Poland

@@martinwinther6013 reinforced bunkers covered by SAM's

Poor attempt, FSB

@@jrdsm and so we just turned Poland into a legit target

@@JC-rr1wu says a cia bot

You need 3 pilots per airplane. Plus 3 shifts of maintenance personnel. Ukraine has 4 partially trained pilots and 30 maintenance personnel in training. None of them will be ready for combat years.

@@donwyoming1936 Part of what you say is simply incorrect, maybe if it were 30 years ago. Also, Ukraine won't be flying sorties 24 hours a day. The F-16s Ukraine receives will be used in a specific strategic role, given the dynamics of how the war is evolving.

There's a reason why no air force in the world chooses the model of more planes than pilots.

@@Peterclevenger-sx1khdid you not watch the video mate?

@@Peterclevenger-sx1khthey are about to concede

Ukraine is the one crying, all that money and nothing to show for it? Russia is still standing :)

Media sure does loves to say “Game Changer” for 2 years now

​@@MrThartofwarbarely

@@ralphpierre9122 Let's wait year 2025, and see who is barely standing, and who is not standing at all.

​@MrThartofwar Russia has not faced a fully equipped opponent ever in its existence. The only time it did, the USSR was about to fail before lend lease saved them

Game changer nr. 483!!

For a while Macron was talking about sending French troops to Ukraine, and then he announced elections, and no more talk about the French troops. Nor any other country like Baltics or Poland. Poland sending troops into West Ukraine would really make sense. Poland lost territory to Ukraine after WWII. Go in to "protect" it, and never leave, just wait for Ukraine to collapse.

@@Nauda999 will be a long wait. I wonder how Putin feels his special military operation is going.

Only 20+% of promised ammo delivered by EU to Ukraine by end of 2023. this was to appease Russia. but no more.

@@Nauda999 Lviv will be polish!

True, just a constant degradation of Russias war fighting ability.

@@ricardosmythe2548ironically it will just give Russia more experience.

Russia is now thriving. The world Bank just upped their status. War economy the west can't catch up with until 2026. Ukraine is just about out of men There's nothing that will change the fact that NATO miscalculated the entire thing.

@@betsyb2256 your not deluded much 😂

Ghost of Kiev.👀🤣🤣🤣🚂🚒

Guardians of snake Island yelling "F U" to the red navy

No it’s been going on for nearly 2 years. It’s just people heard about it not to long ago

@@curtisedwards885 200 years, F-16s not even planes were invented, and Ghost of Kiev as already training hard, that's why he is invincible.

Don't worry about it

@@ryanthompson1981 why not, Are you on the frontlines ?

In theory they should only fly out of a Ukraine loaded with weapons to attack. If they start doing so from NATO airfields, than we're all in trouble. If Russia attacks NATO than we're all in trouble bc that's can only end in a nuclear exchange.

Where ever, they will be targeted

@@nenadmitrovic3469 you’re right

whom?

@@derJackistweg The NATO states won't stop delivering their newest wonder weapon.

If they are as effective as NATO is hoping, they will be a game changer. Russia doesn't control the Ukraininan airspace, but they sure faced few challenges within it. The F16s may well change that. Of course if an F16 shoots down a MIG 29 or an SU 57 over Russian airspace than the game may change.

​@@QAYWSXEDCCXYDSAEWQ can you cope more? Lets see your understanding of this war. Both planes you think f16 might take down are not used in this war...

@@nenadmitrovic3469 They have used SU57, although indirectly as in not in Ukrainian airspace; which will be another dilema for Ukraine. Do they chase an SU57 into Russian airspace after its launched missiles into Ukraine?

@@QAYWSXEDCCXYDSAEWQ su 57 was tested few timea and its not used for long time, over a year. They cant chase nothing that much

If the f-16's go to ukraine then you will force Russia to get air superiority over the 'ukraine' your f-16's will make the situation worse for the 'ukraine'.

yes, THE ABSOLUTE game changer !! Nr. 483 !!

They'll launch out of Poland

It has not helped secure Western Europe with most of the countries being penny-pinching for decades. Praise to Poland and a few others for pushing hard. Time to triple down on military spending.

@@dan9002 Yes we have to increase the spending and also support to Ukraine. It is well worth to sacrifice more of our current inventory and send it to the front lines. We also need more "advisors" in Ukraine to operate even more advanced systems. NATO need to take the gloves off and end this.

Go volunteer.

And that is exactly why Russia will eliminate the clear threat, and take more Ukrainian land, Ukraine refuses peaceful negotiations and prefers aggression, that says it all, giving validation to Russia eliminating the Ukrainian threat, like they fully warned they will :)

@@MrThartofwar Yes, all Putin wants is Ukraine. Why dont we give it to him, so he does not have to kill 44 million agressive people.

@@philu3 The media who are Tabloid keep saying " Game Changers ".

No one called the game changers

@@JC-rr1wu Read the news; Game Changers was synonymous with F16. Two words that should immediately raise suspicion: Game Changer Amazing. The moment you come across them, you know that the author is at best, misguided

Is that the au57 that has not been seen inside Ukraine.

SU's are not replaceable because Russia can't get more computer chips from the US.

Russia doesn't need your chips to replace anything. How naive can you be?

Where in Russia do they produce sub 10nm chips?

russian cope

How’s that special military operation going?

@@Rhotz-ix8llhow is stopping houthis in Yemen going? 😂😂😂😂

And when there's another Wagner Rebellion, the pro-Russia puppets will gaslight people about "winning".

Yeah orc

Yeah, just ask the ukranians at the front line, how static it is😂

But its true though, frontlines have hardly moved at all in the past year

@@carlosdeleon8527 well i guess if you zoom out enough of the maps it may appear static.

😂

🤣🤣🤣

They said same thing about abram tanks, it’s a game changer..😂

It will be years before Ukraine is ready to fly F-16s in combat. It takes 4-5 years of training. They literally just started.

@@donwyoming1936 . Learning to fly the F-16 isn't the problem. The issue is many Ukrainian pilots were trained based on the Soviet/Russian tactics. A lot of retraining for NATO tactics is required, you can't fly a western plane with Soviet strategy.

The milky way galaxy

They will receive F16 from the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Belgium. All recently upgraded to the F35

@@Me1le oh I see

Czy mam rozumieć, że zamiast na złom, trafią na Ukrainę.

@@alicjagorecka3446they are well maintained 90s aircraft with upgraded radar. Roughly equivalent to an Su57.

If the delivery route is tracked by Russia, it may even not be delivered.

problem is....... as we've all learnt.... you just never know what's gonna happen 😂

Same as Himars?

@@happymelon7129 they are going to Romania.

😂

some trained pilots might suddenly have an urge to "resign" from their postings in the West and enlist in the Ukrainian Air Force.....

@@englishmaninmedellin7294 That is part of the plan, add in the US contractors news are talking about. The biggest problem is if airfields are located in Ukraine how to protect them, and if one in Romania is used to convince Russia not to strike Romania or it would make this whole proxy war pointless since it would go directly full scale war.

No you are thinking .....you need to stop 😂

It’s more like 20 F16 against around 100 Russian fighters. Should be a fair fight. They only need to stop the planes dropping the glide bombs. Not the bombs themselves.

@Forheavenssake1ify the planes are to provide front-line support. Air sepremacy is going to be a tough nut to crack, though.

@@kevinfidler6287clearly, Russia with thousands of aircraft could not achieve this.

@@rolfustroli7170 they aren’t going to use them for dogfights, only glide bombs

They really think Russia will use 1 jet type😂

You are living in wonderland

@@et9949 he probably meant, that Nato F-16s will be better than ukrainian Mig-29 that are build in Russia.

These jets are either on there way to the junk yard or replaced by the F-35. Instead of sending them to be scrapped might as well make use of them by sending them to Ukraine. No different when Russia pulls out 60yrs old equipment and sends them off to Ukraine like the T-64 tanks, if a weapon still has a use might as well utilize it.

@@sirxavior1583 on their way to the junk yard, are you out of your mind. The F16 is being replaced by the F35, not because it is defective or out of date, it is simply because the F35 is more advanced and we have the money to improve our air force.

The problem with that is They'd be classified as Mercs therefore ineligible for protections afforded via Geneva Conventions. Meaning you bypass the POW camp and straight to the Windchime Stand aka Gallows.

You may be a coward always fearing “oh what will the bully do”. Obviously that means no one who actually is involved in making defense policies won’t bother about such concerns. That ended with Chamberlain. Because we know that not doing anything is what escalates a bully. It is very clear: Russia is violating the UN charter and the international agreement it has signed and hence are conducting not only an illegal aggression, but are engaged in an illegal annexation of land. The international community, according to international agreements Russia has signed, has the right to aid Ukraine in defending itself. Not only by sending arms, but actually by sending troops too. Some would also argue that the international community also must aid in protecting the UN charter and international law buy providing resources to end Russias crime. Russia as the illegal aggressor is always the one who escalate the situation if the situation escalates. Never the defender.

@@abrakkehakka1357 Regardless what is legal or illegal, in April/May 2022, Ukraine was asking for USA/NATO to provide "no fly" zone over Ukraine, and then Ukraine was told to stop asking or talking about that. Yet it would be exactly same thing, NATO military planes would fly from NATO countries into Ukraine, why do you think it has not happened yet? on Day 860?

@@abrakkehakka1357 look, nobody discusses who is or is not the aggressor. There is no place for discussing who is right who is wrong. If the west doesn’t want a war with Russia then they need to avoid it. If the west is ready to have a war with Russia than they should be very clear about that. Let’s them draw a line and say there will be a war with you, Russia . What is questionable is pushing ahead, crossing others’ line and not being ready to go to war

@@abrakkehakka1357 taking a stand against a “bully” or not being coward means you strike back, draw a line. This is different from what the west does - putting a gun in the head of a minor, in this case Ukraine, and hiding behind the wall and yelling I don’t want a war with this bully

no serious analist uses the word gemechanger. Its only a possible gamechanger when there is the quantity as well.

The plane is not an issue, it is pilots and training. UA population is badly educated, barely anyone speaks any English and that makes training staff super hard.

Maybe China can help as it's the factory of the world. Ironic🤐🤐🤐🤐🤔

The Putin regime is obviously scared about these F-16, just look at the amount of AI bots allocated.

These planes have been updated continuously, especially the ones from my country. That is why the pilots have so much to learn.

@@jensstergard9380Is your country the one who violated a seize fire in Syria with these airplanes?

@@claus-not-santa Get bent Ivan....

@@politicallyincorrect4452 Who is Ivan? Friend of yours?

@@claus-not-santa If you say so Vlad....

In your dream🤪

Ukraine isn’t doing this, NATO is. Ukraine doesn’t have this capability.

@@sebastianvagabond4692 If that is true why isn't your dear leader Putin declaring war on Nato?

@@sebastianvagabond4692 They're not, but even if NATO were, why doesn't Putin do something about it? Fire a shot in anger towards the West and find out what happens. 🤣

​@@SmilingNinjaKZfaq is useless, they keep deleting my comments.

Abrams have been very effective lol

The problem wasn't the Abrams tanks, the problem is that the Russians are unfairly properly armed unlike,. Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya... 😂

This is gonna blow your tiny mind but 31 tanks aren't gonna beat the 3rd strongest army in the world.

​@@willhudson5625scrape 😅😅

Russians keeping spamming about Abramses is hilarious. You lost 3000+ tanks, your T-90s get shredded daily, your T-14 are cancelled. But still, _"hurr durr Abramses are not invulnerable!! Do you remember that?!! We are reminding yououou!! They aren't invulnerable!!!! The wEsT iS fiNIsheD"_ xDDD

These are the game changers nr. 483 !! NOW Ukraine will be winning MUCH more!

NATO delayed delivery of ammo to Ukraine to appease Russia. Only 20+% of EU ammo delivered by end of 2023.

@@claus-not-santa define how ukraine will be winning? What I see is that ukraine become a battlefield with thousands had died, millions has been displaced and good luck with that billions dollar of debt.

@@Mehimehi26Should I have marked my comment as sarcasm for you?

@@claus-not-santa 😬 you should.. but i still eager to get some answer how we define ukrain will be winning, how long it will be zellensky selling this war? What is the end game?.. 😥

@@jensstergard9380 Please be so kind if not polite, to tell me which assumptions were false maybe then it becomes clear what/who was silly.

@@kinngrimm The question if there's enough pilots is relevant because their ability to learn to handle the complicated F-16 at an exceptionally high speed was overestimated. I won't blame you for not knowing that, and I withdraw my critique.

@@jensstergard9380 Ofcause the question is relevant. Just not under the circumstances described in the report. If they have more plains available than pilots one could either say those could be used as replacements if plains would get shot down and the pilots survive or what i suggested to somehow make more already trained pilots available. " their ability to learn to handle the complicated F-16 at an exceptionally high speed was overestimated." As they had flown MIGs and other fighterjets before i doubt they wouldn't be able to cope with the new plains, though ofcause if everything is that much different then it could surely be the case that training would need a longer than planned for duration. Again, then having some replacements for these delayed pilots wouldn't be so silly would it now?

​@@kinngrimm The planes the pilots flew before were really much less complicated. The videos from the Danish military training the pilots don't directly deal with this issue but it is understood. I don't think we should let any other soldier than the Ukrainians formally participate in the war before it is very clear that the Putin regime uses non-Russians. Another serious issue is educating the mechanics, they also have a steep learning curve. And most of these Ukrainians have to improve their English skills a lot before they can handle the hardware. Once all this is in place Ukraine will have a small but very efficient air force, I'm looking very much forward to that. The Putin regime is aware of the situation that's why they push so hard these days. When the Russian bots claim here that the Putin regime is gaining a bit terrain they are speaking the truth.

And before you know it Russia will have depleted their inventory and have shown the USA everything they do. The west is literally playing war games from the sidelines right now.

You know, the laugh emojis gives it away …

There won't be no next "wonder weapon" aside from USA threatening to enter directly, and if they do that would really be a game changer

they seem to have driven the Russians to trench warfare, like WW1

Really ? Are you at the front line ?

So much has been delivered so far, showing that the risk is very small.

The Russ will hit the airfields with IRBMs . Is Poland and Romania going to allow Ukrainian pilots to fly from thier air fields?

@@timkincade9763 Isn't there a base on Romania that going to be the F16 new home.

@@timkincade9763 Of cause the Putin regime will hit the airfields as much as they can. Let's hope the Ukrainians will get Patriot and other systems enough to make the asphalt repair teams able to fix the runways fast enough in the transition period.

Never seen Russsian bot ever reading news about Ukraine . Which cannot be said about Ukrainian bots

@@olivka7560we already scored 1 russian bot on this comment alone

Another Game changer.....let me go cry 😂

​@LowBrowProgramming Been called Russian bot its a god thing nowadays means common sense and Thinking

@@JohnCSmith-lp1qr Only to a Russian bot who calls himself John Smith 😂😂🤣🤣 reverse-logic much???

The Gripen is expensive, can only be produced in small numbers, and actually requires high-grade runways. It actually doesn't take off from highways. Those are legit runways.

That’s the dream.

Grippen and A10 . What happened to the mirage 2000s Ukraine was supposed to get?

@@donwyoming1936 the grippen was specifically designed for this, to fight this enemy, Russia, in an asymmetrical war, from isolated airfields with limited resources in northern Sweeden, while also being a chaper alternative to operate than what NATO has, which Sweden was not part of.

The main reason for F16 is the number of available planes. There are just 200 or so Gripens, so Sweden had to give away from their own active fleet if you wanted significant numbers. So it is not so much about capabilties of Gripen vs F16, but more about the obvious pick (F16 in available numbers) vs the Russian planes.

Who's next on the frontline. Macron.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Because the fans of Russia are more numerous than the fans of NATO/Ukraine 😂 You don't support a losing team.

You like to support the losing team of Ukraine go ahead !

It’s a good sign when Kremlin flood the comment section tho. It means it’s an important topic for them and the video is on to something, hitting a nerve. The more Kremlin in the comments, the more the content worries them

​ @Stuenestoppen2 yeah, the russian comments almost smell as desperate as Putin asking one of the poorest countries of the world (North Korea) for help..... Well, some people can´t b helped...🤷‍♂

​@@lovyriturajbot

A colt 1911 is a hundred and fourteen years old, old don't mean nothing ;)

The planes they get are from the 80's with a MLU in the 2000's, it will not be the game changer, but it will help Ukraine.

​@@justhefacts8358 a 1911 isnt competing in the aerospace theater bro...

@@operator9858 you understand what an analogy is right? And secondly that's beside the point I was making. I was simply pointing out that old weapons can still be effective, case in point Russian t54,s guess what year those came out lol

If it was really a joke then Russia should have won by now

Technically they aren't Frontline soldiers and shouldn't be seen as an "escalation" if Russia using north Korea to do the same