Yeah it's expensive but really it's not much more than the cost of a swarovski scope + the other tools you'd need. (and it's something of an all in one tool.. not ideal for everything but handy for the right person)

Happy you like it!

The clarity of the glass in this scope is in a class all its own, as with most Swarovski rifle scopes. The Eliminator is not comparable, in our opinion.

Sorry for the wicked late response! We use a Wheeler torque driver.

Glass quality is very similar between the two. They are both manufactured by the same company.

It absolutely is. It works the same as an analog rifle scope turret, except the scope does it for you. Once you enter your ballistics specs (muzzle velocity, barrel twist, bullet dimensions, etc.), the calculations are the same. The dS finds the range and adjusts according to the ballistics you've programmed.

DS is hard to beat!

@@Outdoorsmans thank you so much.

Top secret private facility...

That's Americas ass. Thanks for watching! 👍🏼

It’s not supposed to take wind into account unless I missed something

We shot a lot of steel at 700-1000 on this day. No issues whatsoever.

Horizontal Coriolis & spin drift are the easiest thing ever to correct for. I’m at 53deg latitude in the N. hemisphere. To null out these effects i simply apply: - 1 click (¼ moa) left for 0-600yd - 2 clicks (½ moa) left for 600-800yd So, for my hunting rifles after I sight in zeroed, i just apply 1 click left then cap the windage turret. And that’s it… I don’t correct for vertical coriolis, I just ignore it… because… inside of 600yd the error will never exceed 1 click… and worrying about azimuth in a hunting scenario is lunacy! 🤪 This DS scope is designed for hunting… for that application it should do just fine without coriolis correction. Coriolis appears to start becoming relevant enough to start producing misses on small targets at around 800-1000+ yds for most cartridges in my estimation, so way out of range to be a relevant factor for ethical hunting.