're very heavy aircrafts while the su-35 are fighter jet relatively light when compared to the su-34.

@user-fn7re7qw8d 28 күн бұрын

Su-34 only need a ecm modernization and twc engines .

@Magmanic 2 күн бұрын

2 years into this "SMO" and the Russians just can't stop winning.

@timothykenney2966 Ай бұрын

Do they have cope cages

@tattooglisha 11 күн бұрын

Russia has a record , ucranian mig 29 shot down via air to air missile on 417km.

@benb6274 15 күн бұрын

You could literally not be further from correct in how you describe the interplay of a missile and an aircraft in a high g turn. The turn does not in any way effect the missile's radar lock on the aircraft. Turning the aircraft forces the missile to turn, bleeding its energy away due to friction, causing it to slow down, lose effective range, and run out of momentum before it can strike the aircraft.

@henrikchristensen6314 13 күн бұрын

Dedicated long range strike bomber with combat range of 680miles....!?!

@user-jq6hd6vf8j Ай бұрын

🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇷>>>>>>>

@williamnot8934 Күн бұрын

It’s never in the air. That’s why.

@korakodsenthong1887 Ай бұрын

Just because Ukraine posted the picture, you guys already believed it?

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

Z is the Prophet of NATO and MUST be believed!!!

@aabbcc5154 17 күн бұрын

do you have the actual footage? or this is all talk?

@antoniohagopian213 Ай бұрын

Because the patriot was destroyed long before the Su-35 took off😂

@polygamous1 Ай бұрын

And WHO destroyed the patriot?

@exploreandunravel5773 Ай бұрын

@@polygamous1Drones... and one patriot was lost to Iskander M

@kingnorlen Ай бұрын

@@polygamous1 SU-34 with FAB glide-addon wings, or Iskander!

@antoniohagopian213 3 күн бұрын

@@polygamous1 many things can. From a cruise missile, a drone or a MiG-31 with Kh-47 kinzhal

@jg3000 Ай бұрын

SU 35 also has insane EW abilities. Able to make the missile go stupid.

@veronicalogotheti1162 5 күн бұрын

They brave the pilots

@robfrohwein2986 4 күн бұрын

Beautiful planes

@fpsserbia6570 Күн бұрын

there are to much variables that need to be calculated in, in order to know how effective one system is, how well trained are Ukranians, which exactly radars to they use what was the distance,.... and on the other side, what exactly variant of SU-35 did Russians used, how well trained was that pilot, what was the payload that he carried, what was his mission, what was the terrain in that area,....... you can't say one system is performing bad if the system is not used in the correct way, in the correct set up, or by non experienced soldiers, and so on

@wasswagodfrey915 8 күн бұрын

We need to see you in person reporting.Strive to show your self

@billywilliams4778 Ай бұрын

U can not believe what Uraine they will say anything to make people believe they are winning the lost war😂😂

@karelloskot8284 Ай бұрын

Smrt Banderovcům

@mikeqofiy3693 Ай бұрын

They already cross the border onto Russia what are you talking about?

@shawnm8232 29 күн бұрын

Cool story bro, but satellite images don't lie 😂😂

@flxdz7103 6 күн бұрын

@@shawnm8232 Satellite images that reveal Ukrainian casualties 😂😂😂😂

@toddbrackett4277 5 күн бұрын

A smell some desperate Russian projection. I would be embarrassed if my military had taken the losses that Vladimir’s has over the past few years and gained so little against a much weaker opponent.

@bertg.6056 29 күн бұрын

Let me get this straight: A fighter is more maneuverable than a bomber? Who knew??

@prashanthb6521 26 күн бұрын

Let me get this straight. You skipped and didnt watch the video properly.

@bertg.6056 26 күн бұрын

@@prashanthb6521 Nope.

@toddbrackett4277 5 күн бұрын

The SU-34 has canards, the SU-35 does not.

@mustafaoduncu4048 Ай бұрын

We want the videos to have Turkish subtitles.🙏

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

Air you could thumb thru GZT channel's list of English dubbed vids. Some are very serious military discussion. Very Seriously Polite the Turks. (Except for Czenk - he's Alex Jones Turk-Clone)

@wambam3860 Ай бұрын

Maybe because the dont have to pay 90,000$ for a bag of turbine bushing

@americathebeautiful2665 Ай бұрын

12 su35 destroyed vs 500 Ukrainian plains destroyed by S400 and S300 begs a question about effectiveness to cost ratio of Patriot system

@Russinh0 3 күн бұрын

Su-34 are vulnerable cuz its a Bomber, its slower, bigger, thonker and fly closer to the ground shoting its rockets and droping bombs, but it make Russia Conquest Aavdiivka

@nissekarlsson3172 28 күн бұрын

Patriot should not be used for that, there are more suitable missiles for that purpose.

@mikelong5207 3 күн бұрын

What a crock, modern sam missiles are rated to vastly higher g forces in turn rate than any aircraft or more importantly the crew!

@tvsettv 16 күн бұрын

There were no Patriot missiles in Ukraine but there were downed su 35’s

@TamVu-bl5ee 26 күн бұрын

Thought it has 9G, Su 35 cannot counter F 15 in dogfight.

@timothykenney2966 Ай бұрын

Patriot is not designed for a ground attack that is what the russian airforce does best is stay on the ground because they are running short of together s300 missile 😂😂😂😂😂

@meleas8262 18 күн бұрын

It flies at home

@cristiansandor4435 Ай бұрын

So this guy say SU-3x pilot strategy to defend from a 160km range Patriot missile is hand dodging it using supermanouvrability?? Come on guys ... really??? Who the hack is dogfighting these days - well, except of course a fight in the DCS with some Spitfires of the WWII. Even F4 Phantom was designed without a cannon...

@minyaksayur Ай бұрын

Missiles have proximity fuse, dog fighting those are impossible. 🤷‍♂ It's just a youtube video.

@torukmahtomahto409 Ай бұрын

Is not the plane, is the pilot...

@garryh3126 29 күн бұрын

It's both

@garryh3126 29 күн бұрын

Can't have a race car driver sitting inside of a Toyota Prius expecting to win a formula One 😅

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

Very Interested to see this Aircraft Identification and Comparison video. Somethimes the Soviet and Russian numbers get me lost. I once has an Su-2x something that was a DOS simulator down to releasing the parking brake then accelerating and taking off, and this was in EZ Mode! (I didn't have pedals or joystick, etc & keyboarding was very tough)

@user-ox8pg5lh5n Ай бұрын

this analyzed Su-35 against Patriots antiair defense is a Russians say; Don't forget Patriots shut down Russia's Kinzel hypersonic missiles with 9 time the speed of sound.

@albrightomar5892 Ай бұрын

What have you been watching the debry which the Ukrainians showed was an iskander 😂😂😅😂😅

@user-jz5wh5mj4n Ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 oh wow you got your sources from the ukrenians or the brits? The USA haven’t confirmed 😮😮😮😮

@user-ox8pg5lh5n Ай бұрын

@@albrightomar5892 no that was Kinzel hypersonic missiles head

@edmundlyczek3021 Ай бұрын

Patriots even have no time to fart when hypersonic missiles are incoming. Most of the delivered Patriots are gone. This is why the "comic-in-chief " is begging for more and more.

@bobalto Ай бұрын

@@albrightomar5892I’m not even sure that it can shoot down an iskander

@zorbamlucien3798 Ай бұрын

new planes are usually better for you and worse for your enemy systems .

@bonanzaguy1 23 күн бұрын

SU-35 has no canards

@filipmilojkovc6146 Ай бұрын

What a beautifull and powerful machine, sadly for killing people 😢 like other machines

@igorstankovic4770 22 күн бұрын

wrong usage of the su 34 on the begining

@diarmaid0heineachain314 21 сағат бұрын

The Russian jets are fantastic, granted, but the “Patriot” missile is not an anti-aircraft missile. It is an anti-missile missile, designed for use against targets on a fixed path, that are unable to manoeuvre. It should be easy to evade for any reasonably advanced jet fighter.

@BillobanBilloba 24 күн бұрын

along with this video, I recommend listening to the song 'just dream on', a great combination

@Milvus_In_Excelsis 27 күн бұрын

Google Nine reasons the Russian Air Force lost more than 26 Su-35, 36 Su-34 and 2 A-50 Early Warning Aircraft.

@darhammora7867 Күн бұрын

Patriot did down multiple Su-35

@bobdillon1138 Ай бұрын

Patriots in Ukraine will be in vital areas not on the front line their kill range is fairly short and the Russian jets have been staying out of it pretty simple really.

@andreyllosa9106 Ай бұрын

Top G

@JustinStLouis-xz7ut Күн бұрын

Patriots are a cheap by the dozen system. Their accuracy is dependent on the number used. 1 system is irrelevant, 4 is sub par. 6 are usually minimal. It'll take 7-8 missles to eventually down 1 fighter.

@ZAKITHE3RD Ай бұрын

This is a direct copy of Defense Tv's video

@KermitFrazierdotcom Ай бұрын

Viewers Survey of A.I. voicings, perhaps?

@RAF71chingachgook 4 күн бұрын

This is wrong! A high G single axis turn can not defeat a patriot. The patriot or any missile with a decent seeker head can anticipate the aircraft’s location (lead) to make a kill if the turn is in one plane (single axis). A multi-axis turn is another matter. If the pilot does a non coordinated multi axis spiral (elevator and rudder) the missile software can’t anticipate the necessary lead to intercept the aircraft. That Russian did a slipping spiral.