I love it

And the funniest part of that is they really think they are still right..😂😂😂😂

My guilty pleasure 😂

OMG Yes!!! LMAO.

Lol I said the same thing 😂😂

Such a good cartoon!

To me, lawd forgive me..he (plaintiff) looks like the guy that took his top part off his body in the mail room on Men in Black 🤦🏾‍♀️ *cringy* lol

Lmao yes

he had a clear shot, who cares about the damned yellow or red light?

@@sandwichman100 Huh? That’s essential to who was at fault. If he was trying to speed up to make the light and it turned red, he is 100% at fault, hello?

Don’t forget in the beginning he said the defendant was turning left, she got up and said she was in the other lane going straight and then he switched up his story too… he lied about everything

@@LeeoGoneWild you need to look up 'sarcasm' i was being sarcastic with the comment

The cars in front could’ve turned right, hence the light may have been orange. Obviously, there was doubt otherwise her insurance company wouldn’t have paid him. She should have seen him and not hit him, regardless of the green light.

Yes, that was a "set-up for a pay-out" statement if I ever heard one.

Talking about how he was taken to the hospital in a cervical collar and on a back board but was cleared to leave in 2 hours lol

@@bunji_beans I was confused because the injuries he described sounded way too serious to be discharged in just a few hours. What a baby🙄😂

😂👍

Lmfaooo

He admitted to running the light in the end.

I totally agree with you 👍

@karma.... seems like Karma to me! 😉

@JupiterRising don’t go in the comments, where everyone is discussing the video, until the video is over if you don’t wanna be spoiled

Well said, George. As soon as it came out of his mouth, I almost lost my tea, laughing so hard. Lol.

Right

I had 2 options before I settled with my insurance company. I could go ahead and sue the defendants or I could settle at a reduced rate with the insurance company.

It also contradicted his earlier testimony that cars were in front of him.

OMG YESSS 60% is insane. It’s like he wasn’t trying

Caught that too 🧐

Sounds scary

@@globalphenomena6979 big brother

$Roberto Hernandez so true

EMT doesn't want the liability so they put all that crap on him.

​@@mymobilebuddy4392 I know but if you had passed out and couldn't breathe...the last thing you wanna do is move around unless you are in immediate danger

Not true, at least not in California, and I'm pretty sure that is the case everywhere in the U.S. If the light is yellow when you enter the intersection, it doesn't matter if it turns red while you are already in the intersection; you own that intersection until you have completed through it (unless of course you have to stop in the middle due to traffic, in which case you entered the intersection illegally). Red light cameras activate if a car ENTERS the intersection after the light is red, not if it exits on the red. It's the same with the police giving a ticket (why would the two be different? The law is one way or the other).

That’s true, Well in misery I mean Missouri. I got a ticket for that once when I was a teenager.

Not in most states

@@Geronimo2Fly I'm only reiterating what i was told by police officers and a judge when trying to fight a red light ticket issued by an officer

@@Geronimo2Fly and the camera and police have the same standard, they just do it at different times. If the law is that it's a violation to exit the intersection if it's red and a camera catches you entering at red then you're obviously also going to exit the intersection on red. The reason red light cameras don't catch the far end of the intersection is because they are connected to and activated by pre-existing sensors used for traffic lights and those sensors are obviously on the near side of the intersection to detect stopped cars. All this information is available on Google.

the after court interviewer must be someones favor, i bet they make him stand out there in the hallway the entire time of shooting.

I love you daddy Adrian

I think because of that witness statement, she leaned more towards the defendant

I think it's because only Plaintiff said he had the right of way. The Defendant disagreed and the witness agreed that the light was anything but green.

Plaintiff admitted to running the red light when he said it might've changed to red midway

4:45 Plaintiff said the light “might’ve changed” in the intersection. Sounds like he sped up trying to outrun a yellow light that turned red. Yellow means slow down.

The plantiff changed his testimony. When describing the wreck he said he had cars in front of him. He then said he didn't. Even the judge questioned that part, to Douglas I think. Go back and listen. Its when she comes off the bench towards the end.

👍

In theory yes, but I think the show will pay the tab for him.

No, he was given an offer to settle and he agreed to those terms. Case closed, as far as his insurance is concerned. Or theirs.

​@@stonew1927 As an Insurance Agent that is incorrect He settled with their insurance company with regards to their liability for damages they may be responsible. His insurance company is there to mitigate damages "he" may be responsible for Those are distinct insurable interest.... We buy insurance as a transfer of Risk "to" the Insurance company instead of us.... His negotiations for "his" loss from them ( aka their insurance company) is a totally separate issue from his insurance company's responsibility to cover his Risk of paying out.....2 different things They will likely lose because again as someone mentioned he should have had his I/C defend against the suit but this guy is a bit clueless and didn't realize once the counter was filed he could have had them ( his I/C) handle it....again because the possibility of Financial Risk, has been Transferred to them....that's what Premiums do....unfortunately a lot of ppl don't quite understand how insurance actually works 😉 That's why he didn't understand his case was lost before he showed up, he had effectively contractually agreed the matter was over....PC just has to have content in a real court his case would been tossed in 15 seconds

Case has been settled, too late for further negotiations

@@stonew1927 not when it comes to their float, though. They denied their car’s damages, and their client was sued for it. Insurance must cover their client in that case. That being said, the plaintiff was an idiot and deserved it. He changed his tune about people going ahead of him, and that said everything that needed saying. Lol

It's "You can't have your cake and eat it, too."

👍👍👍

ThT was priceless

🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm saying to myself why would he fall by the poop

LOL I thought you said “look to learn” and I was gonna say me too because that’s why I watch all these course cases so I know what to do in the future