I think you need to check your source first, I think they are just in my bad trips

Robbert van Eijndhoven Fuck off you racist. 1. As the guy above pointed out, check youre fucking facts. 2. We here on the Interwebs would rather die than entertaining the idea of a facility used for preservation and display of historically significant artifacts if they have EDUCATIONAL VALUE

Tomas Alanov A good researcher always includes a margin of error. In this case 5%.

Ah, but surely the establishment itself is, de facto, a thing. Wait... Does that mean that musea are, themselves, subject to this 'collection of things' rule? Is there a meta-museum about musea? A metaseum? (If there isn't, there should be.)

_"...we in the UK..."_ Christ, it's no wonder your country's going to shit so hard

Makchu Cook - the irony.

@@jgmediting7770 Don't you know that everyone's brainwashed unless they agree with you, that's totally how it works.

Love the reference!

It's almost like the lefts evil is so wide reaching and pervasive everyone to the right of Marx has has to band together to stop it.

ian dick don't forget that there are vandals and agressors on the left too and the protesters don't do much to stop them. Perhaps they're all baddies too. Just saying.

M1k3y our hats have little pictures of skulls on them.

Felipe Pereira Don't forget to put the lime in the coconut and drink em both together. If you put the lime in the coconut, then you'll feel better. Just sayin.

awful edgy username thats also obnoxiously long wrong

Actually they're not. But leftists and other haters like BLM wants to force their views on everyone.

@Joshua Jung imagine being so empty headed that the only argument you can make is an insult against an ironic username.

@@Fenris77 so if there was a statute of Osama Bin Ladin in New York you would be completely fine with that? And being against it means that you want to force your beliefs on others?

@ Testimonium Ignis Big difference Bin Ladin was a terrorist fighting to (long term) enslave the entire world to his fascistoid cult while for example Washington and Lee was actually fighting for their homelands and should be honoured or at least recognized for it. The problem with PC people and general anti-South hating leftists is that they demand freedom of speech and freedom of expression while denying it to others. Why not take down all statues of Sherman Grant and Lincoln?!

A lot of his arguments are full holes. Its not lies per say but he's cherry picking bits to tell a specific narrative. 1. Owning Mein Kampf doesn't make you a Nazi. Its like reading the teachings of Karl Marx making you a Communist. You read it to understand why it didn't work. 2. Robert E. Lee is not Hitler. Him and his wife were actually for slaves rights and freeing them. 3. Removing statues and putting them in Museums require millions of dollars per memorial to remove. You want your taxpayer money to go toward this?.. and not Obamacare? 4. Nazi or not he ignored the fact they had the right to free speech. Making exceptions to the 1st Amendment is a VERY dangerous thing to do. 5. He's stretching far and wide to blame specifically Trump. Well by that logic Jason Kesslar the organizer of said Nazis was an Obama supporter. So is Obama a Nazi? Fuck no of course not. 6. Anti Nazi =/= good. If the anti protestors stayed on their side and were civilized no one would of gotten run over. Personally I woulda protested the day after. It takes two to fight. 7. He dismisses States Rights as a platform for racism. History lesson. The US fought the British specifically for rights for each colonial state to govern themselves. They were exercising this right but Lincoln said no. The issue is much more complicated than. Oh racism is bad. 8. Holy shit this is long haha. I could go on and on but I doubt this guy is doing this for comedic effect. If he was a REAL comedian he'd go after both sides. So its pretty obvious this video is painting republicans as the bad guys. In short can we just focus on more important shit like why Trump approved of more troops in Afghanistan? Obama did the same thing and it didn't work for us...

Yuni Zheng he made fun of democrats and criticized them as well you know...

Yuni Zheng Good critic =) Only because you like someone or a show doesn't mean that they can't do mistak, too. You should speak for the thing you think are right and only defence a person or a show in order for more understanding and not for blaming the people who haven't want or have this kind of understanding (understanding=/=accepting, agreeing).

dulli41 what about to laugh at its badness?

seems legit

basbekjenl he doesn't mention that the people in the city made a petition to the statue stay, the guys that were wanting to demolish the statue weren't even from the city in the majority, and the Nazis only have go to the city because the pro-demolish guys called Antifa, and the "Nazis" have a bad story Whit them, so the travel the contry and when the arrive, Antifa apparently have attack first, then... Everything turn in a warzone... Funny thing... The gay in the Statue hasn't Racist, he were against, have free a big number of slaves, and I don't know how they forgot to mention that... :P I want to believe it hasn't... But looks like selective News...

basbekjenl the dislikes are due to all the cherry picking and false equivalents. And I'd hope you can see these too. (Like trying to make your argument stronger by labeling a whole side as Nazi. And trying to make it sound like just because one side has anti Nazi beliefs that they can do no wrong)

Wow, well as an outsider I do generally listen to this kind of news as a story some are more interesting then others, but it is very sad to hear that this too is false news. or rather selective news. I suppose commedy and news won't always go hand in hand. Thank you @Nocter Tenebres and @Klint Karas for telling me about this stuff I would most likely never have known but you told me.

Yeah, it happens a lot, and have only getting worst, and if u look in the net, you will see that KZfaq are supporting this, cause the CEO of KZfaq its part of this disinformation campaign, because of this shit a friend of my in the US were attack by a group of guys who have say somethings about he being a trump supporter, happily he have come back to Brazil, and is all right

Robert E. Lee wasn't a racist? You should try read about him, he owned slaves and said that their "painful subjugation" (Yes, his actual words) was necessary to make them better. Yes, he freed some slaves, as required by his wife's father's will. As for the complaints of labelling one side as Nazis, you're part right. It also consisted of white nationalists, white supremacists, klan members and neo-confederates. I'm not sure any of those things is a whole lot better than Nazi but you were technically correct. As for who attacked first and why, that's a separate rabbit hole. If you want to get into that discussion, please answer one question first; Do you really want to side with actual swastika carrying, jew hating Nazis?

Confederates took a l ? Hahaahahah your just as lost as everyone else on the left hahaha

22 shhkadeeww so confederates won the war?

S.o. got triggered hard.

Joey Kevorkian They are the L.

All the confederate rebels are dead by at least 100 years. Only their party remains, and at about 90%+ rates, they have retained control over black Americans. They won big time from that perspective.

I agree.

How many times has Iconoclasm solved a problem or been successful in improving anything in any manner beyond its direct implication?

Opinions are divided But yes

we need to examine the facts

Yes, that’s a great defence. Much like naive people parroting and supporting far right ideas without knowing. Good to know that once they found out they supported taking down such statues.

Hes still a white nationalist

Mads Krogh Bänsch yeah because he exposed the liberal brainwashed people

how has he exposed that?

assuming there is still someone alive to teach it....

Firestarthe he Indirectly revealed that CNN is making up fake stories about Trump showing how despite this the alt left still believe those stories

Mads Krogh Bänsch i just know its gonna be hilarious in history class in the future

You're*

this information is highly biased and inaccurate. trump is actually right bot sides were violent. ANTIFA showed up for a fight although im not sure who started it. should have just left nazis have their harmless legal march, although they did react and fight, lol both sides are wrong.

I doubt papa franku wants people like you to use his lyrics lol

Tomas Delatoba you might not be sure who started it, but the police who were THERE said the Nazis started the violence - they were also the ones marching around with weapons saying "You're damn right we're violent, we'll kill people if we have to". They wanted a fight with counter-protestors (who were also there legally and had a permit), and they started the fight. And then they murdered somebody. People fighting in self-defense against NAZIS are not "AS BAD AS NAZIS". Shithead.

the counter protesters fought too, so they are also in the wrong, end of story. i dont agree with either side and think both are wrong.

That's not what that word means, but I agree.

Mikey Sal Quit bitching and make your own tech company to combat it... oh, wait. I'm sorry, I forgot. All you "anti-PC" types can do is complain about how unfair the world is and do absolutely nothing about it. MY BAD!

Your existence is sad.

HEY! How about you don't lump all Americans in your "you Americans" statement. Because first; MOST of us have a violently negative opinion of cadet bonespurs, second: MOST (3,000,000 more of us) DID NOT even elect the mushroom dick.

"The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long that nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was... The world around it will forget even faster." Naked trump isn't history, its a childish insult.

We won't ignore this one. Thanks!

Ryan Cole oh good to know that the democrats will be destroyed.

Yes. When the Nazis weren't pushed back violently in Germany, they took control. When the people fighting against the fascists in Spain weren't given enough support under bullshit appeasement diplomacy, the fascists won. In Italy, when people didn't fight back, the fascists killed their enemies and took control. Know your history and learn from it so you don't repeat your mistakes.

False. They WERE pushed back violently in Germany. That just made them more influential when they tried the victimhood approach. Mein Kampf "my hardships", by Hitler, currently available at Barnes & Noble. That's how the Nazis actually took over in Germany. It's mentioned in common history books. Clearly you don't know your history. Hitler attempted to take over TWICE. He drew inspiration from the Black Shirts who took another country so he had his "Brown Shirts" attempt. That failed miserably, and he ended up jailed. His book influenced the country to ideas above the individual, making a stronger resolve becoming Nazi Germany. The thing they hated MOST was laughter, because they can't control laughter.

False, the push back wasn't hard enough. Of course people fought against them, there are always good people who fight against Nazis and fascists. They weren't strong enough because of the centrists who thought they could use Hitler to their advantage and condemned violence against the Nazis. You know, kind of like today.

Ryan Cole Uhh If we learned from our past we could have prevented it before they even became a threat Idiot.

Scrap Paper Preach my dude

Errrr I don't know if we really want that there are enough questionably racist assholes on KZfaq as it is. What I want is for anyone he sees a shit heads comment that they just report it so they go away.

Scrap Paper well it's not right to think this way, thinking that Donald trump and Hitler is connected is just wrong, what the fuck, get over it, Donald trump won.

Clifford Bryan john Wilson yes, deleting everything that you disagree with, that'll stop em!

+I once killed A man with my shoe We are very well aware that Trump won. Why do you think bringing that up negates factual criticism? By the way, Hitler "won" as well. Winning doesn't mean you're right, and that's what this is about, not whether he "won" or not.

mostly nazis

Alyssa Johnson some.were nazis others were kkk

"Everyone who's opinion differs from mine is a Nazi!"

So I can threaten to kill somebody and get in no trouble with the law? I can shout "fire" in a movie theater and nobody will arrest me? I can lie my ass off in order to get a job as a government employee? Okay, I'll just go do all that, since "free speech is free speech"

Peregrine, The way I see it is that no matter what you do, whether it be good or bad, you can do it. If you say you are going to kill somebody, you will probably get a restraining order or something, if you shout fire in a theatre you probably will be arrested, and whatever else. The point is you have the freedom to do what you wish. The consequences (if any) come afterwards.

FS=FS means exactly what it means. All free speech short of directly threatening to hurt/kill someone is perfectly legal

Hououin Kyouma! Please actually take the time to look up the law. The supreme court of the United States ruled decades ago that certain forms of speech(shouting fire to cause a stampede and the other sarcastic examples listed by Peregrin) do not have the protections granted by falling under the free speech banner. All you're doing by using zero sum logic to equate nazis and anti nazis is making yourself look like a racist Nazi sympathizing jackass.

CitanulsPumpkin My opinion, your opinion, and opinions within more controversial ideologies hold the same rights under the law no matter how immoral they may seem to anyone else. These exceptions you and Peregrine speak of are valid and those that break theses rules should be prosecuted on an individual basis. As for calling me a Nazi sympathizer you are definitely wrong. I am a liberal. I hate Nazis, Communists, the Alt-right, and Progressives equally. And I'm not going to start a fist fight or throw feces at someone just because I disagree with them.

Y'all got plenty of brain power, lets see if u call out the crazy

His agenda is to say controversial things for views. I'm not sure he even believes half of what he says. Kind of like Alex Jones.

Mollynew's agenda: "Waaaaaaahh those damn dirty feeeeeeeemales won't let me put my teeny peen in them; ergo, they are responsible for the imminent collapse of Western civilization which will totally happen any day now, you guys. Seriously. Aaaaaany day now." That was easy.

Christopher Alvarez or better yet, Dave Rubin

Austel Grey #FireThemAll

#IntoTheSun

SwogFrog you, I, now just, your... reasonable actually.

I don't give a fuck. Fuck Nazis.

No one who incites violence is right. If there were people on the Antifa side needlessly creating violence they were wrong to do it and that should be condemned unless and only unless they were acting in actual self defence because it doesn't help to further your cause, it works against it. And it is a worthy cause being anti fascist. But no one is excused from causing violence to someone who has not inflicted it on you or someone else first. And under no circumstances should people be marching with Nazis and the KKK if they want to actually be taken seriously and have their voice heard. They absolutely have freedom of speech but if you align yourself with them then don't expect a respectable platform

Ryan Cole It seems you missed the point. Probably because your fingers are in your ears and you're screaming "LALALALALALA".

+ Mr Mat Are you fucking kidding me, did you even read what I wrote? You have to be trolling. I'm literally a disabled, mixed race, Jewish liberal. You don't have to sympathize with Nazis in ANY WAY to recognize that preemptive civilian violence against them is counterproductive. Your reply is so strangely and threateningly worded that I think you need to do some reflection. "Be careful how you tread citizen. None of us are any mind to protect you." You're taking a supremely complex issue, and totally misunderstanding. If a Nazi is attacking someone, then by all means we should get police and if necessary, intervene ourselves. But for fuck's sake, don't go to their rallies with weapons or masks, cause it kinda makes you look bad. As for "not protecting me" because you think I sided with Nazis in a KZfaq comment, If you stand by while a Nazi ends my filthy Jew life while you watch and do nothing just because of that comment, I think we know who the real villain is. It's still the Nazi, but you're also a piece of shit. I'm so fucking clearly not saying the Nazis weren't also ready to do violence, or attack unsolicited on an individual basis, and they're detestable in almost every possible way. Saying that to suggest the police contain them rather than come to their rally with weapons is equivalent to "siding with Nazis" IS LUNACY. With your logic, if you had a Nazi who was innocent anything beyond being hateful completely at your mercy, my intervening in your torture and murder of this person would make me a Nazi sympathizer. I'm sorry, but I don't agree. Even despicable people who would kill me if they had absolute power have human rights until they try to hurt someone. The other implication in that last line is hilarious: "None of us are gonna protect you. In fact, we'll probably stand around and cheer whoever is doing it on." You realize the hilariously contradictory nature of this statement right? I can only think of one likely interpretation: You're calling me a Nazi or a sympathizer to an egregious degree, and saying that no one will protect me should retribution come my way. In this case, you would be be a piece of shit. You can't hurt people for what they believe in, and there's no argument to be made that I think people should be hurt. You're stomping all over the foundations of both our country and the morality that makes us better than Nazis.

Or at least attack one side only.

Tevo77777 - attack = evidence based reporting.

That's a cool story, bro... too bad he still fought a war to preserve a man's right to own another man. This makes him a filthy fucking racist. True story.

I like how there is still slavery in this country although we are talking about some shit that happened like what 150 years ago makes you wonder doesn't it?

+Ryan Cole Nah my relative isn't a racist. You are brainwashed.

+John Stevens Exactly he is not only a racist he is a loser why is he being honored?

Stephen Hawking this....was a good comment, cheers. I agree and Lee was anti slavery later in his life. People don't say that much but unfortunately he was associated with the confederates because he was against the unifying of the states. So he lost so remove the statue because it brings the racist movement to the forefront. Sorry that's history. Let's not repeat history.

Lincoln was a war criminal if he was judged by modern standards. His Memorial should be removed.

Why do you believe those statues should come down?

Is it a good idea to have men on horses looking all cool like heroes, when they commited treason?

Ryan Cole Traitors to the US government, patriots to their home land. I don't need your silly little Yankee school article to re-educate me. Yes, the South *seceded* over preserving a state's right to keep slavery, but the reasons why the Southern soldier fought are as numerous as there were soldiers. Until you've fought a war or been in combat, I don't believe you have the experience nor the right to say all of those soldiers fought for slavery. You also do not have the right to say that every Yankee soldier fought to free the slaves. It's morally reprehensible and intellectually dishonest to make such a blanket statement and whitewash history like that, in addition to highlighting your outright ignorance of history and human beings. But tell me this, little guy: would Robert E. Lee be a good person if, instead of fighting the against the US government, he marched on his own land, burned his own farmland down, killed the children of his own local friends, murdered those of his own state? Why do you hold defending the US federal government in a higher regard than your neighbors and your own friends? Why do you hold higher value for some non-living entity 2,000 miles away that could care less about you and only serves to limit your freedoms? It's very easy to judge from the outside looking in. But maybe come back to me after you've been lived in shit with 30 other men. After you've hiked hundreds of miles with a rucksack and rifle with the best friends you will ever have. After you've been in someone else's sights and shot at. Only after that can you come and tell me what the boys in grey fought for.

The fact that people know about the War of 1812 and not the statues, prove that we don't need them to remember that war or any others.

Tevo77777 Is it a good idea to have Statues of Lenin in California when he committed a mass genocide against the Russian peasants and farmers?

If it get's too sharp you may find yourself hurt, so watch out!

Both the daily show and Colbert are still intelligent, sharp and funny. Maybe the funny is subjective but come on, those people inspired this Cracked series.

Thunderfield lol this channel sucks this and Steven colburt is just racebaiting garbage

These Eyes See Darkness Clearly two terms not a question about it

If you believe any president's rhetoric, that they can do much of anything for this country, you don't understand how the political process in this country works. Remember, the only real achievement that OBama had in 8 years of being president was implementing Obamacare, and that was a bastardized document of what he actually wanted. The system is rigid for a reason. Trump won't save America, only the people can save America.

Good way to look at it.

Dalton Lee but... There was a terror attack... That had to do with ideologies and words... And nazis and racism...

The thing is we already know where these words lead us.

Don't forget the terrorist attack by that driver who drove into a rally. Let me ask... When does something become violent? is it before or after a group shouts their intentions towards you? As for what I see, Only one side shouts their cause for superiority and death for the "lesser". Will you somehow justify that? How about you? when should decide to take action when your neighbor is threatening you from outside of your door? Agree or disagree... The reasons this "other" side rallied... was it or was it not a "supremacists" rally?

I choose neither of those repugnant sides. If either attacks me, I will defend myself with lethal force. And yes, that includes if you simply punch or pepper-spray me.

Well then, First Last, enjoy your prison sentence.