Multiple 3-3-5 Blitzes and Coverages

Рет қаралды 35,055

Coach Mac

Күн бұрын

Changing Coverages Behind Blitzes and Changing Blitz Tracks

Пікірлер: 28

@jamesdignan3016 7 жыл бұрын

Coach Mac best football coach on KZfaq!

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

Appreciate it

@evanscharf2284 7 жыл бұрын

He is pretty good on KZfaq!

@Mr_Domez 7 жыл бұрын

Hey Coach! Really like your videos and love what you're doing. Been watching football for many years but only over the past two years or so I've gotten into the X's and O's stuff. Watched many of your vids and they're really helpfull, I've learned so much watching those. Keep them coming! Greetings from Switzerland!

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

Thank You

@JuanMartinez-dx3wc 6 жыл бұрын

Great videos Coach Mac! I like the 3-3-5 and the 4-2-5! Which one would you prefer as the base defense from the two?

@CoachMac 6 жыл бұрын

425 is easier to coach but 3-3 presents more problems for offense's

@colonelrobertsjr.7882 6 жыл бұрын

NatarisX I've worked with both defenses and they're both good my only problem with the 3-3-5 was we rarely could find a NT who could command multiple blockers for our second level defenders to get a good run fit. So we used the 4-2-5 as our base D and kept our 3-3-5 for pass rushing personnel.

@manuelimort7343 5 жыл бұрын

Hey Coach. I plan on implementing the 30 stack next year. I will also go with 5 dbs and I plan on using the rip/Liz stuff. The problem is i have to simplify it due to the amount of time I can spend with my players. Do you have any suggestions? I also plan to use your palms concept and an Tampa 2 with all three safeties.

@CHAD_84 6 жыл бұрын

Coach Mac! Great video. at the 26:00 you talk about the backside safety cutting the #4 if he goes to the trips side. By any chance, would you recommend just rolling the coverage? By doing that the Backside/Right Safety becomes your deep middle. Looking forward to your feedback.

@CoachMac 6 жыл бұрын

Rolling coverage is one of my trips checks.

@davidbange 7 жыл бұрын

Coach Mac are there any videos on attacking the 3-3?

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

I don't have any in particular.

@dalemyers9045 7 жыл бұрын

Coach Mac, I remember you mentioned that you were considering the merits of being just a cover 3, Man free and zero team vs playing the split field coverage. What was your determining factor in continuing the split field coverage? I ask because I've had pretty good success being cover 3 and man, but I do like some of the split field stuff and have been considering dabbling or jumping head first in it, but keep falling back to what I know. Good job on the videos.

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

Multiple vs various formations

@josephmiller38 3 жыл бұрын

How do you play the goal line defense? How many lineman, linebackers, defensive backs?

@CoachMac 3 жыл бұрын

Usually some form of 4-4 or 5-4 personnel group

@leonardsementi408 7 жыл бұрын

Coach is there any video on trips or Pro to the boundary. When you call strength on the hash is it always wide side and if so what is the adjustment in 3-3-5 with trips or pro to the boundary.

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

I dont set my FS to the field so i can call strength to boundary if needed

@Ironmonk036 7 жыл бұрын

Are you using 5 linebackers to make it a true 3-5-3?

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

No 3-3-5

@gussmith5691 7 жыл бұрын

3-3, 5-3, 3-5 are all the same concept, anyways. It's high school football. I don't think anybody has specialized "nickel" players that they sub onto the field for a 3-3-5 or 4-2-5 set. Play your best 11.

@ericwhittle4657 7 жыл бұрын

Ironmonk036 you can use 5 backers but like he said they can't really do as much in coverage unless you have some really athletic guys there. I was not thinking about that when I asked him to do the video.

@CoachMac 7 жыл бұрын

We play a nickle safety every down, for us that is our best 11

@Ironmonk036 7 жыл бұрын

Thomas MacPherson Thanks for clearing that up. Make the video easier to understand.

@briancarpenter6413 4 жыл бұрын

3-3-5 WRONG TITLE

@CoachMac 4 жыл бұрын

Explain that part please

@CoachMac 4 жыл бұрын

I got what you are saying now, we play 3-3-5 the question was asked about the 3-5-3 which technically we don't play personnel wise but the structure is similar