Hey, you have a LOT of pornographic bots spamming in ur comments. Can you deal with them?

Not something he can really do on his own. Everyone reading the comments needs to report them and KZfaq will take care of them. @@LightSpeedFury01YT

​@@d4rk0v3He can ban the channels from commenting

​@@d4rk0v3They may seem like a lot of the different channels, but most of them are the same

Thanks for sharing all your interactions with the FAA. Some constructive feedback, maybe it's just the acoustics in my room, but I had a very hard time understanding the faa agent with the voice changer. Might consider adding captions to calls like that in the future and possibly using a pitch up instead of down? I had to go back a second time with the audio louder and even then every 3rd word was incomprehensible to me, though auto generated captions helped me get the gist of the conversation. Thanks for your great content!

Its a very popular hobby these days. Unfortunately

@@Bendejo-lm8wo unfortunately you are correct.

Seeing the world burn seems to be a popular hobby these days

I have it on good authority the Karen who reported tucker was a class D douche bag

I mean, the complainant seems to be trying to keep people safe and did not know that Tucker had the preapproval to fly off camera. Seems like a very valid complaint to push through the proper channels. I'd only gripe if the person is persistently filing complaints with an obsession, like some sort of stalker.

Pro tips

Im a retired Airfield Manager, and Airspace coordinator... hes correct. Not many know about the initials!

@@dkkids I work at at joint use range with Japanese controllers. It's hard to understand the accent sometimes, but yes, we always exchange initials. We normally deal with just RApCon.

In short, the FAA inspectors are gone for the holidays

Hey Tucker, pay attention to what 747Max (great plane BTW) said and what you can learn from it. 747Max stated info from training. Tucker, go get an actual pilots license and you would know what 747Max knows. ATC is there to make you safe. ATC is NOT law enforcement. ATC is a service provide for safety. An FAA inspector's work can result in revoking a pilot certificate. If you are trained, you would have known all of this and WAY more. The training will make you safer. Your lack of training makes you a danger to yourself and others, because you are not aware of what a dangerous situation is. PG=lawn dart. FYI - two days ago, I almost hit a flight of 2 PGs. I missed them by about 30 to 50 feet by putting the plane on a razor edge in a climbing turn. The plane was in a decent, flying at 170kts or 195 MPH at 5,000 feet and 4,000 feet agl. A PG is too small to spot until you are right on top of them. Does that near miss sound safe to you? The executed climbing turn was not fun for the passengers or myself. I do not know if the turbulence from passing so close caused issue for the PGs. I did report it to ATC that there are two PGs flying on the approach path. PG=lawn dart. You are one person, that has a voice. How are you going to use your voice? Are you going to work at being a bold pilot or an old pilot? I encourage you in the same way I encourage myself every day - do better, be safer. Flying is no joke.

@@daleyoung87 It was you, wasn't it?

​@@bmorg7244I think it was him, he's made several comments lol

​@@BarryEffinGibb It's not a trend, it's been around forever: Just ask Rod "Imagine, if you will...." Serling

@@BarryEffinGibb Imagine thinking the word "imagine" means anything other than postulating hypothetical situations for the purpose of examination and interpretation.

Why bring it up at all?

​@@wfemp_4730bringing awareness to the subject matter

​@@wfemp_4730Well, he is a content creator who makes a living off of it. So why not continue bringing up every time he's been reported? People like these videos, obviously lol.

@@timstephens5893 That's really my point. it's been done before here, and IMO it's only for clicks.

He is indeed a content creator and as his reach and popularity grows the scrutiny also grows. Just because he doesn't share every detail of his planned flight via social media doesn't mean he isn't covering his bases legally. The video is essentially acknowledging and schooling the man that reported him. While also holding some educational value for the viewers. It's also hopefully deterring future Karens/Carls that are eager to alert authorities. I understand what you're saying though. I follow car channels that film constant interactions with police and it's starting to wear thin.

These aren’t regular dudes . These are military personals

He is intervening military airspace

Even though I hate these trolls in reality. These agencies work for us, and we have a right to make a report if we have a concern. But I do agree with your sentiment. I don’t feel these trolls have legitimate concerns related to aviation. They are related to Tucker specifically.

Maybe for repeat complaints from a single person.

@@HelloDonkey9 that does make sense

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆

That’s exactly what I was thinking 😂 When he said “He Tucker how been man? Loved you last videos man!” 😂😂😂

He mentioned that the video doesn’t mention he had permission. So it’s understandable the reporter thought it was a violation.

@robertgary3561 with all due respect, that's silly. When people watch Tucker videos we don't need to know exactly where he is flying and all the details of the permissions he got. The audience is watching for simple entertainment. Trolls like this who have gobs of free time to try to be the police without being qualified to do so is the cancer of our society. If he was really that concerned he should have called Tucker and asked him if he had permission rather than waste a bunch of people's time and tax money reporting a violation when there was no violation. Or call that airport and ask if there was permission that day. I dont think it's an outrageous idea to respect people's time and tax dollars. I'm afraid to make my own paramotor videos for this very reason and it's frustrating. You shouldn't have to worry about being accused of doing something wrong constantly when you didn't.

Yeah, fine it with ~ $ 200 if it‘s obviously a false report and it‘ll stop.

They had a good reason, Tucker just had it covered

@@Fawkes42 though this guy whoever it was was pretty determined to report him. i don't think was for altruistic reasons personally

@@mikerusby I never said he was in the right, but after what I assume was hours and hours of searching, he found a good reason

​@@daleyoung87the FAA says it's cool, so idgaf what you think

@@daleyoung87I think we found the loser who reported him. 😂

Thats exactly where my cat lays on the couch!

That cat has been seen on other videos teleporting in or out. Go cat.

It was quite clear enough for me

Thank you sir. ☺️

Yep, they're called VFR sectional charts. You can find interactive online versions, or they're about $10 a pop for a dead tree.

In all fairness, as you pointed out, the video didn't make clear that prior authorization was obtained. I agree that reporting to the FAA is overkill, but a comment to you perhaps to consider including this information on the video and future videos might help avoid others from watching and then trying the same thing without prior authorization, potentially causing some issues. So, I think the reporter had a fair point but I disagree with the reporter's approach.

nah, that's a quick way to getting sue'd... even if you win, that's still time that could have been put to better use.

@@1978sjt complaints to the FAA are public knowledge man. It's a FEDERAL AGENCY lol... It's called a FOIA REQUEST. Did you pass civics class? www.foia.gov/how-to.html

It's Photoshopped.

I couldn’t understand a single word of it. I didn’t see the need to disguise his voice.

The controller in the tower ordered a slice. He was hoping Tucker had a margarita machine as well.

People like this have too much time on their hands when they aren't running their Nazi-HOAs and making their neighborhoods a nightmare.