Thanks for sharing Tord :)

I second that comment. I’ve had that same system in a pounding rain storm with no issues dials sticking or lens nor camera not functioning the next day. Looks like you’re in joying your system.

I have a friend who traded in his E-M1 mkII kit for Sony FF - he admitted the Sony build quality is inferior in every respect and doesn't expect it to last as long as the Olympus in the outdoors rain and dust and sand.

Thanks! :) :)

You are welcome and yes its a super lens! really sharp and versatile :)

Thanks for sharing and 100% agree with you :)

Thank you :) haha its just in good fun, i like Jared and his channel! :)

yeah i prefer the detail that noise still kinda holds that denoising gets rid of

I don’t think I’ve ever heard a photographer say a ‘bit of noise’ is a big problem. A lot of noise is for obvious reasons.

Its not a problem for me personally but if you have to use them professionally like on stock agencies they have to be noise free or they are not accepted in their catalogs :)

@@RyougiVector I find dxo pureraw 3 ai deepprime Denoise actually enhances detail in a realistic way. Truly an achievement

@@akeluify I have used that as well in the form of DxO Photolab 6 and I don't share that level of amazement.

Thank you for sharing the advice Steven and you are velcome 😁

Its a super system and compared to older systems its fantastic 👍🏻😀 thanks for you comment.

A couple of generations of newer technology helps. Having a smaller sensor, AND smaller lens mount means smaller lenses designed for the smaller sensor. A huge win of the 7D etc and Nikon D500 with mounts designed for lenses larger than the sensor needs.

Thank you Roger :) yes maybe i will some time give my opinion on the DJI mini 3 pro.

Thank you :) yes it is a super nice system! hehe yes i still recommend it ;) it was a "Dennis error" that brought it down!

There are def. some advantages in the MFT system i agree there but personally i wouldn't go so high in ISO unless it was a "one in a lifetime photo" situation :)

Good tip! thanks for sharing :)

@@DennisJacobsenWildlife The beauty of using the DTC (Digital Teleconverter) is that it crops to the center, which is the sharpest part of the lens -- and you do not lose any speed. I use it quite often with my E-M1X and 100-400mm, and have it programmed to my video button. Andy Rouse has a good KZfaq video about this.

@@gregm6894 Isn't it just a crop, like you can do in post? Might be useful in JPEG, but I don't see it otherwise.

@@oneeyedphotographer There are three benefits I see, because I am almost exclusively a Jpeg shooter: First, is the fact that part of my shooting enjoyment comes from composing an image in my viewfinder, and capturing that composition in camera. The cropping done with the DTC allows that, rather than capturing more than I want in the composition and then cropping later. Secondly, I often have clients/organizations that want immediate access to Jpeg files -- they don't even care about RAW files -- using the DTC allows me to crop the image as I'm shooting and provide finished files with the best composition. Thirdly, as I pointed out in my original post, if you compose a scene with a wider angle of view, and assuming you don't simply place your main subject in the dead center of the composition, and then crop later to match the DTC composition, you have just cropped away from the sharpest area of your lens. The DTC causes your subject to be moved closer to the center of your lens -- the sharpest area. None of this may be of any obvious benefit to you, or others. However, I have exhibit prints on my walls that are printed from Jpeg files, captured with the DTC, that are razor sharp with excellent detail and great color. Why would I prefer to ignore this function and waste the time cropping after the fact?

@@gregm6894 JPEG is exactly the exclsion I allowed for. For me, my photos cannot be made in camera. For raw files, I see no value to the DTC, but there could be something I don't yet understand.

Yeps, kan rigtigt godt lide det sted :) Jeg bruger Topaz software

I think @ 400mm on the 150-400mm f4.5 the bokeh looks great in most situations, not FF 600mm f/4 great but still im very pleased with the results in the MFT system :)

Its absolutely usable from this camera at higher ISO values and as you say with todays plugins you can fix alot in post

1/125sec f/4.5 ISO 3200 is kinda bad/low light in my opinion 🤔 especially for MTF systems!

takker 🙏🏻🙏🏻 og 😂📷📷📷

There are a big difference in noise. Over 10.000 doesn't make sense for this system for bird photography but if not cropped i guess it can be usable :)

@@DennisJacobsenWildlife I was asking about ISO over 10,000 on OM-1 because I own a 1st gen 12-40 and would love for it to be used in indoor sports situation for my kid when the full frame camera has a 70-200 or longer lens mounted. I know that ISO 20,000 looks fine in APS-C on my cellphone. I do not look at photos on computer. Most of RAW are processed in camera then go directly to cellphone. I hope you would do an episode of ISO from 10,000 to 50,000 on OM-1.

Apart from an article and sample images from Dpreview of rugby game at night shot on OM-1, which I think the photos are perfectly fine, every video about OM-1 on KZfaq seems to be birding in good light. I wish to see more "enthusiastic dad" content about OM-1.

@@wujiali1117 Maybe i do some super high ISO test when i get some play time again 😀

@@wujiali1117 Yes you are right, most YT videos shows the gear in optimal light and pro sports with good light and not like you say "Dad" sports games etc. thats also why i do some crazy comparisons just to show in real life what it can do