THANK!!!! YOU!!!!!

Lol

Exactly

Agreed

He's confused. He doesn't know if that guy that was there while he had an appt. was pulling a scam.

Racism isn’t just us white people....

@@citygirlingraham No one said it was.

Wait til the end 😅

Yes! Many times I think he’s to rough but today I was like.. “yes! Well said Doug! You tell him!”

"You have to learn the custom in court. It's YOUR HONOR." That's right, Doug!

Judges are not gods and we are forced to worship them and it’s BS and not giving that man his money back when there was no due date in the WRITTEN contract is called unjust enrichment!!!

@@cheleamerica1st87 how about the effort it took to keep a car he already sold someone else in his own garage he had to pay for, while having to move his own car to park it legally in the streets? I know for damn sure I would’ve had parking tickets if it were me coz I get too tired to even get up some days, let alone get out and look for parking when I have my own garage. Some people would’ve countersued for that!!!

@@cheleamerica1st87 That's absolutely not what unjust enrichment is, but you go on lol. Unjust enrichment is when a breach of a contract occurs such that one party is enriched under circumstances the law deems unjust. In other words, the court would have to have found that the defendant breached the contract and therefore, keeping the plaintiff's initial payments was unjust. That isn't what happened here. In this case, the defendant is NOT the one who breached the contract; in fact, he went above and beyond to attempt to get the plaintiff to retrieve the property - even though the racist, race baiting plaintiff never honored his end of the agreement by 1) paying the car off and 2) picking up the vehicle when the defendant clearly tried to get in touch with him to do so on numerous occasions. In fact, this is the opposite of unjust enrichment because it was the plaintiff who breached the contract - and therefore unjust enrichment could never be assumed or imposed as the court would have to find the party who breached was the party who was unjustly enriched - and because the defendant didn't receive the entire amount of the contract and then refuse to turn over the vehicle and thus kept both the full amount of payment, plus the vehicle. THAT would be unjust enrichment. I LOVE IT when people with absolutely zero real understanding of the law attempt to play armchair attorney/judge. Next time, make sure you actually grasp the legal concept you're trying to argue...otherwise you just look kind of foolish. Also, no one ever said judges were gods or that we were being forced to worship them; however, there are certain honorifics that have become part and parcel of courtroom procedure. These types of appropriate salutations don't just apply to the courtroom. I'm guessing you're just throwing out an excuse for the vile plaintiff because you agree with him that all Asians must know each other and be in cahoots. There's nothing wrong with addressing someone respectfully and using their title. People work for years to become attorneys and judges, and there is a certain amount of decorum and respect owed when dealing with them. If you're not someone who respects rules of politeness and etiquette, or the hard work and sacrifice that goes into becoming a judge, that would be a you problem, not a societal one. People just don't know how to act appropriately, and end up getting themselves into trouble because of that, and then they want to openly disrespect the court. That is the law of our land, and untold numbers of our citizens have fought and died to uphold that law. They also fought so that people like you have the right to jump online and whine about legal terminology you have entirely wrong.

Agree! The plaintiff definitely has issues!!

He’s pathetic for having to make payments on a $700 car 😂

@@christophermartin972 💜 RIGHT! PLUS THE VERY SWEET MAN WAS KIND ENOUGH, HE WAS GOING TO LET HIM TAKE IT AFTER HE ONLY PAID $475. HE JUST WANTED IT MOVED SO BAD. IDIOT CLAIMS HE NEVER RECEIVED ANY PHONE CALLS. WHAT A PUTZ 😒

@@katymcginn4644 I like that word. It isn’t used enough anymore …..puttz

It's hilarious that he's trying to play the anti-Semitism card when HE brought up the set-up and Asian card lol Projection 101???

Exactly

He wore his kippa in case things didn’t go his way . People who accuse others of being racist are racist themselves and he sure proved it with his comment about the defendant.

But he did play the race card

@@odettamatthews6960 Typical liberal.

@@jenniehughes6927 typical liberal???? What? Left or right, this kind of stuff happens all the time. Don’t turn this into something it has nothing to do with

Right?

Every time! 🤔

Because he was brought up to speak to women with respect that way... its just a habit.. its not like he was a young cocky guy.. he was just acting on a natural reflex that he has don his whole life...

She’s so right ab the male/female judge thing. She’s so right…

@@ChasRiaStJohn she sounds pretty wrong tbh. Lots of people call male judges Sir.

@@SpiffyPenguin yes, true, but not mister, sir is still appropriate. And still, I’ve seen them get corrected for it. I think ma’am would have been more appropriate. Miss sounds pretty informal. He wouldn’t call a male judge mister. There’s sir/ma’am, then ms/mr. and you know she’s making her point which I think is great, ab the whole male/female respect thing. Bc the disparity still goes on.

He's an idiot and pulled the race card which is hateful in and of itself because it was NOT warranted.

Good, the plaintiff was a Karen.

@@eloahnon4952 I think the term for a male Karen is either "Ken" or "Kevin". I've been hearing both lately.

@@mellvee Nah, I like calling men Karens too... it gets them all in a tizzy😊

Doug is a savage... Better have your word in order cause he will straighten you up on site.

😂

👍🏾

And maybe even a bit racist... the whole "don't see many Asians around here." Comment.

@@Jess-gv5th more then a bit racist .. total racist… and wants to play the victim

agreed

I don't think he was trying to be sexist. If you aren't use to going to court, something as common as using the word "miss" can come out accidently, if it were a man he could have said "sir" And I guess she assumed he is sexist just like he assumed she was antisemitic. Both were ridiculous for the accusation. Just correct him and move on, no need to assume he wouldn't have said sir to a male judge and that he is sexist. Sometimes the Judge acts like she's on speed or something. She's rude, irritable, talks over people and just let them answer the question which I guess makes for great TV, but it also makes the average person nervous because they are being filmed, they are in front of an audience and a judge. Nerves can get the best of you, and make you do stupid mistakes like calling her miss twice in a row, certainly doesn't prove he is sexist. People are so quick to label people without even knowing them.

@@lolalopez7657 not to mention judges act like they are gods and we are forced to worship them by standing every time the enter or leave the room!!! They are public SERVANTS!!!

He played the Jew card

All he had to say was "I had to make an appointment a week in advance to see this car and he never mentioned anyone else showing up so either this other person just happened to know about the car and when I would be there, or he had some connection to the defendant". No need to instantly "he was also asian so...ya know".

Not to mention, the plant is useless. Bruh, it's a $1,000 car. He took $700. What good did that plant do him? It's pretty easy to sell a car for $700. I don't even need another car, but at $700 I'd buy it just because. Plant🙄🙄🙄🙄🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱. What a loser.

He's an example of why the jew stereotype exists... haggles down the price, wants def. to get car inspected on his nickel, whines about anti-semitism when he loses.

He's taken that Seinfeld episode very seriously. The one where Jerry's Uncle Leo swore that everyone was anti-semitic when he didn't get what he wanted

Mean while he made racist comments saying that the other buyer was also Asian and it was a set up because Asian people don’t live in the area. Like What????

@@gabbylem I know, right?

He wore his yarmulke to court for the same reason he mentioned that he was going to temple….lol It’s like the guy that walks in clutching a Bible and wearing a giant cross 😂 Really, all they’re doing is shaming their religion. Interesting that the plaintiff brings race into it with the “Asian set-up” and then claim anti-Semitic with the judge? The defendant on the other hand seems like a very nice man.

No, she's a feminist and she said - NO! to being called "Miss" to which he disregarded and immediately repeated his mistake.

somebody who takes advantage of the situation.

Someone who can't afford it.

And then take from August to October and still not pay it off lol. Hell a McDonalds worker could handle that after a couple paychecks.

A clown that’s who!

@@nixonsneverendingthoughts2824 correct!

matzah balls. there i fixed it 4 you.😂😂😂

Plus he had nothing support his case... It all works together! He needs prayer

Then why is it considered polite and respectful in the south to call females miss (Ms) and their given first name

@Andrew "Ms" is pronounced differently from "miss". "Ms" is pronounced "mizz".

What a weird response.

i take it the plaintiff doesnt lyke KFC. 😛😛😛

🤣 exactly. Like what bro!!!?

@Shandra Johnson to me it makes sense not because he is also Asian, but when the hell does someone randomly show up to look at a car for sale by owner while you are looking at the car and make it seem like they urgently want the car. It seems like he had a friend show up and act like they wanted the car.

And he’s calling ppl anti Semitic ??? For not letting him win? He seems like a stubborn human.

Exactly!!

And then take over a month to pay it off lol.

Exactly. SMH

She is married to a jew...a wonderful man.. not the likes of him!! A complete racist agaisnt all religions except his.

If you use 2 ply, you can get a carbon copy 😉 😆

RIGHT?!?! 😂😂😂😂

Victim complex.

Lol not to mention, his broke ass told someone else to leave. Someone who probably had the money😂😂😂😂😂

Absolutely agree!! If you go lower on the original price for someone (a stranger) you should receive full payment! (they’re both idiots). Lol!!

@@g355150 So true! The plaintiff thinks he’s a badass. Lol! (glad he lost).

And said he was willing to let the guy take the car before it was paid for in full smh the plaintiff probably still would have sued the defendant the minute anything went wrong with the car lol.

Show up with your money right. Just like when buying drugs.

🤣🤣yep

Or "Boy." See how that flies.

@@derinaries I thought of that, but I feel it has an unnecessary racial tinge to it. "Sonny" zings any male judge.

“Boy.” 😵‍💫

More than 75 % of Americans live almost paycheck to paycheck & don't have more than $1,000 in savings.

You have $5,000 lying around? Not typical.

Seems like it's getting your panties in a bunch, miss.

Yup she always reverts to saying , "if I was a woman ,then ..." shes always thinking about sex

Oppression olympics in full display. Saying miss may not be proper but It certainly is not disrespectful

@@mylifewithanimals how did what I type give off such vibe you????

@@1kingfitness It is disrespectful because of the nuance. "Miss" is thought of for a younger person who has no authority. In court, the Judge's authority must be maintained. Too often men will, consciously or not, condescend to women in authority.

He’s rightfully be ejected from the courtroom.

You don't call a judge Miss or Mr. It's disrespectful.

@@tunisiancrochetchannel well obviously, but that wasn't my point

If someone asks you NOT to call them something and you call me it anyway...it's rude.

You would call a male judge “boy?”

Agree! He’s a total creep!!

I’ve seen lots of people call the Judge “miss” but she doesn’t get upset unless the people are dicks. Like the plaintiff was. I’m glad he lost.

That’s the law. If you’re told to satisfy the agreement and you don’t do it over a certain amount of time, the law considers that an act of abandonment. He must not have truly cared about the car or his money or he would have gotten everything done himself and actually moved the damn car. The law doesn’t protect inaction or ineptitude.

If you wouldn’t call a male judge “boy,” don’t call a female judge “miss.”

BECAUSE SHE IS A JUDGE. Wow, I thought it was simple but apparently not… A judge is a profession, like a doctor. These professions come with relevant titles that the person earned by going through the education necessary to attain that job. Neither the plaintiff or defendant had those titles or else she would have used them in kind, as part of her position. In any court case I’ve EVER seen or heard, there’s been the expectation that the judge be called “judge” or “your Honor” as a symbol of respect for the position they hold. Calling her a “miss” was absolute disrespect towards her profession and she rightly admonished him for it.

@@XX2Media , ok lady.