😂😂😂

They’re working overtime 😂😂😂

What a deadbeat did to someone else, they will also do to you.

All the way most american women are whacked lmao

It's on KZfaq but I can't remember which channel. Likely either OSG or Meg.

@@PFMediaServicesdo you happen to know what it’s called?

The server my first divorce attorney used sucked azz. My ex had a precise work and day off schedule that never changed in 16 yrs. Server charged for every attempt. I told the attorney I will serve him. No no don't do that. For other reasons I fired first attorney and hired a competent one who's server had 99% success rate. First attempt was successfull

@@aliciacarstensen7904you cannot serve papers yourself. In California, nobody can self serve, but a friend may, as long as they're not a party to the matter.

How's about a fez?

… for the love of God, add a Fez and Ascott too !

@@stillnocouch yes! Lol!

Count me in! I so agree with that!😂

Debbie has cuter 🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐 goats

Or a black robe, lol.

Yeah, they are on to that one by now...

That wouldn't work on the self-check out in my country. Weight is measured.

​@Steelmage99 plenty of places in the US do that, as well.

@@dormiebasne3578 Cool. :)

I'm laughing about the kool-aid bar code trick, I thought of that 15-20 years ago when self check out became a thing, first began to see them, to extrapolate, my idea was to fold it small, exposing just the bar code pressed into your palm, a sleight of hand so to speak, never did it but I consider the idea a real been there done that kind of thing, move on or stop, kids today, so dumb....

I've noticed this Judge lets slimy tenants get their way OFTEN

Judge Middleton is continually soft on tenants and I can no longer watch those cases in his court. You can't pay me to be a landlord.

But who would've had the biggest aneurysm, Manning or Bryant? 🤔

I was looking in the comments to see if anyone else looked him up! I almost wish I hadn’t . So disturbing!

Pedoph😢le my guess

I caption videos and often start with auto-generated ones. Though more advanced than what yt uses, errors like this are a common - and delightfully funny - occurrence. Ah, technology....

Yes! It's a teaching moment for us non lawyers! Especially when it comes to sovereign citizens!🙄

I agree. I've always wanted to know more about law, and this is really fun and informative.

Congratulations! That is awesome

Thank you, Mike. I do appreciate that. And I really adore your channel. It's what I look forward to, every day. I mean that.🤗🤗🤗🤗

Many, many middle class families own rental properties. It's unfair to have bias against owners as a matter of principle.

I worked at a pediatric dental office in an upscale area, and some of the wildest kiddos (=coloring on the walls and tables) belonged to rich people who refused to control them. Those with modest means, in general, were more thoughtful.

exactly. and for good reason. i’ve defended more than a few tenants with sloppy landlords/slumlords. I don’t feel any sympathy for a landlord not doing what they’re supposed to do procedurally. also, since when would it ever be enough to say the tenant is “killing the vibe” of the neighborhood to terminate a tenancy? goofy ass take from mike.

Separate motion/law suit...

Usually not worth the litigation costs, as well...She sues, and they counter sue for damages=Only the attorneys profit.

because he’s sloppier than her. she never filed for an eviction *due to nonpayment* - just eviction due to some other lease violations (vague allegation of property damage). there are specific procedures you absolutely have to follow to do that. she didn’t do it. she then had months to either amend or refile, but sat on it. she had a lawyer who could have also amended or refiled, but also sat on it.

Possibly covered by a covid eviction moratorium.

Because they're not being evicted for not paying the rent, they're being evicted for breach of the tenancy agreement, which will include a term like "Do not cause a nuisance to other residents". The landlord will be able to bring a separate action to recover the unpaid rent and any damage to the trailer after they're evicted, but this action is just to get them out.

Our justice system at work

Rent amnesty in many states due to covd...

she didn’t file to evict them for nonpayment of rent. that’s on the landlord. too bad so sad. she could have amended her action months ago to make it include nonpayment but she didn’t. that’s on her and I don’t feel remotely sorry for her.

That seems so childish, not your opinion, the law in general. I dont claim to know the first thing about all the legalities. But I do like to feel that I know a thing or two about commonsense. Imagine it with another type of property. Like I loan you my spare car for a few months and when it's time to return it, I'm shit out of luck cause you just want to keep it and have no respect for the fact that I worked hard and earned it. That's when the law fails and people are forced to take other actions that may seem mean and illegal .. but sometimes the law forces your hand to do certain things. And I'm sure there are people that don't agree with that either😆 I guess that's the great thing about everyone being able to share there opinions, as long as you don't act on them

@@brayjill but that’s not at all the same. primarily, the right to have shelter is a necessity, having a car is not (even if it’s extremely burdensome to get around without one). that’s why the law around tenant rights is the way it is, and has requirements beyond straight contract law. this is also something landlords *know* before they start lamdlording. regardless, your comparison is not an appropriate one. for one, there is typically no court process necessary to repo a car. by the terms of most financing contracts, you don’t have the sole property interest in the car. the finance company effectively owns it (i’m being overly simplistic, but that’s the crux of it) and automatically has a right to repo it if the car owner defaults. conversely, landlord/tenant law forbids a similar situation with eviction, and you can’t contract around it. you *have to* go through the courts to recoup rental property unless the tenant voluntarily agrees to leave. more importantly, I didn’t say the landlord has no recourse for nonpayment. they absolutely do. they just need to comply with the procedural requirements. there are distinctions between eviction proceedings for nonpayment of rent and eviction proceedings for other lease violations. this landlord did not even remotely come close to complying with those procedures. if they wanted to proceed on the nonpayment basis, which would have been an easier route, they could have included that in their filing. they could have amended this one or just re-filed. instead, they let this case set for 4-5 months without doing that. instead, they proceeded in other lease violations. they can’t just tack on the nonpayment issue when it’s time for the evidentiary hearing. they also need to plead their lease violation with particularity and come to court with sufficient proof of violation. they failed to do that as well. I don’t feel sorry for landlords. they are aware that they have certain duties as landlords that may feel lopsided compared to tenant obligations. i’m glad those obligations exist and are appropriately enforced.

I know what Mike is saying but Judge is right. She has no proof. If it’s so bad, where’s the proof? I’m not saying the tenants are angels but she’s just rubbing me the wrong way.

@@lokisdottir4293 right? no photos or videos? no repair estimates? come on. that’s ridiculous.

if i’m the judge, i’m dismissing the case outright and saying they can refile correctly if they want to use the court to get these people out. then if tenant moves out by the end of the month anyway, it’s effectively moot. also, he can’t do anything about nonpayment of rent since that was never even before the court.

@@jilliansmaniotto2326 Much better than my judgment! 😜

@@lokisdottir4293 😂 it’s just crazy. i’ve seen this process a ton and have defended tenants against shady-ass landlords. this woman triggered my shady landlord spidey senses. like come on - you really thought you wouldn’t have to *prove* the damage to show the material breach? come on.

He explains just enough to understand the context and what most people might gloss over, explains why it could be significant

@@DunsfordFarnsworth I agree. Mike is a breathe of fresh air in a divided nation. Stay you Mike.