What is the accuracy of Iskander missiles

Рет қаралды 154,056

Күн бұрын

Russia possesses the largest and most diverse nuclear missile force globally, inherited from the Soviet era. Throughout its conflict with Ukraine, Russia has effectively deployed various missile systems, including ballistic and cruise missiles. Among these, the 9K720 Iskander stands out for its speed and accuracy, often proving to be a potent weapon on the battlefield.
One notable instance of the Iskander missile's effectiveness was seen last year when the Russian military introduced a new tactic. They fired Iskander missiles multiple times at the same target, surprising the Ukrainian forces and causing significant damage. This tactic was possible because Iskander missiles can launch two missiles from a single vehicle, enhancing their firepower considerably.
Russia's heavy reliance on this missile really shows how much faith they have in its abilities. It leaves us questioning just how accurate it is, and is it truly that formidable?
Photo 4:46 by Boevaya mashina, CC BY-SA 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

Пікірлер: 359

@jonathanjacob5453 Ай бұрын

I don’t understand why people keep trying to use “the Soviet” era derogatorily. The Abraham’s and F16 both date from the Soviet era.

@arandomwalk Ай бұрын

Because Western propagandistic media says everything Soviet was bad quality or poor 🤡

@SimbaM2kufu Ай бұрын

80% of all US weapons were made when the Soviet Union was still a country.

@Din.Djarin Ай бұрын

👆🏽

@user-jz1ft5jp5k Ай бұрын

Искандер разработан уже в России в СССР была система Ока которая попала под договор о сокращении вооружения ,а именно ракет средней дальности .

@doctorjivago5081 Ай бұрын

This is kind of propaganda - to emphasize and suggest, that the Russians couldn't do anything good by theirself, but they must to lie on Soviet's achievements...

@vs9934 Ай бұрын

I suggest to ask those french soldiers in Slavyansk, how accurate Iskander is. Not sure they would be there to answer though.

@wallingnaga6563 Ай бұрын

Exactly heard that the survivors ran away 😂

@simonneke805 Ай бұрын

The survivors are back in France. They dont want that smoke. 😂

@user-xt8ty6hr3p Ай бұрын

Отличие французских военных НАТО от других военнослужащих НАТО в том, что американские, британские и польские генералы и офицерский состав умеют красиво "случайно" умереть от сердечного приступа или упасть с велосипеда в Альпах, неудачно прыгнуть с высоты в каньон или разбиться в автомобильной аварии со смертельным исходом...согласно красивым никрологам стран НАТО, а у французкого командования просто нет фантазии придумать красивую историю о их "случайной" смерти, поэтому они говорят правду о том где, как, и при каких обстоятельствах солдаты Франции умирают на украинском полигоне НАТО. Не хватает креативности и денег для того, чтобы заклеить рот родственникам погибших солдат и офицеров, чтоб они не говорили, при каких обстоятельствах погиб их близкий. А так умирают все по одной причине, нет осознания, что восточные славяне это три народа, но Отечество у них одно на всех и поэтому украинские партизаны (70% от всей Украины) будет делать всё, чтобы помочь российской армии уничтожить натовских янычар на земле наших предков.

@fredlight Ай бұрын

@@wallingnaga6563 Yep, they ran away, their legs one way, their head and body another🤣

@iROChakri Ай бұрын

😂😂😂 @@wallingnaga6563

@robertcuellar4132 Ай бұрын

New version has 1000km range when fired with a 500kg war head

@Ghosy01 Ай бұрын

new version with a fab 500 . i like that

@robertcuellar4132 Ай бұрын

@@Ghosy01 yep also use similar tech that's in the old Soviet anti ship missile called ship wreck the missile can communicate with each other in flight to coordinate a attack

@steveb890 Ай бұрын

🤣🤣

@user-oq1xg4ml4v Ай бұрын

@@Ghosy01 and fab 3000

@livmurray1958 Ай бұрын

Ukraine will have THE NEPTUNE ready by 2025 same distance 1000

@pouwakaruwhiu8349 Ай бұрын

Bloody awesome weaponry from Russia 🇷🇺, from Australia 🦘

@BanzLanda86 Ай бұрын

According to unconfirmed reports, Bugdanov was reportedly killed in a missile strike today. So, the Iskandars are deadly!

@chewpchewp9670 Ай бұрын

Source please

@niggis76 Ай бұрын

Chould be true, after terror attack he is legit target and russia is looking for him. But we need confirmation first, these rumours has been around earlier too

@BanzLanda86 Ай бұрын

@@chewpchewp9670 Remember, I've stated unconfirmed!

@mrnic3guy305 Ай бұрын

Iskander is no joke

@user-xt8ty6hr3p Ай бұрын

Наша детка "Искандер" очень бесстрашный и горячий мальчик. Никогда не дает в обиду девочек России.❤

@Pinoyslayer8888 Ай бұрын

Has been almost 3 years and I haven’t seen any of interceptions Ukraine claimed

@TacoTomtheBomb Ай бұрын

@user-nv1zh4vk9m I saw some shovels, but they looked like Soviet era models.

@Pinoyslayer8888 Ай бұрын

@user-nv1zh4vk9m Video about Iskander missiles and you talk about decisive victory cope harder

@wallingnaga6563 Ай бұрын

@user-nv1zh4vk9m Ukraine also said that they will be having tea on the coast of Crimea by fall 2023 where is it ?

@user-xt8ty6hr3p Ай бұрын

@user-nv1zh4vk9mв Арктике правит Россия, кто теперь в Африке главный? Кто демилитаризовал блок НАТО? Кто помогает Ирану, Китаю и Северной Кореи оружием (гиперзвуковым) и обучает их офицерский состав? Кто ускоряет дедолларизацию в мире, превращая США в регионального лилипута? Кто создал продовольственный рынок хлеба в мире и держит в руках продовольствие в мире? Кто создал аналог газового ОПЕК? Кто пинком ноги открывает дверь в ОПЕК и решает, кому дать нефть, а кому нет, устанавливая цены? Кто забрал Азовское море и 28% суши Украины? Кто заработал хорошую прибыль и стал пятой экономикой мира, а в этом году станет четвертой экономикой мира, находясь под 16000 санкциями, а? Во истину, дураку не рассказывают весь задуманный план до конца, ибо он и масштаба задуманного не поймёт и сам себе что-нибудь поломает.😅 Игра гроссмейстера в шахматы не для вас, переходите к раскраскам для трёхлетних детей.

@user-yy7ic3dh3y Ай бұрын

@user-nv1zh4vk9m Бро за 30 лет в Афганистане я не видел победы Америки над талибами а они даже не регулярная армия😊...

@seregag1678 Ай бұрын

I would consider Ukrainian conflict a world war honestly. It’s collective West vs collective South. Ukraine just got convinced into using their people to test Russia’s defences on NATOs behalf , but the collective West didn’t realise that during all conflicts Russia first gets punched really hard, learns and comes back with a win. Russian military is much stronger now than it was before the war, and it has large scale combat experience (not chasing flip flop wearing beduins) and it knows how to deal with Western weapons now. The West should have been friends with Russia not enemies. Now the world is going to shit thanks to the decision makers the people of the West have elected.

@najiv8797 Ай бұрын

Totally agree..

@hansolo1571 Ай бұрын

I see this conflict as pointless. West has history of bombing many countries and has accepted illegal separation of Kosovo that belongs to another country. So now we are heading towards ww3 or maybe are in ww3, because Ukraine is bombed and they lost 20% of its territory? War over something that has been accepted as normal by Western standards? That seems detached from reality, and politics and media of both sides are completely opposite from one another. That is dangerous.

@zksstalstawidlo9015 Ай бұрын

True

@Walrus-ji4qz Ай бұрын

You don't understand how democracy works. The elected politicians are only actors who do and say what ever they are told to do and say. The decision making process is controlled by the civil servants.

@MikVision Ай бұрын

Starts saying, it's effective. Then says, is it really that effective??????? XD This Chat GPT Content farm is getting pretty ridiculous lately.

@Nolefan1966 Ай бұрын

It wasn't the first Patriot missile system it was the last Patriot missile system because they're all gone now😂😂

@user-zk2hl9ib9u Ай бұрын

остался один-его вчера передала германия

@non9886 Ай бұрын

exactly! on the top of that patriot is not able to intercept almost any russian missile. maybe drone or aircraft, but russia is using guided bombs far from battle zone and patriots are deep in ukraine defense zone. and they are not able to shoot down migs in 20 km altitute anyway. patriot missiles are quite slow and short range. mig can shoot them down or fly away...

@kingnorlen Ай бұрын

According to rumors, a few more arrived in Kyiv, not sure how many tho, and a couple has already been deleted, lol

@wisdomguy9837 Ай бұрын

Russia has the most advance missile system in the world.

@caloyskienonoyiii7102 Ай бұрын

Superb capabilities!!!

@jayspik6498 Ай бұрын

Accuracy being that if your GPS targeted by Iskander, you’re gonna have a really bad day. That being your last day. Period

@user-hf4kv3jy5w Ай бұрын

From the videos showing the Iskander missile strikes, it is very accurate

@fanaticcoder3320 Ай бұрын

That was a scary strike though. 500kg warhead is little too overkill.

@RandleBeckford Ай бұрын

Do you really want to know how accurate the Iskander is? Putin would say "f*** around and find out.

@davidmann4802 12 күн бұрын

Told the West more than 10 years ago. That fine. You put missiles in all these border countries will make missiles that your defenses cannot stop and our people laughed at him.. All those people hiding in the bunker who are dead. They ain't laughing

@tomraider099 Ай бұрын

Damn, i have never seen a shovel that big can fly. 💀

@lorenzolry Ай бұрын

US fanboys really quiet 😂😂😂

@contentinmotion Ай бұрын

Taking out a patriot defense system WHILE BEING TRANSPORTED ISN'T REALLY AN ACHIEVEMENT

@TacoTomtheBomb Ай бұрын

Taking out 2 Patriot missile systems as the video stated, is not the same as taking out two Patriot launchers. Each system is comprised of up to 8 launchers. So while taking out one quarter of a system's replaceable launchers is good for Russia--especially for propaganda--it is no where near as impactful as destroying 2 Systems. Of course destroying any air defenses is important, especially in this new style of warfare. Had the launchers been properly used as intended, further to the rear, set up ready to fire, instead of sitting there at the front for far too long, the outcome likely would have different. The Iskander seems effective at what it does, but is limited by its range.

@ahinomas2805 Ай бұрын

@@TacoTomtheBomb😂

@Sevastopol91 Ай бұрын

@TacoTomtheBomb It's limited by its range only due to the short and medium range missiles agreement between the US and Russia, which now is off the table btw as far as I know. And which means that the range of newly produced missiles isn't necessarily 400-500 km anymore. But even 400-500 km is pretty much enough for Ukraine war theater. For greater ranges there are bigger better toys in Russia's arsenal, Russia can pretty much reach anything anywhere on this planet, and then some more.

@TacoTomtheBomb Ай бұрын

@@Sevastopol91 Yeah there are a lot of weapons that haven't been used yet, probably best to keep it that way. I for one don't need to see a successful missile strike from half way around the world. Regional defensive missiles are one thing, long range ones will get us all in trouble because sooner or later someone will launch one.

@tyalexander8154 Ай бұрын

The MSM told us that Russia was running out of bullets and rockets and tanks and soldiers and that Ukraine is winning the war I think you call that propaganda 😂

@goulddddable Ай бұрын

Russia needed to fight with shovels because they ran out of bullets and drop washing machines from their planes because they ran out of bombs. Russia has a sense of humor.

@ivanovfarit Ай бұрын

Oh those shovels are terrifying.

@StraussBR Ай бұрын

I remember nato countries saying russia would run out of missiles The Islander particularly seems to be growing in trees and it is so deadly it feels wrong

@lenedfm499 Ай бұрын

nice

@Shahbaz-Ali2k2 Ай бұрын

Design is very awsm

@user-ft2bt9kw7x Ай бұрын

America can’t match it with their old missiles

@hanshuber1875 Ай бұрын

less copium ivan, all your lies dont change the reality. Did you learn nothing from the collapse of the USSR?

@fajarfaranza4280 Ай бұрын

America has prsm Precision strike missile

@YaS-xf5wy Ай бұрын

that sounds like the biggest myth. They spend 900 BILLION for their military. Dont you think they have that ultra advanced stuff already , keeping it for when shit hits the fan? Russia would be a joke to the US if they fought only with ground troops and without nukes

@emjizone Ай бұрын

*400km is too short to hit America from the Russian territory* anyways, except in Alaska. And it that case, the launchers would be *vulnerable to air strikes.* In fact, none of the 36 nations of the American continent, nor the dependencies of extra-continental nations on the continent of America, really felt the need to develop a weapon specifically to counter the Iskander missile, because *they didn't see it as a real threat on their territory.* *The situation in Easter and Central Europe and Asia is very different* and as *diverse* as the economic characteristics of each nation. The case of Ukraine is particularly dire because their budget was a bit small to face such a threat, and this nation never really prepared for war. They had no plans to attack anyone, were trying to have the best international relations possible, and thought that all the other nations around them, including Russia, would had much better things to do than try to destroy them at any cost. Now it's quite late to find clean and safe solutions to this (deterrent, I mean), so I expect to see dirty solutions only.

@mrbigberd Ай бұрын

US missiles are just as good. The problem is that Americans are convinced that nobody else can make decent missiles.

@vkham9944 Ай бұрын

Iskander missile is a military masterpiece. 🤓

@ReeksOfLies Ай бұрын

Well being the Russians were the first to get up into space, first to the moon, first to Venus (multiple times), first to mars (multiple times) etc etc. They have always been more than decent at Rockets, and as such made decent missiles. People like to talk shit about how bad Russians are, and yea sure, we have some better stuff, but we also have 10x the defense budget to do so in the US. *Though,* if there wasn't such bad corruption over there back in Soviet times stealing money that could of help with development even more, who knows how great they could of been over there in theses areas of rocket science and such.

@rgw5991 Ай бұрын

Also putin was shown a video (By his own cabinet) proving that the american moon landing was fake. hahahahaha. He thought it was quite funny. It sounds like a joke but its real. I saw a video of putin being shown the proof.

@user-vd2jl8oh7y Ай бұрын

Ты наверно не осведомлён всё ваше новое оружие не работает хорошо а ракеты ваши в основном 70-80-90 годов пора списывать у вас бюджет в 10 раз больше а толку нет, нет конструкторского задела а с программным обеспечением у нас всё развивается да и в системе РЭБ вы отстали лет на 20 так что не пыли по чём зря...

@user-jz1ft5jp5k Ай бұрын

Вы правы , в США разработками занимаются частные компании для которых главное больше денег урвать из бюджета и у них большое лоби в конгрессе ,а в России оборонная промышленность в основном в руках государства и при меньшем бюджете есть результат.

@user-jz1ft5jp5k Ай бұрын

@@rgw5991да эту тему мусолят уже давно.

@Jess-kg8ge Ай бұрын

if anyone misheard ..its MACH 6-7 not MACH 67

@storyanaksekolah2 Ай бұрын

67 mach could reach the America in minutea 😂

@akinci8892 Ай бұрын

I noticed it too

@storyanaksekolah2 Ай бұрын

Himars has been taken down, but no Iskander or even tornado missile taken down 😂

@EYEWITNESS. Ай бұрын

But but but celenskyy said they intercepted one using a targeted building 🤡🤡🤡

@veritasliberabitvos454 Ай бұрын

Well that Patriot system took it out, by being hit. So, I agree, it is just a matter of perspective.

@hankogle6858 Ай бұрын

I like how people just brush past the fab 3000 glide missiles. They are basically Soviet era missiles. That Russia has an abundance of,with a modern attachment that helps them glide and are extremely accurate. The reason Russia hasn’t used them yet is because they are so destructive. I don’t know if they are comparable to a Moab or something less than nuclear. I know they are powerful

@Samurai___Jack Ай бұрын

Бережем для высокопоставленных и уважаемых гостей с "запада"

@johnnewman1483 Ай бұрын

What u smoking ?😂

@rudociliak6683 Ай бұрын

They are dropping the fab 500 as of recent and that alone is quite a huge bomb

@Wilderness_Tv Ай бұрын

NOW this is pointy! -what? I don't care if it's pointy, the shape of the missile has nothing to do with payload delivery. Are you kidding? This is what I said! You got me executed for that. -I always said it! cit. The dictator.

@ReeksOfLies Ай бұрын

Are you OK there, buddy? Do you need me to send you help? *Nod ur head and blink one time for* _Yes!_

@afhharmse Ай бұрын

@@ReeksOfLies

@VGYugo Ай бұрын

@@ReeksOfLies Aladeen Efawadh (Sacha Baron Cohen) - The Dictator

@iagosevatar4865 Ай бұрын

"I don't want my rocket to look like a dildo!"

@Wilderness_Tv Ай бұрын

@@VGYugo Haffaz aladeen son of Omar aladeen. Efawahad is the double (wink wink) and motzi the little goat.

@rogersmith8480 Ай бұрын

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

@octaviomartinez2355 Ай бұрын

They call it the Sniper

@almasseven5665 Ай бұрын

Lovely Iskander

@usmanladan1515 Ай бұрын

You want to know what we think about the Iskandar missile? We dont want to think or say anything about it. It is a scary weapon.

@simon9070 Ай бұрын

was the destroyed Patriot on the move or deployed? Makes a massive difference.... actually Patriot is about as useful as a dead rat in a tampon factory if it's on the move

@schepvogelk5971 Ай бұрын

I think they followed the convoy, when they parked, they attacked.

@ReShout876 Ай бұрын

that ending caught me off-guard

@remigiopalamini8378 Ай бұрын

Complimenti alla grande federazione Russa Complimenti alla grande Marina Russa Complimenti alla grande Reonatica Russa Complimenti alla grande popolazione Russa un popolo dei migliori con grande capacità e umiltà vera Complimenti al grande Esercito Rosso Z Complimenti al grande Presidente Putin il numero uno su questa terra il Dio del mondo intero Il grande migliore Presidente e unico su questa terra con grande capacità e umiltà vera Unico sulla terra

@ilijaspasojevic7031 Ай бұрын

Iskander is a variant of the name Alexander in cultures such as Iran (Persia), Arabia and others throughout the Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia. In Egypt, its bearers are mostly of Christian (Coptic) descent. Originally referring to Alexander the Great. That's why I think it's fantastic that this excellent rocket has that name. Because it mostly refers to a great military leader, one of the greatest in history, and because its name connects a multitude of cultures that live both in Russia itself and in the regions next to Russia. Perhaps the very thought of naming a weapon is foreign and disgusting to some, since weapons are used to kill, on the other hand, we live in a violent world. And in a violent world, we unfortunately still need weapons. P.S. Well, if that's the case, at least it should have a nice name, if it "must" exist..

@sid31663 Ай бұрын

Damn i dont want to be on the receiving end of it 😮

@johnnewman1483 Ай бұрын

Also it's accuracy has been proven to be one meter😂

@Walrus-ji4qz Ай бұрын

The Patriot systems can not stop the Iskander. Period.

@iktita Ай бұрын

Iskander kick ass

@pierredjoh9941 Ай бұрын

Magnifique

@ffkll8087 Ай бұрын

i think it's highly accurate,saw a video where two uragan mlrs in kharkiv near a mall which hit by iskander..

@yie1918 Ай бұрын

☠️🔥☠️ uuraa uuuuraaaa

@ivotomicic4471 Ай бұрын

korrekt, ein paar auf Berlin !.

@kadyrov3218 Ай бұрын

We love the Iskander

@jurajkovacik2430 Ай бұрын

but how about difference to kindzal?

@calanbennett6817 Ай бұрын

The Iskander 9M723 / 9M729 missiles are only used for targets from 200 to 500kms due to its cost and scarcity (even in 2024, only 38units/month are produced). The most heavily used missiles are the smaller M542 and M544 both only 300mm diameter but use the same guidance system as 9M7 series with range of only 70-220kms. Current production is around 120 units of M5 series per month. This is why Ukraine is running low on surface to air missiles. NATO is not keeping up with Russia in supply of Patriot type missiles. Ukraine will soon have huge losses.

@gastonsaintpaul5590 Ай бұрын

Very effective & deadly piece weapon.

@globalterroil3208 Ай бұрын

Well written script. Congrats.

@zksstalstawidlo9015 Ай бұрын

Nice

@nandanap9225 Ай бұрын

They better make mockups of these weapons and up its range.

@paulevans4905 Ай бұрын

Getting more accurate every day with field testing.

@sidiray9269 Ай бұрын

Western propaganda media told us all that Russia did not have any missile left fore years and they still delusional 😊😂😂😂😂😂 Good luck nato

@hansolo1571 Ай бұрын

As long as it is Ukranians testing that theory there is no harm for them to say such things.

@rockval.1061 Ай бұрын

Esta arma sera el terror de la OTAN 😅😂😂 pobres franceses.

@GraditelMacedonia Ай бұрын

You forgot Tocka - U.

@wallingnaga6563 Ай бұрын

Tocka-U is the older missile system

@user-zk2hl9ib9u Ай бұрын

точка старая система

@derraincorporation5586 Ай бұрын

@@wallingnaga6563now it is Tos M-2

@wallingnaga6563 Ай бұрын

@@derraincorporation5586 TOS is a different system mate!!

@muhammadjijosahaidi1331 19 күн бұрын

Attack on train station at Kramatorsk done by the Ukraine, because Ukraine still use Tochka-U missile system...

@user-sf6bq2gn4h Ай бұрын

Russia with the best weapons on planet earth.

@itsmoot2879 Ай бұрын

how would you know, being a keyboard know-it-all. there are tons of weapons that you have no idea the usa owns

@saleemkirmani5583 Ай бұрын

If it has strong counter electronic jamming and MARV capability, then it can be effective, especially if it can be used at night and in adverse weather conditions. It's hard to know how good it is.

@user-kf9ve2nb5m Ай бұрын

Можешь спросить у польских военных которых вчера накрыли в Харькове. Конечно у тех кто остался жив.

@user-zk2hl9ib9u Ай бұрын

без разницы-их как-раз ночью и запускают

@najiv8797 Ай бұрын

Its not that hard... After this conflict ended and if you saw many countries want to buy these big shovels.. That shit legit. Tho I doubt Russia will mass prodice it for other nations.

@cokrlicix Ай бұрын

It's not true that those Patriots were the first ones taken out. Last year in Kiev first Patriot was taken out with a Kinzhal missile, someone recorded a viral video that night of 32 Patriot missiles being fired in 30 seconds.

@gino3286 Ай бұрын

a monthly production of 30 units is not that much i wonder if there is a shortage of some components that is slowing down production

@edwardcarberry1095 Ай бұрын

It is thus obvious then not to park any equipment near enough that two can be destroyed.

@chiribimchiribom6864 Ай бұрын

You smart preffered to avoid a fact that Isander missiles also can be intercepted, although it is a not simple task, of course.

@ciumtangan4935 Ай бұрын

..whoaao..😲😲

@waltertowery3234 Ай бұрын

It's a sound weapon system

@Happy-be8hh Ай бұрын

Does the video of top 5 Russia air defense is disappeared?

@vinnievalentine421 Ай бұрын

Macron is waiting for one

@JoseLopez-mc7kw Ай бұрын

potent iskader communincation intellegence quest but one too intellently complicate it

@1rumplestiltskin1 Ай бұрын

the Americans have lost at least 4 PATRIOT SYSTEMS, one of which was given to the UKEs from Sweden at America's instructions.

@pernykvist3442 Ай бұрын

Their is no susch thing as a "Tactical" nukes.

@Slavov_Ukraini 26 күн бұрын

Bc in the Soviet era they had a different fighting concept, ineffective compared to nowadays western doctrine. The point is:they still use old weapons and tactics.

@deshappriyangawijeratne1273 Ай бұрын

this missile can will make last minit near target engine off and transfer glid bomb then can save missile defence syestem

@moderate1452 Ай бұрын

lol - Iskander does not comply with current ESG and DEI guidelines - therefore it is superb.

@mikei7498 Ай бұрын

Beltway battery

@doctorjivago5081 Ай бұрын

Красавица!

@tontosilver6578 Ай бұрын

Russia 🇷🇺 💪🏻

@h3w45 Ай бұрын

Flying shovels

@danpetrescu4915 Ай бұрын

accuracy . then why exist military and official building in kiev ? and why block of flats whit CIVILIAN ar hit?

@rajkumar-qf3fk Ай бұрын

1 meter

@joni8090 Ай бұрын

Bravo Ruussiiaa 🇷🇺 🎖️ 🇷🇺 UUURRRAA 🙏

@tamonniangti2468 Ай бұрын

Why the Russian not used brahmos missili.

@ganie1961 Ай бұрын

It is not scary, needs to be more pointy

@clippers4me Ай бұрын

Here is the thing. I don't care how powerful or destructive any missiles are but the main thing is, can it be shot down. There's no point in having missiles if they can be intercepted and shot down. This should be a priority in every missile development.

@macpj12j Ай бұрын

isklander have not been intercept in the entire war it been pentrating partroits , arrow and other air defenses it can be intercepted but its hard

@samsochi2258 Ай бұрын

And new: Iskander K

@sickotwist9802 Ай бұрын

My thoughts Russia winning competition of development and deployment not to mention production also! I did mention! Ofcourse It's never-ending competition!

@davidrickwood5588 Ай бұрын

Where are the T14 Armata wonder tanks??

@dcahodl Ай бұрын

They're are still being tested with the latest update that the engine block issues have been resolved. I wouldn't be surprised if we get to see some limited deployment of them in this conflict.

@shack3609 Ай бұрын

Bye bye america patric square pants system 😂😂😂😂😂

@ziauddin7948 Ай бұрын

if Russia proceeds to advance its Iskandar missile technology & increase its target distance to 10,000 Km then Russia will possess capability to strike at US , UK , France & Germany military tragets # 🇵🇰

@user-sh8vv4fj8w Ай бұрын

Нет необходимости, посмотрите ракету Сармат Sarmat. 18 000 km

@mikedeutsch7723 Ай бұрын

Russia has had ICBMS for decades. They've had that technology for a long time.

@user-bd7gv4ff2q Ай бұрын

Я вам открою секрет 😁 посмотрите в ютубе Буревестник ракета она вас сильно удивит 😁 у неё нету дальности она расчитана на месяцы полётов у неё ядерный двигатель

@Sevastopol91 Ай бұрын

Lol, Russian Sarmat missile has a 18,000+ km range. When was the last time your brain got updated?