The defendant is so smug, and to be smiling while they're explaining tissue was hanging off their dog is mind-boggling. Gross. Even if she believed it wasn't her dog, that behavior is disgusting and despicable.

Judge Milians husband "you can tell the difference between Gucci and a knock-off Gucci" 🤣🤣🤣💀

Lol... The dogsitter just came back, put the dog back in the house and claim nothing happen... He KNEW he would be responsible of the damage if this happen under he's guard 🤦

The defendant was smiling the whole time….no remorse. 😢

She has such a smug smile through all the description of his injury

Lmao not suing from summer fun days 😂😂😂 the plaintiffs were reaching with that one

After the decision, when the defendant said she was "railroaded", I knew the Judge made the right decision.

They should’ve came up with a better description for that extra money they were claiming other than fun money. Cant believe they thought that would ever go over with JM!! 😂😂 Still the plaintiff’s deserved every dollar of the medical costs. So glad the dog is doing well today.

The smirk on the defendants face, especially as the judge ruled, is just disgusting. The fact she keeps saying "if it was my dog"... if there was no chance that her dog did it, she wouldn't keep saying if it was my dog.

It was Pucci , not Gucci . They are accusing the wrong dawg 😞😭😭😭😭😭

Hate people who cannot control a dog and leaving a door open for a dog to get out. Denial of attack is crazy on the defendant and the sitter.

That ‘sitter’ is lying. Watch his face and eyes. He blinks fast when lying. The defendant just wants not to pay

Defendant is 100% responsible. It doesn't matter if she was miles away. She is the owner period. The verdict was justified.

The Defendant should be ashamed of herself because of the smiling smerks at the end....smh

I don't believe the defendant at all. Especially that she has seen the dog prancing as happy as it was before. That's when I really thought she was a liar.

These plaintiffs were really milking it. They really asked for "summer fun money"? Are you serious?

Love seeing you and husband together! What a lovely, intelligent couple you are!❤

16:15: is the defendant really smirking over the dog's horrible injuries?!? I'm hoping that that was just poor/sensationalizing editing on the part of the show. But, I have a sense that she really was smirking about all of the horrible injuries caused by her dog to the plaintiff's dog.

The plaintiff description of the dog’s injuries, suffering and pain just broke my heart 😢

Even IF it all happened the way the defendant's dog sitter said, anyone could've put the dog away and locked the door. And if there really was a Gucci imposter roaming around, I would think she would've gotten more "false alarms" about her dog being out.

Why is it once the drama goes down behind their vicious animal, it's always I don't believe it was my dog once they get the bill, TAKE OWNERSHIP AND BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR YOUR IRRESPONSIBILITY 😠💯

Those dogs don’t look alike. The white is far more distinctive on the random dog than the brown on Gucci.

Poor dog and defendant was smiling.

It always kills me when people have a very serious claim and one that they most likely win, and yet they tack on extra money equally their state max .

If the defendant's dog is anything like ours, especially our 16 year old rescue Molly, she has a favorite place in the house to lie. So the dog could have gotten out, someone shut the door behind it, and it was in its favorite spot when the witness arrived home. That poor pooch went through h*ll! We've had to do wound care on animals through the years, no its not a picnic. Having said that, they were suing for "Fun Time"? That just never looks good when litigants over sue, it tends to make them look money hungry.

That poor dog having to go through that. I detest dog attacks, on people, children or other animals.

Holy $hit…this man takes forever to explain this story.

Guilty. And a bad liar. I guess the dog has a key to the house

The defendant was smiling while hearing about the door doggy owys! Watch... she literally is smiling almost laughing what a horrible person

Judge John…that joke about the fake Gucci?! Good one!! 🤣😂

Dude is so high😧

The dog sitter is a straight drug head 😒 and you had him house sitting and watching your dog 😣 ppl never seem to amaze me

I have a black lab and in my neighborhood there are 2 black lads running around. I'm always getting letters from the city about these dogs running around.i called the city and said what am I responsible for all the dogs in the neighborhood

The defendant sat there all smug, smiling and rolling her eyes showing no remorse or anything. Terrible attitude.

That heartless monster would have lost if I was hearing the case when she was sitting there SMIRKING while the injuries and the amount of care the injuries needed was being described.

THE DEFENDANT IS TRYING TO WIGGLE HER WAY OUT OF PAYING FOR HER DOG ATTACK BUT THEN THE PLAINTIFFS WERE MILKING IT FOR EVERY DROP SOMETHING SHOULD'VE BEEN AWARDED SOMETHING FOR HAVING TO NURSE THEIR BABY / "PROPERTY" BK TO HEALTH NOW HAD THEY NOT THEN IT'LL BE ANIMAL CRUELTY COME ON THEN THE DEFENDANT GOT CAUGHT IN A LIE SHOULD'VE BEEN PUNISHED FOR THAT SMDH I HATE LIARS

Someone who names their dog "Gucci" is SUS, one way or another

I think at a glance those two dogs could easily be mistaken for each other if it's not somebody who owns the dogs and sees the dogs on an everyday basis, especially if you're dealing with an attack and your mind is going a mile a minute trying to stop the dog attack and then the dog takes off, and if they have pictures of another dog that looks very similar running around the same property then it's very possible that it could be a case of mistaken identity, am I saying that that 1000% was not her dog Gucci... no, but IS it possible that it was the other dog that they showed pictures of? absolutely, I think even if the plaintiff's knew in their hearts that it might not be Gucci that they wouldn't admit that because then they would have nobody on the hook to pay for their medical bills, so I don't think they would be honest even if they did have a doubt.

I've honestly never seen a plaintiff completely tank a potentially valid claim for financial compensation with just three words. How out of touch do you have to be to think "fun summer money" is a legitimate thing for which you can sue? I honestly thought that they were entitled to something after they explained the extent to which they had to tend to the dog's injuries but that last bit really ruined any chance of the judge taking them seriously.

Plaintiff got too greedy

The dog sitter looks like he's coming down on meth 😆. Great witness.

defendant is heartless - she talked about the dog looking good and prancing as if somehow that mitigates all the family and the dog went through? No one brought up the fact her dog did not have its shots which evidences someone who is not a responsible caring dog owner. I feel bad for Gucci because he will end up in another bad situation and next time he might be euthanized. She is a bad dog owner.

That dog looks NOTHING like her dog 😂 🚫

i want to thank the plaintiff for specifying the hot springs that is in arkansas.

Funny she didn't think to say "My sister was out of town" IMMEDIATELY when JM suggested she got the dog inside before the housesitter got there. She only thought of and mentioned that excuse out in the hallway.....

I just love it when someones dog attacks and the owner offers to "help" pay the vet bills. I'm already going to have to spend time taking the dog to the vet and tending to their wounds, not to mention the pain my dogs in and you want ME to be out of pocket too??? GTFO!!!!

The housesitter had incentive to lie. Because the defendant is directly liable as the owner. But, she can now sue him for letting the dog out while he was responsible for it, to recover from him...... It just like cases we have seen where JM tells the defendant "You have a case against so-and-so, but the plaintiff can collect from you now. And then you can sue the third party to recover. They don't have to hunt then down."

🤣🤣🤣 Suing for "fun summer" and not the vet bills.

No sympathy for any animal owners who cannot control them. They should be under your own personal care and control at all times. It's ridiculous

Poor bo :( Why is the defendant f*cking SMILING??! psycho

I think its funny when people name their kids and pets after things they can't afford.

🧐🧐🧐🤔🤔🤔...Who else picked up on the fact that Judge Milian just seems to enjoy saying 'GUCCI'??? 🙄😁😁😁

It hardly seems fair that Douglas is the only one that has to show up for work 🤐

The defendant is so smug...why would she smile like that.

“Unless you’re calling her [the lady eyewitness] a liar” - I disagree. An eyewitness can be 100% telling the truth while being 100% wrong; you can completely believe what you’re testifying to but that doesn’t mean that it’s accurate (b/c sometimes people get it wrong). I do believe the plaintiff and think it was the defendant’s dog, just making a point.

People are saying the dependent was smiling but it looks like she has a condition.. the plantiff should not be suing for 5,000 all bc it was the max.

I'm so sorry the Plaintiffs dog Bo got attacked by Gucci. At 20:31 Bo's owners are unable to rehabilitate their dog who won't walk on a leash especially past Gucci's house. Dogs don't get PTSD like humans do. Dogs only live in the present. They don't remember specific events (happy or horrible) from yesterday. They have "associative memory" meaning they get stuck in a behavior (good or bad) because of the repetition of it. To rehab Bo we have to create a new, stable (happy) memory by walking Bo past Gucci's house. Obviously they must make peace with the neighbor advising them they need to help Bo get past the house. The owners energy must be calm assertive and find a relative, friend, neighbor who owns a stable dog and walk the two together right next to each other with the stable dog in front. Start walking the opposite way of Gucci's house for a couple days and if successful start going past Gucci's house. Bo will pick up on the dominant dogs energy and "follow the leader".

Dog without a leash and supervision runs around

It might have been the defendant's dog but her dog isn't a pitbull as it's claimed... nor is the dog that is running the neighborhood. They're just keeping the negative stigma given to pitbulls going.

The plaintiff should say I'm sorry for what happened' if she believes her dog did it or Just out of courtesy

If the defendant is truly convinced that she shouldn’t be held responsible, she can now sue her ‘dog sitter’ for his negligence, since it has been established by this judgment that it was indeed Gucci, that attacked and bit the other dog. That way she can recoup the cost of this judgment from him. The ONLY explanation for Gucci to be able to do so, is that the dog sitter did NOT close/lock the door properly and/or did not check if Gucci was, in fact, inside the house when he closed up. (Unless there were other people with access to this house at the time this all took place too , but there was no mentioning of that during this hearing). Then again, she did not come across as a sincere or even friendly person and didn’t seem to care one bit about the wounds of the dog. And since I am not a judge, I don’t have to follow the law, so: I think she should pay it anyway. Fined for being as POS. This is one of those cases that I wish the show would NOT pay the amounts that are ordered in the judgments!!

defendant not only has a dog without its shots or registration thats gotten out and attacked another dog she lies under oath

I knew it. The dogs evil twin did the attack.

first of all. why the heck would you just put your dog down so easily 😭 ? like his wounds is something that’ll heal over time. i mean i know you don’t want your dog in pain but. i would never just put my dog down so quick esp over something that’ll heal.

Sucks for the pup. That's awful. But suing for "fun time"? C'mon, that's just embarrassing.

The benefits of a lower burden of proof.

Sorry Judge John, but...put your polo shirts back on. Either way, though (polo vs suit & tie), you are one handsome devil. 😍

Fun summer money??😂😂

Keep on smiling there. You lost

Although I think the defendant is guilty, the plantiffs are ridiculous with their costs. Can you imagine everyone getting compensated for things that go wrong on their vacation days?!? "My son broke his arm playing baseball over the summer and I missed a week of my summer vacation bringing him back and forth to the doctor and helping him at home... so I won't return to teaching until a week into the school year because the time I missed!"

I’m so sick of people calling everything a Pitbull. Neither of the dogs shown are pitbulls. They don’t even look like Bully’s although with mix breeds looks can be deceiving. However, there is nothing about either of those dogs that look like an American Pit Bull Terrier. This is the problem with bite statistics. Those stats are based on witnesses statements. People are calling literally everything a Pitbull. It’s beyond damaging to the breed. I know it’s not related to the case but it’s unreal to me that these incidents are ALWAYS called Pitbull attacks even when that’s not the case.

Knock-off Gucci is innocent

He is reading something. She's a fake.

Are they trying to say that dog in the pictures is a pit bull? It looks nothing like one. It seems like every single large dog that does something bad nowadays is automatically considered to be a pit. (Acknowledging that there's no such thing as a breed called "pit bull" and that it is just a type. Still, come on.)

I don't understand why a dog-sitter would leave the animal to go to work, not making himself available to do the very job that he was hired to do, and then claim that the dog was locked inside the whole time--his absence from the premises alone tells me he doesn't know what's going on because he wasn't there to see it. It looks like he's covering up for himself so anything he says is going to be in his favor, and that why he said the dog couldn't have done it because the dog was locked up. He's lying because the witness said she saw a crack in the neighbor's door. That's not what I'd call "locked up." More accurately, he forgot to lock up.

Wow... They won w no evidence... Literally. Defendant had photos of twin mystery dog that roams neighborhood and plaintiffs had no photos or video just their word... Smh

ANOTHER episode @ attack by a Pitbull. Shocking, so shocking. Defendant: "I don't have much money😭". Yet, multiple houses + HOR$E$. Ridiculous 🙄

I don't understand how the law of double jeopardy doesn't apply. You can't be tried for the same thing twice.

I think Judge is more sympathetic to pets than people. She gets the decision....

Fun Summer Money, whats next 😂 😂

Idk why the plaintiffs wouldn’t be given the lost time & use of vacation time for the care of their dog. I don’t think that was right. But for the defendants dog mauling their dog they would not have had to use that time 😏

Isn't it like a priority when getting a dog to take the dog around people, animals, all situations at early age as possible to get as many interactions as possible therfore giving many chances to train your dog??? My little dog is a family member and she knows the rules 100% and if she is questioning something she sits and looks at mw for approval or encouragement. When and if my dog does something she isn't supposed to its at my fault. And I have to take responsibility for that mistake.

Knock-off Gucci 😂😅

What if it was the wrong dog? I mean another dog wonders around everywhere- And plaintiff said she was sure 100% it was gucci, but when attack happens do you really see if the dog is that dog? And she does not even live there just visits that place.. Would be very bad if wrong dog got “punished”, and the one that did damage still runs around.

They should have gotten more $

hmmm... I know Judge M (JM) has ruled in similar cases to this where a black dog attacked someone's animal and then ran away. and they found someone close by who had the same look / type of dog, but that wasn't enough for JM to feel that it was enough evidence. I'm wondering why in this case it was? (was this the only black dog in the whole neighborhood?)

I think the judge got this 1 wrong. That aside, I absolutely HATE that they were ready to KILL there dog for what we all know as inconvenience. I don't need to know anymore about these people except that they should not have animals

On the mistaken identity, did they ever show a picture of what Gucci looks like? Seems like something you would need to show to prove that the dogs look similar (or not). I didn't see a picture of Gucci (just the alleged doppelgänger), but maybe I just missed it.

I’m missing out on what “fun money” was. They definitely deserved to get compensation for vet bills and stuff but do those plaintiffs not know how court works. The purpose is to make things WHOLE AGAIN, not try to get a bonanza out of it. I think that’s what they were trying to do, I mean take a reality pill!

A PIT BULL...shocker!

I'm about to watch this case while i use the treadmill. Let me make a probable guess. A pitbull attack? If i'm wrong I'll correct it later.😁

Gucci is a classy name for a dog.

What a mess!!😢😢..should of got pain and suffering for the dog, and owners to go through that..maybe not what they were asking but some compensation. P.S, neighbors need to call animal control on that other dog, no reason for him to be out, roaming.

Poor Bo😥.

Ain't no head scratching going on you drunk.

Hey y’all 😊

more drama in the trailer park

Jolynn has nice hair- thank you for the effort!

Wow summer money… Greedy.

Railroaded, or just caught out in lies