RIGHT!!! 💯😂

Why did u send sad face?

@@nicholasstanton9575 it's used as a laughing emoji now (crying of laughter)

Wth is wrong with you??

@@Eimaj1991tf????

Which homeless line

@@supremejtrain3251 the (E)

Ok

Wait why is it a homeless line because it doesn’t have some elevated stations?

@@supremejtrain3251 it's called homeless express because it's one of the few train lines that stays underground which makes it a warm place for the homeless to utilize

Also a student there as well, I take the G often as well! And you can’t beat the frequency.

@@misstty definitely it’s better than many have made it to be

They used to in the past. Dunno why they cut it from 9 hours to just 6

Use the LIRR port Washington line for full time express service or transfer at Jackson heights

@@qjtvaddict Use the LIRR Port Washington line instead of extending the *7* beyond Flushing?

@@295g295 Yes that will cost millions of dollars and would be pointless. Just take the LIRR or the Q12, Q13 Q15/Q15A, Q20A/Q20B, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q34, Q44, Q50, Q65 or N20G. You don’t need to extend the 7 train when there’s a railroad and 14 different buses you can take.

@@matthewhernandez8342 That would still be out of reach for most New Yorkers, especially for some stations. Flushing is already overcrowded as it is, and the terminal constraints mean that some trains have to terminate elsewhere. Buses are also inadequate much of the time. Extending the 7 train will be a big boon for the area, since it can help alleviate bus congestion, speed service, and improve train turnaround capacity (my plan sees a four track extension, with half of the trains going local to 162nd Street and the other half making express to 162nd Street and local stops to Bell Blvd). With the straightening of the bus network grid and the extension of the subway, both the Murray Hill and Auburndale stations will close, with subway replacements more convenient for riders. The remaining stations on the Port Washington line will be: -Mets -Flushing -Broadway -Bayside -Douglaston -Little Neck

I think the Z can be reworked, maybe make it like a peak direction express from Supthin Blvd to Cresent st, stopping at Woodhaven Blvd and Cresent St, all stops to Broadway Junction after, then express again from Broadway Junction to Marcy Av, stopping at Myrtle and then Marcy, now it's actually good express instead of just skip stop

@@m34tgaming16 That would be a great idea, while the J stays local.

@@m34tgaming16 I agree with your proposal, except for one thing. There are only two stations west of Broadway Junction that have less ridership than Woodhaven Boulevard, Hewes Street and Chauncey Street (Three if you include Bowery). So Woodhaven Boulevard should NOT be express. Also, Woodhaven Boulevard was designed as a local station, so if they ever lay down an express track, it would only be able to be express if hey either built an expensive useless new station (and knowing the MTA, it would be EXPENSIVE), or, if they would install switches to move them to the local track, which would slow down service. But besides for Woodhaven Boulevard, that would be an excellent idea.

@@ssmith5189 I also think that maybe the Z goes nonstop between Cresent and Supthin would be better as there's no real express stations between them

@@m34tgaming16 We all would love if it would skip all the way to Broadway Junction but there's no middle trackway, so it would only work if they rebuild the stations, which as I said, would be expensive. But if they actually for some reason do that, I think they should rather build new stations on Jamaica Avenue instead, so they won't have to slow down at the tight curves between Cypress Hills and Crescent Street.

Oh, it's cool to get feedback on this list from a former operator. Unfortunately, I never got to ride the (9) much, and when I did, it felt kinda cool to be able to skip some stations. Over the years though, I started to realize how unnecessary skip-stop service is, especially in a subway system. From a rider though, constantly getting stuck on the at Third Avenue bumps it down a few notches, and with the (3) absolutely smashing through Manhattan, I just needed to put it in the "S" tier. Thanks for sharing your experiences though!

Then we can keep the (D) on West End, put the (B) on Sea Beach and the (N/Q) on Brighton. That's the other way we can do the plan.

broo. we both lived the life of getting to ride the V every day

No the V and the G both ran at the same time

@@scytheyt4051 Not true. The G ran on QBL only on late nights and weekends, essentially replacing the V during those times. The V was a weekday only train. This was because of the 63rd Street Tunnel Connection, with the addition of the V service and adjustment of G service coinciding with it.

Same

@@TMC_BC don’t forget the G didn’t run to Forest hills rush hours🗿

its bc there are trains running every 3 mins so its alot of traffic and when its rush hour the station get packed

Offering weekend service in Brooklyn too would be a God send.

I'm glad that you enjoy learning about the NYC Subway system, and I plan to continue to create informational videos to give more information on our interesting & unique transit network.

I agree, the R40/M's performed way better on the B!!

R68As should only run on local lines

@@qjtvaddict they work well on bmt broadway but not anywhere else I mean like those cars and their howls but the speed is a turn off which I why in contrast I love the r179s and even the R68s are decent but those R68As aren’t it

@Versatile Wolf NWO definitely on a good day it can be fast especially coming uptown it just all comes down to that 59th street junction and the Dekalb exchange

Neither, however, I do have family who is in the MTA. I've gotten a lot of my information from them, other operators, rail enthusiasts, and just searching stuff up and riding the trains myself. I am glad that you like my voice though.

@@MysticTransit Well your knowledge of the subway system makes me feel stupid for still needing an app to figure out where to go in this city I've been living in for all my life 😅

Honestly, I think it’s more B-tier because of the bad connection to other lines it crosses

The (Z) is useless. tbh, I should've left it out the video entirely.

The longest used be the cc it ran local 8th Ave between Mott Ave to 168th street bx. It was stopped around early 90s . The cars that ran on was r10s which were awesome

@@robertnussberger6449 i agree for a short period. And the line that operated in every borough with the greatest amount of stops. However It was the "E" from 179th Street to Far Rockaway before the A was extended and the "E" scaled back. It had the longest mileage.

@@qolspony the cc was in operation since the opening of the 8th Ave. The e was not called the e until 1976. It was the kk. The cc was operating 60s 70s 80s early 90s bx to rockaway

I know it is hard for someone to imagine the "A" not being the primary service along Fulton Street and the Rockaways. But that is the way it was back than. YOU CAN'T CHANGE HISTORY! EVEN IF YOU TRY! Anyway, not only the "A" was a supplemental service, it is what today "C" train is. The "E" was Express Manhattan's 8th Avenue, Brooklyn and Queens Blvd. But that still does not affect it mileage. Its just that because it was a TRUE Express it wasn't as hard on train crews. So..... The next time you see the "E" train, please remember the train that has done it all! "Since many Rockaway riders were dissatisfied with having rush hour service provided by local trains, starting on November 3, 1958, four morning rush hour E trains ran express via the Fulton Street Line from Euclid Avenue, two from Rockaway Park, and two from Far Rockaway. To make up for the loss of local service along the Fulton Street Line, four A trains began making local stops.[6] All E trains began running express and all A trains began running local to Euclid Avenue on September 8, 1959.[20][39] On June 6, 1960, three E trains started originating at Lefferts Boulevard in the morning rush hour, and three E trains began terminating there in the evening rush hour after complaints from riders.[40][41] Shuttles between Euclid Avenue and the Rockaways, which had not been assigned a route designation, but often were signed as E trains, were labeled HH trains on February 1, 1962.[6]"

I don't know why this post got removed. But yeah! The "E" was the first train to the Rockaways. "On June 28, 1956, the Long Island Rail Road's Rockaway Beach Branch reopened as the IND Rockaway Line after being converted for subway service,[34] and E service was extended from East New York to Rockaway Park or Wavecrest (now Beach 25th Street) during weekday rush hours. During non-rush hours, service was provided by four-car shuttles between Euclid and Rockaway Park or Wavecrest.[35][36] Three weekday E trains leaving 179th Street between 6:54 and 7:27 a.m. were cut at Euclid Avenue, with one half of the train running to Far Rockaway, and the other half going to Rockaway Park. After the end of the morning rush hour, several trains terminated at East New York, before going back into Manhattan-bound service before the afternoon rush hour.[6][37] On September 17, 1956, rush hour E service was cut back to Euclid Avenue when Rockaway service was replaced by the A train.[20] The A and E later switched southern terminals again, and on September 8, 1958, the E began running to Far Rockaway and Rockaway Park during rush hours, with some trips terminating at Euclid Avenue. During weekday off-peak hours, separate shuttles operated from Euclid Avenue to Far Rockaway and Rockaway Park. At the same time, round-robin service began during weekend and late night service, because of the low ridership at these times. These trains would run from Euclid Avenue to Rockaway Park, and then reverse and run to Far Rockaway, before returning to Euclid Avenue.[6][38]: 216  On October 11, 1958, round-robin service ceased operating on weekends, being by replaced by shuttles running from Euclid Avenue to either terminal in the Rockaways. Round-robin service continued to operate late evenings, late nights, and early mornings. From October to June, round-robin service started at 6:40 p.m. leaving Euclid Avenue, and from June to October, the service began at 9:44 p.m. from Euclid Avenue.[6]"

Oh, nice idea! If this video does well, I'll strongly consider that idea.

Godly:R32s, r11s/34s, redbirds, r40s, r42s

Godly: NTT Decent: R68/46 Garbage: R42/32 cause it can’t handle some tunnels R62A also trash

@@qjtvaddict how do you have two of the longest running trains in the system as garbage?

Take this like

The old 8 3rd Avenue Elevated line definitely needs to come back and the Pelham 6 line definitely needs to be extended to co op city mall barto Bronx. The Flushing line also definitely needs to be extended to Bayside Queens and the 11 trains to 20th college point whitestone in Queens.

The MTA were supposed to do that in 1958 but it was shot down for some reason. The three track alignment would have had made express stops at Cypress Hills, Woodhaven Blvd, Queens Blvd and 168 St

Well, it's finally here!

G not going to Jay St. is no big deal, IMO. You get the A/C ad Hoyt-Schermerhorn and the F one stop after that at Bergen. The biggest thing for the G should be the return to Forest Hills. Court Square connects you to the 7, E and M trains, but it is a hike underground.

I actually take the (4) very often on Lex. The (4) is frequent. The Crackheads/Homeless (in my experience), are only present on the (4) in Harlem, which the (4) has 1 stop in. I think the (4) deserved to have a high ranking. As for the (3), I've taken it into Brooklyn, from Junius to 148 St, I was on it recently, it was fast, and came relatively frequently.

I don't think it is the most interlined. It has 3 (E, M, G). N, A, D, M also have 3.

Much agreed. The F is terrible

The F is so unreliable and hardly shows up even though it’s a heavily used line.

I get you man dat shits crowded as ####

The 4 train is my best friend man the 7 too

@@assonance9057 tbh I prefer the 4

@@NYer8301 the four is lovely

@@assonance9057 IMO it’s the best

4 IS SO DAMN LIGHTNING FAST IN ALL BOROS

Damn, did the dude live?

@@robotx9285 not sure but the paramedics took him away. he most likely got his leg amputated.