It's funny because Matt never even makes any arguments throughout the film, he literally just asks basic questions and all these gender ideology "experts" can't seem to give any kind of answer at all. It's lunacy!

“Smug, narcissistic, and sinister“, that hits the nail on the head. These scoundrels are shameless! And Matt Walsh exposed them for it and the best part is they knew it and had to sit through it. God bless you Matt Walsh!

I felt the same when he was talking to the african tribe, my husband and i were genuinely like please don't put any ideas in their minds, leave them in their happiness. Matt later said that he was really uncomfortable with them thinking that he was ok with this line of thought but couldn't correct them in order to not taint their responses. I was astonished and proud of them that they genuinely had no idea how that perversion would even work

“You’re a parent not a friend” 🙌🏼 Absolutely 💯%

I felt the same about the demonic aspect. It's creepy as hell to watch some of these people defending this when smiling and laughing with "soothening" voices... Sometimes you see it in their eyes too. The devil is real. It's among us...

Compassion is one thing, recognizing their delusion as authentic and using their preferred pronouns is taking part in a lie and a grave mortal sin

Seeing physical stuff like tops scars, the woman's forearm, etc. should be enough to snap anyone back into reality and realize how horrifying the movement is just under the surface

I agree, do not let children on social media until they're 18 or 21.

You got it wrong about Matt needing to defend what the definition of woman is. Once you start doing that you have already lost. These people do not listen. Allow them to speak and their illogical dribble will win the argument for you. That is why Matt’s method is so effective

I think "adult human female" is a proper definition. Yes, female and woman are synonyms. These gender studies activists do not see sex and gender as they same though, so it is not synonyms to them. That is the root problem. They then argue that bathrooms, sports, etc that are separated by sex (gender) means gender identity.

We went from no uterus no opinion to anyone can be a woman in a matter of years. We have been going through a profoundly destructive cultural revolution for years.

When it comes to the "demonic" stuff...I think you might be onto something. For me it's not so much their tone (although they can be very grating and condescending and baby-talking), it's the moral relativism itself. It reminds me of the Serpent in the Garden of Eden. "You can do whatever you want...you can be whatever you want... Only you know what's best for you, no one else! Especially not God!"

Man, I was hoping you'd review that movie. It was amazing. You, all of CA, Walsh, philosophy for the people, etc are bringing sanity back. Keep up the amazing work!

Why should someone's sense of male and female override biology? Because when it comes to sex our culture has gone insane. Utterly insane.

One of the most shocking moments was during an interview with the professor (I think?) at that one university, where he basically used "essentialist" - in the sense of asking for clear definitions - in a deeply pejorative sense. I think Matt missed an opportunity there to ask (ideally before asking what is a woman) "what is a transgender person" - surely they'd have a definition for that, and then it would be even harder to weasel out of answering a similar question for the term "woman". Although at this point I wouldn't be surprised if they doubled down on the relativism and just called it a day.

Trent, I am a chemist with more than 20 years experience. The hard sciences are not now as as bad as the social sciences. But there is ALOT of science fraud going on. Scientific community is not a bunch of truth seekers anymore. They do not have the common good in mind.

I stopped trusting social scientists a long time ago, but I think I was in college more recently, so I saw the crazy up close and personal, in a way that older people may have not.

"Female" is not a synonym of "woman". Lassie is a female but not a woman. Thus, the definition of Adult, Human Female is not circular. It's amply defended by very able philosophers such Alex Byrne and (I am almost certain) Tomas Bogardus. You should have the latter on your show btw. He is a Catholic philosopher who writes on gender theory providing insightful critiques. [I agree though that appealing to "female" in the definition of "woman" kicks the can down the road since the wackiest gender critics refuse to even acknowledge the reality of physical sex].

I watched the documentary and I’m so happy the daily wire made it, it’s powerful and superbly made

I use the word demonic all the time - and it's not hyperbole.