Mostly in the USA where a large part of the people seem to have gone mad or stupid.

​@@jimmyquigley7561I wouldn't say most. But the politics of my country have gone completely mad. You can't even speak solutions without it being called devisive

Also Sabine politics and views and climate change have been trash in the past years

I’m more so surprised that those types of people watch this video in the first place

@@OlmanWillo You are definitely not unique, that's for sure. But you are very visible regarding partisan politics. Quite bizarre.

Scholar dot Google

Been looking at hot models all day 😏

stop using Google.

Hehe...

​@@HarryWHill-GAHe wrote one yt 😅

Move to China, you’ll love their ‘green’ policies.

Let them enjoy the next 5 years if you can spoil them a bit and if you wanna go on a trip, don't say I guess ill wait until next year. Unless we start trying to climate control ourselves some way or another. 2030-2035 will be disastrous. 2040 I don't even see a point to think that far at this point. The green house gas emission are also increasing every year more then these model suggesting we all respect our engagements with the wrong low sensitivity index.

Why? The most lush and bio diverse time in history had 400X the carbon and was a lot warmer. Food grows faster and easier. Less people die from cold.

@@CommanderRiker0 you've gotta be kidding me man...

@@baribari1000 What is incorrect about my statement?

One person, plus one person, plus one person, over and over and over, CAN make a difference. And there's one difference we can make which you didn't mention. VOTE. Vote for whoever in your country doesn't deny the issue, whoever wants to do the work to keep the planet livable for at least most of us. In the USA, for example, that is the Democratic Party. The other "team" is too busy tearing itself apart trying to kiss a felon's arse, while that felon keeps tossing them under the bus for profit and power.

Useless af bro i'm sorry. As useful as a group of prayer for someone having terminal cancer. Even "Working from home" Requires a massive infrastructure for the phone, the laptop etc. The entire system is corrupted. States could just ban plastic, for example. And they don't. why ? They could make train mainstream again. They don't. and so on and so forth. just greenwashing and auto virtue signaling but nothing true

than work on solutions how to feed yourself without the need of the power of the fire. if you can't even do it for you, you cant help anyone else

And support - though so much harder to achieve - the elimination of fossil fuels and the influence of corporate power on policy. Amen

One thing you can do is to get your friends join you. What I think works best is to not dwell on accusations and threats, but practical suggestions to empower them to do things. E.g. don't say to your colleague "you are guilty because your car pollutes the environment" but say "I started cycling to work. It's brilliant - I feel so much more energised after cycling 20min every morning, I've already lost 2kg and yes, it also makes me happy that this is better for the environment. Thinking of it, you also have a bike, don't you? Wanna join next week?" If you can persuade 5 friends or family members to do stuff - and there's a lot an average person in a wealthy country can do without unduly making their lives miserable, just with a bit of creativity and discipline - you have already greatly increased your CO2 savings. And maybe your 5 friends eventually convince some of their friends... And I do hope that people who engage a bit in saving CO2 themselves will be more willing to accept, and vote for, highly necessary government action too.

That’s true, but our individual psyches are created in part by our culture and history. Our current world is not setup for cooperation and we’ve allowed selfishness to thrive. The prosocial beliefs and behaviors necessary to change things are possible for humans to adopt, but it starts at the root. Maybe there’s something to the idea of a Capitalocene rather than an Anthropocene. I don’t think this is an innate problem of the human psyche, but of the psyche of the very Europeans whose worldviews spread around the world starting around the 16th century.

In principle it is a good thing we have this reflex. Because starting to panic or being depressed does not help. We evolved to concentrate on the present, getting enough food for the next winter, having enough wood to heat, finding a partner and so on. The most depressive thing to me is, that there are many things we can do quickly. We can build green energy fast, there is no physical limit in that. The technology is ready to cut down emissions by maybe 80% today. We could build millions of wind turbines, solar cells, battery storage etc. in the next 5 years and shut of most of fossil fuel. Only after that we would neet technology that is not yet developed. But why are we not doing it? Because of economical reasons. Nobody is willing to out down the mony to do this in the paste required. Many people would need to change their job from fossil to green energy really fast. Fossil assets like fossil plants would lose most of their value. We just do little to late right now and future generations are going to hate us for that.

The obscene wealth of algorithm-customized distractions does not help either. 🎪

That's because way back when we invented human society, we slowly stopped seeing ourselves as connected and started seeing individuals as powerful and independent. A proper perspective would be considerably more altruistic and ironically we would've been better equipped to handle current changes if we'd all had pre-social mindsets that view the family (in this case meaning the extended families of humanity and life on earth) as more important than its individual children. Because it doesn't really matter how powerless an individual is, you see; in groups, we have power, so if every individual serves the group, the group becomes nigh-invincible. That's how both disease and multicellular life, teams and hive minds alike find success. Humans technically serve their group, but we spend way more time on ourselves and don't bother acting in ways that would benefit everybody if everybody acted that way. There's no money in it.

@@langohr9613ify I actually believe that capitalism is able to adapt relatively quickly. Like Sabine said just make carbon emission more expensive and energy providers will flock to renewable and nuclear energy to make money. There just need to be political will, which comes from the people, to make this choice which will affect them via the form of higher prices on almost everything.

That is what scientists do. That is what they have to be pretty good at in order to Identity new research topics. If you have the feeling this isnt been done often enough i would probably change or at least check my source because typically this is a week spot of journalist, not the scientist.

Science lives off "don't know"'s. The whole point of a scientist it to ecxel in turning don't knows into knows. (The _exact_ reverse of religion BTW, that _exploit_ don't knows). Journalist's tend to excel in misinterpreting science, trying to dumb it down for their readers, and screwing everything up in the process. Climate change is a great example of this, the term "global warming" is so _soft and fluffy_ that it just hasn't got the _real message_ over to the public. Messaging IS important, as _any_ politician will agree.

Weird. What I noticed was hackneyed superficial banter.

Hi Sabine, I was really surprised by the dramatic forecast you gave at the end. I have seen in my life several major themes that would or should have ended or disrupted civilization. Overpopulation, global warming, thermonuclear war, ozone depletion and rising sea levels are but a few. Your forecast sounded so much like that type of talk. It has made me lose some confidence in you as a scientific commentator. I have a mathematics and physics background and have always enjoyed listening to your commentary on the physics fields. I have always felt you are an expert on physics matters. When you see that you get the most dislikes on your videos regarding climate change, I suspect the answer could be that you do not come across as such an expert on this topic. I disliked this video and did so because I felt it was the case. It is a sad outcome and something you should look into. It is likely I am not the only one who has formed this view. Anyhoo, I wish you a great day and will remain subscribed. Kindest regards, Tony

Sure? “Unvaccinated are a danger to themselves and others. Of course, they should not have the same rights and freedoms as vaccinated people. Anyone who intentionally puts others in danger has to live with the consequences.” Sabine 🤡 Hossenfelder - 2021

Yes, many people see this more as terraforming than as climate change. Canada and Russia will get huge benefits from a warmer climate.

10 years of subjective memories versus billions of years of change mostly caused by the sun.

Had practically no winter here in middle North America. Also very strange.

Kalamazoo Michigan had centuries old record broken for cold temprature in January 31 2019. -16

Malaria used to exist in North America. A chemical called DDT was used to kill so many mosquitoes that malaria was wiped out. But it also was wiping out birds by making their egg shells weak reducing reproductive rates. The bald eagle is an example. Dumping chemicals into Lake Erie through the Cuyahoga River has caused them to catch fire, most recently in 2020. Releasing chemicals in large amounts doesn't only change the environment and climate, but can also cause extinctions. This is a fact.

12k year cycle of cataclysms is here. See creative society asap

Due to weather control, that they use to further their climate change lie, come on people figure it out. It's not about change, and they could care less about the climate, this is only about control. Control of all food, water, and everything else, what exactly do you think the one world order is going to do, care about everyone? Get real people, stop watching CNN for all your information.

I needed a good laugh after watching this video. Thanks.

@@user-ki4ek9wn1l Yes b/c you clearly, a stranger online, know far better than a scientist how the world and systems work. And you know better than me, even though I studed economics at the doctoral level. But what do I know?

@@user-ki4ek9wn1l She obviously knows more about the topic than you. Here in Germany we are more aware about the problem. Island states or low lands like the Netherlands also... Just the ducking super powers think they can decide how ever they want... thanks for messing it up for everyone else.

​@@opheliawild You're right, but your arguments are invalid. Being a scientist doesn't make her an expert in all scientific fields, and it turns out she did trigger a response from an actual climate scientist. As for the economic doctorate level... well... only people who have studied economics think economy is a serious field of study :D !

if ppl dont know about the climate scam by now, they deserve to be robbed in taxes @@user-ki4ek9wn1l

Climate Change is not necessarily an intuitive topic. To fully appreciate it you need to not only know a bit of climate science but also have an understanding of thermodynamics, predictive modelling, hysteris in systems, and a half dozen other STEM concepts that most people are never educated on. It's also an issue where the prescription given to ordinary people sucks. Eat less meat, ride the bus, use paper straws, stop flying in airplanes, and be willing to pay more for consumer goods. Oh and if you do all that we're all still probably doomed because your individual consumer habits dont make a dent. We shouldn't pretend that climate denial, as an emotional response, is difficult to understand. The question still needs to be how do you cut through that and convince people to sacrifice and feel fear about something that to those not scientifically educated can feel like bullshit.

🤔 Probably cos, most societies worldwide have been based in having "faith" in God magic (as in "trust me bro" ) & say it's a virtue to trust in "faith" that a "god" is looking after us / will fix it.. ( or is MEANT to bring the "end of times", saving them 🤦‍♀️) This has been a dangerous slippery slope into self-blinding from the obvious reality around us, & excusing them from thinking they need to do anything to help.. 🤔 Can't blame peeps centuries+ ago cos they had no way to know better.. But now we DO have the tools to see/ measure the reality we really live in, & the physical ability to help fix what we've been doing wrong .. 🤦‍♀️☮️🌏

Because we have been fear mongered for two decades and beraly anything have happened? Just the predictions and threats are ramping up. At least that's what my eyes and ears have been observing. This video slightly worried me, as a first, in a long time.

Because it’s bad for your mental health. There’s nothing we can bloody do about it except vote. In a republic, you depend on your representatives to act.

​@rpals5412 climate change scares me because from my understanding by the time it starts effecting us it will be too late to turn it around and I don't trust institutions to take climate change seriously until it starts effecting their profits.

Rain falls may be invoked by silver oxide in the higher atmosphere. Also in Europe we recently observed an increased ratio of sulfur dioxide, followed by a temperature drop. There seem to by undocumented experiments to control weather. From this it's not clear what the actual reason for your documented catastrophe is.

Why the single answer not displayed?

Equatorial countries will have it worse. Agreed: We are in very difficult times friends, hope that one day we can all agree on a solution.

Stay strong.

CO2 helps plants grow. Our planet is 5% greener than 20 years ago, thanks to CO2. We are still in an ice age let's get out of the ice age and melt this fucken ice. The dinosaurs had 3000 ppm of co2, and their temperature was only 27 Celsius. We have 430 ppm only 0.04 percent of our atmosphere. Our weakening magnetosphere is what is driving climate change, not CO2.

Yep. And it's so. Fucking. Aggravating.

@@keiganblaise9878 what is aggravating? You have no idea how complex these things are! No idea whatsoever! What's actually aggravating is the shallow interpretations of people who think they understand such complex scientific domains and the extend of consequences of the offered solutions.

Video Tittle: Let them slave us with carbon taxes ASAP!!!!

​@@C_R_O_M________what exactly is you alternative? Keep debating until there is 100% proof and evidence for exactly how some process is happening? Which by the way has pretty much never been reached in science, and is not the purpose of science. So, what's you suggestion, just go on as usual not changing anything based on the understanding we now have, because it is too "complex"?

This woman is part of the problem. A smart person whoknows numbers is given a large set of fake numbers and is also given a reason for the fake numbers. Not knowing the area at all she is duped into thinking there is a problem. Even many smart people dont know how to think for themselves.

Unfortunately I'm afraid that might be corredt

No one is willing to accept real sacrifices to benefit strangers.

This is true, but never forget that, for true change, an honest effort by government and industry is essential. They create markets and mass consent on a regular basis. They must do that in regard to the climate crisis...or we are in for a lot of trouble...

2023 had most Carbon reductions . carbon dioxide blocks heat both ways. The molecule is to dense to hold much energy

Our modern society,as an overreaction to the socially conscious movements, is so individualized only personal trouble seems to motivate (and then, only individual action for the most part)

Not only how to grow food, but also how to preserve it.

It's also a great satire against the covid19 mandates isn't it :)

It'll be really funny if we're hit by an asteroid a month after we hit net zero.

The climate has to change. It’s not a static thing. It can’t be static.

@@stormchaser9753 Look up dunning-kruger effect. Please try not to ignore facts.

@@stormchaser9753 What climate scientist have you seen saying that climate is static?

I’m tired of it specifically because I trust it, but because no matter how much more I learn about it, how much irrefutable evidence I see, I still know there are so plenty of potato brains in the world who prefer to live in denial, let propagandists tell them everything’s fine, and hinder efforts to do something about it.

I empathize with you, but I disagree that there's nothing you can do. You're right that you can't change your lifestyle to solve it because you're just one person. But what one person can do is stay engaged politically. Like it or not, politics is intrinsic to how we live our lives. It's literally us having a say in how things should be done. Write to your reps, attend meetings, donate, sign petitions (or even make new ones), etc. There are plenty of ways to stay engaged and you're probably going to find one or two that work for you if you give it a try. (Forgive me if you already are - on the internet, context is hard)

it definItly is, keep it up!

You are doing a service, while things like going vegetarian/saving energy are good, this is a step toward large-scale change.

Within a capitalist society sustainability does not work eventually. Most people speaking of it just use it for marketing purposes. The idea is nice, but idealists are the people who end up getting abused by our society.

"Sustainable design engineering" done by humans will never be sustainable. You are marginally decreasing destruction, because your bosses will NOT PAY for actual sustainable development.

@@scepticalchymist ye you right so lets just keep rollin the way we used to till the great downfall of humanity

No, consumerism contributes to the climate change.

Yes, it would hit your region faster and harder than certain other parts of the world. I live in Cleveland Ohio (USA) and our change is milder. This does allow for more people in my region to remain ignorant and blind to the science.

​@@user-qv6sn9xy9k Some parts of the US are very affected. Just think of the year-long drought and all the wildfires in California.

Maybe this is caused by the increased solar activity of the sun. We are near the end of an 11-year solar cycle. But nobody wants to say this as there's no money in it.

I'm from the Northern part of South Africa (pretoria) I can honestly say that our weather patterns have not changed noticeably in the past 30 years (which is how far back I can remember)

45 year old from Johannesburg, can definitely say I’ve experienced a change in weather patterns over the years (anecdotal yes, but I count for at least one observer)

No it isn't

"Never stop talking about it, and don't apologise" Show some FAITH! Believe!

​@@paddleed6176 Just curious. How old are you and where do you live? I'm 54. Cochabamba, Bolivia. Suggestiin: look up #JHAT, Just Have A Think.

@@thomasmaughan4798 Or, you know, do what Sabine does and show some evidence. That thing the Abrahamic religions never do for the supernatural.

These guys will deny any evidence shown to them but they'll wholeheartedly believe in supernatural beings without any evidence 😂

That's cuz we got all your rain. You can have it back, I hate it.

Sucks to be you.

If you see a steamroller inching closer and closer to you, do you stay put or get out of its way?

@@asdffdsa8863 These are people that eat the seeds we drop on them they're supposed to plant. What do you think

Sort comments by new.

Learn how to cook tofu, chia seeds in lemonade, bread, rice beans, low sodium plant-based and you will lower your carbon footprint. Chia seeds are organic, have a complete protein and are 35% fiber for maintaining adequate moisture in the colon.

Weakling. Climate isn't spiraling out of control. Your mental health and rationality are. If you desire information on climate history, please look at Tony Heller's work.

I hear you! It's madness hearing denial of facts in common conversations, especially about something as essential as our climate. Farmers have been worried for decades.

@@jaredkaye3669Thanks!

Suggestion to overcome this non-dicussion culture?

Were you actually trying to have a conversation that was leading anywhere, or where you just denying climate change and that its foolish to think that, and that it doesnt matter etc. Because there you have your answer. If you don't at least entertain the other persons perspective and throw them some bones. You are not trying to have a conversation, and youre definitely not respecting their pov. But you can disagree in a sympathetic way, and have patience and understanding and some self-critique, that you actually might be wrong, and that the other person actually might be right. I find that most people unless THEY are the problem will accept that. You might not change anyones mind, but you can carry on in good spirit and friendship and talk about other stuff and share smiles and laughs.

@@ComplexConfiguration "denying climate change" is a battle term and feeds division, rather than discussion.

Rubbish, that.

Climate change proponents have hyper-politicized the subject because they know their arguments are irrational but they want to win the argument by cheating and bullying. Climate change skeptics and debunkers rationally conclude that their entire theory is pseudo-science and the IPCC and their lapdogs in the science community are corrupt and full of sh!t and their models are mostly fraudulent and the numbers are cooked up. Climate change is the poster-child for junk science supplanting the old ice age scare of the 70's and the Y2K bug scare of the 90's. The skeptics dislike of bogus climate change videos are trying to do video makers a favor by warning them that they are being fooled and should wake up and stop legitimizing what is huge UN swindle that they, the UN, hope will establish a carbon tax that lines the pockets of the unelected crooks... I mean "bureaucrats"... at the UN. Nothing that the UN does is unaffected by corruption. In fact one might say that corruption is the ultimate goal of the UN. If you want to know more about the UN's corrupt climate change fraud, you should watch the documentary on the subject entitled; "The Great Global Warming Swindle'.

pythons and gator and panthers are loving it.

Thats not because of Climate Change, its because the water table is getting low from over use.

Thank your lucky stars you were not around for the heat waves of the 1930s.

This. No one talks about all those times that they didn't record those massive heat waves that people were talking about back in the twenties and thirties that were literally killing entire Farms of cattle. No one is talking about any of that stuff. Meanwhile I also live here in North florida, and it's no hotter than it's ever been at this time of year. I've lived here all my life, and I'm 30 years old. It's always this hot, and it's always this humid. ​@@channel1_channel

Abusing climate fear for 3 videos in a short period of times to generate clicks sent a chill up mine.

​@@Hentai-Semite You don't fear climate change at all. Don't be disingenuous.

@@Hentai-Semite one person here spoke truth...and it wasn't you. Chill that.

@@Hentai-Semite Keep looking for fair ways of comunicating unfair problems while the ones that don't care at all keep the bussiness as usual

You scare too easily...

Also Australian, and have noticed the same. It is heart-breaking, and still we continue down the same stupid path.

Tomatoes here in Nz have become notoriously hard to grow because our UV levels atm are through the roof

😂😂 you don't "notice" climate change, it happens over time scales more vast than a humans life time or 2. What you are seeing is called the weather. Yes it can and does fluctuate. Its not global warming.

Weren't water rights in Australia also tradable like stocks?

The forecast depletion of 50% of the Globe's aquifers, by 2050, will force starvation and mass population migrations, decades before average temperatures are forecast to make the cultivation of the existing crops impossible, if there were only the goundwater. Places like Saudi have already banned the use of groundwater for agriculture, as for now they can sell oil to import food, and burn oil to desalinate water. Though Australia, China, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Iran, Turkey, Mexico, Spain, USA, ..., aren't is the same position, and have 4bn bodies dependent on pumping ground water.

When things get real bad I plan on taking up on both those devices🤪

bunch of wank. one person does something unexpected and you're like "WOW THAT WAS SO COOL" and like it

Too bad real climate scientists have been dunking on her since she put this laughable video up.

I liked that comment too.

@@nobodyimportant7804whom? link them

@@nobodyimportant7804 the only video I could find from a professed climate scientist responding directly to this video was by "ClimateAdam." He disagreed with a chunk of what this woman says, but also implicated that man-made global warming is a very real thing, and addressing it in the long run is important.

That's heartbreaking.

Why do all the elites buy sea front property if the ice caps are melting 😂😂 think about it

@mostlycloudy1738 they arnt thinking about 20 years from now. They are thinking "I want to live on the beach"

@@mostlycloudy1738 "Why do all the elites buy sea front property if the ice caps are melting 😂😂 think about it" There's nothing the think about--sea level rise is a terrible thing we have done to future generations--our emissions in the past and now have ripple effects for up to 150 years, but the serious effects won't happen for awhile for most places. Right now, sea level rise is only ~4.6 mm/yr, so there's no reason for elites to not buy beachfront property that sits 10 feet above the waves.

@@mostlycloudy1738 Using crying emojis in a smug way has to be a sing of very low IQ.

Climate change is real. Both sides can agree. The problem for me and alot of us is, WE are doing ALOT more than anyone else. And it gets used to push “The Green New Deal” ala AOC. Why don’t Greta and AOC go to China and get them to make changes? They want us to give them trillions of dollars for solar panels that they don’t bother to invest in themselves. They have more than quadrupled their emissions since 2000. They’ve built more coal power plants than the rest of the world combined last year… which they also managed to accomplish the year before that as well. We’ll build better sustainable housing and China will keep building ghost cities of skyscrapers. Dumping trash into the ocean. And creating so much air pollution that 2 million people die a year in their country from it.

The 1% know which videos to push, bc they're part of the agenda. I would question videos high in popularity, & not automatically think there's something valid in it.

@@NE0Nwhip I assume you dont get your head checked only because psychiatrists are also part of the agenda? :D

@@NE0Nwhipso I see you’re in the first camp huh

. *Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?* Fact... *All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today.* Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year. Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth.. Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm. Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm. Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm. . *Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today?* . *Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2.* As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, and enjoy the ride (my opinion). Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone? All of these facts are easy to prove true, so, who/what is promoting Global Fear of Climate Change, and why are they doing it? *Answer:... If you have not personally investigated the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset 2030 Agenda yet, now's the time.*

I agree, I think; (you've omitted a word or two, between "always" and "bigger".) Thank you!

Because people keep burying their heads in the sand until it cannot be ignored.

The entire religion of global warming or climate change is based upon one fundamental misapprehension which, if you remove it, causes the entire theory or religion to collapse, and the fundamental misapprehension is that there either is or can be, any such thing as a Global temperature. It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth. A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate. Planet Earth doesn’t have ‘a temperature’, one figure that says it all. There are oceans, landmasses, ice, the atmosphere, day and night, and seasons. Also, the temperature of Earth never gets to equilibrium: just as it’s starting to warm up on the sunny-side, the sun gets ‘turned off’; and just as it’s starting to cool down on the night-side, the sun gets ‘turned on’. The ‘temperature of Earth’ is therefore as much of a contrived statistic as the GDP of a country. (If the Earth was in equilibrium, that is, if it absorbed and re-emitted the Sun’s radiation perfectly, as a ‘blackbody’, then its rotation would be irrelevant, and the temperature would be a constant 6 ⁰C. Mocking up the effects of Earth’s albedo brings the ‘blackbody’ temperature down to -18 ⁰C, and including greenhouse warming brings it back up to around 15 ⁰C.) ‘The climate’ is difficult to define: is it a trend over one decade, century, or millennium? For what sized region is it defined ? Weather is very variable - how can we go from weather to climate? Furthermore, climate change on human timescales is a very small effect, and the empirical data needed for climate models have large ‘error’ bars. If you cannot define what is changing, you cannot say it is changing; It is essential to understand that no man apprehend or experience the entire plant -the whole-thing all-at-once. You cannot even sense apprehend experience yourself - he-whole-thing, all-at-once, so how could you possibly experience something as gigantic as the planet on which you live, other than piecemeal and seriatim - little bit after little bit. If you remove the fallacy that there either is or can be, any such thing as a “Global Temperature” , the entire edifice of climate change and/or global warming, collapses, because it is contingent on the idea that there can be , or is, a “ Global Temperature, which is a thermodynamic and mathematical impossibility. While it is possible to treat temperature statistically locally, it is meaningless to talk about a global temperature for Earth. The Globe consists of a huge number of components which one cannot just add up and average. That would correspond to calculating the average phone number in the phone book. That is meaningless. Or talking about economics, it does make sense to compare the currency exchange rate of two countries, whereas there is no point in talking about an average 'global exchange rate'. If temperature decreases at one point and it increases at another, the average will remain the same as before, but it will give rise to an entirely different thermodynamics and thus a different climate. If, for example, it is 10 degrees at one point and 40 degrees at another, the average is 25 degrees. But if instead there is 25 degrees both places, the average is still 25 degrees. These two cases would give rise to two entirely different types of climate, because in the former case one would have pressure differences and strong winds, while in the latter there would be no wind.

Nobody wants to discuss what is means for the average person in the developed world, because realistically it doesn't mean much. She even goes through it in the video: more immigration, price inflation, economic downturn. So basically the same thing we go through every 15 years due to various factors.

All else aside, it kind of turns me on when she swears. 😍

It's very hard to feel anyone is serious when we aren't switching to nuclear power. Especially if China and India don't switch first. We share 1 atmosphere.

​@@jr7853nuclear power isn't a panacea. It isn't going to cleanse the environment of micro plastics andnforever chemicals, it isn't going to reverse the greenhouse gas feedback loop, it isn't going to regrow the forests, it isn't going to restock global fisheries. Nuclear power is a piece of the puzzle, and only a piece that's meant to replace the fuel that our civilization runs on not ensure it's sustainability, even though it is less of a carbon footprint I believe it would only keep the status quo, i.e. capitalism.

@@jr7853 : Who is "anyone" in that scenario? The public doesn't decide these things. The people who want nuclear have to get investors and they tend to be big money losers. China invests more in nuclear and renewables than any other country. India is still a distant 3rd to the US in carbon emissions.

you know what? too late: "experts" have been telling us the end of the world is near for at least 50 years. I don't blame anyone for not believing "scientists"

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9iWp7l3vbm2o6M.html

Dec 3rd 1972 50 top scientists met at Brown University to write an open letter to Nixon to save us from the coming ice age by melting the arctic by covering it with soot. Jan 5th 1978 NYT International team of spspecialist finds no end in sight of 30 year cooling trend in noerthern hemisphere. The same year a world Meteorologist meeting was held in Geneva to counter global cooling

China.

​@@beskydyk And then wait for India and else

@@beskydyk China has increased his carbon emissions but also because most countries are externalising its production, which means that we're mostly buying things that were made there (and so polluted there). It's unfair to say that Europe is a "clean" region when that comes at the price of polluting in the other side of the globe.

You're probably thinking of the 1979 greenfly explosion. Like all these events, just one of those things that happens occasionally. Nothing to worry about. There is no man-made climate change.

Couldn’t be the huge increase in telecom masts & the 1000s 3:42 & 1000s of low orbiting telecom satellites. There’s a rumour that insects, birds etc may be sensitive to emf environments Even us! & there has been a huge increase in the incidence of a once rare brain cancer glioblastoma as well as an increase in heart & brain conditions among young & middle age adults & an explosion in dementia in older adults Must be climate change!

Which explains the dramatic collapse in amphibian populations, in particular frogs and toads. I’m in my 60s too and have observed that the world of my youth and the world we live in now aren’t the same - and I don’t like it. I blame humans. We’re the cause of climate change and I have little faith in our willingness to address the crises that lies ahead. God help us…

I've been a truck driver for about 35 years and I've noticed the same. Vehicles used to be caked in bugs. There's a highway that goes through Toronto and 30 years ago I'd have to constantly clean my windscreen. Now, no matter where I drive there are hardly any insects. I emailed a Monarch researcher in Michigan mentioning that on my drives, on average, I would count between 70 to 90 Monarchs hitting my truck every day not counting the possible near hits or the ones I didn't see. During peak migration I've counted 120 to 140. She wasn't impressed which blew my mind. I don't hear bird song anymore, and this is the first year I haven't had any mice getting into my house. Things are bad

I'm also 60 and noticed this too. It's one of the scariest examples of baseline shift. Young people see this as normal and don't know how different and rich our world used to be.

this one got spooky

We are in a pretty similar situation. My wife and I moved to southern NH 40+ years ago and have witnessed the changes that have occurred over that timeframe. Living in a rural area makes you acutely aware of how finely adjusted flora and fauna is to the micro- climate of the area.

I have a farm in New Zealand, ive been scared for a couple of years now. Winter, if we have one is 2 months later than it used to be and the sun is hotter than ever. I suspect we will have trouble growing traditional crops within a short time and that we will be too slow to change. The world wont miss us but i worry for my daughters lives.

I remember watching ice sailboat races on the rivers in New Jersey as a kid. The rivers don't freeze at all anymore

@@farmboypresents9977 - you are right to be worried. The younger generations are in for a world of hurt.😞

Yes similar to the dark ages when it rained and was cold and dark and crops failed and people died.

Nuclear is way more expensive and time consuming to build and operate than renewable energy sources. For now, renewables are a bigger focus, because it's just faster and cheaper, which is really important if we want to quickly get away from fossil fuels.

@@deusexmachina5769 Then why close down the existing nuclear plants and replace them by coal plants ? The government shouldn’t have closed the existing ones down before enough renewables had been built. That is counterproductive from a climate crisis point of view

@@damienpeladan481 Yes, it is. That's why most parties advocated for doing exactly that. First you build more renewables and then you shut down nuclear. But the CDU is incredibly corrupt and was obviously bought by the coal lobby, so they decided to instead replace it with coal. But now the question is what to do now and building new nuclear is just too expensive and time consuming, so they're focusing on renewables instead.

In The U.S., private insurance companies won't insure nuclear plants. Why do you think that is?

@@deusexmachina5769 The problem with renewables is their inconsistency. Oil, natural gas and nuclear plants have to be ready to go instantly when the wind doesn't blow or the sun doesn't shine, and they're more inefficient at startup, so the result is MORE energy loss than if there was just one conventional energy source.

It’s crazy

Where I live, in SE PA, USA, it feels like the opposite. This is anecdotal, but I’d say summers tend to be cooler and wetter than they used to. But winters are way warmer. Snow is becoming rare.

​@chmd22 NJ here. Snow is far from rare. We haven't been slammed in a few years, mid-90s and late 2000's were the last time I remember blizzards that dropped several feet of snow. In the mid 2010's we had those "polar vortexes" those winters were brutally cold. The last few winters have been relatively mild.

It's a natural occurrence. Ever hear of the dust bowl? Nature does stuff. The sun, the earth, the sky... Everything is in flux. It always has been.

A few years ago in July or so, it snowed in both hemispheres. When it snows in summer in North America--that's climate change. The recorded temperature history is too short a time to be considered entirely useful in climate determinations such as what is "natural" variability? CO-2 is plant food, so what do they do? Biofuels--cut down and burn forests. When normally green trees would absorb and thereby sink carbon from the atmosphere, idiots are paid to destroy forests--that makes no sense. Who paid them? Where I am a few years ago they had the coldest day on record in over a century, but that lasted only a day or so, and then the temperature went back up high again. Naysayers. They always seem to be wrong. What is to say that Dr. Helmut Fluhrer's precipitation-influencing ionic atmospheric layer devices have not been deployed and used to promote globalism? In 2010 his company was known as Metro Systems and his company made artificial rainstorms in Abu Dhabi UAE for about 50 of 60 days when normally there is no precipitation at all. Now his company is named Weathertec. Born in Germany, and living in Switzerland, Fluhrer's critics are naysayers who base their criticisms on absolutely nothing. That's like saying that there is no causal link between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer--also known as tobacco science. Thick rainstorm clouds in the daytime cast very dark shadows that block the sun's rays from reaching the surface and heating it. What if clouds at nighttime were eliminated to let surface-level heat disperse into outer space. What is the capacity of outer space to dissipate such radiation? Thereby, any daytime accumulated heat can be cast into outer space by clearing the skies at night. The ionic polarization of the atmosphere can be altered by throwing a polarity switch on such atmospheric layer ionization machines. Wikipedia used to have a citation of Metro Systems weather modification experiments of 2010. The article had the information excized. Who would have that be done? Hmmm? reference: business journal artificial rainstorms abu dhabi uae In this case, climate change can be compelled by the constant operation of such equipment to whatever purpose is desired--heating or cooling. Energy saving or energy-wasting on heating or cooling. The people with huge amounts of money pay hired goons to enforce their will on the rest of us. Some guy invents a 100 mpg v-8 carburetor in the 1920s. What happens? Lead is added to gas as an anti-knock agent that just happens to clog such carburetor designs--coincidence--I think NOT! Some video on KZfaq explains that the addition of lead to gas ended up killing a lot of people with this additive. Lead and other heavy metals are known causes of brain damage. Experiments were done with WW1 battleship hull painters to get rid of their lead poisoning. Those who had heart conditions said that the treatment made their heart condition disappear. Later that treatment was banned so that heart surgeons would not lose any business. Fake studies were done to pooh-pooh the entire finding. Science is for sale--a corrupt business you could find anywhere in our corrupted world where love of money motivates the masses to do immoral things that damage themselves and their loved ones. Seems that the rich want to get richer and lord over the rest of us. Some schemes should be invented, not Marxism, that counteracts the evils of Marxism such as central banking and control of financial systems by constantly changing monetary policies and encouraging people not to work by giving more people handouts whenever they vote for them. How to undo corruption? Advanced lie detection systems, truth serums, and a list of pointed questions to unearth corruption and its network of influencers and financial supporters. Punish the guilty rather than the innocent.

Nope, because u aren't OPPRESSED like me: We should welcome Global Warming because Africans are used to WARM climate & get "ashey" in cold weather... THEREFORE... Trying to reverse Global Warming IS RACIST!!!😅😂😊

If new materials are discovered by AI that are 100X better at absorbing atmospheric C02 and turn it into inert, solid C02, then that will allow us to solve this in a novel way.

The challenge is not the absorbing material alone, but the energy you need to pass all the air through the material. Ok if installed with a Carbon dioxide producing power plant, but to forget for processing ambient air.

I don't find it depressing, I find it energizing to have a problem laid out that we have to do something about. Depressing would be if things would improve if we did nothing.

I think I might need a similar trigger warning for this year's elections, nearly half of world's population will be electing leaders this year and there has never been more misinformation and hate online.

Go watch some videos from real climate scientists that reacted to this video and you will realize that Sabine is out of her depth.

All the green NGO and their supporters in the media live from such fantasy to freighten the poeple.

​@@nobodyimportant7804 a comment like this is useless without a reference to the other videos that you prefer

​@@nobodyimportant7804 Who do you mean by "real climate scientist"? Name at least three of them.

Tonga volcano 2022. Why aren't climate scientists talking more about that event that lofted huge amounts of IR-absorbing water vapor into the normally dry stratosphere where it is especially well-placed to absorb IR and affect the climate?

I just returned from Iceland. Had a great time hiking over glaciers that will be gone in 10 years. Real tragedy.

But is it a win or loss for life ? Forest lost, beetles won. Sometimes it feels that climate examples are very human egoistic, but phrased as an issue of life itself. Or more specificly, we are worried for our life to be exactly as it is now and not different,, like old people want the life to be as when they were young. Should we be looking forward to changes, rather than grasping at the past ?

@@dmitripogosian5084 To me, a selfish anthropocentric nordic woman who loves forest, it is my own personal tragedy and it matters to me the most. Of course, mentally I can empathize with the creatures who will gain something with the loss of the forest (but I'm pretty sure those who lose will be in much greater numbers), and I respect the dynamics of nature and its power over us. But emotionally I cannot accept it and will fight until I lose.

@@ChaviChoffChop That is understandable and valid position. But perhaps when we are talking about policies for the whole human population, it makes sense to point out that we often mean preservation of life very literally as it is now. For instance, it is probably far less important than in 100 years Manhattan will be underwater than some other things, and actually it is easier to relocate Manhattan than to change climate. So are we trying to protect not exactly the most relevant things ?

The amazon really is a huge part of the global ecosystem… it can't be allowed to die!!

@@acmhfmggru if u can't see the amazon dying you're willfully ignorant.

Her sardonic comment is the official policy the the American Republican Party it its MAGA Christians.

A rabid eugenicist. A predator trapped in a gilded cage plotting the death of everything moving freely. Evil itself is what I take from the presentation.

What people miss about the climate migration crisis is that nation states do not simply lay down and die. Northern nations are regressing politically, turning more to ethnonationalism, halting immigration, and turning their borders into armed fortresses. The plan the first world is converging to is to raise the drawbridge and shoot anyone who shows up at the gates. While this technique can keep out a loose flood of disorganized migrants, it fails when actual nation states are involved. Border patrols aren't going to stop armies. And the real scary thing about this is we're talking massive heavily armed nation states with nothing to lose. What will the leaders of India do if they're told that in ten years, 95% of their population will be dead due to lethal heatwaves? If history teaches us anything, it's that those leaders will start demanding a place for their people to migrate to. They won't just want us to let immigrants in, they will want us to hand over some of the increasingly habitable high latitude territories as land for entire nations to relocate to. And these governments really will have nothing to lose. We have been spoiled in the post-1945 world in that nuclear weapons, for all their terror, have meant that the big nation states don't fight total wars against each other anymore. There's literally no reason to; anything you would hope to gain from attacking another nuclear power would be more than cancelled out by the apocalyptic destruction a nuclear conflict would unleash. But if your nation is already facing annihilation, if doing nothing will result in the certain doom of your people, what do you have to lose? If the Indian subcontinent becomes completely uninhabitable, the people living there, in the most populace nation on Earth, literally have nothing to lose by throwing their entire society into a total war effort to capture more habitable lands. Even if that conflict results in a nuclear war, it's still a rational strategy for them to pursue. If you're facing a changing climate that will kill 95% of your people, a nuclear war, even one that kills 75% of your people, is a good move. Vast regions of the globe being rendered uninhabitable is one of the few scenarios where a nuclear exchange may actually be a sane choice to a sufficiently desperate country. And the reason I mention nukes is to break through Western chauvinism and beliefs about the absolute military superiority of Western countries. Even if you believe that the northern countries, by din of their vastly superior military acumen, will somehow resist an entire Indian subcontinent thrown into a total war economy, nukes put the lie to that idea. We're engineering a situation where even nuclear war is a rational option for nations of sufficient desperation. And most people are in complete denial about it, thinking that the worst that will happen through climate change is a few coastal vacation homes get flooded.

I wish it was funny.

nice synchronicity, five seconds before I called her a “rockstar” too! 😎

I'm in victoria BC just north and i was shocked to see the Robin's so early as well.

DR RICHARD LINDZEN? KZfaq I LOOK FOR AT LEAST 2 OPINIONS DR LINDZEN HAS BEEN IN CLIMATE OVER 40 YRS AND STATES WHAT THIS IS IS POLITICS

I am in Oregon, here for 20 years. Oregon weather is very close to what northern CA used to be in the seventies, and northern CA appears to be drying and warming. And yes, the robins are here all year long now.

Lindzen gets money from the coal industry. You have to know who you are getting your information from these days. @@PeachesCourage

Oh darn. There's more life in your yard. How terrible, the world might end that you saw a sparrow in January.

i live in south brazil... the cut down of amazon forest changed the rains here too... now the rains that should go to colombia and other western latam countries go to here... and a lot of floods are happening

@@fete0 It's really problematic how drastic it can be, most people here don't even own a car or heavy industry. Somehow we get affected 😔.

It's called HAARP.

climate is variable and there are 10 20 50 100 200 1000 years cycle

There is no increase in droughts, storms, fires or extreme weather damages. The biosphere is greening, habitable lands expanding.

I think the best way for us layman to talk about climate change, it to be informed, but not use it as a tool, because we can't explain it as well as communicators. instead, we should talk about climate change as a humanitarian crisis, its not whether or not, or who did it, but why aren't we helping people who are in need, especially when it'll damage us as well

I wonder if it has occurred to Sabine that companies and other vested interests might be using bots to mass downvote her climate videos? They only need to convince her that it’s an unpopular topic, if they hope to stop her from making them. At least that’s what they will be gambling on, if they hope to influence her at all? So, it won’t matter to them that others can’t see the numbers as you can.

I’m more afraid of gravity change. Since the widespread availability of backyard trampolines started in the late 60s the earth’s rotation has slowly been knocked out of kilter. It is now becoming critical, countless billions are being spent of so called ‘climate change” yet this more pressing pending disaster is largely ignored. I can solve this problem once and for all using strategically placed counter weights on springs at strategic gravity hotspots ( namely my backyard) and I can do all this for a cool 2.5 billion dollars. Don’t wait for the world to end with us all either shooting off into space of being crushed into the ground. Send your tax deductible donation to the “Harvest the gullible fools Institute”. We are also hiring the services of Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny to solve Climate Change. Santa is going to fly his slay around during his off season and the Easter Bunny will accompany him sprinkling the clouds with left over chocolate which has been finely powdered. This will stain the clouds brown and block the sun ending the dreaded warming that we are assured will one day cause sea levels to rise somehow. This can be done for the bargain price of 1.25 ! So what are you waiting for Send your tax deductible donation to the “Harvest the gullible fools Institute” NOW or they may be no tomorrow !

@@acasccseea4434 it isn’t a crisis when the historical average temperature is higher than the current. 150 years of data on a 4.5 billion year old planet isn’t enough data. Ice core samples say the average temp is higher in virtually all times. We are in a cold age right now and coming out of it.

@@UnlinkedCashews You're missing the point. Nobody is saying the climate is different to historical times, they are saying the climate is becoming different to what we need today for our survival. When you say the climate was this warm billions of years ago, remember that there weren't any humans alive back then either which is what everyone's concern is. If you don't consider the potential loss of your food supply as a crisis, perhaps you'll at least be concerned about having millions of refugees suddenly invading your country looking for food and a place to live.

Then Voltaire was wrong, we don't live together. We live very separately in different communities. But since those with no reason are the majority and they vote solely for selfish reasons there really isn't much hope for the future. Maybe after the collapse, those with no reason will "go away", then there might be hope.

Not really... For Mankind... Not for Earth. Even if you wiped out half of humanity. It isn't the only Fate being played on the table. The Earth will inevitably end. Expand or face a later date of extinction.

Leftist and greens are terrorists.

Rubbish, you can't expect a sudden change excluding fossil fuels. But things are changing, look at the reduction of coal usage in developed countries. Look at the shift to electric vehicles. By 2050 demand for fossil fuels will be dead.

It's finally completed: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9iWp7l3vbm2o6M.html

Germans never were rational. Germans are extremists. So, if you have a rational German, he is extremely rational. If you have a german fool, he is extremely foolish. And so on. What is not done wholheartedly is not done at all. Any known German in the last 400 yrs.

"Germany, you were the chosen one. It was said you would destroy climate change, not contribute to it!" A jedi somewher

Would you change your mind if you discovered that the people who present the data and make arguments based on that data actually manipulated that data to favor a profitable agenda they're pushing?

Some of the most nuanced coverage of this topic I have seen from any source. Like Sabine has actually made me think about my own feelings on this topic in the context of how it is politicized vs how to actually think about it methodically/critically. Imo she desrves my sub just for that, never mind all the other great content she puts out.

Carbon neutralise yourself then.

You mean, act out!

@@anaveragehuman2937 If your basis for making this claim is bc researchers are incentivised by money. Then this will be more of tautology than an inditement of any of the evidence. But congrats I guess, scientific research is also motivated by monetary incentives...Captain Obvious saves the day again.

This is only true if you look at recent years. There was an entire decade(2005-2015) where the global average temperature didn’t move much at all and the predictions were much worse than reality. They’re quick to say that THAT was an outlier decade, but when we have a massive unusual global heatwave of a summer in 2023, which is the definition of an outlier, they will say that’s indicative of an accelerating temperature change. It’s not. There’s not enough data yet so it, by definition, is an outlier & just a weirdly hot year, which more aligns with the solar cycle than anything else.

They fake the data. They are constantly "adjusting" past temperatures based on a number of excuses to make them cooler. They claim stuff like temperature gauges weren't accurate enough etc, and then adjust the data to the numbers that meet their agenda. Then their models are constantly wrong. And as the saying goes, if the predictions are wrong, it's because the hypothesis was incorrect. That's how real science works.

They also assume that heat exchange with the interior of the Earth can't change on the order of a human life span while there is no measurement to support that since most of the Earth's surface is covered in water and we know more about Mars than we do about the Ocean floor.

The model isn't causing the warming. Even if we adjust model to accommodate faster warming (not really how it works), there's no causal loop that that then makes Earth warm even faster. Just means we keep under estimating it.

@@mirfjc Oh, thank goodness this poster was around to inform us that observational data doesn't cause the observational data that is observed when taking observational data.

Exactly, the only thing we've learned is that we've practically exceeded every worse case scenario in the previous global warming models so far. I don't know why they'd decide to now die on the climate sensitivity hill for why global warming couldn't be happening even faster still.

I feel like a nutcase when I talk about it to friends. Don't want to sound like an alarmist, but we kinda...need to do something about this.

Don't smoke please. You are contributing for the worst-case scenario.

@Hei, I have read comments by scientists to the effect that they sometimes downplay the risk so as not to be seen as lunatic alarmists and also in fear that people will decide it´s hopeless and give up all efforts. In my opinion things are going to get very bad, that is inevitable at this stage, but we can still prevent them from getting truly horrible.

Been seeing alarmists for over 30 years man. Those paper straws are truly saving us all

competency crisis

You can thank the leftist ”green” parties for that. For instance Germany ramped down nuclear power and switched to much worse options.

What bothers me most are the people insisting there is a crisis and sea levels are rising keep buying up ocean front property they claim will soon be underwater and buying these properties at a premium price. Nancy Pelosi bought a $20 million mansion in South Florida right on the beach last year. Barack Obama has a $50 million compound on Martha's Vinyard, ocean front and about to be underwater if the crisis is real. Give me a break already!

The typo in the wishlist , no 3, irritates the importance of this topic : nucear nucear nucear . Solving the repository issue must be point 2!!

Beacause the term “nuclear” can hardly be pronounced in western speaking countries, let alone be depoliticized for long enough that anyone can reasonably appreciate its scientific impact

And yet climate change will increase the rate at which civilisation 'cracks up'.

Can you say "perfect storm"?

No you can't say perfect storm. It's more like "6 ways till Sunday." We push every boundary of everything until we get consequences.

We are clever primates...not particularly smart however🤔

No, the climate is pushing civilisation to crack up, it's like Sabine says, some people see the connections and some don't.

Were supposed to have a foot of snow and 10 degree temps up here in Minnesota but its getting up to the 50s for over week straight.

It’s so noticeable in the middle as well. In Ky we went from regular several inches of snow all winter even a decade ago, remember when 21• was noteworthy. Now it’s rain and 20sto 50s all winter with a few dry arctic blasts at near zero. My oldest kids played in the snow regularly and their younger brother barely remembers. The plants have been so confused earlier and earlier.

My husband wants to move south for the weather and I’m saying the south is coming to us!

Scotland is seeing temps over 19C. Should be under 10C. When I moved to the UK, over 35years ago, it was normal to get 30cm of snow (that's in Yorkshire). Now, it is surprising if we get 2, 3 cm.

yeah, 50 years in millions, and YOU "know" climate is changing and the world will end in fire or ice or whatever is the panic hype of the moment.

Climate the movie kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mLVxiNanu87Lo4k.html

I live in Greece, and i came to this video exactly for this reason, after experiencing 32C 3 days ago and the situation only shows that this year's summer will be the hottest on the other hand, and on the other hand it will be the coldest that it is to come. Last year in Greece we reached 48C and probably this year we'll see 50, lots of people will die of heat, especially people who cant afford air conditioning (keep in mind that Greece has some of the most expensive electricity prices in the entirety of Europe)

@@darkforce6763 You should speak about "average monthy temp" , it was not as you say, wrong way to look at past summer, look greek statistics, south europe statistics, no sensible anomalies in 2023.

​@@darkforce6763How come you have weather like that and in England it's like we never got out of February!

In New England, I didn’t even turn on my AC last summer.

right dont pay attention to the science, pay attention to bankers! you're clueless

There is no adapting to this😢

. *Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?* Fact... All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today. Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year. Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth.. Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm. Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm. Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm. . Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today? . *Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2.* As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, adapt, and enjoy the ride (my opinion). Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone? All of these facts are easy to prove true, so, who/what is promoting Global Fear of Climate Change, and why are they doing it? Answer:... If you have not personally investigated the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset 2030 Agenda yet, now's the time.

I had a conversation with a neighbor about climate recently, having read Hanson et al. a decade ago and the recent paper, and he said something similar about governments working on solutions. He mentioned a number of programs and referred to the U.N.’s initiatives. He felt that there had to be plans in place to cope. Four years ago I might have nodded along with him, but we are all a little wiser now about the ability of governments to deal with serious, global problems. I said, “You mean like how the world handled COVID?” To his credit he just looked down at his feet and said, “Well, $&#€!”

@@ColdHawk *If the World Economic Forum Great Reset Agenda impact on Liberal government policy is not part of the Foreign Interference Public Inquiry, it's only another deliberate distraction from the real threat we must deal with. Anyone that disagrees, has not personally investigated what the mainstream media is deliberately not telling us. Can we all agree on that?* How about this... . *Was the Garden of Eden supercharged with atmospheric CO2?* Fact... All human activity = only 4% of Global CO2 production today. Volcanoes alone, are dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere in a matter of weeks than humans do in a year. Fact... Colorless, odorless atmospheric CO2 is the exact opposite of air pollution, and actually stimulates healthy plant and animal growth.. Fact... During the Age of Dinosaurs, atmospheric CO2 was well over 5,000 ppm. Fact... The 500,000,000 year average for atmospheric CO2 is well over 1,000 ppm. Since the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago, atmospheric CO2 has doubled to 420 ppm. . Can you see how far from "normal" CO2 levels we still are today? . Stop feeling guilty about human activity creating CO2. As long as the trends are towards a warmer climate, we all have to stop being afraid of our naturally changing climate over time, and enjoy the ride (my opinion). Who disagrees with any of these facts?... Anyone?

Well governemts alone can't solve the problem, jet alone one. They can only translate a fixed solution in required laws. At that point you still need "a industry" that enables all people to follow up on those laws. So targetting the oil industry was a good call, even if it didn't had the effect you hoped for. I work in automotive and it's a tough call to find a compromise between what the customer wants, what the government wants, what we can actually do and what the environment requires. From what i can tell your client was listening. Fuel, lubricants and plastic are partners with rather bigger departsments in that area. Sadly not all of them succed. Michelin is closing doors for PKW tires, because the customer preferes the putative cheaper option that is not living up to their standard. The best thing for us would be if the customer would value the environmental quality in money, so i actually have a budget to do something. Second best bet is the government requires it for every competitor, so it's not a huge risk for us to take.

@@ColdHawk - Covid was a real turning point for me. Before that I thought we were capable of working together towards common goals. Now I know that was a naïve assumption to make.

Not making it a political issue in the first place would have helped.

It is truly depressing to be outnumbered by idiots.

I think people dont want to hear about it because they realize our absurdely high western living standards can't be sustained. They were achieved on borrowed ecologic capacity and now that payday has come, they choose to ignore the invoices nature keeps dropping in.

I sometimes feel helpless, because everyone thinks they know what's going on. Why is warming bad? Who cares about "climate sensitivity"? It sounds to me like a phrase that is made up just to scare women. How hot does it have to be to be bad?

No one is denying climate change. No one is denying the earth is hotter now than the last 10,000 years. What me and a lot of people asking is what are the negative consequences to human life (if any) and to what degree this change is caused by humans I am not looking for some bullshit answer about in the last 100 years humans have been mining and engaged in industrial activities which that contributes to more greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. to the . Yes - we all know that. As a scientist that is making a video about global warming and using fear mongering title, I expect answers to questions. If you want me to support whatever it is you think is a “solution” to your “problem” - then why don’t you provide an explanation so we can work together. I am willing to be on your team. So if you actually want me on your team then do something about it. Talking down to your audience or telling them they are conspiracy theorists for questioning assertions is unscientific. The oceans are warmer. Ok - why is this bad? The polar ice caps are melting. Ok - why is this bad? In an effort to stop climate change, should I drive an eclectic vehicle or gasoline powered vehicle? Explain your answer. We are increasing CO2 levels in the. Ok - I agree. Why is this bad? How much CO2 are we pumping into the atmosphere each year? How much CO2 is in the atmosphere right now. How much CO2 is in the atmosphere as compared to other greenhouse gasses. What percentage of CO2 makes up the atmosphere. How much CO2 is in the atmosphere that is not a result of human activity and how much is being pumped into the atmosphere that is not a result of human activity. Are you willing to disclose all NEW sources of income within the last 18 months. This is an important question because it can speak to the transparency of the KZfaqr. How do we know someone has not paid you off to make videos about how climate change is bad. Again I am not saying client change is not bad. I am saying that if you want me to do something about it, then instead of insulting me help me to see your point of view.

My son taught me to embrace insufficient action. Look into it. It may seem like a waste but it really can help.

Also anxious, but I watched and I was gratified to hear someone state out loud every single painfully obvious result of climate change. So didn't make me more anxious made me feel...finally it's not me it's reality.

I agree, it was a strange kind of relief to just hear someone say it all. @@debrabarnhardt1103

That's what the left do, induce fear to more easily control the people.

Most of us pre-gen Z all grew up thinking the world would only get better as time went on, we were wrong and that is a very uncomfortable truth.

maybe not the whole society is unwilling - but that part of it who made the most profit out of the economic system as it is. And those are the ones who have the money and the influence to make the majority think that we shound not change it

Science: Eat your vegetables. Politicians: No! ⛽🔥🌎

Climate change is going to take care of the human virus.

This is a broader problem that affects more topics than just climate change: we know the solutions, but how can we implement a policy that will please everyone? Are all supporters of a carbon tax also willing to support nuclear power, and vice versa?

Obligatory witty answer

Yeah, it's the colonialism that holds you back. Wow.

@AA-yc8yr What you say is true. What holds us back is the lack of money and resources, which oddly started somewhere around the 1800s. 🤔 Most of us hold no grudges, the past is past. We are bettering us in the best way possible with the given situation, and we will continue to do so. Indians are tough that way. Religion and politics may be slowing our progress, but most major countries have gone through that at one point in time. All the Western countries seem to have come out of it, somewhat unharmed ✝️⚔️🛡 We are holding out hope too, for a better tomorrow.

@@AA-yc8yr he/she didn't say that

@@ra7e Oh, I see. All those 'resources' vanished, with 19c. tech no less, and India became a barren, resource-less place, did it? And same for the 'money', which of course is precisely why India ranks 5th richest country in the world nowadays, ahead of the UK, and - let me think - 70 years after independence? That's mirculous, no? Having been left resourceless and pennyless, it's now one of the richest, even if it hasn't developed that much socially. Peculiar that all former British colonies do better economically than other countries' former colonies, as well as many states that we never colonised. It's almost as if there's a common denominator for doing that well. But then, also, one can only wonder if a) India would have even existed its current state, and size, had it not been for colonisation, given as it was a 100 or so little kindgoms at the time of British invasion; and b) even if it had managed to unify - and do so non-violently, no less (I mean, one needs only. go back to the 50s and the Hindu-Muslim pogroms, after all, to test the 'non-violence' hypothesis) - what it would have looked like, e.g., would it have been a democracy? 'cause, there really is little by way of example in the whole region to suggest natural propensity for equality and human development, unless it was brought in from outside. And before you show off your hypocricy yet again on the subject of equality, given your colonial history, do consider that nowadays India is considered among the most racist countries worldwide - far more racist that its coloniser, and the country with the highest number of modern slaves. I doubt you can give that to colonialism, or 'stolen' resources and money, when the country that colonised yours is nowhere near as racist, for example, and was the first country in human history to outlaw slavery.

@@cmonofficial Yes, they did. I hate to point it out, but you clearly cannot read with understanding.

I visited Mt Cook recently and the guide was explained that the glaciers have been receding over many decades. It may be anecdotal but all the anecdotes are saying the same thing.

@marble4533 No you are wrong, please check the records back as far as it goes. We have had periods of years where the temperatures were just as hot, and seasons where it got colder, check out 1979 temps for the 7 month period Sept to March. People are missing the HISTORY, not going on computer generated climate models

@@Quadrant14 it’s the concrete heat traps radiating heat through the night that is throwing off the statistics, in addition to the base scale for presentations being set between the small ice age and long winter anomalies as a sandbag.

@@Quadrant14 blah, blah, blah,

Living in Wanneroo, West Aus I would agree. This year we had a fire in Autumn that was suburban for the first time ever. Usually it's just rural... Now it's burning down homes in the suburbs

The same Exxon that was Standard Oil during WW2 and provided Hitler with all of the oil he wanted for his death machine? Yep.

"Exxon scientists in the late 70s and early 80s knew exactly how bad it was going to get " Scientists rarely use the word "exact". So, how bad is it NOW? "What will it be like in 50 years?" Your guess is as good as anyones.

@@thomasmaughan4798 Except they were calculating based on information, not guessing. And then Exxon buried the findings of their own scientists.

@@mercurialsilver5688 "knew exactly how bad it was going to get" but then "Except they were calculating based on information" Oh? So you can *calculate* ? Well, I suppose in a hundred years our descendants know if they calculated it correctly. There's a big difference between a calculated guess and "knew exactly" when it hasn't happened yet.

Greener