Learn more about how Chrysler executed an interesting cost savings on its most expensive car for 1972!
Пікірлер: 427
@eyerollthereforeiam1709Ай бұрын
I hate the "costing out" of nice features. But I have to admit, that little mirror is clever.
@stoveboltlvr3798Ай бұрын
I'd prefer the lighted instrument panel instead of lights in the door panel. Dome lights and under dash lights are enough. Beautiful car just the same.
@kendalson7100Ай бұрын
Truth.
@JohnnycdrumsАй бұрын
Yeah, but look what happens; You get the 1956-57 Continental Mark II, and the 1957-58 Cadallac Broughm. Wonderful luxury cars yes, and all exponetially better than any Rolls Royce ever produced, or on the road anywhere in the world at that time, but what did it do for the company or somebody not super rich?
@robk9685Ай бұрын
Until it's covered with golden sludge. Everyone smoked back then. 10 cupholders replaced the 10 ashtrays.
@eyerollthereforeiam1709Ай бұрын
@@robk9685 Good point, everyone smoked back then.
@clintonflynn815Ай бұрын
GM spelled it "Gages" to save that one letter. That's worth the price of admission right there! Thanks Adam... you consistently manage to present information found nowhere else.
@rickc303Ай бұрын
That's an old wives tale
@tdvandy2Ай бұрын
@@rickc303It's not. Adam has another video on here devoted to that and how it came to be.
@cardo1111Ай бұрын
Indeed.
@CathyHolton-jh1xvАй бұрын
My 1998 Ford Explorer did the same. When the fuel tank’s sensor realized I was running low, it would throw a light that read “Check Gage” on the dash. I thought to myself “What kind of illiterates do they have designing the dashboard???”
@danielestrada1850Ай бұрын
Now I know why Plymouth Wrote "Nite" instead of "Night" on my Valiant's rearview mirror, to mark its nightime light dimming position. Go figure.
@michaelpfaff6009Ай бұрын
That "thud" from the headlight doors closing is very impressive!! You are right to describe it as authoritative!!
@dannyo3317Ай бұрын
It sounds like something on an aircraft closing.
@trudygreer2491Ай бұрын
@@dannyo3317...there's a "fuselage-body" joke in there somewhere..
@kalnieminen65Ай бұрын
Sounds like slamming a Toyota Matrix door
@frecuenciasvariables543Ай бұрын
Iconic automobile when they manufactured luxury without all the computer chips to make everything fail and surveillance. Your vehicles are true classics, most appreciative of your videos
@misterhat5823Ай бұрын
To be fair, you can engineer for failure without using electronics or software.
@TomSnyder-gx5ruАй бұрын
Every time you show this car it takes my breath away - absolutely stunning in the black/gold combination! Like I said before - if I were to be buried in a car, this would be the one! 🤣I thought the mirror idea was brilliant myself - keep it simple less things to go wrong!
@oriontaylorАй бұрын
Someone in a previous video commented that this one looked like a mobster. Not that it was driven by one, that it WAS one. I agree, and it’s amazing.
@patndave4919Ай бұрын
@@oriontaylor The corrupt business CEO and the Wise Guys drove these Fat Beauties in the crime shows.
@althunder4269Ай бұрын
The "check gauges" light is a good idea since most people don't monitor their gauges.
@HunterB738Ай бұрын
Have that in my 90’s GM vehicles and I can confirm the light does not come on when the gas gauge gets low.
@emjayayАй бұрын
@@HunterB738 Isn't there a little low fuel light by the gauge, maybe gas pump shaped?
@HunterB738Ай бұрын
@@emjayay Not in any of mine unfortunately.
@larrybruce4856Ай бұрын
Always loved the sound of a Chrysler car starting. You knew it was a Chrysler product just from the sound of the starter.
@trudygreer2491Ай бұрын
I have a friend who does a perfect imitation of it! (Specifically a '66 Dart!)
@Greatdome99Ай бұрын
Hollywood loved it and used it in a huge number of TV shows, regardless of make.
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
@@trudygreer2491 does the friend's imitation get better with a few drinks?
@fredmertz8538Ай бұрын
They call it the "Highland Park Hummingbird".
@trudygreer2491Ай бұрын
@@chrisgoebel9187 No, it usually stalled out.. !
@bigcrowflyАй бұрын
The dull black plastic on the instrument panel screams Plymouth Fury I police/fleet vehicle.
@loveisall5520Ай бұрын
For me, ever since the Imperial lost its unique body after the 1966 model year, it just looked cheaper. I can remember a Car & Driver road test of the '69 and they said that "it smells like a Plymouth Fury". Your comment reminded me of that. Sad that their interior designers weren't stolen from either GM or Ford.
@TomSnyder-gx5ruАй бұрын
@@loveisall5520 "it smells like Plymouth Fury" 🤣--- you know that had to hurt!
@allenwayne2033Ай бұрын
@@loveisall5520 I think that may have been Tom McCahill in Mechanix Illustrated. In the late 50's to mid 60's he loved Imperials and personally owned several. You can read a few of his reviews on the Online Imperial Club website.
@solemandd67Ай бұрын
@@loveisall5520Ouch! Yet I must agree. It deserved a better dashboard material.
@HtfsikАй бұрын
@@loveisall5520I’m a Mopar fun…but I have to agree with you. 🤦🏻♂️
@jeffsmith846Ай бұрын
Tha is the most bizarre tidbit that I have ever learned about an older car. How cool.
@jeffsmith846Ай бұрын
@@MarinCipollina You are correct. Thank You
@fairfaxcat1312Ай бұрын
One of our fine KZfaq commentators, indeed one “MarinCipollina,” lets loose with a superfluous lesson in diction since KZfaq commentator “jeffsmith846”correctly expressed the quirkiness of automobile’s door control illumination. Whether through editing or otherwise, “smith” carries the meaning satisfactorily by calling the illumination method “bizarre.”
@jeffsmith846Ай бұрын
@@fairfaxcat1312 He was rather snarky, but was correct. Lol
@LewTittertonАй бұрын
@@fairfaxcat1312 You're criticizing a comment for being superfluous, but in commenting on it you're being even more superfluous! Which makes my comment meta-superfluous.
@bobjohnson205Ай бұрын
In October '73 I had the pleasure (displeasure) of riding in the back seat of a '72 Newport for a couple of hours as we went around 'trick or treating' on Halloween night. The whole time that I was back there I could hear the gas sloshing around in the fuel tank. I guess removing the baffles from the tank was another way the Chrysler engineers cut costs on their cars!
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
Hey Mr. Bob Johnson! That sloshing sound is way better than the sudden BANG! sound of a Kia gas tank expanding under the back seat! Kia recall coming soon...
@bobjohnson205Ай бұрын
@@chrisgoebel9187Yikes! lol I'd rather hear neither!
@HunterB738Ай бұрын
@@chrisgoebel9187Why do you lie? Even back in school. Liar.
@patndave4919Ай бұрын
They cut cost on the tank baffles to provide dual premium mufflers with resonators for that quiet cabin. That means can really hear the induction when you floor that big block Mopar. Music to the gear heads ears.
@bobjohnson205Ай бұрын
@@patndave4919 There were no dual mufflers on that '72 Newport, just the sound of the gas sloshing around in the fuel tank!
@michaelmullard4292Ай бұрын
Absolutely love that ‘72 Imperial! Same starter as my dad’s ‘71 Newport. Can’t imagine that removing the light in favor of a mirror was that much of a cost savings. But, I guess if you deal in volume, every $ makes a difference. Thanks, Adam! Your videos never get old!
@kellismith4329Ай бұрын
Really, eliminating a wire harness running to the window switches etc - seems it would save quite a bit of $$
@danschubring7957Ай бұрын
One less bulb to replace
@jed6271Ай бұрын
“Extra care in engineering.. it makes a difference.” One of the ad slogans for Chrysler Corp. during this era. Awesome topic. Thanks for a great video here!!
@scottdiamond7133Ай бұрын
Cost reduction runs rampant across all manufacturing. I worked at Nortel in one of their "CR Teams" . when they were making millions and the joke was, start pulling parts out till it quits working then put the last part back in. We actually quit painting their cell site equipment to save money.
@martinliehs2513Ай бұрын
Sadly, Nortel was an iconic Canadian company that was respected around the world. I guess the post Y2K obsession with stock price at the expense of product did it in.
@scottdiamond7133Ай бұрын
@@martinliehs2513 exactly. Then we Canadians lost BlackBerry. And that was the end of tech in Canada
@GTVAlfaManАй бұрын
I worked for Nortel for 16 years, installing and testing new fiber optic terminals all over the USA. We always stayed in hotels, had rental cars, and always taking airline flights every one or two weeks. I always wondered how could Nortel afford our travel expenses and still make a profit?
@scottdiamond7133Ай бұрын
@@GTVAlfaMan they couldn't
@drewjansen7825Ай бұрын
I love it! We had a 1972 New Yorker, and the interior here (along with that delicious MoPar rumble which was a hallmark of the 440s) brought back some great memories.
@user-wu2pg5zh2rАй бұрын
You’re so good at coming up with interesting content. Every video after so many feels like you’ve got to be scraping the bottom of the barrel for topics. But no, each one feels good and fresh even with some recycled footage here and there. I sure appreciate your channel but appreciate your excellent stewardship of all those cars even more. It takes a lot of real passion and yours shows.
@misterhat5823Ай бұрын
With Adam's knowledge of (less popular) old cars he'll probably never run out of material.
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
@@misterhat5823 Absolutely! CAN'T WAIT for Adam to open his own museum!
@TorCow1234Ай бұрын
On the subject of lighting, one egregious cost cutting move was Chrysler replacing their spiffy 1968 side marker lights with cheezy reflectors that looked like they came off someone's mailbox for 1969. FMVSS regulations allowed lights OR reflectors for 1968 and 1969, so it technically did pass muster, but it's always been the first thing I notice when approaching a '69 Mopar. I guess the Imperial did get the cool "shark gill" cornering lamp up front, which had an amber bulb for side marker function, but the crummy reflectors remained on the rear quarter. This fortunately changed for 1970, when FMVSS 108 required both illumination and reflectors on each side/corner.
@user-kh9sy7fh7uАй бұрын
Your Imperial is absolutely gorgeous and always one of my favorites in your impressive collection.
@bernieschiff5919Ай бұрын
I have a 1972 Chrysler Imperial brochure from a friend who visited a dealer back then. An impressive design with the hidden headlamps and sleek clean lines, also in black with a black vinyl roof. Styling was on par with GM in my opinion. Clever and smart interior design details as well.
@douglasdowns4846Ай бұрын
I remember seeing a black Imperial in California, it's license plate read "BLACULA".
@misterhat5823Ай бұрын
The best one I saw was on a girl with a less than stellar reputation's car. "68N IOU"
@axjasonАй бұрын
Bro, this imperial of yours is just fucking incredible aside from being massive and over the top and in every way, freaking beautiful man what a nice piece of machinery
@jst7714Ай бұрын
I have to say the mirror is more ingenious than a lightbulb, has my respect. The whole car has my respect!
@MarinCipollinaАй бұрын
Backlit armrest switches would have gotten even more respect
@jst7714Ай бұрын
@@MarinCipollina how many cars has your company sold?
@MarinCipollinaАй бұрын
@@jst7714 Your question is absurd. Why would you think I have a car company ?
@66skateАй бұрын
I have a 69 Imperial and there is a lens with a bulb behind it on the door panel. With the relatively small number of Imperials sold, you've gotta wonder if it was worth it. Plus, they had to redesign the panel to remove the bezel.
@fairfaxcat1312Ай бұрын
My ‘70 LeBaron had light or lights in the door for this. Yet my ‘90 Mercury Sable was pitch black. No lights; no illumination of any kind on the door switches.
@That_Tuning_GuyАй бұрын
A great trip down memory lane for me. My dad sold Chryslers in the 60's & 70's. We had a '73 Town & Country station wagon that was a monster! 440 4 barrel engine with the towing package to pull our camper. I loved that thing! Oh, it had an 8-Track player too! 😉
@woodyw6891Ай бұрын
The family truckster.
@MisterMikeTexasАй бұрын
Today, what's left of Chrysler is Dead Man Walking. What Stellantis has done is criminal!
@bobjohnson205Ай бұрын
But in the long run it may benefit the consumers that won't end up purchasing one of their inferior vehicles.
@misterhat5823Ай бұрын
Chrysler is like Kmart. It has been circling the drain for decades.
@francoischamberland4029Ай бұрын
The sell junk......
@plap.Ай бұрын
They are going for a save, Hemi is back in production. just confirmed
@eugenepiurkowski5439Ай бұрын
@@plap. Not quite. Had a few hundred hemi engines left over, so they will be offered in a 392 Wrangler for 2025.
@ldodomАй бұрын
The haunting glow of those Park lamps are unmistakable. Also, the performance of the reflective mirror, if cleaned, improves dramatically. Thanks for the cool content! 📺🚘✨
@LCRАй бұрын
This is actually very smart and efficient!
@ce9345Ай бұрын
Interesting fact. The 1971 to 1973 Imperial could be equipped with a 4 wheel anti-skid braking system made by Bendix.
@Randomness5050Ай бұрын
That transmission stalk knob still screams "Dodge" in a big way...
@frederickbooth7970Ай бұрын
The windshield looks to be the same exact one that a 1973 Plymouth Satellite we used to drive used. The little mirror was a great idea. It may have been less troublesome later on than having additional wiring for a light for the switches. You truly have an amazing collection of vehicles!
@JK-dp3lpАй бұрын
Same exact one in my 76 dodge motor home.
@WiencouragerАй бұрын
Seems strange they cheaped out on that, since they had 4 special cigarette lighters for the imperial with special turned aluminum and chrome knobs. But then they used the same shift lever as a Plymouth
@Primus54Ай бұрын
@@WiencouragerStrange isn’t it? They had some Imperial only doodads but parts-binned where they could. Chrysler had many up and down eras as did AMC, but AMC was too small to survive those down years on its own.
@MarinCipollinaАй бұрын
@@Wiencourager People spent more time handling the lighters.
@alanblanes2876Ай бұрын
Thanks for a terrific review, Adam...extremely informative. Just imagine how this car would be if they had used construction materials up to the 1966 level of quality! That would be exceptional.
@veronicahawthorne3452Ай бұрын
Wow, they thought of everything back then. I’m glad I was born in the late 60s and grew up in the 70s. I remember riding in cars like these, and especially at night it was a treat, because of the ambient lighting. Cars of today just don’t have these special touches anymore. That interior is sublime. You feel safe in that huge land yacht. Love the old Imperials!
@NFL1976Ай бұрын
Nice job! Sometimes it's difficult to sit and watch a program like this that's 30 minutes or oftentimes much longer. This was perfect!
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
Adam is the best!
@stanmarcusgtvАй бұрын
Chrysler ignition sounds just like the Martian death ray weapon in the 1950's film War of the Worlds love it
@aleks1939Ай бұрын
It really does! Good ear!
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
EXCELLENT! It does sound just like it! THANKS!
@mtliam99916 күн бұрын
That mirror is genius. U get lighting without an additional bulb that needs to be changed. These 72’s have about the best line on a car ever. So long and the front grill is just epic
@tomwebber9377Ай бұрын
New information that I will keep on hand for future Mopar-head driven conversations. Of course I can't remember my own phone number, but this will be with me always. Thank you for another great video!
@robarchpdxАй бұрын
I like this segment a LOT. Great idea! As always, your videos are brilliantly done!
@jasonpreucel9839Ай бұрын
I’ve been watching your videos for quite some time now and I love all of your videos! You explain things clearly and I have learned a lot of stuff from your videos that I didn’t know before, very intuitive. Thanks for your knowledge and keep up the excellent videos, thank you very much!
@donk499Ай бұрын
Cool idea. Love these fuselage chryslers... And those hummingbird starters
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
Hey! Adam! Thank you for another Highland Park Hummingbird! Every time I hear that sound then the engine start it means another fun ride in a MOPAR! I would say though that your Imperial was sitting way longer than a week due to the long crank cycle. Thanks for all your thoroughly detailed explanations. Love the mirror solution. Its great the Chrysler solution was just a small hidden mirror with no smoke.
@user-nj2px3gq7bАй бұрын
I always felt they skimped on the steering wheels for such a magnificent car!
@GeeBoggsАй бұрын
Very cool and informative episode. I never knew about the mirror reflecting onto the armrest!
@Randomness5050Ай бұрын
The starter sounds just like Squad 51 (except it always fired up quickly)...
@robk9685Ай бұрын
I thought my Wi-Fi just went out.
@chrisgoebel9187Ай бұрын
I believe Adam's Imperial was sitting much longer than a week.
@christopherlaflam6383Ай бұрын
Great video! What a gorgeous car. And an interesting idea with the mirror! I want a ride.
@scoobyroorogersАй бұрын
What a beautiful car. I always liked the sound of the Mopar starter on my several Plymouth Fury's I had as young man. As I grow older I often wish I'd have kept my last 71' 2 door.
@thomasdearment3214Ай бұрын
one more thing I loved the Chrysler starter sound you could get in a Valient or your Imperial and knew you were in a Chrysler
@czechmate6916Ай бұрын
Adam you never disappoint. Always great content and beautiful cars.
@OLDS98Ай бұрын
Thank you Adam. Chrysler continued the illuminated ignition area well into the 1990s as I saw it on 90's Chrysler cars. That cost cutting was not just Chrysler either. They were just more obvious with it. You could see that with the Imperial and New Yorker for decades( 1970's and 1990's) The late 1970's Mercury Marquis/Grand Marquis and Town Car and LTD used the same instrumentation panel parts. GM was really doing this a lot. I recall so many cars that shared parts for decades and it was obvious. The W body Regal and Cutlass Supreme shared the same instrumentation panel in the 1990's . Those cars had different more loaded interiors, and by 1995 it was the same. The Oldsmobile Achieva and Buick Skylark did as well in the 1990's. There are parts that were carried over from other models to others. The Oldsmobile Eighty Eight Royale Brougham seats were used in Pontiac Parisienne Brougham before 1985 and for one year in Chevrolet Caprice Classic Brougham LS( a rare option in 1986 until a real Brougham LS was created in 1987). The 1990's B Bodies shared so many parts it was scary. You really could see the Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser shared parts with Buick Roadmaster and Chevrolet Caprice. The only thing unique to the Oldsmobile was the steering wheel, the wheels and grille and the seats. The 1970's Oldsmobile Ninety Eight, Eighty Eight and Toronado and Custom Cruiser 1971-1976 shared lots of parts. The same thing happened over at Buick with the LeSabre, Electra/Park Avenue and Riviera. It was a common practice. The other interesting thing is at the end Town Car and Grand Marquis were still doing it. Another obvious example was Ford Thunderbird and Mercury Cougar in the 1970's and 1980's and 1990's. The The Mark IV and Ford Thunderbird shared parts. That was obvious too. The Lincoln Versailles and Ford Granada and Mercury Monarch did too. The 1992-2011 Ford Crown Victoria and Grand Marquis really started sharing in 1997-1998 time frame. The Chrysler LH cars in the 1990's shared parts. They took the trunk lock cover off the Ninety Eight and Eighty Eight in 1993. They both had them in 1991-1992. By 1993, it was gone. My 1996 Ninety Eight does not have a trunk lock cover. GM took the trunk pull down feature out of some of its luxury cars too.
@KsoismАй бұрын
That floodlight for the gauges is pretty spectacular in it's own right. Can see myself cruising dark highways a bit too fast with illuminated fake wood. Oh damn i just hit the end of the video, and that "dying dolphin" starter cracked me up!
@______IVАй бұрын
That plush bench seating is fit for royalty. Bucket seats are safer, but I’d gladly exchange the safety they provide for that old school comfort.
@DSP1968Ай бұрын
a very clever feature in a car with a beautiful interior!
@bobl1769Ай бұрын
Brilliant in all senses of the word. Thanks!
@johnnystarspangle287621 күн бұрын
In '79 I was working in Korea, my boss bought one of those from the US Embassy there. It was a tank ! Drivin' around Korea like big dawgs !
@76TomDАй бұрын
The sound of the headlight doors closing is like two bank vault doors locking.
@davidepperson237625 күн бұрын
Too cool - thanks for sharing!
@jeffmcmuАй бұрын
Thank you for covering one of my favorite parts about this era of Chryslers. I loved how they could light up the entire dash with only a few lights, and apparently they also could do the drivers door as well! I can't get over that these were the longest non-limousine production cars made. I would have thought that would have gone to a Cadillac but here it is. Thanks again, and your car is in beautiful shape.
@Santor-Ай бұрын
Baclit gauges are much preferable for night driving. Chrysler had electroluminescent gauges already in the 50's.
@toddpfАй бұрын
One of the greatest channels on YT.
@jameshammond680Ай бұрын
Adam, you are the king of interesting, arcane malaise-era automotive knowledge. Your videos are almost ridiculously awesome for guys like me who love 70s and 80s American iron. And since I am not well off enough to purchase one of these beauties, your videos really allow me to experience the cars. I'm super envious of your auto collection but also happy that you are highlighting knowledge about these very special cars. Dude, rock on!
@RareClassicCarsАй бұрын
Wow, thanks!
@loveisall5520Ай бұрын
I so love the Mopars from this time! My parents always had Pontiac Bonnevilles and then the Grand Ville. I was fortunate though to get a Fury III gold sedan with black vinyl roof for my high school driver's ed. This man's Imperial is so cool and such a great alternative to the ubiquitous Cadillacs. I'd have had a hard time in '72 (I was a senior in high school) trying to decide between this fine car and the Lincoln sedan.
@adenshures657316 күн бұрын
I miss big cars like these. For a few years, I drove a 1972 Delta 88 land yacht.
@YS-fr6nuАй бұрын
I’m very impressed, & didn’t know that , great video
@TeeroyHammermillАй бұрын
Clever trick with the mirror. Starter sounds like 1 Adam12.
@danlitchfield894Ай бұрын
Great video!!!
@aaronlopez492Ай бұрын
LoL, The imperial at 235" made my old Electra 225 feel almost like a mid size car;-)
@marvsmith8137Ай бұрын
Love your cars, and vids adam👍
@JohnnycdrumsАй бұрын
Once again, beautiful piece, Adam. Bean counters are critical to mass production.
@benloveless3590Ай бұрын
GM spelled “employee” with only one “e” on the end for decades. Technically acceptable; someone calculated that it must of saved a barrel of ink a year!
@loumontcalm3500Ай бұрын
Elwood Engel's '61 Continental's canvas still contemporary, modern, and stylish a decade later in this beauty.
@cardo1111Ай бұрын
These Imperials were beautifully understated American luxury vehicles. Seems like cost-cutting has always been with us to greater or lesser extents. Unfortunately few can afford items that are built to a standard and not a price point.
@Art-is-craftАй бұрын
I cannot see it really save any money though. More than likely somebody did not like it.
@Santor-Ай бұрын
@@Art-is-crafta bulb a harness and socket cost maybe 35 cents, a shiny tiny disc and a screw probably 3 cents. Makes more sense if one sell in large quantities though, which these cars didn't.
@Art-is-craftАй бұрын
@@Santor- So producing 2000 cars at a saving of $700 would not mean that much to a manufacturer. Trying to play people to come up with it costs more.
@Santor-Ай бұрын
@@Art-is-craft yes, agreed. It makes more sense if one sell 3 million units over 3-5 years, and save those amounts on a few more items. It does add up to millions saved if it's $1 per car then, but not on this car, as it's very low volume. Probably spent more money engineering that mirror than the savings removing the bulb.
@HelpingHand-ic4wtАй бұрын
I believe this lighting of the master switch panel started in 1967 for Imperial. On page 17 of the owner's manual for that year, it mentions the "Driver arm rest light". It describes it as adding light to the master switch panel on the door as well as lighting the headlight switch area. The bulb tucked in under and back a bit from the interior door handle, as I recall. I think I prefer the subtle reflected light on the chromed switches over the direct lighting from a bulb.
@averyparticularsetofskillsАй бұрын
I ADORE that car, absolutely love ALL OF IT ... the first time i was _assaulted_ by the sound the headlight doors make when they close would make me hit the deck and throw in a couple "Hail Marys" just in case 😂
@oriontaylorАй бұрын
‘Warm and inviting’ is the term I would use to describe that Imperial’s interior. Seems to be sadly rare these days.
@christianheidt5733Ай бұрын
Dude! That car is better than new 🤯.
@tonychasey7990Ай бұрын
Hi Adam! Hope all is well! Great video! I have a 71 and a 75 imperial. My 71 does in fact have the illuminated switches on the driver's door. It's an early build car... 9/70. That may have something to do with that. I prefer the 71 over the 75. More power. I prefer the fuselage style... and honestly, it has more interior room and more room under the hood due to the three inches of extra wheelbase, all in front of the cowl. The 75 has its positives, too. Factory 4 wheel disc brakes... and the auto temp finally got away from the faulty servo underhood. Keep up the good work!
@matthewpaanotorres7309Ай бұрын
Imperial, a very good and very luxurious/prestige company by Chrysler, with my favorite models being the '59-'60, '61-'66, '67-'68, '69-'73, and '74-'75 (my most-most favorite being the '59-'60 and '61-'66). It is a real shame it only lasted 20 years (with the nameplate used again from 1981-1983 and then used as the Chrysler LeBaron from the 80s to the 90s). It was a luxury company that was even lesser used and liked than Oldsmobile, Buick, Cadillac, Mercury, Lincoln, and even Chrysler itself (especially the fact it was not as seen as much in movies as those car companies. The only movies I remember the 1970-1975 being a very used car was in "Mean Streets" (1973) and "Last Of The Red Hot Lovers" (1972) along with some popular cop series like Adam-12/Mannix and CHiPS). Still a lot better than most of the modern-day interior and uncomfortable and electronic-obsessed garbage of the cars of today. It makes me wonder, why didn't Lincoln and Imperial sell as well as Cadillac? Cadillac's sales for those cars were always in the 100,000s to 200,000s, but for Lincoln and Imperial, it was around five to ten times lower!
@drippinglassАй бұрын
They used the name again on an extended K car in early ‘90.
@matthewpaanotorres7309Ай бұрын
@@drippinglass Thanks for the correction, sir.
@drippinglassАй бұрын
@@matthewpaanotorres7309 I didn’t mean to correct you actually… that gussied up K car was an insult to the Imperial name plate. 😂
@matthewpaanotorres7309Ай бұрын
@@drippinglass Oh, funny! 🤣
@BRAINFxck10Ай бұрын
@@matthewpaanotorres7309 for me the 1960 Imperial 2 Door Hardtop is the best American car ever made it is the epitome of American style, wealth, and engineering, uniquely American no other country could even dream of building a car like that. 🇺🇸 🦅
@apex107lrpАй бұрын
I learned to drive in a '73 Newport...basically the same as this monster but even cheaper interior etc. Long, you say? Yup, we called it "The Boat" because Dad's car was 6" longer than his fishing boat. The best part of the design was the loooong straight fender top lines...made parking much easier because you actually had a clue where the ends of the thing were.
@nlpntАй бұрын
Fun fact about those fender-tip turn indecators - they were available on early Omni/Horizons.
@emjayayАй бұрын
And lots of other Chrysler products. Pretty cool when driving on a dark night.
@Napier363Ай бұрын
Beautiful car & fabulous seats but I always thought the Imperial dash design looked cheap compared to the rest of the interior.
@TomSnyder-gx5ruАй бұрын
One thing they messed up on was not giving the Imperial a different dash! If money wasn't there for a unique dash they should've at least tweaked it enough to give it a different look - like what Ford did with the dash of the MK III that shared the dash with the T-Bird! As it was, you didn't know if you were behind the wheel of an Imperial or a Newport!!
@solemandd67Ай бұрын
If Chrysler interior designers had to use the same dashboard template, they should have added brown/gold irregular stripes to make it look like ebony.
@patndave4919Ай бұрын
What a stunning ride. The front end is elegant to this day, it was futuristic for the 1970's. I think your carb needs a tune up kit. The float bowl or the accelerator pump are not giving it the gas to start fast.
@Primus54Ай бұрын
Cool video, Adam. Now clean that mirror! 😉👍
@twomustangsАй бұрын
Cool video! Was I the only one thinking about the drain on the battery the whole time?
@NuxDriverАй бұрын
Beautiful car. Interesting tech.
@2HopesGarageАй бұрын
Beautiful car! Excellent video as always. Great presentational style. The seats are magnificent on those cars. The headlamp doors sound like wheelie bins falling over! Worth buying one just for that feature alone!! Keep up the good work 👍
@bret9741Ай бұрын
I miss the 60’s and 70’s so much. The US for all its issues was so much cooler than today.
@tetedur377Ай бұрын
Starts just like a Chrysler. I had a '69 Fury III, a '72 Fury III, and a '64 Sport Fury, and they were all cold-blooded like that.
@valiant1968Ай бұрын
The mirror is genius! I also think it's more than cost savings, because if the light was anywhere on the arm rest or door panel, it would also be subjected to rain and snow, if/when the driver's window was down, which would inevitably lead to the 'inconvenience' of the light not working at all. My old '68 Valiant two door wouldn't let you lock the car unless the doors were fully closed. That meant that you either had to be inside the vehicle with the keys, then depress the locking knob on the door; or outside the vehicle to lock the door with the keys in hand. Brilliant!
@TheCasualRealtorАй бұрын
I think the cornering lights were genius. Shame that many cars today don’t have them. I know that some have them built into the floodlights, but it is helpful at night in my BMW that they go on when you turn.
@dlotboyАй бұрын
Please please please do a segment on the one year only oddly placed courtesy lights on the 1977 Cadillac Fleetwood. I LOVED these and they were a one year only feature on one model only. They were placed on the door panels just above the arm rests. Oddly enough the car also had regular door courtesy lights placed below the arm rest as well.
@patrickmurawski400Ай бұрын
They had some nice designs nice looking car!!!!
@jamesengland7461Ай бұрын
Want to talk about costing out? My wife's 2005 Buick Century has no dome light! Only car I've EVER seen without one at all. It only has those tiny map lights on the bottom of the rearview mirror and 2 above the rear seat grab handles. They're so small, they're useless. Don't even cast a shadow. My son and I ordered LED bulbs online to replace them which are easily ten times brighter. They're fantastic and still not excessively bright.
@gm12551Ай бұрын
Idk if that gen had a dome light or not but I think it might had
@greenbus9Ай бұрын
.....meanwhile, at Mercedes Benz, the heater controls on my dad's 1971 220 had a fiber optic wire to distribute light over the control and the blower switch......think about that. This was1971- ......
@randyfitz8310Ай бұрын
Yes, and GM B-body and C-body cars had fiber optic lamp monitors (some were optional).
@thewiseguy3529Ай бұрын
Are you related to Elvis?
@greenbus9Ай бұрын
@@thewiseguy3529 I AM Elvis, baby.
@thewiseguy3529Ай бұрын
@@greenbus9 i have a present for you. See you soon 👍🏼
@solemandd67Ай бұрын
The '68 Corvette used fiber optic lamp monitors and so did the '69 Mark III.
@skunktotem8785Ай бұрын
Love how you can actually see the front corners of the car.
@x_Dude1Ай бұрын
Must be sweet driving that automobile - its a car that many like.
@tomdave42Ай бұрын
It eliminated the bulb, socket, wire, solder, trim pieces and probably more.
@peterdelestrez8880Ай бұрын
I believe this is the most beautiful Imperial ever made. The 72 and 73 were styling masterpieces. If Chrysler would have promoted this car, it would have sold better. It also came with Sure Stop, an antilock breaking system. Yet, they never promoted this feature either.
@dannyo3317Ай бұрын
Does this Chrysler seat about 20?
@cesars7860Ай бұрын
Does a tin roof rust?
@MrScottie6829 күн бұрын
My 1969 and 1993 Chrysler New Yorkers were both the most comfortable and smoothest riding cars I’ve ever owned. It’s just so sad that the Chrysler nameplate today consists of just one model and will probably fade away in the coming years.
@grayrabbit2211Ай бұрын
I don't have a problem with this type of simplification. Functional with much less fuss. Fewer things to break.
@Santor-Ай бұрын
I implement similar cost saving routines when feeding the family, instead of those expensive dinners with lots of fancy ingredients, like veggies, i serve a 1 ingredient meal, like beans or hot ketchup and then put a reusable picture from a cooking magazine in front of each plate to look at. Works great!
@aleks1939Ай бұрын
Such a beautiful car!
@theda850twoАй бұрын
I love the cars that go all the way to the end of the assembly line!
@PaulHayman-tq5kb28 күн бұрын
I like the push button Auto Matic gear box selection
@dave1956Ай бұрын
I think that Chrysler took cheap to new heights back in those years. I once read a story about a man who went to work at GM in the 60’s. They actually tested steering wheels in taxis and other high use vehicles to see how long a steering wheel would keep its color. They didn’t want it to last too long as they wanted owners to become dissatisfied so that they would trade for a new car.
@roundrock6329 күн бұрын
Please do a video on the headlights opening and closing. Maybe some other unique hidden light options on other models.
@PeterMcDonald-sl9rtАй бұрын
Funny, they could have saved money by completely eliminating those front vent windows, (yours appear to be optional power operated)which I happen to like. Most cars did, in '72, save perhaps Mercedes-Benz and VW?