Rafale is better than Eurofighter Typhoon ? Comparison video.

  Рет қаралды 10,598

Jetline Marvel

Jetline Marvel

Ай бұрын

In this video, we will compare two strong fighter jets one is from France and another is from the European Union. Share your thoughts about both fighter jets.
Follow us on social sites
Facebook: / jetlinemarve. .
Twitter: / jetline_marvel​​​
Instagram: / jetlinemarv. .
KZfaq: kzfaq.info/love/hub....
www.jetlinemarvel.net
Website : www.jetlinemarvel.net
Which is better? Airbus A320 neo or Boeing 737-8 max
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwjfF....
The Most Powerful Passports Of 2019
www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-XOY....
Which is Bigger ? Antonov AN225 vs Airbus A380
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKAcH....
Luxurious Helicopter cabin tour : Part 5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3Ihe....
Top SIX Airlines in India - 2019 : by its Market share, Punctuality , Fleet size, Destinations.
Baltic Aviation Academy, TRTO, Type rating training, Full Flight Simulator, FFS, Airbus A320, A320, Cold and Dark, Cockpit, Airplane, Pilot, ATPL, Simulator
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrVbD....
The 10 Best Airports In The World In 2019: Skytrax Awards
www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0pZY....
HAL Helicopter Ambulance displays at Aero-India 2019
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJex....
#rafale #eurofightertyphoon #Fighterjet #aircraft

Пікірлер: 50
@happyslappy5203
@happyslappy5203 Ай бұрын
In 1976 France built the Mirage 4000: delta wing, 2 jet engines, canards just above the air intakes. Its design was the ancestor of both Rafale & Eurofighter. 1st flight on March 9, 1979, way before the Eurofighter (march 1994). France pulled out of the Eurofighter project when other involved countries said they didn't need a carrier-capable fighter. For French Navy it was non negotiable because they operated then 2 CATOBAR aircraft carriers. So France made the Rafale on its own, but with a modified design (reinforced fuselage, air intakes, canard position, landing gear, tailhook...). Rafale is certified for operating on US Navy aircraft carriers since 2007.
@jay1st1st
@jay1st1st Ай бұрын
Exactly what i was going to say. Rafale is compact, separate air intakes, the landing gear fits in the fuselage keeping the wings clear for max hard points, front LG is not below the weak air intake for hard landings on aircraft carriers.
@MilkaSingh-rt6zp
@MilkaSingh-rt6zp Ай бұрын
French do not make many different weapons but whatever they make are top class, there is just no comparison with any other country in its classes, be it American, German or Russian
@happyslappy5203
@happyslappy5203 Ай бұрын
France is the only one country in Europe able to build on its own: nuclear aircraft carrier, strategic nuclear submarines, nuclear attack submarines, frigates, amphibious assault ships, replenishment vessels, ICBMs, air-launched nuclear cruise missiles, omnirole carrier-capable jet fighter, attack helicopters, MBTs, APCs, IFVs, AA missiles, military satellites.. M51 ballistic missile carries six to ten independently targetable thermonuclear warheads, 110 kilotons each, 10,000+ km range, reentry at Mach 25, 150-200 metres accuracy.
@augustiner3821
@augustiner3821 Ай бұрын
wow, what a bold statement, insider.
@CROM-on1bz
@CROM-on1bz Ай бұрын
Let's say that the best is the one that sells the most to countries that did not build the plane and if foreign customers buy more Rafale than EF Typhoon it is surely for a good reason.
@antoniotorcoli5740
@antoniotorcoli5740 Ай бұрын
I think that Rafale is superior but the sales are not a compelling factor proving its superiority. Typhoon it is difficult to sale since it is produced by a consortium of countries and each member can veto a sale.
@CROM-on1bz
@CROM-on1bz Ай бұрын
@@antoniotorcoli5740 😏😏
@philv3941
@philv3941 Ай бұрын
Fair point. ​@@antoniotorcoli5740
@NATObait
@NATObait Ай бұрын
Eurofighter Typhoon do not sell well for reasons that are political rather than ability. 1. Rafale is ITAR FREE 2. Germany also Sanctioned sales to Saudi Arabia and Turkey ( a bit vague on the Turkey deal ) Would you buy from a consortium that wants to lend you an umbrella when it's sunny but takes it back when it rains?. Remember what you wish for as Rafale has a Franco German Spanish replacement ( France/ Dassault don't want a flip flop partner but are stuck with one now....guess who ) Remember your history books....P51 was slated for it's low ceiling and poor climb rate until it used the RR Merlin then it became the best piston fighter of the war. Likewise modifications alter the performance of aircraft throughout the life cycle. F15 is past 50 years and still relevant.
@filemonpuente1766
@filemonpuente1766 Ай бұрын
👍Rafale🇨🇵 Frances.Hermoso,Moderno y Poderoso.El mejor multiroll 4.5 Generacion.
@denismichel8385
@denismichel8385 Ай бұрын
Typhoon has more agility. Are you sure ? This is not the impression I have when I watch air shows.
@NATObait
@NATObait Ай бұрын
Rafale is designed for carrier landing therefore it must have good safe low speed handling. Hence the close coupled canards. That gives excellent airshow capability. EFT has it's canard position much further away from it's centre of gravity to give leverage at transonic speeds, were the fighting is done, hence it can pull 9g turns constantly until Mach 1.2 with 2 fuel tanks and missiles. It also has better TTW with more powerful engines so it can outrun and outclimb opponents. Gripen has close coupled canards for its roadside party piece. These are intentional design choices and help make the aircraft fulfil it's potential mission.
@user-ls5zb2dx5j
@user-ls5zb2dx5j Ай бұрын
Nice video, but you make one mistake, the rafale has longer ferry range then the typhoon.
@JetlineMarvel
@JetlineMarvel Ай бұрын
Yes, you are right
@user-MaxGrub
@user-MaxGrub Ай бұрын
La laideur du Typhoon est létale.
@NATObait
@NATObait Ай бұрын
Rafale would look a 10 but it has a growth on its face ( some call it a fixed Refueling Probe ) and that lowers it's RCS also. The small nose gives a sleek look but allows the smallest radar of all. Sometimes it's better to look mean than pretty.
@caglar3957
@caglar3957 21 күн бұрын
Bunlar savaş makinesi spor otomobil değil.😂😂😂
@Cfu72
@Cfu72 Ай бұрын
Rafale .... the .best 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
@oskng
@oskng Ай бұрын
Slazem se, i mi u hrvatskoj smo dobili prvi dio isporuke. Cestitam sto ste vi narucili i najnoviju verziju f4.1 uz f3r. Mi smo trenutno na f3r verziji
@Paul-fp4ux
@Paul-fp4ux 25 күн бұрын
The Rafale is homogeneous and beautiful because it comes from a long and succesful lineage designed by a unique creator since 1929
@wolfbleue4920
@wolfbleue4920 Ай бұрын
The Rafale is vastly superior in all areas... moreover it has never lost a single match against a European opponent It is the only aircraft in the world that can carry 1x5 its own weight in armament and it is a multirole aircraft.. it has no rival in Europe 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵💪💪💪💪💪
@kaizenpsy8259
@kaizenpsy8259 Ай бұрын
I knew since „vastly“ that the rest will be mostly nonsense. The aircraft’s are pretty similar and both are very capable. It’s actually not even true that the Rafale never lost a training fight. I have friends who fly or flew Typhoons, they won training fights against the Rafale they lost fights against them.
@oskng
@oskng Ай бұрын
​@@kaizenpsy8259nisu isti, rafal je omni roll avion, dok tajfun nije. Tu sva prica staje
@kaizenpsy8259
@kaizenpsy8259 Ай бұрын
@@oskng true the Rafale has wider spectrum of possible applications but in the applications they both capable of they are very equal.
@oskng
@oskng Ай бұрын
@@kaizenpsy8259 u biti si samo potvrdio sto sam ja napisao, ti si prakticki napisao "sto imaju isto, imaju, a rafal ima vise". Nista zlonamjerno sa moje strane, da me ne shvatis krivo.
@elrulio9889
@elrulio9889 Ай бұрын
Omnirole aircraft *
@atrides7
@atrides7 28 күн бұрын
RAFALE💎💎💎💎💎❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@thiemokellner1893
@thiemokellner1893 Ай бұрын
0:22 strange you show the Euro Fighter when you are talking about the Rafale then.
@andrecolpron5603
@andrecolpron5603 Ай бұрын
Mes oreilles saignent quand il prononce Rafale. 😱
@thiemokellner1893
@thiemokellner1893 Ай бұрын
Les miens aussi, and I am not even French speaker.
@user-jr9qn9rc2e
@user-jr9qn9rc2e Ай бұрын
Typhoon is clearly designed focused on air interception/superiority. Its main advantage are its engines which are clearly more powerful than those of the Rafale - but this comes at a cost both in price and in maintenance. The smaller size of the Rafale (possibly due to the need to be carrier-compatible) has also player a role. Both aircrafts are weak regarding long term development compared to US counterparts which is reasonable since volumes of european fighters are traditionally much smaller. Although the sales of an aircfraft do not necessarily represent which one is better, the Rafale seems to have gained momentum towards the Typhoon, mainly due to its relatively lower price and maintenance costs and also due to its greater versatility. The main advantage of Rafale is that it is based in a consistent uniform philosophy since it was a one-country design with very focused specs whereas the Typhoon had to address multiple and not always compatible specs. Overall I would consider Typhoon a 'better' fighter on a spec-by-spec comparison but Rafale is clearly a better all-rounder (and most probably the best all-rounder worldwide as is essentially the only fighter designed from the beginning on that basis). Rafale is good in every aspect - not very powerful engines but powerful enough, decent radar, very good electronic warfare suite (very clever french move to focus on that), a decently stealthy design although not as advanced as the F-35 (but stealth comes at a considerable cost in other aspects...), great reliability (France does not have the luxury of a big fleet so losses are not acceptable...) and very good air-to-air missiles to compensate on the interception role. And as a whole package it comes at a price that can be justified, whereas Typhoon may not be so... . I believe that if Rafale gets more powerful powerplants (+10%, not more) and an upgraded radar (not that current AESA is bad but an upgrade will be needed to keep it competitive - although some 'nose widening' may also be considered for increased radar size - size does matter!) its capabilities will increase overall and this is one other of its benefits - you do not need to do that much to improve the original design.
@noriko-nm8vc
@noriko-nm8vc Ай бұрын
私はタイフ―ンが好きです🎉
@tomislavcukac9677
@tomislavcukac9677 Ай бұрын
You have destroyed this video with myth that Serbia will buy Dassault Rafale soon. Dassault Rafale is sold out for 10 years 2024-2034.
@zagrepcanin82
@zagrepcanin82 Ай бұрын
france would not sell them because they are afraid that serbia would tranfer technical data of jets and its weaponry to russia and/or china
@oskng
@oskng Ай бұрын
Ako francuzi prodaju srbima (genocidno, agresorskoj naciji) to bi doslovno bila potpuna izdaja prema natu. Jer svi znamo kako je potpuno glupo ovdje izjavljeno da su oni neutralni. Nije nikakva tajna kako se otvoreno svrstavaju uz rusiju i sjevernu koreju.
@Paul-fp4ux
@Paul-fp4ux 24 күн бұрын
@@zagrepcanin82 Yes the risk exists!
@necatisahin6585
@necatisahin6585 Ай бұрын
EF-2000 TYPHOON Türkiye best options.
@jeanpierreragequit1726
@jeanpierreragequit1726 Ай бұрын
lame option for a ridiculous & pointless country
@Elcactouss06
@Elcactouss06 Ай бұрын
@@jeanpierreragequit1726 😂😂 bien calmé le turc
@jeanpierreragequit1726
@jeanpierreragequit1726 Ай бұрын
@@Elcactouss06 :D
@necatisahin6585
@necatisahin6585 Ай бұрын
@@Elcactouss06 👎
@alihanhaydar8369
@alihanhaydar8369 Ай бұрын
Are they copy eachothers?
@Arleq1
@Arleq1 Ай бұрын
Eurofighter is a bad copy of the Rafale indeed.
@allegromoderato7404
@allegromoderato7404 Ай бұрын
Non, ces deux avions sont totalement différents. Nous voulions un avion omni-rôle navalisé catapultable à partir d'un porte avion, alors qu' Airbus a développé un avion de supériorité aérienne..
@oskng
@oskng Ай бұрын
Na pocetku su zajedno krenuli, ali se onda francuska povukla iz projekta i napravila mozda i najbolji omni roll na svijetu, rafal. Tajfun nema niti priblizno mogucnosti koje ima rafal. Rafal je jedini avion na svijetu koji je radio bojna dijelovanja, bez podrske drugih aviona i bez awacs
@user-lk6jf8ss2z
@user-lk6jf8ss2z 9 күн бұрын
Euro fighter❤
Comparison between S korean KF 21 Boramae and Turkish TFX Kaan
8:08
Jetline Marvel
Рет қаралды 210 М.
MEGA BOXES ARE BACK!!!
08:53
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
DO YOU HAVE FRIENDS LIKE THIS?
00:17
dednahype
Рет қаралды 93 МЛН
Final muy increíble 😱
00:46
Juan De Dios Pantoja 2
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
JAS-39 Gripen E VS Rafale F4  |  The Best Fighter Comparision
12:35
Military Might
Рет қаралды 3,1 М.
Difference Between Mirage III and Mirage 2000
3:47
Computer Skill Hub
Рет қаралды 571
Fighter Show: The Italian Job - Alpha Scramble
9:57
Eurofighter Typhoon
Рет қаралды 247 М.
Is India's Su-30 is better than Pakistan's F16. which is better?
8:25
Jetline Marvel
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
FREMM Frigate: Which Version is Better, French or Italian?
15:23
FP Defense News
Рет қаралды 23 М.
United States F-35 vs French Rafale - Which would win?
9:14
Grid 88
Рет қаралды 975 М.
Which is Better? Flying the F-16 or the F/A-18?
30:19
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 483 М.
MEGA BOXES ARE BACK!!!
08:53
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН