thank you Mr. Kumar and Dr. Otto. It's past time for all of us to come together, spread the word, and be activists.

As a climate scientist who makes a LOT of graphs, I'm now just going to start pointing out the window into the fiery inferno of the coming Australian summer.

Think that now is the time to be blunt with the message of earths changed climate. Scientific papers and journals are often lacking in how "fucked" we are.

Thank you for creating this! Will definitely share!

For the algorithm I am glad she has hope

Fantastic video from Kumar and Otto! Really hammers it home, and I appreciate that moment at the end a lot. Climate scientists are just regular (albeit in this case unusually stylish) people with an ear to the ground and an on the sky. They get stressed and irritated and hopeful and happy, so let's aim for those last two, because they do a lot for us. Also, looove the earrings. Listen up, folks, or the axes will be full size next time.

Great videos. I know we can still avoid the worst. I just think we as a society won't. Out of greed, misinformation and not wanting it to be true. I so hope I'm wrong.

The fact of the matter is that carbon dioxide makes plants grow faster and more robust. And it also makes them more resistant to drought . Carbon dioxide is a very beneficial byproduct of the energy industry. That coal-fired 2,600 MW power station in Ohio doesn't merely help farmers in Ohio. Because carbon dioxide dissipates into the atmosphere, it helps farmers grow more food worldwide.

Thanks for bringing it to the point. Well done!

As a university Student I thought about specializing in glaciers, but I just couldn't see myself as a History teacher.

Personally I don't think the language was necessary to get the point over, but maybe it works. Good to see Wind Farms off the New York coast now, I guess we're more used to them in the UK.

How fucking metal is a scientist wearing double-bladed axe earrings?

There is another twist to why change is painfully slow which doesn't come up often. Governments don't exist without tax income. They don't have money (unless it is a surplus), they don't make profits - it is why the idea of UK PLC doesn't really make any sense. Fossil fuels have been a huge income source for many govs. It has helped stabilise countries, reduce poverty, increase education, simply because the gov has more money to throw around. In some countries, they don't have to tax their populations because the revenue is so high. For developing countries, they look at the old guard, see how rich they became on fossil fuels, and say, "we want some of that," at just the point where the planet is shouting, "no you can't - I can't take any more greenhouse gases, etc. I've had enough!" And the old guard countries are scared silly that by leaping over to renewables, the amount of energy money available for taxing will crash - especially as the tech becomes cheaper and cheaper. Their cash cow is potentially a lot smaller. But, moving from fossil fuels is ESSENTIAL. And so are all the other things that cost money. I think some governments have yet to see numbers that reconcile the problem, and that makes them dangerously cautious.

Remove the swear words for wider distribution of the important underlying message.

I don't think comedians like Nish Kumar should swear and blaspheme. It is offensive.

With money you can buy everything. Including science.

A PhD in climate attribution. You do know CO2 is essential to all life.