The problem is that the opponent has a gun.

@@f.5233which they are using to threaten, but not to kill

They will for sure. But they want other gunmen there. Russia wanted the boses and wanted to bleed the victim to death. ​@zwillinge3116

@@zwillinge3116 unless they're cornered. Why would you own a guy and not use it if you're at the risk of perishing?

Ukraine is supposed to fight with one hand tied behind their back.

Because Ukraine has already been doing it?

@@Gman3.0 Nope, Ukraine only used his own drones to blast Russian oil refineries, oil depots, ammo depots. bridges, tunnels, train stations, railways hub, power stations, etc

@@AlexanderKorshinsky they used nato drones to blast Russia Russia is using their allies drones to blast them back same thing

Ukraine could try. Let's see what Putin would do.

@@springsummer7138 Try what exactly ? Are you talking about allies missiles. They did yesterday in Crimea and Russia (Novosibirks) and a refinery down the same region among four of the location.

The UK has a real leader, we have a real-world JOKE in the US.

There's no rules in war...

Would you want to live under Putin?

Putin can end the war he started any day - the question is will he?

Tell Putin that! 😅

Funny, that’s Russia’s point of view as well.

@@jonathanjacob5453 That means Russia will understand why they are striked

@@seselis1 Exactly and the countries doing the striking (Britain) will understand that Russia is not Iraq. They can expect to get something in return. No one should do any crying. Take your action and accept the consequences.

@@jonathanjacob5453 Russia fighting for its survival? Get real. Little Ukraine sends over a few drones and you think you are fighting for survival. If NATO actually joined in, even that would be only to liberate Ukraine. No one wants Russia. You've been fed lies.

exactly

Zelensky digging own grave..

The British will be crying afterwards and their state media will be reporting that it was an unprovoked attack.

@@jonathanjacob5453 Putin is crying now and his state media is reporting that it is an unprovoked support.

​@@jonathanjacob5453🤣 Russia won't dare, would stand no chance against NATO

@@Tom-ct6rp 🤣🤣🤣

You look more funny let's be honest.

@@acajoom my man, the sexy squirrel!

@@shuycg haha

It is different. But he looks the way he looks, his choice

That’s my boy from college, man. Chill

What else is left really? Russia is jamming everything.

We collected all of EU flags already😂makes no difference now

Norwegians in Mariupol, French in Avdeevka, Americans everywhere, British at home behind the computer😂

@@lettheflamestakeover7374 Buying EU flags from Ebay isn't impressive, vatnik

No, don't risk an escalation!

I'm there now. Looks fine to me. Morale and capabilities are GO!

😂😂😂

He shows up with $2 billion and you want him to also put himself in danger for a dirt poor country that only Putler wants. We have given more than Ukraine is worth already.

That's your opinion

"Blinking man" made me chuckle 😄

Spot on! :D

The history of humanity in a nutshell. During peace we are ground up and poisoned for profits, in war our young die for profits.

Orcssia started. Orcssia pays.

@@simonthekindcutthroat6324 Not quite. It used to be that you stood no chance of becoming the leader without having stood the test of war borne personally. Nowadays, the politicians never work in any real world job let alone fight.

A couple of rich orcs in london should get a visit.

This has nothing to do with the information in this vid. No rich kid or rich person on the Ukraine side started this war. You're speaking in generic phrases

All we have to do is wait for what out of pocket response the will be delivered by the Kremlin

agree 100%

It's elementary logic that this will escalate the war, Gefreiter Pauli ! 🙃

more common sense elementary logic is such things will result in furthur escalation and furthur creation of buffer zone in ukraine side desperate west is using mad man logic committing same mistake again and again last 2.5 yrs gone in astray try more

@@eddastrohmayer251 Bring it on, orkz.

Supposedly going to be there in a month or so, and the one thing Ukraine lacks is a significant airforce. Having the amount of Jets that were promised will make a heck of a difference. The F-16 is a fantastic platform.

@@jacobnewcombe5367it was a typo. The writer of the article wrote “month” instead of “months” They quickly apologized but by then it was too late and everyone thinks next month! Greg terry a pro Ukraine KZfaqr who has many connections in Ukraine and visits frequently guesses September! I believe someone who’s experienced the war for themselves and not just the thousands of armchair generals on social media who repost articles

No

Norway also gave a few recently with the implicit wish that Ukraine would use them deep into Russia. Probably to take out the military factories.

They are coming... there has been delays, and they´ve focused on best possible training, and might have updated some stuff in the F-16´s. While they WILL help, it´s hard to say how big difference they make. F-16 is an OLD plane, and it´s no Raptor 22, or F-35 ... it will help deliver bombs to the front, and it will increase the possibility to shoot down some missiles and drones.... but with Russian S-300 and S-400 you can´t simply get air superiority like that.

Because Russia is a world power who no one wants to poke

Ukraine is not an ally of nato or eu officially just on words while NK and Iran is officially Russian supporters etc

@@leto2582 NO! utterly meaningless distinction between the very important Iranian cooperation (with actual ppl on the ground training on Ru & maybe Ukr lands) & western support for Ukr, albeit, yes, western support has almost no ppl on ground in Ukr. But the real question is why? Imho there is now nothing stopping a slow rise of western help and western expertise working closely with Ukr, including on the ground if necessary, which is probably is. As an american liberal, i am hoping that we are already on the ground. In any case, within a decade, RU will be contained, or there will be no success on earth of any type, whatsoever, and we will all descend into what 'conservatives' worldwide want, a nationalistic antogonistic hellscape where the most basic things cannot be done any longer! (let alone climate mitigation! lol)

You need to specify which trolls you can smell

🙌

You're playing? You're sitting on your couch and shitpossting .If you guys are so bloodthirsty and brave - go on , Ukraine needs volunteers,new land was just recently converted to host another 1.5 millions kia

you will stop someone!! hahahaha.,,,so go to Ukraine and fight,,,not that you are a keyboard warrior

@@predraze_vrazevv9945 that's right, you go fight for mother russia an see how valued you are by your beautiful russia😂

​@@ronin7531why going to Ukraine,my country IS full with orcs and their Family....No need to Go elsewhere,the war IS here

Because we are not all related. It’s survival of the fittest.

Because some folks are more related than others.

All things are violent, from the cells in your body to the galaxies in the cosmos

Because we are a dumb species. There is this dumb misconception that without war then technology wouldn't advance. Firstly, there would be more total available resources at our disposal. Wars destroy infrastructure that has to be replaced. It takes resources to build weapons and equipment. It takes resources to extract the needed resources to replace, repair, and rebuild. Secondly, we would not lose as much knowledge from entire people being wiped out (having to relearn/rediscover it). Between the people that had specific knowledge dying and literally libraries being burned down, I'm surprised we made it this far. Lastly, the people themselves. How many have died that had the capability and capacity to further our species? Doesn't matter if it's small contributions in their town (helping the poor) or are a genius and cures cancer. So long as you aren't hurting others, everyone has a place. We are stronger together than we ever are apart.

If you're panicking no need to project that onto others

riiiight proxy wars are not a thing in your little world

​@@rhetorical1488 Yeah Russia is familiar with proxy wars by itself too.

That is such a pathetic argument. Like Antifa does not exist and is only an idea. The only thing that Ukraine supplies in this war is human bodies. Everything else - everything - is Nato and a very few select allies.

@@rhetorical1488, just like your little green men were not a real thing in Crimea.

@@rhetorical1488 If Russia cannot even fully defeat Ukraine, how do they ever expect to stand a chance in the Baltics with NATO 😂😂😂😂😂

nothing but empty threats...

​​​@@thegreatdane3627"Great" dane thinks to be a heroe... 🙃

So yeah it’s scary. But what can you do. If the west caves, that will teach the world that all that you need is the threat of a nuclear attack to get anything you want. That’s the thing with blackmail once you give in your going to be on the hook forever.

So the reason why expert believes is an empty threat is ..who in his right mind would like his country to turn into ashes, who will he govern wen it turns nuclear, Russia knows damn well that nuclear war will erase Russia so where will the people be to be governed???????

@@thegreatdane3627you’re “barking” 🐕 up the wrong tree 🌲

exactly

I hear Ukraine is talking volunteer, don't let fear stop you

@@Meeko2689👏👏

There is no point in fearing the impossible.

Ha Ha ha ha! Koja Evropa to je Američka kolonija! Amerikanci su postavili "predsjednike" u Evropi koje drže na povodcu i komanduju! Na globalu Evropa je postala nebitna! Novi Svjetski poredak je u toku glavnu riječ vode Rusija i Kina kao najveće vojne i ekonomske sile! Amerikanci su prezaduženi, nemaju vojsku i oni su u slobodnom padu ali grčevito se bore da ostanu na površini!!!!!

and you just don't learn how to operate it overnight i was a army 14t patriot launcher operator my school was 14 week and thats just one part of the patriot system

NAFO?

NAFO?

MiGs are Russian tech. Altho I would personally accept, i can kinda see a few reasons for declining. I'm not saying it's the right decision, I'm just saying 😅

They are game changers. But they were given really small amounts of them. I think they only got half the tanks they wanted.

@@williamwayne4043 I believe 'lEoPaRd' has been displayed in Moscow, guess russian destroyed them with magical shaval 🤣

@@williamwayne4043 They are game changer agains Iraq but not against Russia.

​@@rs1357learn English if you're going to try and troll

LOL!

Gaza is a poor example!

​​​@@4411825 You mean Germany will become a better one ...

hmm. Russian moms seem to be ok with it

Ukrainian made weapons. No one has said they can’t attack inside Russia…many nations simply didn’t want the weapons they sent Ukraine to be used inside of Russia. I think the EU is now coming to terms with the fact that if they don’t step up and send a message to ol’ Poot…then NATO may be attacked next. This is all a copy and paste job from WWII….and poor Ukraine gets screwed again.

Either that or all of our money would be going into a war economy like what's happening in Russia, and their pants would be wet

Does Russia cry? Does Russia make empty nuclear threats? They do. We have seen it with our own eyes.

@@willthecat3861you would rather the nuclear threats aren’t empty?😂bc me too

I don't think that all can start with nuclear weapon. Conventional missiles will do.

@@pavelslutsky3114 Russian media doesn't put it like that. Russian media talks about nuking everyone that opposes the Kremlin viewpoint. And many Russians appear to agree. Russian media/radio/tv doesn't explain what will happen to Russia, and Russians if Kremlin uses nuclear weapons on the West. Is it an epidemic of simple mindedness, or just BS?

Don't you prefer empty nuclear threats im..e​@@willthecat3861

Sure, if Russia can find a country that is fighting Nato, it has every right to supply this country with weapons. If on the other hand you are talking about direct Russian strikes against Nato territory, then of course Nato has the right to directly strike Russian territory. (not just by giving Ukraine 1% of its weapons, but by using the other 99%) Why is it that Putin fans constantly act as if Nato could not strike back in case Russia would directly attack them? And why don´t Putin fans understand that Nato can always answer any Russian attack with ten times as much force. Nato is A LOT stronger than Russia. Get over it!

russia is using Iranian and north Korean weapons to strike inside Ukraine. What is the difference?

​@thegreatdane3627 difference is ukraine has no muscles to hit ukraine or to start a war wit ukraine...russia remember is a superpower doing that it will make them retalliate

@@emazjassam2452 make sense please?

⁠@@thegreatdane3627is that a Swiss flag? So the Swiss can’t read?😂

What's the good of an aid package if there's no left to utilise it?

Ukraine men are lhaving fun in western countries like a girl. I cannot understand why do Ukrainian men between the ages of 20 and 25 not have to join the army and can live and have fun in other countries like girls?

@@unsalbulentbecause girls just want to have fun?

Yes, Natto ... 😂

It always was. Since 2004.

The bouncer since the US initiated Cuban missile crisis is that no nuclear power should be made to choose between a humiliating defeat or the use of nuclear weapons.

The propoganda is rotting your brain.

It's just terror attacks... They want to put fear in the hearts of ordinary Russian citizens

Both.

They are military targets. You are confused with Russia.

Even if they are they'd totally be justified. Russia has been doing it the entire WAR

@@natalieturko4808 ok.

Lets be honest, we both know you look way more funny than him. Just judging from your silly comment.

Ok, source? If the source is "trust me, I'm a professional anonymous KZfaq whoever" just be open with it, don't be shy.

@@Cloud-dq1mr BBC: Ukraine's security service says it has uncovered corruption in an arms purchase by the military worth about $40m (£31m). The SBU said five senior people in the defence ministry and at an arms supplier were being investigated. It said the defence officials signed a contract for 100,000 mortar shells in August 2022.

@@Cloud-dq1mr Yahoo news: According to Mezha's findings based on open-source data, contracts were signed with companies that appear to be fictitious. Tens of millions of hryvnias were transferred to a private entrepreneur whose owner, Ihor Chaus, has a criminal record for stealing a bottle of whiskey from a supermarket and was sentenced to 100 hours of community service, said the anti-graft activist.

Are you using emojis to compensate for a lack of good points?

Big news for ruSSia,

Makes sense, bc US always said they want Russia only to be seriously weakened (and not defended). Collapse of Russia is not in US interest bc that would automatically strengthen China. And they neither want WW3. Obviously Blinken was once again, similarly as all his doings in Israel, "confused"...

good thing this only applies to US supplied weapons then

​​@@icu17siberiaWhy? Do you think Pentagon can speak for all NATO countries ? 🙃

@eddastrohmayer251 Of course the Pentagon is the master of NATO!!!! The Pentagon decides to which country and what kind of weapons it should send and how many it should send, it's obvious!!!!

They did enough. It was Ukraine who failed.