Of course not wzf

Ok. So may i show you a video or 2 in which you can see certain experiments everybody could do in their own backyard, producing reliable data (something that was known prior to the person doing the experiments in those videos, to basically everyone with a bit of interest in the subject) and yet they are discredited by so called "experts and scientists" on the official side? Big Company (aka big money) rules. And it does not matter how reliable your data is. If politics are involved, you may show what ever experiment you like.... it will not change "history" nor will it change society. hints enough, i assume? If not, pls dont call me all kinds of names, or get angry or whatever. Just ask what i mean.......and i can explain. But i think i have given a few hints towards the subject i am talking about, and everyone with just a bit of knowledge SHOULD be able to understand that we have been fooled. Yes, it is offtopic. Sorry for that. But i cant help it. When ever i see a comment like yours, mr Jacob, i feel the need to point out how we ALL accept BULLSHIT. (or seem to accept) Over money! Worthless toiletpaper when you have control over the printer that prints the bills.

@@bertjesklotepino that’s not entirely true. To get data published for peer review it has to be be done to a known standard of accuracy by an accredited institution and the results carefully subjected to statistical analysis. That much is true. But if you have some surprising data and your methodology looks sound and you’re not talking complete and total bollocks (e.g. claims about perpetual motion machines) you might be able to get your local university interested. Bearing in mind that they have limited resources and the project size would need to be something they could integrate (eg a suitable size and scope for an undergraduate or masters program project).

There is plenty of science done by amateurs. Some even manage to get papers published.

@@ralphclark You see to misunderstand me. What i am saying is: I know of a few videos in which experiments have been done which EVERYBODY could do on their own. These experiments have been done so many times that the science behind it is fully known. And yet somehow when people are shown videos like the ones i am talking about, they often deny it is possible. And try to find all kinds of excuses to not think about it any longer. Im not talking about perpetual motion sir. And, plenty of accredited institutions have said the same all throughout the years, until a moment in time made them all change their opinion. And now a days the subject aint even open for discussion, because according to certain people everything has been studied, everything has been looked into, nothing new to find. Case closed. I am very very sorry, but no matter the amount of sugarcoating, it will still be a turd.

If you're just starting fires this shouldn't matter but for smoking I could see this mattering to some people. if you care that much though then you should probably use butane instead. as i understand them, butane is somewhat cleaner burning than naphtha, but you're inhaling carcinogenic smoke either way so i don't understand why people care at the end of the day.

​@@nobody2021The "taste". At least from what I've heard.

@@midgetman4206 I've heard of that as well, however I have also heard that if you light a Zippo and let it burn for a couple of seconds before lighting tobacco or weed or whatever you're trying to smoke, the naptha flavor won't be there. That's just what I've heard, I don't smoke.

@@nobody2021 yeah, like drinking gasoline and complaining that the naphtha tastes worse lol.

you can cut 'em about in half and it's really close to the standard zippo flint in my experience, so it's two for one! : )

@@alexbiggs9208 yeah bic flints are huge, I usually use a nail clipper and place the flint in the clipper so it will cut it in half. Just make sure to wrap your hand around the flint and clipper when you cut it so the flints wont fly

@@Thelounge3k haha that happened to me once just about the same way as you described my 1st time testing the idea. Lol badass

@@Krunchyjclown lol thats cool... Yeah whenever my friends have bic lighters I always ask them to save it for me when it runs out. I have no idea why bic puts such huge flints in disposable lighters but oh well lol

@@Thelounge3k well, bic lights for a good while. Im sure the long flint is one reason why. I like to shave em down rather than cut em. I keep flints just long enough to get a heavier spark. So far i haven't worn out the striker.

Could you please tell the name of the items? The brand for "wax and bread remover" and the "lacquer thinner"?

@@moser3712 wax and grease remover, don't know how bread got up there. They both are whatever house brand for O'Reilly auto is. We were next door to them. And I got my wax and grease remover and 5 gallon buckets of lacquer thinner from them. The brand doesn't matter, you can use whatever lacquer thinner you can find. They are all slightly different mix of chemicals. But all flammable. I know the wax and grease remover toulene was the majority of the solvent in it.

True, but that was the good stuff in those gas tanks. Full flavor, lead additives, which of course makes it delicious like lead paint chips. I mean if you are going to get cancer anyway is a little long term brain damage really a problem? I don't want to be fully alert and aware for a slow painful death lol.

I've been using white gas Camp fuel for over 30 years in my zippo.

@@dadtheman3516 anything high volatile will work just about.

I tried alcohol because that's all I had... horrible and doesn't last long when if you don't use it

well its not the liquid that burns its the vapours so if the 3rd party Naphtha last longer that suggests it vaporizes slower so it should last longer as it will evaporate slower. Zippo fluid is Naphtha so the fact that one performs differently suggests there are more impurities in one or one is more refined.

@@Destructor8031 Naphtha is a mixture of products not a specific product. That's why they are both actually Naphtha but derived from different mixtures. hope that makes since i have trouble finding the right words to explain it. There would be major variations in it due to which sources it was produced and how well it was refined as well as if it was mixed with other similar products distilled from differing sources like natural gas, crude, coal, peat, and so on. Zippo fluid is likely highly refined from one source where Naphtha paint thinner remover may be less refined combination or alternate less clean source or production.

@@masterdebater8757 Thank you for the clarification.

@@Destructor8031 Zippo (Ronsonal) branded fuel is Naphtha but goes through a hydrogen treatment process. Made specifically for an efficient burn, both hotter and cleaner.

Old school naphtha like old school ronsonol is going to be just that REALLY STRONG odor but burns faster and lasts longer. It’s an old formula. They’ve redone it throughout the decades just to make sure it burns less dirtier

Any variation from how the wicking material was packed would have been negated by him switching the fuel in the two lighters each time

@@jcmorgan26 exactly. it's pretty clear which fuel won

Bro can we use kerosene oil in zippo?

@@fatirjee6217 Try Petroleum Ether ❤️

change product brand you should find one equally volatile thus it lights similar to traditional zippo fluid. All products you mentioned are naphtha products because it is a mixture of hydrocarbons by definition. Another manufacturer or product brand may be all you need just like the competition for zippo brand is not equal to the zippo product either.

Naphtha is not a specific chemical compound, it's a mixture of petroleum distillates, so you can call anything you want Naphtha. Equivalent of Naphtha in most of Europe is Kerosene aka highly purified lamp oil.

lighter fuel/fluid is hardly odorless or optimised.

There was no discernable difference in odor.

they both smell great

Acetone will dont works good as naptha.

@@ryu-yuta9259 agreed. Isopropyl Alcohol 99% works best. But it evaporated very fast.

Zippo fluid is naphtha, coleman fuel is too.

so is royal oak fluid right?@@Voyajer.

They both smell like brain cancer. Pick your poison

Zippo is naphtha

I can tell you the chemical composition of these two are nearly identical the naphtha is just a little more "dirty" in terms of purity. If your lighter is going dry quickly it could be due to the insert and housing not being a tight fit. Lighters with a tight fit will often keep fuel for 3+ weeks and average fitting inserts keep fuel for about 2 week. That's about the norm. If it lasting less than that with minimal usage i would by a new insert. Also, if you make or by a ranger band it should help you as well.

Weigh both lighters. Write both down. Fill both, write weight down. Weigh every day

Weigh both lighters. Write both down. Fill both, write weight down. Weigh every day

Weigh both lighters. Write both down. Fill both, write weight down. Weigh every day

Weigh both lighters. Write both down. Fill both, write weight down. Weigh every day

No difference in smell. I do not recommend for lighting cigarettes as it is unknown of the exact ingredients of the Naphtha. It could contain harmful chemicals. This is just a test of how well it would work in a lighter.

I use that exact brand of naptha to light my cigs for a couple years, I don't notice a difference, but Idgaf about chemicals, so dudes right, if u want to be safe, use zippo/ronsonal

Coleman is the same but is dirty.

I'm not certain but I do know you can use benzine.

They are practically the same thing

@@user-realahhnikka but the lighter when into the naphtha with it being lit

Is that a question or statement?

Statement

No difference than regular use of Zippo fluid.

@@ThisVSThat-xw2cb awesome could you do a video or how the cotton inside looks like

@@osbaldohernandez9174 there is no point in comparing the parts of the lighters as he rotated the lighters 6 times thus each fuel was inside each lighter 3 times. In doing this he presented optimal data for this experiment just short of chemical analysis and BTU data there is no more data to be had here for the purpose of the experiment was likely to compare an alternate but functionally similar fuel that is reasonably cheaper than the severely over priced zippo fluid.

Zippo brand is only 70% Naptha.

Ace Hardware, paint stores, Home Depot

naphtha is a generalization for a mixture of refined hydrocarbons... the product you tried didnt work because it is either mixed with less volatile products some countries have gradients of naphtha to reduce its volatility (designed for specific purposes) try finding a higher grade source of the product or another product like colemans white (gas) liquid fuel, colemans concentrated camp fuel or the like.

Naphtha is a flammable liquid hydrocarbon mixture. Mixtures labelled naphtha have been produced from natural gas condensates, petroleum distillates, and the distillation of coal tar and peat. In different industries and regions naphtha may also be crude oil or refined products such as kerosene. Mineral spirits, also historically known as "naphtha", is not the same chemical. "the internet can easily answer your question thus why no one bothered...."

Naptha samel remove formula

bruh i came to this video trying to find naphtha for dmt extraction. Do u know if i can use Zippo lighter fluid as substitute to naphtha for the extraction?

@@masterjoh8409 as long as it doesn’t leave residue

they didnt have plastic in western films so you should be ok...