Great tech, just need to recruit some soldier’s from the council estates like in the old days 😂

Outstanding work.

1:26 Anyone else thought those were tie fighters?

This is like the toy shop window. I wonder how much of this tech will actually make it into service?

Strength, guile, agility, adaptability, momentum & aggression. 🇬🇧👍❤️

really cool! would love to have gotten a closer look at the individual tech

Perfect guys.

Phew, at least I could still operate the GPMG shown at 6:31, which I learned how to use in 1969 as a cadet wearing the cap badge of the Prince of Wales' Own- one of the predecessor regiments of Royal Yorks!

British armed forces has cut back on numbers but grow unbelievably in the tech world,some of the best kit available

Ex squaddie here. Are the Septics now training us? Blimey, things have slipped.

05:45 - Полевой госпиталь на гусеничном ходу - это то, что может найти своё применение не только на поле боя!

Cool

If I may be candid, too many links to other units. Autonomy, supported by information, imprinted on stand-alone chips.

5:54 Please can someone tell me that the Royal Medical Regiment is a real thing that for some reason lacks any internet presence, and that the army social media team knows about the RAMC.

We got r6 drones now, cool

Buzz word buzz word manager talk manager talk waffle waffle.

Dear British Army absolutely TOP TOP TOP ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ♥️ and absolutely 💎 diamond ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

Modern warfare seems to dictate that speed, agility, stealth and autonomy are the prime advantages to have.

Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.

LC Moore aka Robert Webb from Mitchell & Webb

Looks like a lot of gimmicks to me

best army

Unmanned tanks and APC support vehicle infantry and drone's ship's and submarines

All that tech and cost. Who spotted the drone with a green gaffa tape repair! At 1.36 min in Nothing changes

If only we had the funding to actually use these

Question: the image I have in my head of our army is one that barely can field what it has been using the last twenty years let alone adopting the "newest", most technologically advanced stuff. Like the civil service I see it as using barely running systems overstretched and behind the private sector. IS THAT TRUE? Or does it have capability beyond what I can imagine. Ya know, "modern warfare" tools etc?

Uk 🇬🇧 will always stay on top we just need are government to spend 3 to 4 % gdp and we need more troops! I’ve tried many times but can’t because of my disability but coming from a mod navy and army family with in the uk 🇬🇧 I have so much respect for are soldiers keeping us safe ❤love to all of you!

do you send them to ukraine ?

And Armoured military Hummers with machine gun and missiles mounted controlled on display screen inside

hopefully it's used to reduce civilian causalities rather than multiply them

can't we all just get along?

I'm happy to see the revival of once great and glorious british army ...!!!

Will work good in an insurgency. Many of these systems will be immediately blown to pieces by drones in an actual war.

All great in theory, but the Army's biggest issue is it has no mass or redundancy. I don't see this being addressed.

Put blow proof tires on them haha

2:48 Update your Windows ;)

See you soon when conscription starts 😅

Maybe the MOD could pay their soldiers properly, provide decent housing and make being a soldier a job to be proud of....

A future which according to the MOD readiness document of 1997 requires at least 2 years to prepare an emergency response to an external threat. Four years if you want a full response. Lets hope the Russians tell us four years in advance. Oh and don't tell the general population they are nearly all going to die. Otherwise they won't help you. Its farcical.

Do keep the bayonet, though, won’t you, you know, just in case…

Throw in a grenade not a little robot, that'll tell you if there's an enemy in there a lot quicker.

Queer Dance Theory graduates are meant to operate this?

What about an EMP blast ?

we need to wake up. we need more aircraft , more tanks and ifvs & way more ships. we are basically just a landing trip for usaf atm.

COMMENT: 10% of budget, from UK government as minimal increase, at a generational level, to restock and reevaluate, as a peace dividend at issue from prior....go figure.

Ukraine. Kamikaze drones, the transparent battlefield, electronic warfare, death, chaos, trench warfare and more death. Plus lets not forget, PGMs by the shed load, which means more death, chaos and destruction. Everyone in this presentation is so clean, so professional, the reality is dirt, filth and squalid death on a battlefield where the rats are the only thing that thrives. Ukraine today.

High Tech Military Gear is great and of course the future, but what happens when this Smart Kits, does not work for some reason? Soldiers and Marines, still need to be able to do it old school as it were, with a Assault Rifle and Bayonet plus some British Guts behind them too! whether it is fighting in a built up area in cities and towns and clearing rooms one by one, or its back to First World War Trench Warfare in mainland Europe? or its Jungle Warfare in the Africa or South America and/or in Asia and the Far East, to Arctic and Mountain Warfare in either Northern Europe, Canada and Alaska or at the North and South Poles, let alone across the Himalayas too? Or Amphibious Warfare, Island hopping in the South and North Pacifica Oceans and across the South China Seas or in the Indian Oceans, or large scale Armoured Vehicle Warfare in the Deserts of North Africa and across the Middle East too. Or lastly carrying out Anti-Terrorism Warfare, or Airborne Assault Missions, plus Special Forces "Black Bag" Operations, anywhere in the World at any time and with little notice too. Military Smart Technology will only get you so far, sooner or later you need human boots and minds on the ground in the middle of battle, who are willing to fight and more importantly able to make human decisions whether to fight or not fight, or whether to withdraw or advance, or just take a different approach to a conflict, even holding talks with your enemy forces leaders too. AI systems will never replace a Soldier or Marines, or Special Forces operator and/or even a Para Human Mind, in the decision making process, especially when your so called Smart Military Technology breakdowns, or does not like the weather, heat or cold conditions, or just stops working, or the enemy is jamming your High Tech Systems too. Military Professional's, still need to be trained to fight and survive in combat, when everything does goes wrong, in other words "Murphy Laws" Basically Things will Go Wrong, at the Worst Possible Time and Place, then all you have is your training, knowledge, experencise and expertise to fall back on, so always be prepared to Adapt, Overcome and Improvise. The First Causality of Warfare, is the Battle Plan, even Military Smart Tech, cannot stop that from happening!

All i am reading is Britain couldn't defend itself against Russia but before Britain started given aid to Ukraine there stopped Russia in there tracks with sticks and stones

kick out the tories

$10K each just so you can spot the drone before it smokes you. Sf toy only use, average grunt going to brake or lose it in a month.

Why can't this be used on our borders especially with illegal immigrants Costing the UK 🇬🇧 2 Billion year What a joke 😂😂😂

🫡

Maybe instead of spending billions on tech and the governments own pocket and increase military pay/accommodation there would be more people signing up🤷🏽 truth is no one's willing to risk dying for 1800 a month 😂😂🤦🏽

I would be a lot more impressed if you guys decided to defend your own borders.

uk is always stands with poor countries

Lol. Talking about unproven capabilities. It's like the school bully talking about how many hard men he's 'done in.'

Артиллерия (His Majesty Artillery!) - пробует и испытывает новинки - первыми! 😅😅😅 😂😂😂

Research & testing, good. But the implied tactical benefits, less clear. Every scripted utterance has an unspoken caveat or counterpoint. Often painfully obvious from the visuals. Ststic, clunky slow-moving hardware. Complex tech, fragile tech... Cognitive overload thst is barely sustainable in training let alone a warzone. Degraded mobility carrying yet more pounds of hardware. Maintenance of the gadget. Set up times. Reliability! The real crucible (Ukraine) is right now, real time, life & death. Ultimately if nobody is willing to pay for the 10x costs (for dubious benefits), pointless.

Yep, bloody marvellous... so how come the 20 most technically advanced armies with all this kit were roundly defeated in Afghanistan by illiterate goatherders on a donkey? Not American myself but we had similar malarkey in Vietnam and don't get me started on Israel's Gazan 'Wonderwall' with all it's gadgets..

A 500 dollar drone takes out a tank in Ukraine. How much are our military drones, 75 million dollars each.

This is worrying if this is the direction the British Army wishes to take for the future. Combat in Ukraine has shown us that everything gets blown up or severely damaged within a couple of weeks or less. All this fancy, super delicate, high maintenance tech will be out of comission very quickly in heavy combat. The comms tech and battery charging in field for drones was great (though I don't like us being so open with what our future communications tech is for infantry in the field) given how effective and advantageous drones are for recon and combat roles. I feel like those large Rheinmetal UCVs would be a very expensive waste for something that would be destroyed/disabled on the frontline quite quickly, they could be used in a support/logistics role ferrying munitions or medical and food supplies with troops having more loiter munitions or fixed position electronically controlled weapons systems for fire support whilst assaulting.

Lost to the Taliban

Still a joke the uk army blame the government