herranton1979 unless it was shot on that 55k 100mp thing

RedUnicorn You do bring up a good point. You may be able to tell the type of camera (medium format, large format, 35mm, super 16, etc), but you still wouldn't be able to tell which brand it is. Although even larger formats can be mimicked with things like the Brenizer method (fro might be able to pick that out, but I wouldn't know a shot like that from a real medium format unless something went really wrong in stitching). You still wouldn't be able to make out the _brand_ though, outside of some really specific examples. (like the deep field photos were taken with perkin-elmir glass....dur).

Nikon has the red ring of power

herranton1979 it's like coke and Pepsi to me

I thought red ring is a Canon users cult.

same thing i said! whats the point of this review as well? i mean he knows he will always go towards Nikon!

royandescartes The point is to give people options to make their own mind up.

Jared Polin sony.

Jared Polin The 5D is not a first generation bud as the name imply's its a Mark III

phourtwenteephorlife I think he knows that, what he was trying to get at is that it's due for replacement soon, but I think you knew that as well.

+yuenglingking to the top haha

+Thephiliphong what lol

+yuenglingking The guy wears glasses. It probably makes it easier for him to read.

+Lit Visions yes right now.

Very good observation

+Brandon Morton ñ

robb1138 thank you. I'm going to return my t6i on Monday. Getting the nikon d5600. And going to buy a lumix g7 just for video

Yeah I think so!

Really? You ever try shooting with a Potato BlackBerry? No, it's not. Gear matters.

+Kris Vladimirov It does help. But if you don't know your gear it doesn't matter what you kinda camera you got

Yeah but that's not the point of this video. You're not very bright.

+Rudy Silva He was debating which one is better. I'm saying that if you have a Canon and suck at taking pictures and have no idea what you're doing or how to use it, the pictures are not going to come out well if you have that Blackberry camera you were talking about and you know how to use it and you know what is what and what buttons do what then that's a better camera.

No body cares. The conversation was never about the abilities of the user. This video is about the capabilities of an object. It's objective. You're missing the point entirely.

Omg xD

That;s literally as good a reason as any. They're both so great, it may as well come down to that.

Same here 😂

Me either! I also hate the red line on the grip lol

I didn't like the yellow straps too

Canon is superior in video while for still photography I would vote for Nikon. The light metering is underexposed for Nikon and Over-exposed for Canon, for digital image it under-exposed is easy to solve and over-exposed just kill the details that can't be restored.

+JACKnJESUS premium word usage

Both brands use 36mm by 24mm format in cameras that were compared in this video. I get that you're a fanboy. Just don't make your lies so straight-forward and you will be fine.

Canon has a full frame sensor too. What are you on about?

it is

Hahhaha!

+Nicolas Bertolotti Nah he's attaching a brown filter.

lollllll😂😂😂😂😂

+Nicolas Bertolotti that's why he paused! ahahaha

Aaron Fisk he has glasses it probably makes it easier

Aaron Fisk lol ikr

Aaron Fisk, so he knows when he has highlighted everything.

Because it makes it stand out more.

Fro knows photo, thats his website :)

see it works catches peoples attention well! haha

Peter2kx thankyou.

DylanDTrimble 😂😁😈😈😈

Sony is such expensive

The vintage lens used old materials glasses that I found the color, sharpness were special and look more natural than cut-edge sharp modern lens.

ZEAL FILMS MATRIX im using d5200, i will recomended you to save your money and wait for nikon d7100

DSLM wins DSLR in auto-focus speed as well, but only in single auto-focus mode, but the continued auto-focus is just notch behind top DSLR like D4 or 1DX when it comes to fast action (martial arts) or motor sports (or horses, dog races etc), so it really isn't a bad thing but just like 5-10% off. DSLM wins DSLR in many ways in fast situations, as with EVF alone its huge benefit to see the exposure correctly before you even take the shot. No more taking samples and glance rear LCD how it looks, how histogram looks etc. No more relaying to exposure metering (point, center-weighted, full-frame) as you see exactly how the photo will look like. No more overexposure or underexposure as shadow/highlight clipping like Olympus has (Red for overexposure, Blue for underexposure) tells you immediately what you can recover, wins zebra anyday... No more focusing problems in fast expected situations (snowboarder jumps behind hill etc) as manual focus can't be easier as with focus peaking. No more focusing problems in portraits when face detection AND eye detection (even possible choose left/right or closest one) like Olympus has makes taking street portraits easier than ever (requires auto-focus). No more focusing problems in Macro or landscape when you can just enlarge the view to wanted area and really check the focus, very awesome in astronomy! Throw there all other fancy features like touch screen and you can just touch the point from what you want the shot and its done. Makes very easy to do low and high angle photography. Throw there features like WiFi and you can have multiple cameras in different angles and take shots from other camera with smartphone! Stick the camera on 7m pole and you have secure controllable long-monopod and much better than any UAV for landscape photography. The only place where DSLM lose to DSLR is the battery consumption. While with cameras like Olympus E-M1 you can get 1000-1500 shots with a single charge, you do with DSLR easily 2000-3000 shots. But throw there couple batteries with you and problem is solved (unless you are guest in weddings and you have only suit without anything else than camera in hand). DSLR is dead, in low-light, in strong contrasty or backlighted situations, in sports, in normal landscape etc. (Take a D810 example for landscape photography and you need a very heavy and sturdy tripod to get sharp photos, but there it then wins easily with pixel amount).

"Currently, they defeat DSLRs in 4 areas; low light, portability, manual focus and video." Low light is sensor and processor specific, not mirror based. The mirror, or lack thereof, has nothing to do with high ISO performance. There is only one mirrorless camera that outshines DSLRs, and that's the A7s. Once again, the mirror has NOTHING to do with it. If you remove the A7s, then the high ISOs are the same when comparing similar FF sensors. Also, the big lens argument still holds true for professionals, and experienced amateurs. For those who want to shoot with a 24-70 or 70-200/2.8 (wedding photographers), then they're still going to have to stick large glass on the front of the camera - it's a matter of physics. I wish people would stop acting like there aren't drawbacks to either system. DSLRs are bigger, but they offer better camera/lens balance and deeper grips. Mirrorless cameras tend to be smaller and more portable, but may sacrifice lens selection, and grip.

kingalias clearly you havent tested some other mirrorless cameras than A7 when you say that for grip. The DSLR design like Canon and Nikon has offers worse grip than smaller mirrorless camera. And even Sony A7(r) lose about 11% in SNR (Dynamic Range) to one much smaller mirrorless camera (m4/3) when it comes to same depth of field (required feature to get deeper DOF in almost every portrait photography, just check the libraries) and that offers even benefits to freeze motion with two stops faster. Removing mirror causes that whole camera needs to be redesigned, optics needs to be redesigned and new technology needs to be implemented. Its not possible just remove the mirror and continue as it ain't changed requirements to change other elements. When the mirrorless cameras cons are like 5-10% worse continues autofocus, it doesn't really matter. You can often see samples how praised pros praise DSLR continues focusing speed in sport, where the subject is so far away that depth of field is covering whole subject in almost hundred meter either direction. Then they praise how fast the focusing was and accurate. Well, in many fast situations its just pre-focus and then high framerate. Ultra high ISO is often not needed (over 6400) except by those who are afraid to use flash. The whole photography history has managed to get awesome photos without ever going so high ISO as now many now requires. Its more like there ain't skilled photographers anymore, there are just rich photographers who only wants latest gear and best automation so the camera would do the job to them. Like the lens selection, quality or amount? Nikon and Canon has native lens collection from decades, but quality is good only very few of those. Smaller mirrorless cameras has a smaller collection, but beats most if not even the best ones from Canon or Nikon (and from few other in some cases) in quality and offered angle of view, resulting that the photographer doesn't need to choose between dozens of optics when 1-2 are already the best offerings. Makes the decision making easy when made decision hardly can go wrong and collection covers wider angle of view range same time. Like how many lenses someone needs to give them 46° degree? Or how many to get a 28.5° degree view? Two, five, six, twelve? How many bodies there really needs to be, if one twice smaller and lighter offers 95% of the image quality and rest is possible get covered with software? We can get all kind a fancy tech, but the most important factor still doesn't change, and that is the viewer. Most photos are so low by resolution (like 800x600) and viewed from uncalibrated displays that the DSLR really doesn't offer any kind benefit what's so ever. Even mirrorless are having a problems because a 100-200€ smartphone does well enough for average joe life. It is just the niche small group that repeats "its must be a Full-Frame and a DSLR!" while rest of the world is going by. Many even turns back to film when they want high quality.

paristo I think you just had an argument with yourself.... 1) I own a Pen PL-1, have used NEX cameras (my department just bought one for work), and have held other mirrorless cameras (except from Fuji). Yes.... yes I have used other mirrorless cameras. I own a D600, and still find it more comfortable than any mirrorless camera that I've used, and the D600 doesn't have the deepest grip. 2) I know the optics need to be redesigned for what is called the flange distance, the size of the sensor must also be taken into account. HOWEVER, that flange distance doesn't turn a 70-200/2.8 into the size of an 85mm prime for a FF sensor. Just like the Sony 70-200/4FE isn't substantially smaller than Nikon's. 3) I've seen samples, and they are 5-10% in GOOD light. 4) I don't even know why you're arguing about ISO. I already said that the mirror has nothing to do with ISO. 5) Your lens selection argument is silly. Some people like primes, some people like zooms, some like fast aperture, so don't mind modest apertures. Nikon and Canon have all of those covered. For now, the mirrorless options don't, but will. 6) Depends on the photographer 7) $100-200 smartphones do well enough until people want something they actually care about, which is where higher tech cameras come in.

kingalias Nothing you mentioned is in conflict to what I've written, yet somehow it seems you're disagreeing. Let me address these issues 1 by 1. Firstly, the thing about low light having nothing to do with mirrorless or DSLR camera types. Of course this is true. I'm just pointing out that if you want the best in low light ability, then mirrorless is the way to go (because they have the king of low light cameras for now). In a similar vain, I can say that AF performance has nothing to do with a camera having a mirror, but it just so happens that the 1DX and D4s are better at AF performance and they happen to be DSLRs. I also mentioned about the lenses earlier, but you probably missed that bit. I'll summarise by saying you can make an A7r big but you can't make a D810 small. Finally, I never mentioned that there aren't drawbacks to either system, you just happened to have read it that way.

Nickon sounds stupid tho

I find it depends on the region. Think about the word 'fuck' U.S. - fuh-ck Western EU. - f-OOK Australia - fahck

+Propane TreeFiddy I don't say fook 😂 that's only in some parts like up north I live in London in England

The Japanese don't pronounce their i's like that, Scott Chegg is right, it's 'Neekon". It's how I pronounce it as well, but the company officially uses Jared's pronunciation for NA.

Sony is getting up there, it should be recognized at least. But with some camera reviewers they are stuck between nikon and canon, and don't notice sony for its power and the ability to change/adapt. And when they do all they want to do is bash it. I have a Sony a6000 and a Sony a7ii and it's a beauty, worth all my money

True that.. I use a Sony A57 and love it

Well I prefer Nikon/Canon bec they are just camera brands. Sony is best for TVs

+CUTIEPiepixels​ would you say the same for Minolta? Minolta is now the Sony branch for camera

Gokul Krishna Addanki sony alpha 77 mii is good r bad against d7200 and canon 7d.mii

Don't forget the inbuilt Wifi and GPS. Both come in very handy. I also found enough customization in Al Servo mode for keep track of moving subjects and the camera does a good job of doing this in good lighting conditions. Also the buffer I found to be very good even on a slow memory card shooting both Raw + jpeg at the same time. It's not rocket fast like some of the other cameras but it still more than capable for many situations apart from sport/wildlife photography. But at the end of the day image quality from this sensor is stellar and for a grand and a bit saving over the 5D Mk III you can buy yourself a nice L lens or some quality flash gear.

Adam Bolt Of course! and you could almost buy two 6Ds with the price of one 5D mark III, sometimes you can find them at $1300 on ebay. I know it lacks of so many features but again, i dont think it is a bad option or an option not to consider and i dont think this is an old camera, it is still young, i will think it is old in maybe two years when ti is a 4 year camera but it was just released september 2012 i think, just 2 years have passed and dont forget it is the NEWEST FULL FRAME SENSOR in the canon lineup.

I agree. 6D's image quality is not outdated at all. Still now, it's probably the best at this price and even higher.

Do you think Canon will announce a new camera line-up in February?

I love my 6D!

I'm in the same position. From what I know the 5D Mk III is on another level. It's should be compared to the D800/D810.

+Elliot Maverick actually I made my mind and it will be a d810.. it's way better than d750 in terms of the dynamic range. 5dm3 falls in a category worse than both the nikons.

evertuber I've seen amazing photos with 3 cameras so you can't go wrong. I'd lean towards the Canon due to their used/refurb lenses being abundant so you can get huge deals, and their lenses can be adapted with the Sony A7 series, which I may pick up in the future.

Honestly, it makes little difference. They are both good brands, however, once you pick a brand, you are there for life, because of glass compatibility. Nikon is great, Canon is great. Canon is horrible if you previously owned Nikon because the UI feels awkward and none of your glass works without adapters. Nikon is horrible if you previously owned Canon because the UI feels awkward and none of your glass works without adapters.

750 is way better. dynamic range topples the markIII but markIII has better autofocus. so depends on what you shoot

used to use the d600 for club indoor, just got the d750. while the d750 has a little edge on af in the dark, the d610 might save u more money

xophaser thanks..

Stills 18-105 VR at the moment. Its so versatile. If I spring for the 610 I'm getting the Nikkor 50mm and the tamron 70-200

Curly Crown so you haven't even purchased quality glass, but you're worried about jumping to full frame?

Justin King yes..

It'd be pretty hilarious seeing one of those with an EF mount adapter with a 70-200 2.8 stuck on it haha! That lens makes even a 5D MkIII look kind of comparatively small. Unless you have the battery grip.

yeah that would make the nex 7 look like a lens cap haha TalesOfWar

devlin Lynden you get that red line on the Canon lenses though

It's funny, cos it's that same red highlighting that put me off the Nikons. Looks tacky.

jetblakink hmm, interesting, i see it as a point of difference and i guess my eye is just attracted to it. I see where your coming from though.

I liked the red strip on F3. This newer design just looks wacky.

+Charlíchimo Pagaínzar Except that's bullshit a fanboy would say.

I dont like Apple, is just how masses behave

this idea helps me a lot

Nah a leica is apple

@@charlichimopagainzar The masses do not buy apple. Are you serious? I'm not saying windows is better but windows PC's and Linux PC sales are so much higher than Mac sales. On Mobile, Android has like 9 times as many users. A lot of artists use Mac computers but not the masses at all.

en4ce When they have the lenses to compete than there will be a change in guard.

Sony's problem is the lack of good lenses for their mirrorless system. Too much you'll be depending on adapters.

yep, as i said... its e-mount :D but you know, id really like to see a review from you for the a6000 and lets see how much nikon / canon stuff we'll see after that on this channel :) e.g. jason lanier :-P

The (F)E-Mount gets sub-pro lenses compared to the A-Mount line like the 24-70mm F/4, 35mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/4, 55mm f/1.8 etc. The a6000 however is a nice lightweight camera though. Lens wise it is lacking also. Adapters to put other lenses I think kills the purpose of the system. I want to use a light mirrorless lens that comes with the mirrorless territory, not an adapter and SLR lens-sized glass. I would however use the A7 system with Zeiss F-Mount glass or Leica glass. But that's about it though.

thanks! villegas24

Nikon: ducati panigale Canon: kawasaki h2r

I'm a motorcyclist.

Sort of. As he said, lenses. There's just a bigger, more realised range from Nikon and Canon both first and third party. Sony are doing some great things with their bodies, but they need a few more years to round out the lens range for them to become a proper contender in the "pro" space.

I was a canon only shooter, those days are over. After acquiring the A 6000 and soon the A 7s or in the future the A7sm2, I haven't looked at Canon and Nikon the same way. I kepted all my canon glass (4 L lense in total) and have combine them with the metabones speedbooster ultra. All in all it depends on the amount of lenses you have before you make the switch and have the extra cash for a Speed Booster. *Unrelated side note, Sony makes all of Nikon's Camera Sensors. So it's like you're shooting on a Sony Camera, but in a Nikon Body.*

GundamKicks No, not all of their sensors.

GundamKicks Sony makes most of their sensors (not all. I think Toshiba make some) but that's only part of the story. A lot is down to the processor and the algorithms they use. Apple use Sony sensors in the iPhone for example, but the rest of it is an Apple thing. The software, the processor, the lens blah blah.

GundamKicks The sensor is just part of the equation. Nikon cameras use superior software/processing. That's why Nikon cameras are rated higher in image quality than Sony despite the fact they both use the same/similar sensors. The A7s is $2500. You'd be better off selling what you have and buying a Nikon D750 for $2300 along with some lenses. It rates way higher and you get access to a huge/better selection of lenses and accessories. If you're going to spend that kind of money, you might as well go with Nikon or Canon and get the complete package. www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings

no, i mentioned where they all came from.

Yeah I posted that too soon!

Jared Polin could you mention it for me by replying back? thanks!

WATCH THE VIDEO

That is so deep

Indeed it is. Four words couldn't say more.

Hahahah It is a matter of habit

RSAS media You spelled NIKON* wrong lol

real funny... Dillon Zabarte

Kevin Garcia t5i all the way man