still can't believe Sony fanboys still defend paying to play online to access the online features of games you have already payed full price for... madness

@@bazzgaming27 i don't know too but for me when i want to play online i don't want to pay a service for this i want to be free but maybe they're so attached or they're fanatic for this ....

Surely it costs less than a 4070

@@DioBrando-qr6ye 4070>>>PS5 fool, PS5 equivalent hardware like RX 6700 costs only 270$ right now.

​​@@DragonOfTheMortalKombat And ps5's equivalent gpu is more like a rx 5700xt. Not even a rx 6700🙄

They keep a straight face because they’re so dumb they believe it.

Fr😂

The PC has definitely less AAA games, because it has only the multiplatform ones. The console exclusives stay on consoles. Gone are the days when the PC had its own AAA exclusives.

@@DioBrando-qr6ye The PC still has some AAA exclusives.

@@CombatMonkey11B such as?

Steam Deck doesn't support VR. I wish it did, but it doesn't. Source: Steam Deck owner

@@ericbazinga I own one too! It does! it's just realllllllyyyyy bad at it. lol

It is all in all a portable PC, although I don't know if you can use it like a laptop.

It doesn't solve the lack of AAA exclusives problem, the PC doesn't have any. Sure, it has a lot of indie exclusives (that stay exclusive only until they get popular enough to warrant a console port), but isn't it ironic that superpowerful multithousand dollars machine have nothing to show for it? P.S. I'm not saying that AAA exclusives are necessarily better, but certainly are made to show off the strength of the machine, remember Crysis? The best a PC can show off today are console conversions in higher resolution and at a higher frame rate, no more than that. A modern Crysis would embarrass any console, but there's no financial interest to make it. In fact, the original crysis got re-made and ported to the PS3/360. Embarrassing.

@@DioBrando-qr6ye My dear console peasant, the PC has AAA exclusives, those being LOL, Starcraft, WoW and other big free to play games, but you'll probably find a pathetic cop out to justify your idiotic argument. You peasants don't want to touch the exclusive argument, because beats your peasant boxes on that front, stick to less obviously stupid arguments, for your sake. And even if didn't have AAA exclusives, that wouldn't matter, because PC doesn't need to take games hostage to actually get players on it. And in case you didn't notice, PC is the second biggest gaming platform after mobile at 2 billion players world wide. Console has 600 million players world wide on the three consoles combined. The peasant station 5 has 45 million players, you know less than 1/40 of the PC demographic. Maybe the key to a successfull platform that people actually want and afford is an open platform that doesn't need to take games hostage and speaks with its features. "that stay exclusive only until they get popular enough to warrant a console port" That isn't always guaranteed peasant, because releasing a game on console costs a lot and most indie devs can't afford it, which is the result of the closed nature of the console where the console manifacturer demands a lot of money. Meanwhile it costs almost nothing to release games on PC, which is why most indie release on PC first and may port a game on console if they can afford it. Also, my dear peasant, you appear to not realise that there's entire game genre's that are completely absent on console, such as RTS and point and click games. "superpowerful multithousand dollars machine have nothing to show for it" It is incredibly idiotic to parrot this argument yet again. You are too stupid to understand that it doesn't take a multithousand dollar machine to demolish the consoles, it takes a machine that costs 800$, 1000 $ if you want to exagerate, that machine will last you for a generation. Also, only the price point of entry into PC gaming may cost more than the console, but PC gets cheaper overtime, as after you got it you can upgrade, meanwhile on the peasant stations you need to get a new console everysingle time console manifacturers tell you it's time to upgrade and you have to spend full price to upgrade. In addition to that, you need to pay more for games on console and you need to pay for online, so in the end you spend 1000$ and more on console, so long term you save money by playing on PC.There's no concept of generations on PC, you can upgrade whenever you want. As for what PC has to show, here's a small incomplete list: mods, best performance and graphics, customizability, ability to change OS, ability to use all input devices, backwards compatibility, emulation, customizability of ingame experience, ability to fix bugs in your own, you know, all the stuff unavailable on console. You might feel offended for being called a peasant, but when you are going out of your way to lie about PC for the benefit of console manifacturers, that makes you a console peasant by definition. Stop lying, stop repeating nonsense that has been debunked years ago. "certainly are made to show off the strength of the machine" Oh yeah, and what amazing performance they show, like, say, sub 60 fps and at low settings and not even true 4k. Meanwhile even a low end PC plays games consistently at 60 fps, at 1080p or 1440p and it can play games at higher than 60 fps, something underheard on console. And speaking of console, we are back at games locked at 30 fps and not even on 4k, but on sub 1080p resolution or 1080p resolution. This bad performance doesn't show the strenght of the machine, quite the opposite. Also, when the exclusive is ported to PC, that exclusive runs better on PC than on console. I mean, god of war 2018 and spiderman ran better on PC than on PS4. "The best a PC can show off today are console conversions in higher resolution and at a higher frame rate, no more than that" As if a better performance is something bad, if that was the case, why even bother getting new consoles? Also, you're still wrong, as usual, and I have written a list of things you can do on PC but are unable to do on console. "infact, the original crysis got re-made and ported to the PS3/360. Embarrassing." Oh yeah, it's embarassing for the console peasants since it ran like ass on the consoles. Also, did those two peasant stations run crysis 3, its contemporary? And since you're a console peasant, I repeat again: the advantages of PC aren't just the graphics and the performance, it's also the other features that are present that console can't do and will never have. It's pretty clear that you're quite the stupid console peasant, since you started your canard with the muh exclusive bullshit, as if PC is anything like your precious peasant station, maybe get a brain and learn that there's a world beyond the limited confines of your peasant station. But tell me, dear peasant, what will you do when Sony starts releasing its games day and date on PC? Will you cry? Will you throw a tempertantrum on twitter like your fellow peasants because more people will be able to play sony games? Or will you finally understand that if a platform needs to take games hostage to get players on it (and judging by the relatively few people on the new consoles, that doesn't seem to be working all that well, maybe because people have been waking up finally) then it is worthless because it has nothing to offer and thus doesn't deserve to exist? Microsoft is already at that point and as for Nintendo, its games aren't already exclusives, as they are available on PC through emulation.

They literally do. I've watched so many of these videos I can predict what the fanboy is going to say with near perfect accuracy.

That’s because their no life’s and idiots and don’t do anything else but spend their time online all day and make the same shit up for clout and attention

Yeah, it's not being a fanboy, it's the truth. Where is PC's Ghost of Tsushima? The Last of US 2, Shadow of the Colossus? Sure, the PC has Horizon zero down too, but it it wasn't for consoles it wouldn't have. Some things are repeated because they are just true, but I guess you don't wanna hear the truth after having spent north of a thousand to build a PC.

@@DioBrando-qr6ye keep crying

@@brandondudley3202 crying about what? Being able to play high quality exclusives that you'll never going to? But maybe you meant crying of joy.

Playstation 5: Play Has Limits

Just like their consoles, console peasants' arguments are outdated.

That sounds like a blast lol

Reading your comment made me think that the PS5 is nothing more than a micro-transaction!! LOL

@@streamcastrhahaha

Believe it or not, but some retards generally believe a ps5 is better than a 4080 16gb. It's insane how uninformed and sometimes dumb some people are.

If your pc is powerful enough, you could basically be emulating ps3 and ps2 games at 8k 60 fps.

Something people don't talk about enough is community servers that exist after offical ones go away. Setting up a server just for friends is surprisingly fun

​@@luukherfst12098k60 is 4k240 which is 1080 480 you can absolutely do that with even lowmid range pcs on games like quake (1-4) and most games before the 2010s

It runs bad on pc even now with updated hardware 13 years later sooo. Yeah lol.

@@BigBlackChicks Lol, no it doesn't. Runs great, it's the best version of the game available.

65k to be a little more accurate. I'm stressing this because even the difference between the two estimates is more than the amount of games available on PS5.

@@DavideDeLuca-public 65k not even counting the games on gog and on "other" websites

but it's unofficial. I don't get why Sony doesn't make a simple PC driver.

steam will do it for you... ds4 is the other one...

@thomgizziz true, but if you play a game outside of Steam and the game doesn't support PlayStation controllers. You need the app, or i you can add the game through Steam

Kinda funny how you can use a console controller better on pc than you can on the console it was meant for.

funny ive been saying this pc isnt hard. you litteraly are forced to use one. simple steps when you get your pc. install drivers. install steam. install the game. play. spend 30 seconds in the settings menu. done.

@@traestephen7276 No no you see,downloading a game on console spending 10 minutes or more to install a game on console is easy, but spending less time to install a game on PC is actually too hard, as it spending a few second to check the settings menu if you want( you aren't even forced to do it in most cases, as the game detects your hardware and sets itself accordingly).

@@durshurrikun150 ik its braindead simple even with troubleshooting the only not simple thing about PC gaming is the initial setup which is retard levels of easy and after that its a breeze and the settings statement idk how people can spend 3 seconds in a menu settings are a literal advantage

3070 already showing its age coz of the 8gb vram limitation, at higher res on next-gen games ps5 will aboslutely demolish that gpu

​@Paulo James Minimo Isaac No, they won't. If you're talking about native 4k then both would be at a disadvantage. If you're talking 1440p then the 3070 100% will look better and have higher fps then the PS5 counterpart. So, No. You're wrong.

@@Foreboden no you're the one who is wrong, hogwarts already uses beyond 7gb at 1440p and still a cross-gen game

@Paulo James Minimo Isaac Yet the 3070 performs far better in that game then the PS5. Sure, kiddo. Whatever helps you feel better.

@@Foreboden sure kiddo, 3070 already dips at 1440p below 45 fps on benchmarks while ps5 destroys 1440p at 60+unlocked fps

Wait were your saves automatically backed up even without paying for PS Plus?

@@wolfboy20 Sorry, they weren't backed up. I know I was playing NFS heat and finished the campaign but after I changed the console, even after I paid for ps plus I still had to start from the begining

same i'll get a higher refresh rate and resolution monitor maybe curved and bigger screen and a 2nd monitor some time soon.

To be honest, having 4K is hugely unessasary when 1080p and 4K feel way too similar at least to me.

​@blackrosegodessD4C 4k and 1080p are not similar. Maybe at like 24 to 27 inches the screen size is way to small to tell. I'd say 27 to maybe 32 inches go with 1440p and if your doing typical tv screen sizes of like 55 and up then do 4k.

Also want to add that it consumes a lot of the controller's battery life.

@@77wolfblade it does!!

Not owners, fanboys. Most PS5 gamers are not like this.

just spend 1k and you good

@Trae Stephen I put 4 thousand into my build, also got a beefy cpu and went high end for my first build so I can emulate my physical collection of games especially on ps3s emulator on my desktop, definitely a good switch to make especially if you want to preserve your games you've collected throughout the years and have more options at your disposal, only time I use my ps5 is basically to try out some of their games my.friends have that haven't come.to pc to see if I'm interested in purchasing the pc version ounce it arrives, but definitely do 90 percent of my gaming on strictly my pc now which I've been loving the freedom to do what I wish with my software and the freedom in general

How is that a problem? The more, the better.

Which one

​@@cooleyYT I'm thinking a 7800X3D

@@kitsune-chan6897 nice

Chad warden was a fanboy everyone loved.

Hes was just a nice troll.