Exactly what I’m doing rn

@@coltonroach3862 same lmao

I can relate to that too

Its 4:50 rn for me

Close, its 2 44 here

The thing is, he destroyed his family because of the Seer's prophecies as well. Now that he is disillusioned, he puts the blame on the Seer for his choices.

@@subutaynoyan5372 He took responsibility and didn't complain, lived with his decision, he puts blame on believing in the gods instead of doing what is reasonable, trusting in oneself

@@Amleth89 Ragnar never complained. He just thinks he was manipulated by his faith and could've been a better man without it.

You seen it when she lost her baby. She told Bjorn and Ragnar to leave her alone, they just scooted back and was right there for her. Thats love

M Bayrak I just wanna know how the seer lied to him , I keep seeing people saying that

It's a tradition to come here once a while

@@Jianxin_ImpactAgreed

I memorized this by heart

This and Bjorn.. I just can’t stop coming back to. I just wish there was another show like this. The last kingdom was also decent, but I need more viking fix! Any suggestions welcome 🙏🏻

@@Jianxin_Impactthat’s for sure

they presented him with a destiny, but he manifested it

@@KingslayerSrb but what if it wasn’t?

​@@Xpert_Aliwhat if it was

you may be right, i may have been wrong@@JiskaStorm

True and I really liked the white horde scene. It had something emotional ragnar sees Everyone where hè thinks about. Even atlesthan in the back of his mind

Nikolay Ivanov Ye but ecbert used his intellect to his own benefit Ragnar wanted to teach everyone his knowledge

As well as Athelstan

"Odin gave his eye for knowledge... But I would give far more."- Ragnar Lothbrok

@@georgeholbrook843 Ragnar never wanted to teach anyone. He just wanted to explore.

@@misterwabbit4690 not true at all he wanted to farm

Fayçal Mansouri Then you've seen pretty few epic scenes lol. Don't get me i think this scene is epic too but to say that it's the best one ever, hell no

Oh please...😂😂

@@movez8223 Tell me a realty based scene that's deeper than this?

@@patrichewill5403 Tell me a realty based scene that's deeper than this?

@Eternal Wanderer Tell me???

Well man isn't master of his fate. Your choices are bound by natural and human forces

I remember when I was 14, too :^)

@@_so1ius what that has to do with what we are talking about?

Those words are nothing but true...

But we cant give our answers( like who create us) so we invent God or other gods like Odin to belive in

I agree that this scene is amazing. But for me the best scene is when Ragnar and Ecbert get drunk and talk about religion and honor, and ramble on like friends, because they may have both been the closest either of them have ever been to being understood.

So did Ecbert. The only true equal of Ragnar

I think Rollo wasnt to far behind in wisdom. He seen how the Christians were encroaching in all directions. Frankie, North Saxony, Kievan Rus, Novgorod. He played it well turning over to the West Frankish, became more powerful than anyone else in the show and the real Rollos bloodline now sits on the throne of England

I hate shows that idolize bloodthirsty murderers. Vikings shouldn't exist.

So true, when he was imprisoned they had some of the most intelligent dialogues with King Ecbert...I suppose when he stopped to fight we got a chance to see his wisdom.😊

To simply say, that is law of attraction.

@@senpaikz6900 that's actually another way of explaining it very well

Smart man

Lol. It’s not true . “She was never going to have a child” his prophecy came to pass regardless , she could have as well stayed at home and had a miscarriage 😂. We are fated , believe it or not

i think the word you may wanted to use was revolutionary/visionary. but either k

and what you are a purist historian?

L Y R I L L Thank you for the correction!

Yes, yes, I know that this is historical fiction. But I am just amazed by the personality of the character Ragnar within the series. (I haven't read the original sagas about Ragnar) I just decided to share my opinion about his personality and experience.

Yeah well I thought it was obvious that the people watching this show aren't expecting a documentary when they do so you idiot. Anyone who watches this and thinks "oh my god the writers are trying to mislead people. this isn't accurate at all, i have to make sure they know the truth" doesn't even deserve to own a tv in the first place. When did the producers or writers or anyone in an executive position for the show ever claim the events that happen in it are true or an accurate representation of what happened. Matter of fact when have they ever really claimed it's anything more than just "based" off of the viking era? Ok so what the channel is called "History" I can't imagine any person with anything more than a below average iq watching the show, seeing the production value and think "wow all this stuff really happened?" Dude even if someone WANTED to fucking make a show that's a realistic portrayal of all the characters and events, etc. based only on things actually recorded they wouldnt even get past like a season or two. There's barely anything recorded about the Vikings because their communication was almost 100% oral-based so the only things we even have written down are from accounts by Englishmen or people that they raided, and don't forget it was probably not even common for English citizens to know how to write so only a small percentage of the societies even could record the events down. Imagine Aethelwulf writing about Ragnar's life story? What realism could you expect from that? I mean no wonder there is only legends of Ragnar and people don't even think he existed because there was probably no way anyone could learn to write in Viking lands besides only one-off scenario's where they learn it as a special skill, that no one else can do from someone who only would teach that person and not others. So how the hell are people saying shit like "This is unrealistic", and "Ragnar wasn't like this". You do realize that the best they can do is literally just make it seem believable enough for that era right? It's not like English or American history where they can go through journals day by day and discern every event that took place. I have no idea what you thought it would be like but dont fucking watch TV and expect to get accurate facts unless the program you are watching literally says "This is a fact". Never did Vikings claim it was entirely true or that the events in the show actually took place. How are you going to be outraged at a show that literally had the Pagan god "Odin" come to earth and speak with Ragnar's sons through a mind-link that makes him invisible to everyone else except them, and say it is not "accurate enough" or is too "unrealistic". WELL NO SHIT SHERLOCK DID YOU REALLY START WATCHING IT FOR ITS REALISM, OR AUTHENTICITY? It's like someone watching the TV show Merlin and saying "It's not factual" when it has fucking talking dragons and magic.

Yes, but it will never be in some videos for top 10 this and that... And i dunno whyy

@@markomaksic1048 who gives a fuck We don't need lists or any shit like this This scene is a pure masterpiece

its an epic scene indeed,but im sorry nothing can top Red wedding

@@arthasmenethil7208 I said possible for a reason. But it is up there. I can't fault the scene at all.

@@mohamedkhider6998 well, yeah :"D

One of the most powerful scenes ive seen in my lifetime, hail Ragnar!

It is now 2021 and i am still watching this ✌🏽

I'm Muslim and I still watch this scene lol

it is now 2024 and i am still watching this@@allthingseverything4606

metal elitist almost.

Truer words has never been spoken

this speech made me think a lot that what if gods dont exist

Imagine his reaction when he get in Valhalla 😂😂😂

hehehehehe lol.

Xeax95 I thought i was the only person.

adding me too guys i watched 100 times

I often come back to watch this scene.. very powerfull 🤘

Xeax95 q

What about the scene after being defeated in Paris when he talks about why he became Earld and then King? That's so very good too

but lagartha loved him back.... 😢 the deserved eachother. 👏 fuck queen aslaug

Exactly, he couldve easily blamed the stupid decisions he made regarding cheating on lagertha and going to kill ivar and alot more on the seers prophecys. But like how he described the gods as a tool to relinquish man of responsibility he cannot fall into that trap and contradict himself. He takes responsibility of all his wrongs and shows his love for lagertha instead finally getting closure

but this is where it seems odd to me about walhalla or heaven, odin or a christian god. the ravens indicate that there is a vikings death so that means they are with odin right?, after ragnar died in the snakepitt later his sons seen the ravens and get a visit from odin......but did Ragnar not let himself been baptised and said cause when I die i want to see my friend Athelstan again. So this is odd to me is he with odin or is he with the christian god with Athelstan?

Harry DeRemmit The baptising was all a play to pull the wool over the eyes of both the Parisians and his own camp so he could successfully act out his ingenious way of entering the city of Paris. His feelings for Athelstan had always been true. Maybe he also felt that being baptised would be something Athelstan would of loved seeing and was also doing it to show his love for him and to sort of honour him as well.

yes come to think of it when he said goodbye to athelstan where he made this cross he said talked to the grave and said they will not se eachother again. And had someone els point out the same thing you just said and thank you for the answer i learned something new, sometimes the excitement of the show makes you misses the small details

i had one episode wich was so much excitement that in the end i was like wait what....what just happend, i litterly had to watch it again to understand more

Harry DeRemmit Haha there's no need to apologise my friend. It's quite an amazing show.

Very good assessment, especially the point about him growing quieter - its definitely evident when you look back on it and you feel his tensions and internal battles build up to this point. That being said - i felt he was still at war with himself for he still didn't know what to believe. He questions why things, why would gods do, reasoning, which god to believe. He is a man of questions and he looks for answers and doesn't want to just sit back and accept things- maybe his lack of clear answers here led him to almost resenting the gods and questioning there existence. Its such a great work in that it can be interpreted in so many ways. I found it hard to put into words, even as i do so i cannot really express all the mixed thoughts/emotions it invokes.

You put it into words...thank you for that.

it was because he got on them drugs

This is when I lost internet in the show. I never cared about the series after Ragnar Lothbrok's saga came to an end.

I disagree that Ragnar ended up with an atheistic philosophy - atheism doesn't just deny god/gods, it denies all divinity. Ragnar's was a Promethean philosophy, where he, instead of devotion to them, rose to meet the gods in their understanding. He followed Odin by becoming an embodiment of his quest for wisdom.

I searched the comments for these words...

Ragnar beat him, Ragnar made him say that.

Wht does this mean ?

@@indianslave1547 no bullshitery... He was being honest. He admited he was wrong. He didn't predict his destiny. He. 😂

I can't expres what i want to say, english is nkt my mother language 😂

Advait Bhave. But having largetha and bjorn in the other seasons Was more calming because they kept us reminded of Ragnar.

@@Philosophical_engineer I beg to differ. Ivar and Ubbe should have been the ones in charge. Bjorn and Lagertha both seriously overstayed their welcome. It's honestly why I stopped watching the show. Bjorn and Lagertha stopped being interesting. The writers gave them more stuff to do, new relationships, but I didn't care anymore. Ivar and Ubbe were breaths of fresh air, inheriting different aspects of Ragnar's legacy and they were played by brilliant actors. And yet, they were either turned into a villain or they were sidelined to play second fiddle to whatever wacky BS Michael Hirst decided to make up. The idea of Ubbe training King Alfred how to fight, for example. Such a laughably bad idea which flies in the face of historical facts about those two men. I didn't mean to go on a rant but I'm still angry about how badly this show nosedived when it should have soared to new heights with Ivar and Ubbe leading the Great Heathen Army to conquer England as a team.

@@Lamporre They also wasted Bishop Headmund's character imo. I did like seeing Bjorn conflicted in the last season about the decisions he has to make as a King. But the last season was too short.

The mistake of overusing a very charismatic character in a story. Michael Hirst made this whole thing a Ragnar driven story. And he completely blundered when he was supposed to follow up with a second generation. I love Katheryn Winnick, and loved Lagertha in first three seasons most of the time, but her not dying, and the show focusing on a family drama more than a true Nordic saga just killed the show. Because let's face it, Lagertha, Floki, Athelstan, Rollo or even Ecbert were all Ragnar based characters. Each of their stories were tied to Ragnar's actions. None of them(Save for Ecbert) had the wit, sharm or cunning of Ragnar. What the show was supposed to do, was to kill off the first generation with proper stories, turn Björn into an heir apparent who despite his best efforts, is not his father, and create a new arc between 5 brothers and the English. Instead, they just kept Lagertha in the centre with no justification whatsoever, never properly killing her off nor keeping her a proper character. I knew the show had no way of getting back on its feet, when Heahmund died whilst Lagertha who had no more story just lingered.

M Bayrak Floki was in a very interesting position when he got to train Ivar and mentor him like a second child after losing his own. And even Iceland could have been interesting because that’s what he historically did. But besides that, I agree with the comments here that Bjorn and Lagertha shouldn’t have become the stars after Ragnar died. It should have been Ivar and Ubbe. They were the most interesting of Ragnar’s sons, no matter how hard you try to push Bjorn onto us. He could have teamed up with Sigurd to oppose Ubbe and Ivar, but making Bjorn the obvious heir who can do no wrong is where Hirst failed to make Bjorn interesting.

Lagertha loved him more than anyone

@@pvaldespino She loved him so much that she repeatedly spread her legs for his brother and passes their offspring off as Ragnar's without so much as telling him. Yes, true love!

Straight White Male we don’t know if that happened, and really it was just bad writing, nothing previously suggested that was the case. Also Ragnar cheated

@@godofnothing428 Ragnar likely only cheated because he knew she was a hypocritical bitch. Who was she to talk?

They are together now.

So did ivar!

Henrik Dahlberg Yes but ivar on his brutally and childish way, Ivar is scumbag who has no patience, Ragnar is a genius.

Henrik Dahlberg i feel like ivar story has no future that is why they are ending the show after season six. I think hirst realized he messed up his story by adding all this childish and anger acts ivar possesses. Personally I thought ivar would be portrayed as a smart tactical viking who would outsmart everyone because he doesnt seem like a threat.

@@wreckitking yes i too was very disappointed with how ivar turned out. ragnar chose him and believed in him because of his tactical mindset and unpredictability, which then showed when he would give his ideas to the rest of the brothers in battles and actually come out victorious. he had the potential to be another ragnar. Ragnar said everyone will come to fear ivar, but i dont think he wanted it to be this way. the character had so much potential! but just sunk into brutal madness... it does make sense though, it does match how he has been portrayed the entire movie, there has been darkness looming around ivar's character since he was a child.. still i hoped it wouldnt have sunk that deep into darkness and instead had some more adventure/exploration/tactics portrayed through his character. i is dissapoints..

Peter Louis his anger and immature actions were his missing childhood and no time to grow up instead sitting down for 20 years

Some people watch series but don't understand a things

​@different6620 Finally, someone who understands Ragnar doesn't believe in any religion. Which he clearly stated to King Ecbert and in this scene. I don't get how some people's brains can't grasp that concept.

​@Aidan_H4 yet he said he was going to Valhalla,Odin preparing a feast and valkyries Yadda Yadda, isn't that an after life,? Isn't that a god? Isn't that a religion? Make it make sense.

@@majintoguro4952 That speech was for the gathered English. Not himself.

@@majintoguro4952 That was to strike fear in the English and inspire his son. Religion is a tool and Ragnar understands that.

and so sad too ! :'|

Camille Labrecque very much so - incredible writing and accompanying musical score.

hell yeah

Quand ça va pas, 2-3 écoutes et on est repartis sur les rails

Mahmoud dahma المسيح اادجال

deep.

It sums up the problem with the world, in one 2 second exchange

Totally agree!! ❤️

Can someone please explain?

@@nenadsubotic9507 Basically its a stalemate, the seer is defiantly firm in his stance the Norse pantheon does indeed exist while still acknowledging that neither of them can truly prove it with certainly. Yet Ragnar on the other hand is more on the midline not knowing what is really or not. This subtly show by him not challenging the Seers assertion.

Ikr Tbh I'm a Muslim Of course this scene is legandary cuz for me ragnar dared to challenge the seer and he proved em wrong at the end But for me i believe in an all powerful and almighty god

@@mohamedkhider6998 thanks for being so honest

@@mohamedkhider6998 That is so fucking sad to read. Why would you believe in such bullshit?

@@AbraGaming sad? Dude it’s his belief and it isn’t hurting you or anyone else, leave him believe. Everybody’s got something they believe.

@@imikal8046 Just because it's someone's belief or isn't hurting anyone doesn't make it not sad

@Ronaldjump if you believe something it is true to you, even if it is wrong

i love this scene... and i didnt relize that until i watched it agai

@Ymir Otsutsuki how?

@Ymir Otsutsuki no it isn’t. That’s literally the whole point of this scene lmao. That prophecies are confusing and because they can be interpreted in so many ways they can always find a way to see it as true when it isn’t. He was prophecied to die on the day the blind man saw him. A literal blind man told him he literally saw him and her you guys have to come up with some “Ecbert was blind to Ragnar” bs which is obviously dumb if you think about it for 10 seconds lol

@@thrillainthemanilla1409 it isn’t dumb, Ecbert was “blinded” as in he believed in what Ragnar told him that his sons will only seek revenge after aelle and spare ecbert. Ecbert believing that Ragnar was his friend, actually believed him. And it turns out, Ragnar fooled him and his sons took revenge on both him and aelle.

This is why I became an Atheist.

@tsikou aniphandis It seems odd to me about walhalla or heaven, odin or a christian god. The ravens indicate that there is a vikings death during a battle or such, so that means they are with odin right?, after ragnar died in the snakepitt later his sons seen the ravens and get a visit from odin......But did Ragnar not let himself been baptised and said cause when I die i want to see my friend Athelstan again. So this is odd to me is he with odin or is he with the christian god where Athelstan is?

Ragnar is a non-believer. He doesn't believe in gods, whether the christian, nor the vikings gods. Like he said, the religions were created by the people to give answers in a time (middle-age), where poverty and undistinguished education dominated.

well actually Odin is his god cause he is in walhalla now so it seems accoarding to the seer

the seer predicted that he would die the day when the blind man sees him but the blind man who see him says that it would be at least 1 more day until his execution that is why Ragnar smiles at the seer

The Seer states that Ragnar wants it to be true, so it is. The blind man being referred to is none other than King Ecbert. Ecbert thinks they are friends, but Ragnar does not consider him one. he wants his demise. Ecbert however feels guilty for sending a friend to death, so much so that he walks all the way to the scene where Ragnar will die so that he can watch a "friend" in his final moments. As soon as Ecbert makes eye contact with Ragnar, Ragnar gives his speech, and is then dropped into the snake pit. Ecbert was the blind man who saw him, not the blind man who claimed to see him.

Lol nah it was just 2 many of em great show

The show it about vikings. Not holes.

Series was too hit and miss. When it was good it was great but when it was bad it was awful. Very inconsistent and only gets worse after this scene

so true

Your comments though. Am glad.

yeah same do i sadly every moment of viking is carved in my heart

2020

@@Xhellfiire quite a year huh?

2022

2023

Do you realise this is a tv show?

+boskovicderesve Can't people analyze characters in tv shows? Writers would completely waste their time if people would not be allowed to analyze their meaning through the characters they portray in stories.

@@boskovicderesve some of the events are actually true. The fake death scene to enter paris was done by bjorn not by ragnar. The way ragnar was killed. Also other moments and events actually happened.

Well where did you think ivar got his brains from?

This whole scene is amazing but that line is my favourite and gives me chills.

Couldn't agree more.

I agree

What if the seer realized something as well after this moment with Ragnar?

Wrong.

i wached that,more than 10 times in a day 😂😂😂

10000000000000♾♾ a day 🙂

U reckon ecbert?

Me too ... I started to question so many things

Well you dont know if those are true words or not, nothing cant prove gods or god exist or not exist so affirm such a thing is scientifically a very arrogant position

hmongguyful can you please explain me the meaning of this line. Please

@@aradhyamaithil1486 Throughout the history man created God's in order to justify things they could not explain and understand, every big ancient religion in different regions had Gods that symbolized their fears, Ra being the God of Sun in Egypt, Thor the God of thunder in Norse mythology and so on, they couldn't understand natural disasters and occurrences that happened so they assumed it was the doing of someone more powerfull, they feared and cherished thinks they had no control over, later that evolved in to today's religions which are again based abaut fiction and fear. Christians pray so they can enjoy affter life because they belive this life is nothing but torture and bla bla bla...it's all to control others and justify your sins.

@@CyberHeat548 brother Thanks alot 😄✌️

@@CyberHeat548 but yet he still embraced those God's.

@@CyberHeat548 You believe that, so it is true, to you...

America explain

Yup. Religion is just a way to make sense of what we don't understand. It probably caused more problems for mankind than anything else throughout history.

And she fucked him over by not being sure about Bjorn's father.

It's just to bad you don't see him in movies. At least I haven't, he is a great actor.

@@tinocontreras5105 He's getting there now. It usually takes a few years after something like this for people to recognize talent such as his. He's starring in some big movies lately.

For me in the last seasons it’s maybe the best acting performance i’ve seen in a serie, you can just notice it when you see the comments all the people speaks about Ragnar as he is a true person cause all the people belive in the acting, this is the real meaning of an actor, Travis Fimmel was Ragnar and it’s not like he is just like him, no he worked hard to become Ragnar, the accent the way he speaks, his looking his eyes it’s just unranked cause we can’t rank perfection on this episode, it’s like we can spectate an amazing version of the legend Ragnar Lothbrok, the prophet

And then it turned to shit like another Walking Dead.

Exactly. Nobody would follow alive Ragnar. And he knew his death will unite and make Vikings to follow him.

Even without god, free will is an illusion

las season was bullshit

This season was so boring and dumb

Yh it was shit every great character died and the season ended by showing that vikings was disappearing etc it didnt have anything good in it just sadness

@@arabiannights5301 i meant season 6 you donut not season 4 and it's not me that says that most people find it shit

Dad 😢😢😢😢😢

Do you know the music name?

@@druid3694 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nraCfMZ5xMmsiIk.html

That's not the same from this Szene. I need this one. It's Georgeus.

Kadir Mert Homan have u found it?

@@elgeeko9380 nope

Death where is your sting? 🤔

Great comment

I wonder why it was deleted.

I just saw this today imagine my shock!

Jay Polomsky I think Ragnar was more of an agnostic man, not atheist.

Jay Polomsky So many questions with no real answers. That's the life story of curious people. Deep.

But if King Ecbert is the blind man, then he already was the blind man, he is the blind man in the moment that Ragnar lies to him ( when he says that he would tell to ivar that king ella is the bad guy)... sooo, king ecbert is already "blind" and he sees Ragnar, but ragnar didn't die that day... he sees ragnar multiple times before ragnar dies and when ragnar dies... and because of that i do not think that ecbert is the blind man

@@flavioandressotomillar1642 I think what he meant by 'see' is that he only realised when Ragnar died that he was fooled

I think Ragnar was right about the idea of prophecies that it has no exact interpretation but many interpretations. So it doesn’t cause comfort but instead causes confusion. Example is the phrase” you will die the day the blind man sees”. 1.blind man could have just been the blind guy in front of Ragnar. 2.the blind man could have been the seer when he sees that the gods actually aren’t a real thing. 3. Blind man could have been Ragnar when he realised that god/gods don’t exist.and that it’s just human nature to make up stories about gods/god to give them simple answers that they could have found themselves. 4.the blind man could have also been ecbert when he realised that god isn’t actually a real thing. But the problem with these is that neither of them actually happen on the day that Ragnar dies. They happen before so the seer was wrong but the directors had to just put that uncertainty vibe to it in order to keep the audience thinking. People get chills of enjoyment and curiosity when you leave that uncertainty vibe.