LOL...good one.....Matt Risinger would be proud..Onnnnnn The Build Show! ☺🇨🇦

Glad you liked it!

Thanks for watching

Measurements from the building plans

Cheaper then the repairs for not getting one.

Allan Lao we do have a team up there. If you just google a-action we will show up.

Builders are not obligated to do anything that an inspector asks or a client. If they disagree, it is up to the client to continue or move on from the build.

The builder is obligated to assure things are installed as per manufacturer guidelines and local building codes. If the over-penetration of the nails - which causes an unsealed exposure of the core - is a problem according to the manufacturer then, yes, the builder IS obligated to fix it. Same with anything else in the build.

B Hirshey from the amount of fasteners I would say no but it creates a weakness in the system performance. Creating a possibility of water getting in the structure.

Matt Risinger has a good video on how to get the details right on a Zip system - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g9RlfsR82pPYpGQ.html

It is weird because the builder spends the extra money on Zip but then only gets 1/2 the details right.

Yes. They DO.

The main issue is water penetration. The installer need to regulate the pressure on the nailer. The builder or superintendent needs to catch that early to prevent extensive damage. The superintendent should have catch most if not all the issues caught in the inspection. That said, the guys in the video did earn their pay. It is less expensive to correct now than later.

I feel like a lot of this is way overboard. A lot of old time houses just had blackboard (basically cardboard) with plywood on the corners and or some just had board cut in on a 45. Then they bricked the outside. Still standing warm and no big deal.

They will need to cap it off and install a new one. Or jack hammer through the slab and move it.

I am wondering the same thing. How did you get yours fixed?

contractor nightmares!! sometimes they run away with your money and you can't do nothing. but atleast with phased inspections unless your a builder yourself they will give you an update on the quality and the job of the contractors. so you can decide to mitigate with the builder or or hire a new one before a catastrophe

This is why it’s important to have a Realtor on your side who has a fiduciary responsibility to you.

Builders have there own inspectors that should be inspecting ever phase. However, things get missed and the builder may determine that some things aren’t worth fixing, and they have no obligation to share the report with you. That’s why it is important to have your own 3rd party inspector, like these guys, to do an inspection for you, so they can find the things that the builder’s inspectors missed or are trying to hide. Most builders are honest, but you need a Realtor on your side to help you track whether things are getting fixed or not. If they are not fixed, you have to make the decision to pull out of the contract or stay in, but at least you’ll have the information.

I do believe a builder would be obligated to install a product in accordance with the manufacturers instructions as not doing so voids the warranty. 100% they must do so according to local code. Thats the law. But I imagine there are general fit for purpose clauses in the contract as well as what's known as implied warranty of merchantability. That implied warranty exists even if it's not stated. That buy the way is the law that says a merchant That sells you something designed to do something must do that thing. If I pay you to put on tires and you don't tighten down the lug nuts and the tires fall off. That's a case of even if I didn't write down on paper by the way you will tighten the lug nuts it's implied. Any reasonable consumer expects lug nuts tightened down as part of a tire change. If a builder installs a weather protection system in such a way as to prevent it restrict it from actually protecting against the weather. If I pay you to install weather protection it's implied regardless of contract that you install it so it actually does that. An implied breach is actionable.

I believe Preston Sandlin is over there. He can help.

They have to break through the concrete and reposition the pipe.

I don’t know anyone out there, sorry

I can’t remember what build this was

That will be between the builder and the client. Most of the time they will release the funds.

No such thing as near free. Its fascinating how yall rationalize your stupidity and entitlement. I would bet in another comment you are complaining about high housing cost, or food pricing.

This is common builder slander. No different than an inspector saying, “I find most builder are over confident in their product.” No reason to trash talk anyone. You can easily see the issues we point out.

I heard it was 96%. I’d say they’re smarter doing inspections instead of doing the actual work. Trades destroy your body before too long.

your not canceling shit, you signed a contract just because some clown have a different opinion ,all he's trying to do is justify his fee, we build to municipal code ,and builder asso nation standards

I would not sign an intent to purchase without an escape clause for failure to pass inspection! this shoddy construction is surly NOT code!@@davetupman462