MJJC Pro Foam Cannon VS MJJC S 3.0 Foam Cannon!! There Is A Difference For Me!!

Рет қаралды 6,216

5 ай бұрын

In this video, I share my comparison between the new MJJC S 3.0 and the MJJC Pro foam cannons. MJJC Foam Cannon S V3.0 is newly released.The price, performance, and features of that foam cannon make it the best value in my opinion. But MJJC just launched a new Foam Cannon... The MJJC S v3.0. The S line actually sits one tier below the Pro line, but with some pretty cool new features and an awesome redesign i wanted to put these two head to head and see how they compare. Equipped with Thicker Snow Foam Technology, it makes an even thicker, creamy foam like shaving foam.
1/4 Inch Quick Connector Adapter included. Can be attached to "Karcher PS Series" that adopts 1/4 Inch Quick Connect. (K1700, K1700 Cube, K1800PS, K1800PS Cube, K1900PS, K2100PS, K2300PS) Cannot be connected to Karcher K2, K3, K4, K5, or K7.
MJJC S 3.0 Foam Cannon...www.amazon.com/s?k=MJJC+Foam+...
Operating pressure range: 1300 psi to 3600 psi; please use different orifice nozzles depending on the pressure performance of the high-pressure cleaner. (The higher the pressure, the larger diameter orifice nozzle required.) 1.25mm orifice nozzle (1600-2200psi) is pre-connected to the main body.
If the pressure of the high-pressure cleaner is 1300-1600 psi, replace the nozzle with the included 1.1 mm orifice nozzle. If using with the high-pressure cleaner at 2200 psi or higher, replace with a 1.35mm or larger orifice nozzle (sold separately).
Follow The Apex Detail Support Group on Face Book for any questions, concerns or if you are in need of general detailing knowledge whatsoever!! / 946245059134747
Follow Apex Detail on INSTAGRAM for more exciting projects!!
/ apexautodetail
www.apexautosurfaceprotection...
Apex Detail Support Group (FaceBook) / 9462450
#foamcannon #mjjcfoamlance #autodetailing

Пікірлер: 79

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

Do you use a foam cannon? Which is your favorite?

@Carlos.Rivera 5 ай бұрын

Griots Brilliant foam cannon. It come 1.1 orifice installed and works well with cheap electric pressure washers. Big mouth so less mess adding chemicals and stainless steel ball in the straw.

@richardseem7948 5 ай бұрын

Tri nova and pro..

@dtna 5 ай бұрын

I don't know why they went with the narrow base. I don't like the idea of the bottle being less stable.

@240sxdriver 5 ай бұрын

MJJC 3.0 blows away my old MTM foam cannon. Also easier on the ears compared to some cheap foam cannons with their higher pitched induction noises. The aeration is a noticeable difference like you've experienced in the video so I can turn down the mixture knob a bit up top. Please try out the original orifice as well!

@UndressforAndres 5 ай бұрын

@@Carlos.Riverasame liked it better than mjjc and mtm it’s stout

@Jayb21724 5 ай бұрын

Appreciate the time for another great video! Keep those comparisons going!

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

Thanks, will do!

@archiepezek 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for the comparison Brian. I have the MJJC V2.0 and I love it. I, like you, want my foam to move down the panel and take the dirt with it. Also, the older version has a wider base which I prefer.

@gnawty4662 3 ай бұрын

The shop is looking BEAUTIFUL! What a turn around 👏

@SaddyTaz 5 ай бұрын

Thanks Brian for another great video. I got mine a month ago but due to the cold weather here in New York, I haven't got a chance to foam my car with it yet. Can't wait any longer!

@millerdetailing4176 5 ай бұрын

Great video review and comparison Brian, thank you.

@limoman4125 5 ай бұрын

My cannon is cheap one!! I said i will up grade when it starts failing. So far so good. And it's always a pleasure spending time with u also!!

@ShineYourLightDetailing 5 ай бұрын

Excellent comparison Brian, I have the PRO V2 and love it. 👍🏼👍🏼

@chriskiefer5132 5 ай бұрын

Love these informative videos. Ty.

@coreymerritt7742 5 ай бұрын

I have the version 2 pro been working great love the foam thanks Brian

@DetailsNMe 5 ай бұрын

I use the MJJC Pro 2 with my active 2.0 and together they feel like Gods gift 🎁….I have yet to try the version 3; but until my Pro 2 falls part…I’m completely satisfied with the level of foam I obtain with my unit 😊 great video!! And gorgeous vehicles!!!

@bhcamaro2002 5 ай бұрын

Ive had the 2.0 for 2 years it still works great!

@richardseem7948 5 ай бұрын

Awesome video and product review and comparison good friend

@wescat2 5 ай бұрын

You could definitely tell a difference. I too like the runnier foam. That is the perfect consistency for an alkaline pre-wash.

@kennythomsonjr5553 5 ай бұрын

They both look great. Can't go wrong with either

@bryanjohnson665 5 ай бұрын

My guess is if both were brand new, they'd be nealry identical. The older model likely has some clogging or deposits on the screen and filter based on the amount of usage. I'd say you can't go wrong with either. Got my pro a few years ago for $55.

@icurt06 5 ай бұрын

I use an Armour All foam cannon. I had to put thread tape on the cup to stop it from falling apart when using it. Not much foam more of a runny soap that runs down the vehicle. The MJJJC would be a nice upgrade! Thanks for the video

@micd9256 5 ай бұрын

I use the MJJC pro regularly. Had to replace the metal screens and foam piece after about 2 years and it’s back to new. Planning to try the 3.

@steveclark2426 5 ай бұрын

I just got the MJJC 3 and I have vey hard water. I find I have to use slot of soap. So far armour detail has given me the best results with less foam. I appreciate the solid build and clear bottle of the 3.

@carlosorengo1809 5 ай бұрын

Awsome video, I will use, for the first foaming the PRO with the runny foam first to have the dirt run down first and then when I am ready for the contact wash I will use the new version because you will have more time before the foam dissipate.

@bigd9848 5 ай бұрын

Good comparison Brian 👊🏼You can get a water filter system for the shop they run about $350 if you have water that is not too good. I have one it is very good to have.Thanks again for the video 👊🏼💎

@johngriffiths3394 5 ай бұрын

I use the MJJC Pro 2 on an Ava Smart pressure washer P60 for home use- no complaints. Bilt Hamber Touch-less snow foam, just the best on earth for dirt removal. (Your Lambo is gorgeous.)

@dougmasters3875 5 ай бұрын

I have the S 3.0 purely because it was a little cheaper than the Pro. I've been super happy with it compared to the el cheapo Amazon lances. I learned two things in this video: a) I needed to change the jet, b) the marks on laundry detergent cups are ounces.

@elithegreat6463 5 ай бұрын

The Shop Manager made a surprise inspection , you're lucky it came out well. 😋

@middlegaautomotivedetailin1350 5 ай бұрын

I love the V3. I use it about 10 times a week!

@Enthusiast_detailing 5 ай бұрын

I’ve been eying those Mjjc they seem like some of the best foam cannons

@wademiyataki9221 5 ай бұрын

Looks like the Shop Manager is ready to go home.😁

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

She certainly was!

@ddautodetailing 5 ай бұрын

I have both foam cannons, and each are great. I do need to get a new filter for one of them!

@60trickpa 5 ай бұрын

I like the old MJJC Pro foam gun with the runnier foam it is what I use. The attachment on the 3. is nice idea

@paulreichelt1259 5 ай бұрын

Check out that gorgeous Poison Ivy HSV Commodore in the background.

@tracyenglish9998 5 ай бұрын

The new foam cannon has a newer screen in it, that may be why it's a little thicker foam

@davidboyce6427 5 ай бұрын

👀What. You got an Aussie car! So cool Holden a GM collaboration right? So cool.

@paulreichelt1259 5 ай бұрын

If you zoom in it still looks right hand drive?..

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

This is a right hand drive imported from Aus.

@kidservant 5 ай бұрын

Question - I enjoy detailing my black, GMC Yukon every 1.5 - 2 weeks. I really liked Turtle wax, "Max Wax" followed with "Flex Wax". Beautiful depth and gloss. I recently found out about the dangers of graphene oxide in the body, its really bad, and I will no longer be using or purchasing graphene products. Im pretty focused on Ceramic products now. Because I detail so often, I dont need a super long lasting product, but I do want depth, shine, protection and ease of use. Do you have some suggestions to replace Max Wax & Flex Wax that doesnt have graphene? Thank for your input!

@c.javier1203 2 ай бұрын

Nice! Just ordered my 3.0 … don’t have a Lambo, but looking forward to using it on my G80 M3. Also, what wheels are those?

@dthomson409 5 ай бұрын

Oh my god a Holden wagon!

@Carlos.Rivera 5 ай бұрын

Shop looks promising 👌

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

It is slowly getting there.

@kimnewling5728 5 ай бұрын

Looks great!

@JeepJL 5 ай бұрын

I’d be willing to bet if you put new metal and fiber filters into the Pro V2 the performance between the two would have been identical. Conversely, after using the S V3.0 for some time, I bet you’d get the exact same results as your current Pro V2.

@swoldierjan5332 Ай бұрын

The filter is just newer on the S line that’s why it’s producing a thicker foam. If both were new, they’d produce the same quality foam.

@nyernga 5 ай бұрын

Do both cannons have the same size orifice?

@jimflanagan6029 5 ай бұрын

Nice Lamborghini Brian 👍 NJ fan.

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

Right on!

@AntEloftheHouseofEl 5 ай бұрын

Another good video Brian. What I'm seeing appears to be aeration. The S appears to be lighter and more airy than the Pro. When was the last time you descaled or changed the gauze filter? I have water harder than Rocky Balboa and I notice a HUGE difference when I descale my cannon. Like night and day difference.

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

It is truly way overdue.

@AntEloftheHouseofEl 5 ай бұрын

@@apexdetail85 guess that's it then! Do wish they'd redesign so you don't need to do a total strip down to get to the gauze. Thats the one major flaw I've found with every cannon I've seen.

@Chris-wb7ni 5 ай бұрын

I use an MTM. Which do you prefer Brian

@norcalspitshine6406 5 ай бұрын

Nice

@motiOn732 5 ай бұрын

Orifice size is based on flow, not pressure

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

Does it not take pressure to get the water to flow through the orifice?:)

@motiOn732 5 ай бұрын

@@apexdetail85 I'm not an expert in this but from what I understand, if you have a high flow machine (which it sounds like you do) with a small orifice, you're going to be pushing more water through a smaller hole which will strain the pump.

@dvlop0018 5 ай бұрын

I still have a soft heart for that Lamborghini. Foam canon, original seems to spread nicer. That glossy paint is just awesome.

@KotakaSRT 2 ай бұрын

which one do you preffer?

@markbenno 5 ай бұрын

Been considering these lances for some time but how do you recommend cleaning them out? Also what methods do you use on the fabric roof too maintain?

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

Descale them regularly with CLR. I use Angelwax Excelsior for soft tops.

@markbenno 5 ай бұрын

@@apexdetail85 right ok and do you seal them with anything like fabsil?

@MNpicker 5 ай бұрын

I see foam... thats the objective 😎👌

@johnp6987 5 ай бұрын

The S line is more foamy. I wonder if you would need to work out a new PIR with a cannon upgrade and I have the Pro one but only use it around once a month so it will last for ages even with hard water😄

@Kiki099 5 ай бұрын

I own both I use the 3.0 more the only thing I didn't like about the 3.0 is that it leaks if it's on it's side or upside down.

@unacarafea567 2 ай бұрын

Great..... A new foam cannon works better than an old one with corroding parts. I think I guessed that before the start of the video LOL.....

@daveparker8019 3 күн бұрын

At the end of the day, which is your go to

@kennythomsonjr5553 5 ай бұрын

The new one seems to make much thicker, better quality foam

@kimnewling5728 5 ай бұрын

I have an MTM PF22 cannon. Thick foam looks cool, but I like mine with foam of a lower viscosity. I've seen videos with these 2 cannons before, but your video is more fun. When you say cannon clugs up, what actually clogs up? Is it fixable? Thanks, Brian.

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

I need to descale it...change screens.

@weSteh 5 ай бұрын

Is the Holden owner an Aussie Brian?

@apexdetail85 5 ай бұрын

Not that I know of....bought it from one however.

@richardseem7948 5 ай бұрын

Imo the pro works better.like you stated pro is runny and thats my perferd method

@tylerfj24 2 ай бұрын

ill bet you had extremely old filters in the PRO vs the brand New S model..

@1stfrompuertorico568 5 ай бұрын

First!!!!

@nypigskin 4 ай бұрын

So, this was a waste of time. You compared an old clogged up cannon to a new one. The water to soap ratio is not calibrated with the knob on top of the guns. These are pretty much the same guns with different bottles.