Fueling planes is almost as easy as fueling your car.

if you know what your doing that is @@robertsmith-zz7ot

why visa and not Mastercard?

Hi 🙋‍♂️ there is this a easy job ? and do you get good payed for it ?

It's easier to just drive straight in and out. No maneuvering. Also you're potentially blocking other ramp staff that need access to the aft cargo compt.

Talk to *_Allied Aviation_* in San Antonio, TX. They're currently hiring aircraft fuelers .

it's a rough job i'll tell you that much. especially in arizona

Agree. It speeds the up the process. However, it also introduces clutter. Clutter is less safe. Thanks for the video. Nice Job. 👍🏼

Most of your smaller CRJ and e170-190 ground out at the panel

@@georgeeaves219 Thanks most if not all fueling was on wide bodies DC-10- 747-767-777-A340

I noticed that as well. I was a Boeing fueler in Renton, Wa. I put the fuel on around 200 737 max

It's nothing top secret

Transport category airplanes are refueled before every flight in 99% of cases due to weight

There are chocks, they are just small

Neither, likely If he's performing this job in Canada, then it's probably in kilograms. You should watch the documentary on the *_in_*_ famous_ Canadian Gimli Glider incident. Math can truly save lives !

Him grounding the fuel truck to the plane.

Keeps everything in one place, faster setup and takedown. I do the same with Embraer jets.

@@alial-faesly2902 I guess it varies from company to company. We aren't allowed to do that here

yes

Yes it is. Gotta keep pressing it or it stops pumping

Looks like Ontario to me

yup

No, it’s a dead man’s switch

both. One is the deadman (black) and the other the ground/bound cable (yellow)​@@smiteaccount666

It can carry up to around 19 tons

I’d hate airbuses when all tanks including both ACTs needed to be full, talk about longest fueling yet. I swear, it was faster to pump a 767 with 10k gallons of fuel, than a a321 with 4k gallons of fuel.

Hated the airbuses they always turned off on me😂👎🏽

727s fueled really fast too. You really had to eyeball the gauges.

There's only one spot where southwest wants that ground cable and it ain't where you put it LOL.

i feel you, those airbuses take 6 dark ages to fuel. at my local airport, for example, a lot of transatlantic flights have been switched from a wide body over to the a321neo for fuel efficiency. most of them are taking around 6000-7000 gallons. it takes so ridiculously long to finish fueling them. boeing, although having major publicity issues now, are much better to fuel. depending on the truck, most a321s fuel at around 190-240 gpm. compare that to a 737 which fuels at 400 gpm, or a 777 at 800 gpm. the difference is insane!

coz there are instructions and special place for it, it's not sure if landing gear on 737 Max electrically connected to the whole plane.

@@s.i.m.c.a yes there is an approved grounding point on the 737 max behind the landing gear on the fuselage. In the video it’s a trip hazard

​@@s.i.m.c.a Why would Boeing change a grounding point for one series of the same aircraft???

Because you want your conductivity path as close as you can to the point of static transfer to prevent arching.

@@falconwings wrong, the bonding cable is insulated so can’t arc

I think its receipt paper