The smirk the defendant had on her face when the videos started to play, that’s all you need to show how heartless and guilty she is.

Bites on the hand are not "little things". The anatomy of the hand is a fertile environment for bacteria to travel along the structures and enter further.

Once again these owners don’t take accountability for their dogs. That lady bold face lied smh

Mad that JM. Did NOT call this Defendant out as the LIAR in this case..period!!!!

Defendant is such a liar, she absolutely left the attack video out on purpose.

Really lady you couldn't, rather wouldn't, give him an apology even at the end. The smirk on her face when JM noted the missing footage says a lot about this lady.

Defendant erase the part where he dog attacks the plaintiff's dogs and him. She did not want that evidence. Shame on her.

$500 is peanuts. Being bitten by an aggressive dog is traumatizing. He should have at least received 1500.

It always has to be the most irresponsible dog owner's, who decide to own the type of dog you must be most careful in owning , SMH 😠💯

JM was being really nice to her. She shouldn't have even submitted the video footage if it didn't disprove the defendant's claims. This was a sloppy attempt to deceive the judge.

I hate how easy Judge went on her. She is obviously a liar and is still unwilling to admit her mistakes

Douglas body language shows how everyone should feel about this lying and irresponsible defendant

Little bit of kindness and consideration would've went real far with the plantiff.

It’s always a pitbull. Smh.

I understand the plaintiff wasn't looking for a big payday but $500 for what happened to him is a slap in the face.

Ironic that her last name is Narcissian. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Hmm, Pepper and Waffles.....Makes me Hungry!😂

I'm amazed that the judge acts like the bite is no big deal. ANY dog attack should result in a $5000 judgement against the neglectful owner.

Douglas smirked when he said he had trouble using his hand.

At 5:01 the judge demeans the plaintiff by saying 'that little thing on your hand' when it is a large puncture wound in the middle of the bone joint. How dare the judge be so belittling, the plaintiff is not at fault at all, he is the victim, so why is the judge being so hostile to him? He's just a bit timid and didn't come fully prepared for court, but he deserved a whole lot more than a measly $500. And the fact that the defendant miraculously can't provide footage of the attack, should be enough to be convinced, but the judge kindly says to the defendant 'I'm not saying you are keeping me from it' when everything proves that she is, so why is the judge being so nice to the defendant and so mean to the plaintiff?...

Its really weird that she keeps interrogating the Plaintiff as if he's lying. Literally ALL the facts of the case line up with his testimony. The time he was at her house. The time he called the police. The time he went to the Drs. The fact that the Drs treated him for a dog bite. The fact that the police confirmed the door was open and a dog inside. Everything. This should have been over in 3 minutes. The only questionable part is whether or not he missed work. But that doesn't even matter to me...because if he went to work he still had to do his job with a dog bite on his hand, which would have been painful as shit, and probably took him longer than it would have otherwise.

She is a big Liar

Defendant is a lot like the owners whose pits bulls attacks a human, it was their fault. It was her fault for not keeping her dog contained. Leaving the front door open, not a good idea for 4 hours.

What a coincidence that the camera has missing time😂🤣.

Douglas facial expressions be killing me lol🤣

The plaintiff is frustrating as hell. First the defendant is clearly lying cause she purposefully left out the footage of the attack and admitted that the cops locked her door. Second, the plaintiff should've brought evidence of his injuries and proof he missed work. He didn't help himself when he kept saying he wasn't that badly hurt and that all he wanted was an apology. Had he done the bare minimum he might've got thousands just for pain and suffering.

He should have got a lot more than $500

The defendant is a pathetic liar!

The plaintiff is driving me nuts with his explanation of the dog bite. They clean and leave it open so it doesn't get infected. Instead of going back for followup with doctor he goes to a lawyer. He did get bit but he's being excessive.

Happy Saturday. Watching from Australia

Wow! The defendant is a bald-faced liar! That smirk told me everything I need to know. SMH!

The defendant had absolutely no empathy for the plaintiff, before or after the case. Wish the plaintiff's lawyer advised him to bring proof of wages, he might have gotten a little more compensation (but $5000 was a little ridiculous to ask for to begin with) Missing ring camera footage is very suspicious.

It’s ALWAYS a pitbull!

She magically cut that part of the footage out lol 😂 When your own camera works against you . Listen people y’all are giving pit bulls a bad name by not properly corralling them when needed . I personally don’t like pit bulls whatsoever , but every time it seems to be human error . The same with Guns , I can’t blame the gun I can only blame the owner . If your pet is property , and potentially a dangerous property - then lock it up when your leaving or leash it with a strong leash , don’t walk it off the leash - do the opposite of what all pit bull owners in court have erroneously done ✅

What I can't stand is while exercising walking past people with their dogs they don't bring the dog closer to them nor switch sides if the dog is on the side I am. Also this evening at a restaurant we were seated outside and the people across from our table had a large dog and as they were leaving the dog came inches away from plate for my food why because the owner of the dog did not have control of the leash and had the nerve to get smart with me after I told him to get control of his dog. I don't give a damn I will curse any of you out about your damn dogs! Your dog don't know me! And l don't leave out my door for your dog to be in my space or business!

How convenient there is a gap in the ring video

She's a liar

How convenient that the defendant just happens to be missing the few minutes of footage when the attack actually occurred. Did she really think she was gonna pull one over on JM? Get outta here!

Judge blew yet another verdict. She’s really dropping the ball the last couple of years.

I think he deserves more than $500. Just because you "can" do something doesn't mean you can do it well, or do it painfree. Bare minimum: He was attacked by a pitbull. Even if there was not much physical damage, that was scary as fuck. He had to take time out of his day to go to the Drs (and get a shot, which was painful) which costs money. Had to take time to talk to the police. And like he said, there are day-to-day activities (using a computer, cooking, going to the gym) that require full use of your hand. He couldn't fully do those things for at least a couple of days. I think he deserved somewhere closer to $800-1000

I don't understand why people keep animals that have agression characteristics in their genes That what they were bred for through history

Very very suspicious that the Ring video captures everything before AND after the attack, but nothing of the actual attack. And when Judge Milian and the plaintiff say as much, she had a very guilty smirk. It’s crystal clear that the defendants daughter didn’t close the door, and the dog ran out. And wtf? $5000.00 for a little hole in his hand??

I broke my neck and was using a walker when I was attacked by a pit. It took a chunk out of my leg that is still missing 7 years later. This happened during lunch time in research triangle park. Not a single person helped. I had to walk to an fire department for aid, but even they didn't do anything other than let me use a phone. The owner didn't have insurance and not much else. About 3 months later the pit started showing up in my back yard, I lived about 1mile away. I guess I tasted good and he wanted more.

One, can't understand the defendant.....two, its ALWAYS a freaking pit bull!!!.......three, take responsibility!!

The attack mysteriously vanished

He should have gotten $5,000.00.

Why does Douglas smirk when the plaintiff is trying to explain his side? The baliff's snickering at the plaintiff cheapens the seriousness of the case and is not fair to the plaintiff.

I'm not saying you're keeping the video.....WHY NOT? Jesus she has all the video except when the dog bite happened... what a load of BS. The guy wasn't the most articulate but that hole looked like a grand to me.

I don't get it, these dogs continually injure people and no laws have been put into place banning them. I think they're an UGLY breed to boot, I see nothing lovable about an animal that can tear someone's flesh off, fingers, kids faces, etc...And don't bother telling me how wonderful your dog is because you will never convince me. All animals can bite but pit bulls seem to enjoy it. They are the number one animal with lawsuits against them and their owners. You never hear about a golden retriever or a sheep dog tearing a child's face off.

Love the "gap" in the tape at the exact time of the attack. What a coincidence.

What a big baby. I get cuts like that everyday and i dont try to sue my boss!! Thats just a scratch. Sue happy, Sue happy, Sue happy!!!!!!

She's a bold face liar and smiling through it 🙄

Why is it that the most dangerous and deadly breed of dog has the most irresponsible owners? You cannot "accidentally" leave anything to chance when you own a pitbull. Odds are they are going to cause a lot of damage. Just ask the insurance industry.

Good afternoon jury!!

This lady is nice but she is clearly dishonest. The opening credits stated she had video proof that her dogs didn't get out. However, that is not truthful when clearly there are time gaps in her video evidence. What did she think Judge Milian wouldn't catch that? She said she was being scammed but the scam is her. And the ridiculous thing is that she wouldn't even be there if she had simply apologized.

Why didn't the judge say to the defendant "it's obvious you left out that part of the footage" but instead said "I know your trying to say you didn't purposely leave out that part" when it's obvious she did.

The defendant couldn’t be more self righteous, entitled and a flat out liar. I’m so sick of wonderful dogs being tainted by irresponsible, self centered owners. What an absolute joke of a fellow human being.

Big sneaky liar!!!

Douglas' face when judge said very sarcastically "when you couldn't work because of a small bite here" 😂😂😂😂😂

This is so infuriating, I make sure that my dog cannot ever get out of my house, it's not hard to be responsible dog owner. This woman absolutely does not feel bad about what her dog did. If you know you have an aggressive dog, you don't have the luxury to not make sure that they are contained. That smirk on her face when they asked her about the missing footage is really pissing me off. I'm a pitbull owner, and I can't stand irresponsible pit owners.

For the life of me can't understand how people can live with vicious animals in their home. Every SINGLE TIME there's a case like this, its always a pitbull. $500 is ridiculously low for what the plaintiff went through thanks to the complete carelessness and lack of empathy of the defendant. He should have been awarded at least $1000. Although he did drop the ball somewhat by not having neither followup medical treatment and proof of income.

Yeah her "ring" records it all just enough for her to delete all she needs.

She IS a LIAR!!! A pit bull in a house with the door LEFT OPEN and you think it won't venture out and get into some trouble. She erased the portion of tape that would have proved her dog bit the man. Moral of the story= when you walk your dogs in that neighborhood ALWAYS carry a baseball bat or mace.

So so so sick of dogs. I've had so many vicious dog scares in my life. I know.. they're not all bad. The bad ones seem to be the ones that just aren't taken care of correctly it seems. Dangerous game.

Marilyn, you should let your husband talk and finish his thoughts sometimes. You continue to talk over him the poor guy. I love you but I like your husband too and he has an opinion on these legal matters also.

What luck she has all that video but not the 4 mins in question

I was PRAYING🙏🏾 this one wouldn't be a pitbull. No such luck!! 😂

This defendant was absolutely ignorant!! LOL I truly LOVED when the gentleman that is always at the end of the pshow that does the ending interviews, spoke to the defendant, and basically said in his own words that she has an attitude!! that was the best!!! 😂

Hello to my fellow PC addicts! I hope you're all having a fabulous day! Wishing you all love and light!🌠

Sad situation and even worse it being a pit bull. It’s always the negligence of the owners but even though the mother was unaware the children that left the door open should be more aware that they need to be responsible of ensuring to close the door as to protect their home and pets. Also, in defense to the poor dog I think he was even surprised that a door was open and probably just when the dog realizes this the plaintiff comes into sight. The dog seemed to be protecting his space/ domain and not at all to be mean because he returns right back into the home and never comes out again. Even when the police comes to check out the situation. Seems like the dog realizes he messed up and retreated to wait for his punishment. Bless his heart. I know that’s a lot of assumption but it’s obvious the dog wasn’t on a hell bender around the neighborhood. Just a unfortunate scenario all together. But someone was hurt and there’s never a excuse for that. Someone must be made whole again. I agree with the verdict. 5,000 was asking too much but I believe if the defendant had made a attempt to apologize the plaintiff would’ve just asked what he was out. I think 500 is the perfect amount since the damage wasn’t that bad. I think both the litigants should be very grateful that the attack wasn’t so bad because like other cases this could have been bad all around.

She knows "dog gone well" that her vicious animal bit the man. It was evident to me when we saw the smirk on her face.😮

Mother is showing a good example to her children. Sneaky liar.

I understand that people are saying that the ring camera sometimes doesn't catch everything. But the judge said that the defendent sent 25 videos from the camera.. there's no way it didn't catch the action that was happening. Even little clips of them. Where's the video of the cops closing the door locking it?! That HAD to be on there.. she hid it.

Ms. Narsasist lol

What a liar the defendant is. How could she shame herself and her children in front of millions of people?

"Well maybe you've learned something from this. Hopefully." HIGHLY doubtful sadly.

I love the new Douglas side-eye cam.

What is appeal of owning a pit bull?

She absolutely knew that her evil dog attacked someone and edited out the part of the attack in the video. I hope that someone saves her cat before that evil dog attacks and kills it and the evil dog put to sleep before it attacks again. Ban Pit Bulls and all Pit Bull like dogs.

Typical of bitbull owners to deny their dogs caused harm.

It’s ALWAYS a pit bull!!!! Get a clue, you owners.

She's a freaking liar! How come she assumes she's just a good person. She is hiding the footage and destroyed it!

for the ATV question - the judges statement about the certificate of liability was correct. When ever we did a job that required a job certificate of liability and not just a general liability insurance we would call our insurance company up and ask for the certificate to be issued and have the job name/address named on the certificate also. Most jobs we did just needed to show our general liability which does show $1 million. I think that was the Minimum standard amount.

Douglas is too cute . I love JM and his relationship.

When you go to a doctor for a dog bite, the doctor must report it to the authorities. Why no mention of that? It's a good motive to erase some of her tapes. I can't believe she left the front door open. 🤔🙄

The way she just lies. 🤡

I’m sorry but I think this women is 100% dumbing down her English. She speaks much better English than that 💯

I’m calling it, she’s guilty, 3seconds into hearing her voice I can already tell she’s treading very carefully around what to say / not to say lololol

Anyone who repeats “I have nothing to hide” more than once def has something to hide. I don’t trust her.

he's lucky....police in our city would NEVER respond to a call like that! Heck, when someone was trying to break into our apt in the middle of the night and i phoned 911, they never showed up then, either.

AND the woman is snickering when the gap in the Ring video is found.

Judge Milian is great...but it would be so frustrating to be her husband lol. Every time he starts talking she cuts him off. Homeboy is a Judge as well...he knows what he's talking about

ohhhhhh gotta love the video screen setup!! reminds me of TBBT, when Sheldon makes the tv screen robot to stand in for him!!! LOL oh how convenient that the attack video is missing!! and she is LAUGHING about that!!!!! G U I L T Y

that wound is NOT a small wound. I had a very similar wound in the very same spot and it was a miserable experience. It is a deep flesh wound and due to the nature of it being a dog bite they absolutely could not close the wound.

I hope there was a report made to Animal Control. Her display of zero responsibility makes another attack by her dog more likely.

she deleted the video that why she didn't have it. sad he should have gotten a lot more to treat her a lessons

Negligent owner and any dog bite.. he should have received the 5k. Bad pet owners are the worst. she doesn’t believe she is wrong. He even had the officers make sure the house was okay. He is a good person.

Milian was sloppy and partisan again. The defendant was clearly a liar. Worse still, the bite was not a ‘little thing’ - the dog bit through his finger. Defendant left the door open - irresponsible and a liar. She smirked when the gap in video was noted and she smirked when the plaintiff said all he wanted was an apology. She is a real piece of work!

How did he NOT KNOW if his wound was glued or not??😮😢

Thank Goddess that Waffles and Pepper were good. She's guilty!