Shame on you, KZfaq, for taking so long to recommend this video and channel to me. Excellent content. I'll definitely watch some of your older videos next.

This has rapidly become my favourite plane in the sim, especially in VR. No GPS, just radios and the sky4sim moving map with the airplane not showing, navigating by radio beacons and roads / rivers etc. It's not designed to fly so high that you can't enjoy the scenery and at the same time it's fast enough to get me from A to B at a reasonable pace. I forgot to turn the alternators on last night (in VR I don't hide the yoke so the battery and alt switches are normally out of sight out of mind) and nearly kakked myself when the avionics died 15 mins into the flight :)

awsome review man never shy away from making them long as some creators might. hopefully more ga planes will come out as there is definetly a huge market for them, same as these study level airliners

One of the best reviewer in flight sim community! Please do keep making amazing content!

I was so happy to see this plane appear in MSFS as it brings back so many memories of the three years I worked at an FBO at my hometown airport after I got out of the Air Force. As we were a Cessna dealer, I got to take a lot of free rides in the 310. The feature of letting it get dirty then washing it makes me laugh, as I can attest that they did get grimy. I spent many a free moment at work degreasing the undersides of these beautiful planes.

Awesome video! It was great to see you go through the whole list of tests. Having the two of you together in the virtual cockpit really brought me back to flight school haha, what a kick. I'll definitely have to pick this one up.

Best review video I have seen. Excellent job with Nathan & yourself. Doing the checklists & controlling the plane. All I can say is Thank You & Happy flying, Captain. Slainte

I love this aircraft, because I flew one back and forth between Ft. Lauderdale and Boston several times in the early 80's. And the first A/C so far to work to A2A standards (that I loved in FSX), where everything works, including wear and tear and maintenance. Going to become my favorite.

From the manual about Individualization :-) way cooler than you think. "No aircraft you’ll ever fly is perfect unless it’s just come from the factory, and even then it’s unlikely everything is perfect. Most pilots know that every airplane is a little different from another even of the same make, model, and year. Since the last new 310R left the factory in 1981, we can be sure that applies here even more than usual. All have been heavily modified, repaired, and even rebuilt. We offer you this option to “individualize” each and every 310R in your hangar. By this, we don’t mean we change the look of the airplane - besides the different paints, the visual model is the same. Nor do we change the cockpit environment - except for the avionics suite options, they all have the same layout and controls. What we mean is that we randomly set the age and condition of the hundreds of components that make up the aircraft. On a certain airplane , the left engine pump might be starting to go bad, one of the gear lights might be close to burning out, or perhaps the right mag on the right engine is a little weak. And so on - the possibilities are almost endless. Each aircraft you choose to individualize will be set up a different way. We won’t hand you a broken airplane; every system will be operational. But if you are the owner (see above) and you choose to individualize, your first stop should be the maintenance hangar for an inspection. There, you’ll be able to see the condition of the major components visually. (For details on how to do this, consult the “Status” page below.) Individualization is permanent, so the option is off by default for each airplane. Once you choose it, the individualization happens instantly and can’t be un-done, and likewise a new individualization can’t be done. Clicking the option back off won’t do it. (You can, however, use the Status page to overhaul the entire airplane and turn off “Wear and Tear” (below) and you’ll be restored to a perfect sim plane that won’t change.)"

Fantastic video ! The bottom check box on the EFB passenger loading screen ('hide avatars') removes the models of the people but leaves the weight there - great if you want a MTOW plane but don't like looking at the passengers.

My multiengine and multiengine instructor were done in the 310 (30 hours of flight training) and I built the 310R at the Cessna plant in Wichita, KS. until leaving in 1978 to work full time as an instructor. I normally climb out at Vyse. If you have an engine failure on takeoff you MUST retract the landing lights!

The stock TBM 930 has animated deicing boots!

Thank you very much. I love your reviews, please keep doing them :)

Thank you very much for the great review. I am currently in the process of familiarizing myself with the C310r. Your video helps me a lot. You asked if there were previously airplanes that could be washed. I know the Diamond Katana DA-20 100 4X for FSX. There was washing and many other features ten years ago. I flew with her enthusiastically until"2020". If you like you can check the plane out bei Aerosoft. The Milviz 310 has been reborn in MSFS, I wish the same for the DA-20.Best regards

Fantastic review

Really nice review and very informative. interesting having the opinion of someone that owns it too

At 47:47 you found the value of pre-flight checklists! It might have been a very short flight if you left the AP on with elevator trim full-forward on takeoff. :D I bought the MilViz 310R on release day and still love it.

love the content

I really enjoyed this review. You touched on every aspect that I was curious of and then some. I've always thought the Cessna 310 was a really cool airplane and I'm glad to see that such a detailed version of it is available in MSFS. However, I think you're right about the price of it. After seeing your review I'm sure I'll be purchasing it at some point, but I hope this doesn't start a "justification" of higher prices simply because of a few "unique features" on otherwise normal GA aircraft. If the 310 were offered by Carenado (for example) with great looks and reasonable flight handling for ten bucks less, I'd certainly consider it. I don't care much for having to worry about a breaker popping, etc... most of the time I just want to relax and enjoy flying the airplane. Perhaps those "extra realism features" could be offered as a reasonably priced addon package for those who want it?

All fine, thanks for the video. However I cannot hear or understand nothing of what the second guy is saying :P

Got interested if flying watching Sky King on TV, when I was a teenager. He flew a C 310.

The KAP140 Mod fixes the AP issues.

Your voice was clear as a bell but I had difficulty hearing most of what Nathan was saying. Still loved the video though, and do look forward to better production with the next one.

Please provide your bindings for honeycomb, thank you ☺️ amazing video, tons of information

What a fantastic video. Thank you for taking the time to make this. May I ask if you have had any issues with the heading knob on the Garmin G5? I know you prefer the analog gauges but just curious. It’s sensitivity is so low it takes 50 swipes to get the correct heading dialed. Analog seems to work just fine for me however.

Milviz don´t update this plane since release. Actually a big update Service Pack 1 is in final beta, would be very nice a new review with this update, that solve many things, also the touchdown when landing. Nice channel!

Looking closely at this one. Obviously the A2A Comanche is everyone’s big deal at the moment, but the mph airspeed and weird panel layout aren’t doing it for me. I just spent a crapload on Rod Machado’s IFR ground school, and need a reasonably fast plane with an utterly standard panel to learn that, uh, stuff. Loved the old Milviz 260, and have always considered the 310R the most beautiful light GA twin ever designed, so, yeah… pull up the PayPal!

Excellent video, well worth the watch. So based on the landing here and what you put it through, are two-engine planes technically safer, in case of engine failure?

Great review thanks. I all ready have the 414 chancellor, on xbox and as this has just come out do you think it's worth having alongside as its quite expensive!! Thanks

I too enjoyed the surprise murder attempt of the 1940s autopilot. If I could have my way, I would rather use the G1000 autopilot.

I love this plane in VR! I'd love to map the primers to hardware switches. I can only map the starters but no luck with the primers (even with FSUIPC 7). Any ideas ?

What is the best: Milviz 310R or Flightsimware 414A Chancelor?

Which is more realistic, Cessna 310 or 414?

I have absolutely no luck with this airplane. There is something I miss I can´t get above 100 knots on it and that is just enough to keep 250 feet above sea level with help of ground effect. Not sure what is going on no ap, auto mixture and throttle lever always show 100 %. prop fully forward too. also on start up it has crazy torque must use 70 % right rudder to somewhat keep it straight.

Simply Luv this twin and yes the auto pilot is rubbish I know not Milwiz fault. I realy realy like this twin but in real would never fly a real one with its instability etc. the only odd aircrafts I ever flown in real life were the Piper Tomahawk and a V35 . Normal aircraft were The Piper Warrior and Cessna 172 or just say cessna etc

Can't hear real 310 well enough to make it listenable 4 me