As a guy who has lived in England all my life , for me Fury sums up the kind of moronic arrogance that screws this country up at every turn. Fury is the Boris Johnson/Donald Trump of boxing.

Usyk is the product of a well-oiled machine! The rematch should also be intriguing. In the H. Fury-Pulev fight, H. Fury and P. Fury had to change the game plan. As P. Fury has always stated, it is all about executing the game plan first. It is not first and foremost about scoring points and getting knockouts as those are just merely by-products of the game plan. When H. Fury was cut, he and P. Fury decided to go for the knockout. It was a big departure from the original game plan but they had no choice as they knew the referee could stop the fight at anytime due to that cut. Going for knockouts should be done out of necessity. Going for knockouts should never be the sole or even primary strategy due to machohood and bravado. This is what Peter Fury has said for many years. Yet Sugar Hill and T. Fury were citing this for these reasons only. While T. Fury is known for talking bravado just for the sake of talking bravado, Hill is not. He was dead serious when he said that this fight would be a chess match for sometime and then T. Fury would catch up with Usyk to knock him out. Hill really wanted T. Fury to make a statement like that by knocking out Usyk. The only statement P. Fury feels needs to be made is for his fighter to get the clear and unquestionable victory. T. Fury's victory over W. Klitschko was boring and unexciting. However that triumph was clear and was not subject to questioning. Boxing is not about being macho. It is about using both aggressive and conservative methods to win and also about countering those methods used by the opponent. Peter Fury has pretty much expressed this over the years. There is no one other than him who can help T. Fury come up with the right combinations of thinking and doing, acting and reacting, and complexity and simplicity for the entire fight.

Was it not Peter Fury who said in interviews that if Tyson Fury wanted to win, he would have to take the fight to Usyk but he would have to employ a variety of jabs? Yet in that fight with Usyk, Tyson Fury only used the long jab followed by the uppercut and occasional hook. Because of Tyson Fury's physical attributes, that plan worked for him the first 6 rounds. After that Usyk caught on to that simplistic plan. He was then able to react better by countering immediately with a quick left hook or with a quick right jab followed by a left punch to Tyson F.'s body. As I said before, Sugar Hill was too simplistic. Andy Lee also did not have much of an impact in developing a comprehensive game plan, and John Fury's rage negated anything he may have contributed. I am not bashing John Fury because I believe if it was not for him, T. Fury would have lost that trilogy fight with Wilder.John Fury is the one who said that Tyson could not rely on aggression alone to beat the American. Again Peter F. said Tyson's game plan would have to be varied in interviews namely because Usyk is varied. Apparently no one watched his interviews.

Let’s say Greatest Of This Generation

I have no authority on greatest but he's my favourite boxer has an astonishing list of accolades and has beaten the top 2 HW while being much lighter...p4p top HW champ CW champ Olympic gold and s real character and brilliant ambassador for boxing

Ali is the goat.

​@@oakparksacramento amen

It is just as well that Peter Fury formulates the game plans of his own fighters. No one is really heeding the common sense and logical advice that he gives. I am just a boxing fan. I am just a novice, mush less an expert. Yet I was appreciative of the fact that he had the foresight to state that certain things had to happen for a T. Fury victory or a "train wreck would occur". What he said was not "rocket science" but it did require thought. I do not understand how anyone can think Usyk could be knocked out in 7 rounds unless his opponent lands a lucky punch in his mid-section? The man lives in crude barracks in remote "ice villages" months before fights. He is so mentally tough because of this. He could be knocked down repeatedly, take a bashing, and yet he would still only get more tenacious and determined as the fight goes on. I wonder what Tyson's accommodations were. There is no doubt he too is mentally tough. After all look how recovered after the 9th round. However there is a difference between trained mental toughness and natural instinctive mental toughness. One can be coached and one cannot. Again If I remember correctly, Peter F. said something very similar to that as he stated that a fighter needs both to win a difficult fight. It was Usyk's preparation that got him to go all out and all in. He was trained to get going when he was getting hammered. I wonder what mental toughness training Tyson received in camp. Did he live in such austere conditions as Usyk? It is hard to say but I think I have my answer.

He certainly was. It was a disgrace how the ref saved him then gave him ages to recover. He may as well have helped fury to get up because it was clear he was in fury’s side.

It was the right call. Fury didn't hit the ground and was able to continue. It was very close to being a KO win, but a robbery, no.

He might decide to do that. Vlad would be happy about that

What's the point apart from millions erm I'm guessing millions they are prize Fighters cum on m8 cash is the reason obviously

He'd get sent to the War in Donbass get killed in a pointless war.

Retire from boxing and sent to the frontlines of war

Yes he did. And he basically KO’d fury in the 9th but the ref deliberately gave him AGES to recover.

I personally cannot wait for that to end. Everyone, obsessed with having HW boxers taller than 6' 5" since the Klitschko era, pushing for the tallest guys to be fighters. The quality has deteriorated since then for the division in my opinion.

I see FURY beating Usyk in a rematch as I saw a lot of slippage in this fight in terms lateral movement and foot speed.

Should be 90/10.

Totally agree, great fight though

Joshua will knock him out. Fury is on the decline.

Usyk wasn’t the ‘rabbit’ He was the magician! 🤣

Sanchez was completely negative! I knew Kabayel would do him, but never expected zero resistance from Sanchez.

Six years ago now when he got all the belts in the WBSS

Not really a coward. He talks crap and Usyk showed him up thankfully

You may not like him but clearly not a coward. He's was fighting for the HW championship of the world.. Where as you're making meme's..

Appreciate that you stayed up! KZfaq troubles delayed me 10 minutes

Usyk didn’t have AJ on chicken legs like Fury either.

Joshua would smash fury to bits...furys past it and joshuas approaching his peak

His crusier run ensured HoF status, this just enhanced it further

@@BoxingSquared so very true

Passing the torch is the right thing to do imo, fight until loss. Otherwise it will be a very tame period for hw boxing without any personalitites.

Is there any point him continuing, he’ll be undisputed for 2 weeks until the IBF strip him on June 1. The rematch winner will not be undisputed, what’s the point?

Same for me, just 3, 7 and 12 were close rounds. So if someone is very biased he can give all 3 to Fury and have 114-113 for Usyk.

115-112

Referee certainly gave him every opportunity to stay in the fight

Protect yourself at all times… I didn’t see a lot of protecting going on

no, everything went fine.

I had 115-112, but change two close rounds around, and that's 114-113. I can see it. Luckily there was no 117-111 card

I had it 117-112 to Usyk but with two even rounds, give them both to Fury and it’s still 115-112 to Usyk. How anyone gave seven rounds to Fury is a stretch

Tyson Fury is to blame for wasting his best years drinking and snorting cocaine.