Paul Davies: What I believe about God

  Рет қаралды 10,886

Premier Unbelievable?

Premier Unbelievable?

2 жыл бұрын

Physicist Paul Davies shares his views on God and religious experience.
Watch the full Big Conversation between Paul Davies & Jeremy England: • Paul Davies & Jeremy E...
For updates, bonus content and more conversations sign up at www.thebigconversation.show
The Big Conversation is a video series from Unbelievable? featuring world-class thinkers across the religious and non-religious community. Exploring science, faith, philosophy and what it means to be human. The Big Conversation is produced by Premier in partnership with John Templeton Foundation.
• Support us in the USA: www.premierinsight.org/unbelie...
• Rest of the world: resources.premier.org.uk/supp...
• Newsletter: www.premier.org.uk/Unbelievab...
• Blog: www.premierinsight.org/unbeli...
• For the podcast: www.premierchristianradio.com/...
• Facebook / unbelievablejb
• Twitter / unbelievablejb
• Insta / justin.brierley

Пікірлер: 113
@user-zc4yd9ss7h
@user-zc4yd9ss7h 6 ай бұрын
'God moves in mysterious ways, His wonders to perform.' So does the universe, and the more we discover about physics, the more mysterious it seems.
@digitalfootballer9032
@digitalfootballer9032 9 ай бұрын
Paul Davies also has discussions on "why is there something and not nothing". He basically concludes that because there IS something, there MUST be something and nothing cannot exist because if it could, it would. Logically speaking, nothing should be easier than something, "something" requires a degree of effort and/or energy. Yet here we are. So to wrap it up nicely, something cannot come from nothing. We as observers even see this first hand, no matter or energy has ever just spontaneously appeared. It is always an effect of a cause. Which leads us to the ultimate question, and that is "how?". Well nobody knows exactly, but I think two logical conclusions can be drawn. One, that the universe and everything within it has always existed, will always exist without end, and stretches infinitely in all directions. That is the "static universe theory". This has been widely discredited in favour of the big bang theory. Which brings us to number two. Something else infinite and eternal made the universe and everything within it, or at least laid the groundwork for everything within it. This, to me, is most logical because firstly where did the big bang come from (remember something can't come from nothing), and secondly, how is everything so orderly and not chaotic. Again, chaos is much easier than order. For me, the only logical conclusion is intelligent design. Take that where you will, is it God, is it nature itself, or is it a super advanced civilization? That's really the only debate. It's not debatable that everything just spontaneously appeared from complete nothingness. That's absurd. I am not a religious person, in terms of following any organized religion, but the concept of God is much less absurd to me than stuff popping up out of thin air. I absolutely believe in God, and it's because of science and logic, not despite them.
@stevenwiederholt7000
@stevenwiederholt7000 2 жыл бұрын
I missed the part where he actually Answered The Question.
@MyMy-tv7fd
@MyMy-tv7fd 2 жыл бұрын
you are not alone
@emmashalliker6862
@emmashalliker6862 2 жыл бұрын
Your comprehension must be dog shit.
@hhstark8663
@hhstark8663 2 жыл бұрын
He basically says he is a generic theist.
@hhstark8663
@hhstark8663 2 жыл бұрын
He basically says he is a generic theist.
@MrHalukbilgin
@MrHalukbilgin 2 жыл бұрын
He is a pantheist of a sort. He says there must be a universal law and order that favours life and rise of intelligence. He believes it is hidden somewhere in the quantum mechanics. I have read a few of his books. He is close to A. Einstein's view on "God".
@chadjcrase
@chadjcrase 2 жыл бұрын
Paul Davies is an extremely intelligent man and, along with biologist Chris McKay, is one of the foremost scientists today in my opinion. Any monkey can do science, peer-reviewed or not, but it takes a special person to have imagination and become a genius.
@gordonmitchell729
@gordonmitchell729 2 жыл бұрын
In keeping with your channel name and such discussions as this one with Professor Paul Davies, would you kindly take a look at Mudfossil University here on KZfaq and consider debating the professor and Roger Spurr? It’s long passed time that such amazing and important information from Roger Spurr be taken into account. For all our sakes, I hope that you will seriously consider doing this. Thank you.
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon 2 жыл бұрын
UNBELIEVABLE! No physical thing can make or direct itself. There cannot be an infinite regress of physical causes. At some point, there has to be a creation of physical things. Prove otherwise. All power comes from a greater power, always!
@neilcates3499
@neilcates3499 2 жыл бұрын
"All power comes from a greater power, always!" Really? I assume you believe in a god...? What power created that power?
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon 2 жыл бұрын
@@neilcates3499 There is no power greater than God. No one ever taught you that?
@fukpoeslaw3613
@fukpoeslaw3613 2 жыл бұрын
so all power comes from greater power except infinite power sure go play with Anselmus...
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon 2 жыл бұрын
@@fukpoeslaw3613 You never heard of the greatest power? You can't have an infinite regress of physical causes.
@fukpoeslaw3613
@fukpoeslaw3613 2 жыл бұрын
@@JungleJargon but can physical come from non physical?
@mikebellamy
@mikebellamy Жыл бұрын
If you are not a *materialist* then you have a big question to answer: *Who is God?* Paul Davies says he doesn't _"believe in miracles"_ but then has a universe making itself from nothing violating several laws of physics ie miracles! Seems to me God has not left us the option of picking and choosing who he is or having a small piece of Him. It's all or nothing as it logically must be.
@Nooneself
@Nooneself Жыл бұрын
Sounds like the God of Einstein and Spinoza....but hard to decode his interesting points into a coherent picture Best Wishes
@ConservativeAnthem
@ConservativeAnthem Жыл бұрын
Spinoza's "god" is just the universe.
@karlschmied6218
@karlschmied6218 Жыл бұрын
I think that what we call intelligence is a tool for adaptation. Like eyes (a part of the brain) brains have evolved independently several times in the history of life on Earth. So what we call the universe is still our limited view of what we can grasp.
@KermitFrogThe
@KermitFrogThe 2 жыл бұрын
Paul like many scientists is struggling with the amount of things we know are true without knowing why. It is why science is sometimes called the study of discovering questions. This is not unusualy and it does lead many to feel there could be something(s) behind the observable pulling the strings. I accept him more than some others because he is not declaring this as fact, just his thoughts, so declaring hypothesis not dogma. A few similar on here have tried stating it as fact, and that defies what makes science great, the willingness to be wrong.
@doctorfaris
@doctorfaris Жыл бұрын
Against dockins and hucking
@alemartinezrojas5285
@alemartinezrojas5285 2 жыл бұрын
He could have a least explained why he doesn't "like" the idea of God. He accepts a rational and intelligent order, why not, then, a Rational and Intelligent source of it.
@Sharvalgon
@Sharvalgon Жыл бұрын
Because he rightly believes that a physical law isn't a law when God can arbitrarily break it - if it isn't a law then physics is a useless enterprise. If you bothered to read his, or any other physicist's stuff, you'd know that it doesn't follow that any kind of god has anything to do with those laws.
@MrHalukbilgin
@MrHalukbilgin 2 жыл бұрын
He shares Einstein's views on life, universe and "God". Common grounds for any H.sapiens intelligent and honest enough.
@moses777exodus
@moses777exodus 2 жыл бұрын
"Language: ALL DIGITAL communications require a formal language, which in this context consists of all the information that the sender and receiver of the digital communication must both possess, in advance, in order for the communication to be successful." (Wikipedia: Digital Data) Inherent in DNA is language. Language is scientifically proven to be the product of only Mind/ Consciousness / Intelligence.
@ironsharpensiron9406
@ironsharpensiron9406 Жыл бұрын
They believe their science to justify their unbelief. They reject the evidence because they reject the Gospel of Grace. They'll never believe in the true God until they first believe they're sinners: 1 Timothy 6:20-21 King James Version 20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen. Hearts are getting harder and they'll continue to reject overwhelming evidence of God. Bible proves itself scientifically with overwhelming mathematical evidence and they ignore that. Being saved is all that matters. I pity them. 1st Corinthians15:1-4 Ephesians 2:8-9
@luisdasilva3879
@luisdasilva3879 2 жыл бұрын
I would honestly like to know why they associate God (The Creator) with religion? God is not religion , the bible is not religion , Jesus is not religion , The Holy Spirit is not religion
@beckc.5084
@beckc.5084 2 жыл бұрын
I want to correct you in kindness, brother. Religion is not a bad word for Christians. Indeed, we do follow a religion, and we ought to stay faithful to it. James 1:27 "Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world."
@luisdasilva3879
@luisdasilva3879 2 жыл бұрын
@@beckc.5084 That 's correct , this is biblical , but the problem is that because of religions the name of God is dirty .
@Tzimiskes3506
@Tzimiskes3506 2 жыл бұрын
@@luisdasilva3879 God came to this world to save us by grace not through faith but that a free gift God offered by the son... its not a religion... It's the very purpose the creator formed us for...
@Sharvalgon
@Sharvalgon Жыл бұрын
Of course it's a religion. 'Your beliefs are a religion but mine are something different!' So arrogant.
@digitalfootballer9032
@digitalfootballer9032 9 ай бұрын
Religion is belief in a specific doctrine set forth by your particular religion's scripture and laws. Religion is worship. Religion, by most accounts, is belief in an active/interactive deity. General belief that there is a God or some other higher power is not necessarily religious, however it is more generically theistic. Those whom are religious are all theists, but not all theists are religious.
@Rayvvvone
@Rayvvvone 11 күн бұрын
did he say he believes? I fell asleep.
@TheLoneWolf7743
@TheLoneWolf7743 Жыл бұрын
Paul Davie is one of my favorites, a lot more reasonable than a lot of those anti-Christian scientists no a days.
@johnnisshansen
@johnnisshansen 2 жыл бұрын
awfull sound quality
@MyMy-tv7fd
@MyMy-tv7fd 2 жыл бұрын
surprising how many brilliant scientists on this type of channel manage to achieve spectacularly bad sound quality
@Iamwrongbut
@Iamwrongbut 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah they just use their laptop mic and it is trash
@captainzappbrannagan
@captainzappbrannagan 2 жыл бұрын
He doesn't believe in any god. He relishes in the human brains unique nature to understand reality, none of which is supernatural. This is the most honest way to be.
@grantbartley483
@grantbartley483 2 жыл бұрын
Only if you assume there is no God. But it's not true. So there.
@captainzappbrannagan
@captainzappbrannagan 2 жыл бұрын
@@grantbartley483 I don't believe in any god because there's no evidence for any. The christian god is for sure imaginary.
@grantbartley483
@grantbartley483 2 жыл бұрын
@@captainzappbrannagan Don't talk nonsense. There's lots of evidence. For instance, the evidence of the testimony of the witnesseses to the resurrection. Why would they lie? They didn't get power or wealth for saying they saw the risen Jesus, but persecution. Would you be martyred for something you know isn't true? Neither would they. Or, for philosophical arguments, Aristotle's argument for a first mover is sound, and so is Leibniz's cosmological argument from contingency (look them up, if you really actually care about evidence).
@captainzappbrannagan
@captainzappbrannagan 2 жыл бұрын
@@grantbartley483 The bible was written after the fact by anonymous authors (except paul) there's no reason to think this is anything more than imagination and fables. You base everything on stories go for a better book with less genocide in it.
@grantbartley483
@grantbartley483 2 жыл бұрын
@@captainzappbrannagan The Gospels are based on eye witness accounts, as the historical details they provide and the embarrassing events they include show. There is no evidence for any other position on their authorship, nor any evidence at all of significant later tampering. For someone who claims he respects evidence, it's suspect that you base your understanding of the Bible on a position for which there is absolutely no evidence. I would guess that your whole understanding of Christianity is based on hearsay, and actual evidence has no contact with your a priori, mind-made-up position. Stop being such a hypocrite.
@hhstark8663
@hhstark8663 2 жыл бұрын
Paul basically says he is a generic theist.
@thegroove2000
@thegroove2000 2 жыл бұрын
GOD HA HA HA.
@tobetrayafriend
@tobetrayafriend 2 жыл бұрын
What an original thinker you must be.
@tonybinder9392
@tonybinder9392 2 жыл бұрын
You put a lot of thought into that one 😂😂😂😂
@MyMy-tv7fd
@MyMy-tv7fd 2 жыл бұрын
'the human brain evolved'? Says who? Alfred Russell Wallace, the co-proposer of evolution by natural selection broke with Darwin over the impossibility of explaining how the human mind could 'evolve' by mindless random events and mindless natural selection.
@Iamwrongbut
@Iamwrongbut 2 жыл бұрын
Who cares what Alfred Wallace said? We have learned an insane amount about the brain and the process of evolution since the 1800’s.
@knowledge_lantern
@knowledge_lantern 2 жыл бұрын
@@Iamwrongbut anything new that shows evidence of random mutation selection producing us?
@Iamwrongbut
@Iamwrongbut 2 жыл бұрын
@@knowledge_lantern I am no expert on this matter. I’d recommend you look one up for answers.
@davidlara993
@davidlara993 2 жыл бұрын
@@Iamwrongbut If you make a claim, be sure that "the insane amount of new knowledge" is supported by some kind of evidence.
@Iamwrongbut
@Iamwrongbut 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidlara993 it is supported by evidence. I just knew that no matter what I said a KZfaq young earther would say “well how many degrees do you have in biology nanny nanny boo boo” or something along those lines so I’d rather they just read up on someone like Francis Collins and learn for themselves.
@Sharvalgon
@Sharvalgon Жыл бұрын
Davies has said plenty of times in other interviews that he does NOT believe in a theistic God and that he believes the universe takes care of itself, creation, existence, and meaning. To try to frame him as some kind of reluctant theist is disingenuous.
Paul Davies - Does Consciousness Lead to God?
11:19
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 32 М.
Joven bailarín noquea a ladrón de un golpe #nmas #shorts
00:17
Be kind🤝
00:22
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН
Paul Davies - "The Origin of Life" (C4 Public Lecture)
57:06
Santa Fe Institute
Рет қаралды 85 М.
Paul Davies - Big Pictures of God
7:47
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Paul Davies - Does a Soul Have an Afterlife?
9:55
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 21 М.
The Universe, Fixity and Flux | Sabine Hossenfelder, Paul Davies and Lee Smolin | IAI
41:43
The Institute of Art and Ideas
Рет қаралды 92 М.
Paul Davies - What is the Origin of the Laws of Nature?
14:06
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 46 М.
Physicist-rabbi Jeremy England explains why we need both God and science
4:08
Premier Unbelievable?
Рет қаралды 3 М.
Paul Davies (Part 1) - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered?
14:38
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 63 М.
Paul Davies - Gap Between Non-Life and Life
10:49
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 114 М.
Kathy Keller: Why I changed my mind on women's ordination • Unapologetic 2/3
23:04
Joven bailarín noquea a ladrón de un golpe #nmas #shorts
00:17