A lucky few break from the mold

Since he seems to genuinely enjoy the "whatever podcast," it'll likely be closer to 10 years. He'll come around eventually, though.

They usually are just virtue signaling… so yeah once they get over that bs they realize most their values line up with republicans…

@@DickWigglin He needs Jesus, I'll be pretty quick then!

"Conservative" means almost nothing these days.

I know him and can indeed say he thinks for himself and is a wonderful person.

Right?? Idk why they titled it "student flips" when he was clearly just nervous to be put on a spot where someone else is more prepared and educated in a topic. Pretty brave if you ask me 👊 (Maybe just speak a little slower but again... he was really nervous)

@@PeazCooperI think the title meant “flipped” as in flipped his stance. Not “flipped” out.

Yeah he thinks its ok to rip little babies arms off sucking them out of a woman's womb, he is sick and so is anyone who believes abortion.

Send this young respectful man my respect (someone with slightly differences of opinion).

I mean..... not related at all... but I kind of get what you were trying to say. Just a bad analogy.

thanks Tom

@@Gizmettithey aren’t related but they are similar in a sense. If a man doesn’t want a kid he would still have to pay child support etc, would be known as a deadbeat / bad father. But if a women doesn’t want a child she can execute it before it’s born

@@Gizmetti i don't see how it's a bad analogy. insult the dad for doing a bad thing. don't insult the mom for doing a worse thing. it's hypocritical.

​@Gizmetti Not really, you just gotta think harder. Both are neglect for life. So, the same. In one case, the life has a chance to thrive. In the other, none. So, different. Most things can be objectively compared.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Are you really out of the coma or is all this happening in your brain?

That's amazing!🙏❤

​@@dawsondetrana5496or maybe you are?🤔

@@dawsondetrana5496😂

Yeah why is this debate not taking place indoors, in an auditorium??

​@@hyperteleXii Depends on the schools regulations. If a particular location at a school or university is considered open to the general public, restrictions on speech may have to meet the same requirements as if on a public sidewalk. For example, speaking or passing out literature in the middle of an open university square is usually allowed while doing the same at an elementary school playground may not be. To speak indoors inside of a building generally a request to speak needs to be sent to the campus or an invitation directly from the campus needs to be sent out.

The crowd he's debating here doesn't look like other crowds. LOL.

Agree. I don’t even care if the person stays firmly opposed, I just don’t understand why there can’t be discussions like this rather than salivating rabid animal behavior you typically see.

@@svalbard01yeah, they weren’t screaming him down. It was kind of odd. Refreshing, but odd.

I agree and you know what, I bet there are more people like this. But unfortunately controversy and radical opinions sell. They create more clicks, more ad revenue for Kirk so he only uploads those, not caring that he polarizes the issue. Unless you tell me that he doesn't monetize his channel, in which case I'm in the wrong.

@grafficacma yeah, I've noticed this too. It doesn't matter what side of politics someone is, an influencer is still an influencer and will most likely post things that are more likely to get views. The whole Candice Owen's thing lately was proof of that. All of the right-wing influencers jumped on that ship so fast and each video, title, and thumbnail clearly has evidence of click bait. I agree with a lot of right-wing views but I don't sell myself to the people who currently represent those views. I decide for myself what I will and won't agree with and move on.

"What is a woman?" Then they'll shut up.

Nah, I'm a woman and I've had women tell me I shouldn't say anything about abortion because I'm biased, being a mother.

@@janeenschultz8502 just because I didn’t mention women doesn’t mean I’m saying this doesn’t happen to y’all i’m just speaking from my own experience. I don’t need to speak for other women because you guys can clearly speak for yourselves💁🏽😂

@@OmegaVortexx I'm just saying they have no logical consistency and like to move goalposts.

Men can't have an opinion on abortion because men can't give birth but pregnant transmen are men apparently. I'm slightly confused.

That was his white guilt in panic mode. He's afraid of people thinking he's racist.

@Microsoft, this twinky was truly making me cringe

At least they have a respectful conversation.

@@merrydoc1051 that makes him a right winger. Look at how they treated Lacy Green.

@@pepperonipizza8200 his peers seem rather respectful though.

okay?

And he wasn’t brain dead so it’s not analogous

Coma and brain death aren't the same thing. Common misconception, but two vastly different things. Something along the lines of only 200 people ever have come back from declared brain death.

@@redneckrambo9626 Yes, a baby has brain waves by 6 weeks. Which is all my dad had when he was in a coma. He wasn’t brain dead, as a baby isn’t either.

@@stephaniecoomey2356 You clearly didn’t listen to the argument very well if you’re questioning why I said it. It was even yelled out by someone in the crowd. This is the issue about having your emotions rattled up before you watch a video because you don’t like the view point exerted. Good for you for being an emotional listener instead of a rational one! 👍🏻

A woman would do it much faster because she wants her money out of him.

Same goes with women.

I'm very sorry to hear that. God be with you.

Are you the mother of the guy with the most liked comment on this video? 😂 He said he was in a coma for 2 weeks, but with his mother's prayers he came out of it.

​@@deepg7084 No, my son suffered a gunshot wound to the head and I don't see a single thing funny about it. You're not funny at all, in fact you're rude and uncaring. Yes I prayed so hard I would almost throw up. I give my son's recovery to the glory of the LORD. Don't mess with a mama bear.

You can't blame him for having logical followup people have done that before so there is no need to call him uncaring Hope your son got back on his feet

​​@@rokasciurinskas7890I don't but he used a laughing emoji. Not cool at all. Very rude and uncaring. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Ryan died this past July of a heart attack not related to the gunshot, which he fully recovered from to the point nobody knew if you didn't see his scars. Thanks for asking.

I'm pretty sure I have a tbi but idk how to get it tested, my brother dropped me on my head when I was a kid and I can't do anything regular people are expected to

I think that was why Charlie went right into the even lower age ranges after he said that!👍

The unborn human has not had brain activity yet while the person who lost brain activity already did before

My position is as follows: Once a sperm and egg meet, they set in motion a course of events that if uninterrupted, will result in the birth of a human. Like a train leaving the station in Alphashire and going towards Betasville. As long as _nothing_ happens along the way, that train will arrive in Betasville. Now... a tornado could sweep in, cross the tracks, mess them up and derail the train. Thats an act of nature, a tragedy, and no ones fault. But planting bombs on the bridge, and blowing the bridge up while the train is on it? Thats a willful act. Abortion is the willful act of arresting the fate of that human. What _would_ have been a human being with rights and legal protections, is destroyed in order to prevent them receiving those protections. This is why i still consider it an act of killing. Its just that its an act of opportune killing performed by someone who realizes they can only avoid consequences if they do it in that narrow window. Theres literally no difference between killing a 1 year old child and aborting the fetus. Except that they cant see the fetus, and can more easily rationalize away their actions while safe from legal consequence. HOWEVER. I will bend when it comes to rape, incest, or life threatening condition. On the grounds of self defense. We know childbirth is an experience so painfully traumatic that the mind willfully forgets it as a matter of survival for our species. That alone is enough, not to mention the fiscal responsibility. A woman or young girl who is raped by a stranger or molested and raped by a family member, is sexually "assaulted" in that moment. But if impregnated, the assault continues for nine months. As the victim must deal with the complications and obligations of pregnancy. The vomiting, the sickness, the strain, the increase in weight, the soreness and tenderness of sensitive regions, the cravings and hunger, the mood swings and stress on the body, and finally the culmination, an indeterminate labor period of prolonged agony the likes of which theyve never experienced. A hospitalization and medical bill, possibke complications therein. And ALL of that... forced upon her against her will and consent by her attacker. Hardly different from being mildly poisoned and then having a knife driven up her vaginal canal. When it comes to the sickness and the pain. I personally consider that to be therefore, an extension of the assault. And it is the obligation of the legal system to protect our women and our children from assault, not prolong it. Even if the baby is innocent. And thats the only compromise im willing to make, on the grounds of self defense.

He is open, honest and free thinking. He is young and at least think for himself. Not a sheep following leftist teacher

@@alexanderrahl7034 I understand your point about rape/incest, but it's still not a good moral reason to murder the baby in the womb. The baby can be given up for adoption, or in many cases the mother ends up still raising the baby, knowing that he/she was an innocent blessing that came out of a bad situation. The only case that should be permissible is the life threatening situation, if one had to choose between the life of the baby or mother, and only one could be saved, the mother is saved.

Or just directly reverse it. Ten babies vs. ten pregnant women.

You can easily adjust the hypothetical to account for that. 10 fertilized embryos vs 3 live babies you don’t have an emotional attachment to

@@highlightrelz897 Right... but his point is that just because one might (and probably would) choose to save the 3 babies, it doesnt mean that the 10 embryos are not human lives. I would save 3 babies over 10 terminally ill elderly people as well... that doesnt mean the 10 elderly people are not human lives.

Your statement is completely untrue, you are clearly not a parent (or not a good one). Every loving parent believes his child has more value than any other living organism on earth. It's not objectively true but it's how nature has programmed us.

@@highlightrelz897 Fertilized embryos are 'live' as well.

Most rational minds have both conservative values and liberal views

@@exgeeinteractive or liberal values and conservative views

Free minds = Libertarians

Bro keep getting brainwashed by right winged media and don’t force your ideology’s on to other people.

Or maybe you need to come to full understanding. Because you are demonstrating the problem: every side believes they have it right, they refuse to listen and demand you come to their understanding.

Bro has been brainwashed by righted winged media. Sad reality

@@grafficacma And are you willing to listen to the other side? Or are you stuck in what you believe. Interesting that you say what you did.

@@DottyGale8 I think what he said is totally fair, because is truth. We all want to be the only one that has it "right" and the others are the ones that should change and do it completely. AS long as you don't go to either extreme and you don't crush others believes i think we are able to survive being different in aspect and thoughts.

Idk your mom thought a bit differently last night 😉

@highlightrelz897 Just dying to sport, those new loafers, aren't we? Sunshine 😃 😀 😄

He looks like he likes almond milk.

@@highlightrelz897lmaoo is this you in the video

like every single lefty ever

Bingo. That's how you know it's not about not getting pregnant, it's about wanting to be free of consequences. If you use condoms and fertility awareness, with or without hormonal BC, it should be very very rare to 'accidentally' get pregnant. But I've talked to so many pro-choice women who aren't even aware that women can predict when they're going to ovulate...

@@overcomingobstaclescreates1695 I just don't get it. There are pills, implants, shots, IUDs, condoms, ovulation tests, and of course saying NO. There is no reason for there to be so many abortions.

@@cackleberrycottage2340 I 💯Agree!!

I agree with you wholeheartedly!

@@overcomingobstaclescreates1695 Because of relgion I know people who say birth control is a form of a abortion. The problem is people are so gung ho on religion that they believe have sex before marriage that does not always work. Religion wants to stop abortions but yet they don't believe in the phills or birth control so there you go that is the hot mess. Catholics and Christian are a cult like any other religion they want to inforce the laws and stop abortions claiming they want to save babies, but yet they don't want to help when the babies are born.

Human consciousness is what separates humans from other plants/animals. We don’t put the same moral value in killing non-human life.

@dustierbottoms That is nowhere remotely near my point. Idiots like this guy use that as an excuse to kill children but don't consider the possibility that life does not require conscience. I'm not talking about the morality of killing anything. I'm only amazed at how people use that as an excuse to kill.

This young man is referring to the "subjective conscious experience". That could be applied to any (or many) living organisms. Some would refer to that as 'sentience'.

Like saying earth is the only planet that has life on it. Arrogant much!!!

​@@alwayspooh1588👀😏

"College is a waste of money" - That's the end of the sentence. The "anymore" on the end makes it not make sense.

Of course it's a waste of money for you, just like the grammar lessons you took in school

​@@vicevilla9949has nothing to do with how capable and smart he is in real life situations. That was his point

@@user-lo4np1bs1roh ok, maybe if he would've written it right i would've understood it

A person in a coma has been alive. A person can be in a permament coma with life support. Would you want to be kepted alive like that forever.

@@ronaldmead7643 Your reply has nothing to do with my comment about the right to live due to having brain waves. Without brain waves, the heart usually stops within a week, even with life support. My siblings and I agreed to have our parent disconnected from life support two weeks after his accident due to a greatly reduced quality of life and he was in his 90's but he died before that time lapsed. He wanted to go home and die but my sister pressured him to stay in the hospital, where he slipped into a coma. If I was with him, I would have taken him home

@@rogerm3708 I am very sorry for your loss. Without being brain dead the rest of the body can be kept alive through life support. A lot of times they keep the organs alive so they can see about a trasplant.. The wife and i have already talked about it and if there is no hope of recovery to a normal life then we do not want to be kept on lifesupport or do anything to keep us alive. A fetus can have brain activity at around 8 weeks with some movement which is spontaneous. If you take the fetus out at that stage it will die. All legal documents have you alive when you are born. Not before. Right now in some states if the fetus is deformed or something is wrong with it the doctors can not do a abortation unless the mothers life is threatened to the point she might die. Under this law she has to continued carrying the fetus until she might die or she has the fetus. Now i dont believe abortion should be use as birth control but i do believe it is the womans and doctor decision on abortion and not the governments.

@@ronaldmead7643 After 6-8 weeks the embryo is recognized as being human. The law considers it a double murder if the mother and embryo are killed in that stage. As for abortion; I believe in it only if it is in the best interest of the unborn. That interpretation would vary greatly depending on the doctor and mother. Most abortions are done for personal reasons (don't want a child, don't want to carry to full term, don't want to put the child up for adoption)

do you know how many abortions there'd be if men had to carry the pregnancy and give birth and then have to be a single father because the mother would not want anything to do with the child? Because that's the way it is this day only reversed.

Every time I talk to someone pro-choice I rarely see them bringing this up. Why are we fighting for women to be able to end the lives of their unborn babies when we could be teaching them about sexual responsibility? Would not preventing the pregnancy in the first place be a much better solution than ending it's life? Plus, you prevent the spread of STD'S. It's a win-win. But I think the reality is that some of them want to sleep with who they want, when they want. And then not deal with the consequences afterwards. A.k.a they want to be like a God, being able to create life and destroy it whenever they see fit. I personally don't see how ANYONE should be allowed such power and authority though.

Criminally underrated point

Your "logic" fails. How? Because all 3 babies could die the next day. No one can guarantee you get 3 adults from those 3 babies. Then where will you be? A baby isn't inherently more valuable than an embryo.

That’s great. Not knowing if you have brain activity is not the same as knowing you don’t have any brain activity.

@@highlightrelz897 are you the product of an abortion?

Materialism is indeed illogical!

Lmaooo

Probably would say that individuality is within the brain waves in response. Though I agree

Not really, as brain waves are just neural firings. Therefore, there are differences between people dependent on what they are doing/accessing in their brain. Still just a physiologic response.@@simulatedstring9029

What is a soul? Also why are you downplaying brain waves like that’s not a miracle in an of itself that electrical impulses can create a conscious experience. Our different DNA means we have individuality built in.

What a crown? Dafuq you talking about

@@Eastunder prob meant 'clown', just mistyped or autocorrect

@@keepitsecret-dl1pr Or a "Queen" Maybe??🤔

If you find out the answer, respond to my comment.

@@rrowhe4dthe girls

I mean like he said, if you're being consistent and if the embryos are going to be used, why save 3 lives over 10?

There is no applicable analogy here. Anti abortion believes that both the fetus and the mother should live. There is no choosing who lives and who perishes.

Because it’s triage and the three lives are more likely to survive the fire than the embryos that are not in a state of gestation. Triage is always difficult but a decision needs to be made

@@evanbell7825 it doesn’t really work that way. “Sort of” like “women and children first”. We do have an order. “Born children” before frozen embryos that have no feeling.

@@larky368 this isn’t really true. If a pregnant woman has an ectopic pregnancy or uterine cancer, a Catholic hospital will remove that part of the Fallopian tube or the uterus even tho the secondary effect is death to the embryo.

The hypothetical is meant to force him to place a value on different stages of life when he values ALL life equally. Even IF it is guaranteed that the Mother will die there is never a time when you kill the child. You induce birth and work from there. If the child dies it's not murder because the intent was not to cause death but to remove the child to save the Mother. Big difference.

@@larky368 The hypothetical I use is two men are dead. Both sad. Both tragic. One died from a heart attack which is a natural cause. One died by being strangled which is murder. So those that say "what about babies that are miscarried?" when bringing up a willful termination. One is a natural cause. One is a malicious intent.

how so

willfully killing babies is things only monsters and animals do.@@Dareword

You are an animal if you didn't know just more intelegent that the rest of the species but that's debatable

@@Deadeye401 are we not animals ourselves?

@@Darewordabortion undermines the rational basis for human rights. We cannot arbitrarily decide which lack of features allow us to deny human rights to a human or else you leave the door wide open for any powerful entity to be the arbiter of human rights. The justification used for abortion is literally the recipe for tyranny.

Exactly while I love Kirk. You don't have to agree with all his views, but everyone can agree that he's a calm, intellectual, and well-spoken person.

Ok so why not agree with his logical arguments? That sounds illogical to disagree with logic

@@whitebroccoli694 probably because his stance is a mix of logic and morality and they disagree with the morality

@whitebroccoli694 Because while I can understand and agree with his logic, I have an ideological difference of opinion.

@@tcelltech2518 Would you like to share it?

That is my favorite, leftists are cool with abortion up to any point, but capital punishment is immoral 🙄

It's a lose-lose situation. Keep in mind 10 embryos would grow up into 10 people.

Lol, you grab the god damn babies. Imagine standing out in front of the burning building, news team is there, mothers of the babies are there, screaming “my baby!”, fire department, bystanders, and mothers/fathers of the embryos, screaming… well I don’t know what they would scream because there’s about as much attachment to them as I’ve had to a wet dream. The scene is perfect, right out of a movie, and you say “it was a lose-lose, so I grabbed the ebryos because they will grow up into 10 people “ 😂 “Oh them babies are fried chicken”

@@RacingSnails64They would, but even if they didn’t, you should still save the 10 embryos because you value the embryos just as much as the children

@@RacingSnails64 there in no guarantee that any of them would survive or even be implanted in the mother. babies are already someone's child, their death would be devastating to all the friends and family.

Good news! A lot of people from the new generation are not like this! I suggest you drop this artificial division and speak to more youth.

You’ve seen one 4 minute clip of me and come to that conclusion. Idk sounds like you’re the weird one

heh, they're not gonna get very far with their current attitudes and worldviews when they come up against non-idiotic and level-headed competition who don't care about their safe-spaces or asinine crap

eww lefties

you're right, left-wingers ignore the truth and don't understand how societies work

The disagreement was never about “when life begins”. The disagreement is: what about life do we value? Charlie values DNA. I value the brain.

It's perfectly clear: you have the choice to either puree your unborn child into spaghetti sauce or not to.

Yeah. Only one side gets to choose, indeed. It is highlighting the "positive" side, even though it is sick to call it "positive", as it is about killing an innocent defenseless victim for convenience.

Just save the embryos dude and you’re chilling

@highlightrelz897 What does that prove? Is the baby not human or merely that I'm inconsistent? Until you can prove the former, the latter is irrelevant.

Excellent point! Well-written and articulated comment

And what is "his race theory"?

You clearly don’t watch enough of his material if you’re asking that “question”.

@@casusbelli3468 answer the question.

@@michaelmacpherson-wm6mh His race theory is that the color of your skin is irrelevant and it is the content of your character that matters.

I wonder the same thing. Hopefully someone will answer. I don't like how Brian treats Madison and the dude in the military uniform.

This dude is no different they just push their agendas where ever they see fit

I think he was talking about the girls I can’t imagine he’d insult Brian