11 5 20 Hey Sally Smith, Imagine: a loving man & woman having to go through the process of having a dead baby in utero (3rd trimester, first child) & the mother @ risk for having a stroke & dying; a dead baby delivered, the Mother lived, they named the baby, dressed him, & grieved.. Or, a mother who had 2 pregnancies (!!!) where the fetus had no brain; 3rd trimester pregancies. Yeah, put these woman through more HELL. With nonmedical nut-jobs in charge, more women will die. Stay safe, keep calm, & be well. v

8 2 19 Hey Shawn Ladd, I guess that's what happens when you have a Rhodes Scholar for a candidate. How refreshing?-very! Be well. v

That is so spot on. I love how precise he is

It's like people assume women are happy to get abortions lmao.

@@gai.l4916 He is artful isn't he.

But babies survive outside womb with a little help (incubation, breathing) at 6 months. That's end of Second Trimester. This Fox News talk of Third Trimester is not even the problem as they are trying to make it be. Also, At That Stage Of Development And Ability To Survive, cutting babies up and vacuuming them out as was formerly done in abortions, doesn't happen anymore, I don't think.

If they know the baby is going to be born without a brain or other major organs yeah abort.

👊🗽✌🗽👊

Put the crack pipe down.

@@laryjohnson5736 Fr

@@letsgobrandon1367 mayor peter is still busy looking for manbearpig.

Ha. Must be a bot

PETE is used to go in through s***

lol

Are you always the dumbest?

Ditto. I don't understand what happened...? I recall Pete _winning_ the first two primaries. And then....he just drifted away as Biden "took his rightful place as next in line" or whatever. But my god....Pete is a masterful politician. Smart, ethical, likeable, and able to get an audience of Fox News conservatives to agree with his stance on late-term abortion? Are you kidding me? Who can DO that? Pete can. If the DNC was smart....they'd put everything they have behind this guy. It's beyond frustrating to know they _won't_ do that. They'll probably just say Kamala is "next in line" and expect everyone to be thrilled about that. And that's how Trump will win in 2024. It's maddening to see it all coming....

Put the crack pipe down.

I was ignorant until I saw your post. I always thought that Roe v Wade meant you could have an abortion at any time. But now I understand that you can only have it in the first trimester. Is that true?

@@jpsned Unfettered access to abortion is only allowed in the first trimester. Abortions can be banned in the third trimester as long as there's an exception for the life of the mother. Abortions can't be banned in the second trimester but the state can put obstacles in the way. The line the Supreme Court drew is viability.

@@exiledfrommyself Thanks again for the information. At last, a YT commenter who has some brains!

The onus shouldn’t be on Democrats to explain why allowing the government to force women to give birth is immoral. Every other 1st world country understands this. It’s time conservatives stop trying to create Gilead from The Handmaid’s Tale.

And now theyre trying to remove it

He makes me proud to be a gay man.That's what I want in a commander in chief. Someone who lifts others up and is a good role model for our young people. Pete is the total package.

Daniel Celmer Yes, he is an honorable man. That is a rarity these days. I’m glad he is gay too! 🇺🇸🥰 🌈😎🤓🌈

Why?

He's a total coward

Why? He's a coward

@@0my lol

I DID vote for Mayor Pete. And I sent his campaign money even when I barely knew who he was. I was that impressed by him.

Umm… he did. He didn’t win the primary. Have you been living under a rock?

MICHGO1 no part of this specific question/answer pair was cut out; this itself is the exchange between Wallace and Buttigieg on the matter. If you’re interested, you can see the four-part Town Hall on the Fox News YT channel.

Compassionate to allow over 800,000 abortions per year in the U.S. What a great guy.

@@dearymcleary you ever carry a dead fetus inside your body?

@@dearymcleary clearly you missed the entire point of the video 🙄

@@dearymcleary that's not the point. The point is to let the women decide. Guys like you really need the experience to be a woman, to get pregnant, to have pain every month, otherwise you won't ever get what it means

@@dearymcleary how about we tell men to have a vasectomy when they come of age it can easily be reversed when they are ready to be a parent, shouldn't be a problem since they see no problem telling women what to do with their bodies. this would solve the issue especially that which involves rape and incest, and since you are all for finding a way to have less abortions I believe you should start preaching for all to have a vasectomy weather they want it or not.

Why cuz he allows defenseless unborn people to be murdered?

@@dearymcleary If a stillborn child were to be carried into term, the birth-giver would be defenseless against things such as sepsis. A fertile teenage girl would be defenseless against an older man who commits acts that force her to conceive a child she is not mature enough to raise. A family living in poverty would be defenseless against the ruthless systems that force them to either have water for the month, or afford to buy baby formula for the child they cannot afford to raise anyhow. By criminalizing abortion, babies will be granted to those who simply cannot raise them. These babies may survive, but they will not truly live.

@@Madisongs Poverty is no justification for abortion. Rape of course is a different story. 60,000,000 abortions since RvW. Isn't that a bit excessive???

@@dearymcleary Not really imo. we’ve been making children at a good rate, and if we need more children for the population to succeed, the solution isn’t banning abortion. The solution would be to make it actually worth it to have kids in this country. For example, we could add more funding for schools, more maternity leave, better IEP and disability accommodation for children, improve the adoption and foster care systems, and we could start paying people wages that will at least enable them to survive and not enter a state of poverty in which they cannot properly raise a child. Those are a few examples that will make people more likely to want children.

@@Madisongs 60,000,000 dead is ok -- Nuff said.

Hes not debating it. He's saying women should decide.

Because he as a candidate for president at the time

We should all! Debate it. Who are you to exclude others?

Because they are the fathers of these babies. In accordance with the arrogance of these egotistical women, who can't be bothered with birth control, they don't give a flying ____ that the baby's DNA is half his. HE HAS RIGHTS AS A FATHER to his son or daughter.

🐔

Voting for Pete would be like voting for Pee Wee Herman.

Considering pence at one point supported federal funding for people to change their sexuality, I’d pay to see it www.snopes.com/fact-check/mike-pence-supported-gay-conversion-therapy/

Pence, no thank you

There are many complications that are only discoverable within the Third Trimester. You are not a doctor. You aren't even trying to educate yourself.

Do you have the same position about the death penalty?

Not quite. The Declaration of Independence (I spelled it out because when I looked up what DOI could stand for all that came back was Digital Object Identifier. Took me a minute.) says "... they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights..." It doesn't specify who that creator is. We are not a theocracy, so the Christian God doesn't have a say in secular law, nor does any other God. Your argument is that a child in the womb is human. I would argue a child in the womb is a potential human and that a living human woman should have more rights than a fetus. I think it's tragic that that even needs to be said. Forcing a woman to give birth no matter the circumstances is immoral. See? I checked my morals. When a right already exists, like abortion, there traditionally, legally needs to be a profound societal benefit in order for that right to be taken away. I don't think the country would benefit from a sudden influx of hundreds of thousands of unwanted children per year. Are you and other pro-lifers planning to put your money where your mouth is and adopt a few? If not, you might want to take a step back from this discussion.

@@kirkinsf4 glad you have the courage to answer this ..."The DOI does not specify which God" Well ...if you look at article 6 of the constitution, ... the constitution ties the DOI which came first into the rule of law of the constitution ....the DOI set forth the principles and the constitution set forth the operation ...and those operations came exclusively from the Christian Bible ...and when they signed the law of the land "Year of Our Lord" 1827 they understood this Lord to be the Christian one ...so that is settled, .......lets dissect your statement ...where do rights come from "woman should have more rights than a fetus" rights?...they come from God ...and again ....we are talking about those rights bestowed to us by a creator, ...the govt was never made to be secular, (the silly argument is that the constitution never mentions God, lol ...neither does the book of Esther in the Bible, ...neither does the Book of Song of Solomon ... those are not secular books) ...the founding fathers had bibles and prayers in their schools and abortion was outlawed ...to say something is unconstitutional is to say that the founders would have disagreed on it ...that is really stretching it, an to say that a woman is being forced to give birth ...no one forces that ...it is a natural process, ...the understanding should be obvious ...if you have irresponsible sex with the desire to NOT have a child ...then you should experience the consequences of taking risks of unprotected sex. what is unreasonable about that?with

@@lukevillarreal973 It seems like you are very fixated upon the aspect of human life trumping the choices made by “those who can save it”. Since you seem very open to answering questions, I would like to give you a hypothetical.

@@lukevillarreal973 Lets say that a woman was denied an abortion by a doctor, delivered a stillborn baby, and died shortly after from a condition contracted via carrying the pregnancy out to term instead of aborting the stillborn. Would that make the doctor a murderer for denying this woman an abortion, even though the fetus was going to die before being born anyway? Would that make abortion morally correct because it meant one less “murder” occurring? I would like to hear your stance on this.

Explain why he's an abomination. If it's just because he's gay, don't bother.

And what happen if she didnt decide to get that baby ? 😐

What at 6 months when it has no brain or lungs?

That's not always possible. Because people like you we are in serious trouble now. Think out of the box, oh I forgot, you just can't

Are you sure he hasn’t?

Good thing you don’t listen to yourself.

In no way is a gay man less qualified than a straight man to have an opinion, especially if that opinion is to trust women.

@@lisamiles817 exactly

He just answered it straight in this short clip. The only time a late-term abortion is even considered to be allowed is in the case where the mother's life is at risk, or the fetus is going to die regardless of whether or not they carry it to term or it's going to kill both mother and child, or any other host of medical reasons why that decision would have to be made. The point is that if you get to the 3rd trimester, by definition you're expecting to have that child, you've picked a name, etc. and you're given horrible life-changing news and a decision that no one wants to make. At the end of the day, that decision shouldn't be made by the government, it should be made by the woman and their family, and their doctors.

Seriously, no woman at 8 months gestation is going to wake up and say "hey, let's go get an abortion" - it's just not happening.

Thats because he is a spineless and emotionless reptilian.

@@sallysmith920 So some research Sally. Until you know the stats, you can not draw conclusions.

@@dearymcleary it does happen but legislation can be put in play in order to prevent that, while simultaneously protecting abortions for fetal anomalies and medical problems. Here’s some stats on the issue: lozierinstitute.org/late-term-abortion-stats/