+Piyush Ranjan Rai Consensus on the forums is about 3hp

también tengo la misma pregunta, alguien tiene la respuesta?

I also have the same question, does anyone have the answer?

+RedGhost1990 Less than 5hp for sure. Consensus on the forums is about 3hp when combined with a full exhaust system. Not really worth it, IMO. You'll spend around $1000 for a negligible gain, though I'm sure the sound will be killer!

@@Ghost590 3hp on a litre bike is a negligible gain but on a r3 its 10 % races are won or lost there do you want to race against the guy who has a 10% hp advantage ?

+victor anzueto If you are going with a full exhaust you should absolutely do a PCV. Without it you are running extremely lean and you will lose mid-range power, amongst other issues. Keep in mind that you are only going to get about 3hp with a full exhaust and a PCV.

+Taijean Moodie I don't know if you just decided to not read the title, or just disregard the last half but......It clearly says this fuel controller is designed for the 2015 Yamaha R3 haha

+Austin Huizar this is the power commander 5 not the fuel controller they are different here. www.powercommander.com/powercommander/products/PCFC/powercommander_pcfc.aspx

Dude, it IS made to control the fuel. It tells your EFI different information, to control the amount of fuel put in.

+Austin Huizar ik that but the pc5 also controls the ignition and cuts power for a quick shifter also has a bunch of other features i don't need. I only need the fuel controller to make the bike run rich or middle when i install a kn airfilter with a tbr exhaust.

+Andy K It does not need to be empty Just have a rag or couple of Paper Towels in your hand positioned under the Quick Release in case a few drops come out.

Thanks!

You all probably dont care but does someone know a tool to log back into an Instagram account?? I stupidly forgot the login password. I would love any tips you can offer me!

@Aryan Quentin instablaster ;)

@Layne Keagan I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and I'm waiting for the hacking stuff atm. Looks like it's gonna take quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.

bangyahead1 There must not be a performance gain, otherwise they probably would have replied promptly as they claim. Ive seen another PCV install video and the guy said "about a 10% performance gain. so out of a 42hp bike, youll get an extra 4.2hp or so gain. Not really worth a measely 4.2hp for $500+, imo. In Australia the Akropovic carbon fiber slip-on costs $649. It's not really worth $1150+ to me. Might was well spend that money on a better bike.

+bangyahead1 well some of us ride these on purpose, meaning we like the small bikes, I have had a cbr 600 before, a ninja 500, some cruisers etc, but wanted a bike that is reliable, smaller for flickability, and affordable fun that you can actually afford to put on tons of miles (other bikes eat the tires). I just wish we had a 400 4 cylinder Super Sport available where I live that was newer

Ive seen clips wjere the poster was talking about getting a measely 4,000 miles from a set of Diablo Rosso II's. The R3 will eat tires too.. LIke you, I too, have had big bikes and I love the R3, so dont get me wrong there. Personally, i consider it to be illogical to spend $7,000 AUD on an R3, then spend $1,150 on the pipe, and $500 on a small performance gain. To me that is money better spent on a better bike.. Youre now looking at $8,650 spent on the R3. Maybe you're just not picking up what I'm putting down. Then you upgrade the tires.... You're now looking at over $9,000. That kind of money will buy a bike with alot more balls than the R3 will ever have. It is illogical.

Yeah where I am the r3 is just sooo much cheaper is part of it for me, but I am lucky, where I am at I guess when I comes to cost

Here, with putting everything on the bike I would pay only 6000, but the other bike I like are about 11000 at minimum

Thank you very much! I appreciate the response and help.