Richard Feynman: The Beauty of the Flower

  Рет қаралды 183,709

FreeScienceLectures

FreeScienceLectures

17 жыл бұрын

www.FreeScienceLectures.com
This video is from 1981. The interview is also the subject of Feynman's book The Pleasure of Finding Things Out.
I have a friend who's an artist and he's some times taken a view which I don't agree with very well. He'll hold up a flower and say, "look how beautiful it is," and I'll agree, I think. And he says, "you see, I as an artist can see how beautiful this is, but you as a scientist, oh, take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing." And I think he's kind of nutty.
First of all, the beauty that he sees is available to other people and to me, too, I believe, although I might not be quite as refined aesthetically as he is. But I can appreciate the beauty of a flower.
At the same time, I see much more about the flower that he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside which also have a beauty. I mean, it's not just beauty at this dimension of one centimeter: there is also beauty at a smaller dimension, the inner structure... also the processes.
The fact that the colors in the flower are evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting - it means that insects can see the color.
It adds a question - does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower forms that are... why is it aesthetic, all kinds of interesting questions which a science knowledge only adds to the excitement and mystery and the awe of a flower.
It only adds. I don't understand how it subtracts.
---
It's Never too Late to Study:
www.FreeScienceLectures.com
---
Notice: This video is copyright by its respectful owners.
The website address on the video does not mean anything.
---

Пікірлер: 118
@Dispatern
@Dispatern 3 жыл бұрын
I'm both a scientist and a photographer/artist and I can only agree with what Feynman states here. There's beauty in observing and there's beauty in finding something out.
@leif1075
@leif1075 2 жыл бұрын
Do you have a website for your artwork? Cool what kind of scientist are you?
@Dispatern
@Dispatern 2 жыл бұрын
@@leif1075 I do have a website for my art but I haven't updated it in years. I'm studying Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. I'm seriously thinking about leaving science though.
@leif1075
@leif1075 2 жыл бұрын
@@Dispatern ohncan you share your website please if you don't mind..inlove to look at art it's therapy for me..I was studying physics and try to write music..may I ask why you might leave science?
@Dispatern
@Dispatern 2 жыл бұрын
​@@leif1075 I can share some art with you but not the outdated stuff on the website. When I say outdated I really mean it. I just checked it and the most recent post with a painting is from 2013. :) I used to love art, too. Now I see the art in nature (gardening!) and photography. I haven't painted or drawn in a longer while because of a lack of time. I have a few reasons not to work in science/ not to work in a lab. Wow, physics and music, that's cool! What kind of music if I may ask? Kind greetings!
@leif1075
@leif1075 2 жыл бұрын
@@Dispatern what's wrong with outdated? I'd still love to see it....I like old things .a.re you embarrassed by them or something lol? The music is mainly solo piano ideas but unfinished..I can share with you but it's incomplete and I'm a little embarrassed by them..
@wonderouswonderloo
@wonderouswonderloo 13 жыл бұрын
It's funny how he mentions a flower. Siddhartha Buddha once said, if you truly realize the beauty of a flower, you will throw your head back and laugh at the sky. Feynman seemed to have done that :)
@Matthew-ut6ed
@Matthew-ut6ed 3 жыл бұрын
Perfectly and succinctly put as to why scientific knowledge has its own beauty
@PleaseDontTakeMyShoe
@PleaseDontTakeMyShoe 11 жыл бұрын
You are beautiful Feynman.
@Megalilalol1
@Megalilalol1 7 жыл бұрын
jiji exsdi
@abbybluecovers
@abbybluecovers 4 жыл бұрын
I see these things all around me, it makes the world a million times more beautiful than it already is
@AL_THOMAS_777
@AL_THOMAS_777 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah Abby - and for that it just takes t i m e. But what are folks no0rmally craving for ? Just more money money money. See the point ? The true wealth is the spiritual one. Once upon a time I sat beneahthg a tiny brook listening to the weaterflow for some hours. And I said to myself: Hey what the heck do I need m o r e ? I do n o t need ten ore one hundred of these. And why yes, you bet: this wonderful afternoon has been more golden for me than a ton of r e a l precious metal !! N a m a s t e !
@rictheis
@rictheis 16 жыл бұрын
Feynman just happens to be one of my very favorite physicists, and I love his manner of explaining physics ... thank you for this video clip.
@pleximanic
@pleximanic 4 жыл бұрын
Beauty is in the mind of the beholder.
@adrienlenud
@adrienlenud 3 жыл бұрын
- Agnes Martin
@1man1bike1road
@1man1bike1road 3 жыл бұрын
my favourite scientist of all time, hes sadly missed by the world today
@MrJimboLang
@MrJimboLang 11 жыл бұрын
This guy is a boss.
@gabrielmaddern6070
@gabrielmaddern6070 6 жыл бұрын
Phoria - Red :)
@oregonduck307stein4
@oregonduck307stein4 6 жыл бұрын
Gabe Maddern omg thank you so much. I was about to lose my mind if I didn't know the song with it
@gabrielmaddern6070
@gabrielmaddern6070 6 жыл бұрын
Thomas Steen you are most welcome
@materac440
@materac440 4 жыл бұрын
Yup
@matchley500
@matchley500 3 жыл бұрын
Precisely
@willsketchesmusic
@willsketchesmusic 16 жыл бұрын
I'm a scientist and my girlfriend's an artist. I thoroughly enjoy art and I believe similarly to what parispeter2 says that developing both sides (artistic and scientific) is very important and deepens and enriches one's understanding of both subjects. The only problem with art that I can see is that as a scientist I can expect to see regular paychecks whereas it tends to be a lot more volatile with art. :)
@fretherdjently6159
@fretherdjently6159 9 ай бұрын
As a child I wanted to be a scientist, in my teens a musician. As an adult I see that I was always both
@quantacosmos7277
@quantacosmos7277 3 жыл бұрын
Favourite of favourites
@LordMalice6d9
@LordMalice6d9 14 жыл бұрын
Richard Feynman is awesome!
@kristine8338
@kristine8338 2 жыл бұрын
A flower is alive and knows action and you can help it grow. An Observation of a flower you gives a silent food to the human soul. Even during the night they are beneficial to insects and butterflies.
@dank8981
@dank8981 11 жыл бұрын
Kudos!
@Enigma758
@Enigma758 11 жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@MrMnoorist
@MrMnoorist 12 жыл бұрын
Proof that word Brilliant should be sacred in human discourse. It should only be bestowed upon those who make the actually make help people understand the inner workings of nature. The elegance of his explanation is remarkable.
@waskithowee8885
@waskithowee8885 2 жыл бұрын
fabulous app brings me here.
@parispeter2
@parispeter2 17 жыл бұрын
Or as Umberto Eco put it: "gynaecologists still fall in love with women". But art is also interesting because it's about HOW we see things, not about how they are in themselves i.e. it makes us think about how we look at things and people and why, and THAT is also fascinating. Neither art nor science is superior, and we need both.
@lippalma4661
@lippalma4661 3 жыл бұрын
Science is to feed the left brain, and art for the right brain. Feed both to tame the lions.
@Raison_d-etre
@Raison_d-etre 16 жыл бұрын
I'm not a very artistic person, so I see more beauty in the sciences than in the arts. I get more enjoyment out of physics. I know everyone doesn't agree, though.
@casacara
@casacara 3 жыл бұрын
I think both are worthy. Art and science are nothing without eachother.
@Raison_d-etre
@Raison_d-etre 3 жыл бұрын
@@casacara I didn't say art wasn't worthwhile.
@asadzmann4761
@asadzmann4761 2 жыл бұрын
Sinence is beautiful math is beautiful. art is meh
@shanmantv
@shanmantv 6 ай бұрын
Its possible to love art and science at the same time!
@prabhakarv4193
@prabhakarv4193 5 жыл бұрын
Great scientific personality.
@mbar128
@mbar128 16 жыл бұрын
I totally agree and I'm of a scientific personality.
@lordtoranaga
@lordtoranaga 13 жыл бұрын
I concur. I do not see where science subtracts from beauty.
@kurtkennedy333
@kurtkennedy333 4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know where I can find the full interview? I see clips on here from time to time, but would love to watch the full thing.
@barash3603
@barash3603 4 жыл бұрын
This interview is from a BBC program called "Horizon" and the episode is titled "The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, Series 18 Episode 9". If you happen to live in the UK, you can find this episode on BBC iPlayer; if you don't, this may help you narrow down your search.
@Reorte
@Reorte 3 жыл бұрын
@@barash3603 Ah, when Horizon could find a genius and point a camera at him and let him talk, without flashy graphics or exciting music.
@psibarpsi
@psibarpsi 2 жыл бұрын
Surely you're _very interesting_ , Mr. Feynman.
@FranFerioli
@FranFerioli Жыл бұрын
Most of the physicists I know are quite artistic types. Definitely more than us engineers
@frozenrats
@frozenrats Жыл бұрын
I disagree. Engineering is design, design, design sprinkled with a lot of math, physics, and suffering. Physics and engineering are very closely related, and I see similar types of people in both.
@CarlosElio82
@CarlosElio82 Жыл бұрын
I contemplate a tree. I can accept it as a picture: a rigid pillar in a flood of light, or splashes of green traversed by the gentleness of the blue silver ground. I can feel it as movement: the flowing veins around the sturdy, striving core, the sucking of the roots, the breathing of the leaves, the infinite commerce with earth and air-and the growing itself in its darkness. I can assign it to a species and observe it as an instance, with an eye to its construction and its way of life. I can overcome its uniqueness and form so rigorously that I recognize it only as an expression of the quantum law-those laws according to which a constant opposition of forces is continually adjusted, or those laws according to which the elements mix and separate. I can dissolve it into a number, into a pure relation between numbers, and eternalize it. Throughout all of this the tree remains my object and has its place and its time span, its kind and condition. But it can also happen, if will and grace are joined, that as I contemplate the tree I am drawn into a relation, and the tree ceases to be an "It." Buber, I and Thou
@parispeter2
@parispeter2 16 жыл бұрын
My feeling is that everybody is potentially artistic and scientific, and that our outlook becomes more complete if we develop both sides. Personally I'm more artistic (emotional-imaginative?) but I've profited from finding out more about science and thus developing my scientific (rational-imaginative?) side. I would add that the philosophical-spiritual side, which deals with the search for meaning, also makes up the complete personality in my view, and should not be neglected.
@tigweldNY
@tigweldNY Жыл бұрын
What are you up to 15 years later?
@petercoville
@petercoville 11 ай бұрын
@@tigweldNY I'm giving guided tours around Lisbon and writing a book on social and political values in the 21st Century. I took part in climate activism and the Occupy movement, met my partner and had a son, who is now 8.
@dave1741
@dave1741 5 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know the full interview for this?
@drewduncan5774
@drewduncan5774 5 жыл бұрын
www.dailymotion.com/video/x24gwgc
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
how can you say that when the issue of a passive observer is very relevant to the discrepancy between objectivity/subjectivity? I do agree that consciousness isn't the cause of the wave function collapse but i dare say that finding out whether a passive observer "exists" indicative of some sort of objectivity
@ballroomrescue
@ballroomrescue 9 жыл бұрын
Is this material free to sample ( working on a album ) would love to cut it up over a knocking track or two
@6884
@6884 9 жыл бұрын
Bertrell Smith hehe same here man... I don't know but I would have a go anyways. These are such great words it would be a shame they weren't spread as they deserve
@catonthehowlingmoonrecords9529
@catonthehowlingmoonrecords9529 8 жыл бұрын
+it's 6884 Just use it man - trust me - if you ever get into trouble just say - there is no copyrighting a single electron.
@stevenvanhulle7242
@stevenvanhulle7242 4 жыл бұрын
Late at the party, but I think it falls under "Fair Use".
@radiusalias7096
@radiusalias7096 2 жыл бұрын
100%
@shiz777
@shiz777 12 жыл бұрын
I wonder what Feynman would've said about qualia
@9one9Music
@9one9Music Жыл бұрын
🌌☯️🌌
@OmniversalInsect
@OmniversalInsect Ай бұрын
My response to people who claim that a materialist worldview is cynical and lacking in beauty.
@ILoveBlackMetal100
@ILoveBlackMetal100 12 жыл бұрын
@Ostgrindarn doubt is natural in the human mind, it gets us to interact with others more, and interacting is one of the basic instincts of a human being
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
It isn't EXACTLY like studying religion, i'll admit and retract that because i misspoke - but the two are similar in their search for truth and explanation. One who studies religion (being all religions and not just one that he/she believes in) is searching for explanation and truth of how the world is - and bringing that back to the self. With the development of quantum physics, passive observer/measurement problems, we also see a sort of connection between science's search for objectivity
@rafaelpereira5575
@rafaelpereira5575 2 жыл бұрын
Phoria - Red brought me here
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
well, for example, there is a religion that says time does not exist. It acknowledges that time is a construct used to measure things that are immeasurable for the purpose of giving humanity comfort of order, but it distorts our perception of the truth. I think if we're talking about things that describe the world, first you have to realize your description of religion is too narrow, and second, realize that "feeling good" and trying to predict the world are both aiming for the same thing.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
Inductive reasoning maintains that if a situation holds in all observed cases, then the situation holds in all cases. Does this make any logical sense to you? If it does, something needs to be called into question.
@9one9Music
@9one9Music Жыл бұрын
Alan Watts, talked about prickles and goo. Richard was a goo person, his friend was a prickly person. ☯️
@alecLogan
@alecLogan 6 ай бұрын
It sounds like the artist was critiquing clinicality, under the presumption that ‘science’ breaks things down to hard facts, rather than a myriad of queries and discoveries.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
Eastern cultures nowadays are western mostly - when I said hinduism has god i misspoke. They do have gods, but hinduists do not concern themselves with creation stories at all. Gods in hinduism die, which is why i put "god" in quotes (since they are not the same as our conception of god), which is also why "God" with a capital G is emphasized. You didn't read what I read right. I'll speak to the logic part later
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
like you said, it takes experiment and the search for appropriate mathematical formalism, both of which rely on induction trumping other means of "reasoning," but under what basis? for instance, a = a and b = b in Math. why? Does math reflect nature? Or does nature act according to math? Science barely addresses the question of why when it comes to fundamentalism and universe origins. And I don't see any logical reason why physics is more viable than any other operating worldview.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
1) philosophy =/= religion 2) You can definitely apply one to another. In fact, I'd say that one has a larger scope than the other. Even religious scholars can't even truly agree on what religion is, but it is definitely a much wider thing than you seem to think it is. We aren't talking institutionalized religion at all. 3) To be able to make the claim that they do not overlap and cannot apply, you should qualify it. All you did was say what physics was concerned with, and then say phil=phil.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
Like someone said, why is the most annoying question in the universe. Why do we want to predict the world? Why should we even use science? Why would we ever want to describe the world with induction?
@joethespo
@joethespo 2 жыл бұрын
This video has been edited in a somewhat dishonest manner. In the original video, transmitted on Horizon (BBC UK) Feynman's artist friend goes on to explain exactly why Feynman's reply is deeply flawed. The artist friend explains exactly how "it subtracts" But this has not been included here.
@jimb9063
@jimb9063 2 жыл бұрын
Not in the 'version' that's currently on the BBC Iplayer. This is the very start of the Horizon interview. His artist friend doesn't appear in it anywhere. How is it deeply flawed btw, what did the friend say?
@joethespo
@joethespo Жыл бұрын
His artist friend said he regretted using the example of the flower, and wished instead he'd used the example of a beautiful woman walking over to Richard, and bearing her breasts. The artist then pointed out - correctly - that Richard would NOT have thought that examining how the nipples had evolved to suckle a child, in any way "added" to the beauty. Sorry for the late reply
@Luzt.
@Luzt. 5 ай бұрын
@@joethespo I would say that the artist simply lacked an instrument of perception or cognition which the physicist had. He would have to become a physicist of Feyman's posture to be able to tell. I stand with RF.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@ThereIsCake no. that's just such a wrong way of seeing it.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
Induction limits nature in that you will only be studying nature under the lens that what you observe and what you can test is what is. There is no logical basis to say that induction by itself is a valid way of observing the world. There is indeed a contrast between the assumptions required to study science, but to STUDY religion you do not need to assume anything in particular. To BELIEVE in religion is something different. Do not mistake the two.
@Mr.MP10
@Mr.MP10 5 ай бұрын
Surely you're joking Mr feynman
@flamingemu
@flamingemu 13 жыл бұрын
Feynman's friend must be a pretty cruddy artist.
@pubuman
@pubuman 12 жыл бұрын
Also, how does the assumption that induction holds, limit nature?! That makes no sense at all. There is a marked contrast between the assumptions required to study religion within its philosophical context and science.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
texts, and the world under the context of this philosophy, applying it to everyday life and the theoretical, testing the philosophy and furthering development of the self in search for an objective truth - almost all of the previous things stated are parallel to scientific endeavors, which are in place to try to find a "truth" or "truths," and a way of understanding the world. Don't tell me i'm ignorant, especially when you haven't even provided a way for me to relate to your knowledge.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
at any rate, what i truly want to say boils down to this: there is no such thing as science vs religion as operating worldviews. perhaps institutionally they may butt heads, but an individual participating in studying both will usually find them complementary. The search for an objective understanding, is subjective in its endeavor. You really can't say anything like, physics > religion, etc. The fact that you still wear clothes is indicative of religious resonance playing into society.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@ThereIsCake Fact of the matter is, studying science is almost exactly like studying a religion. This whole God thing, remember, is almost a purely western conception - so try to keep your mind open about how the existence of nature came into being. Neuroscience has revealed a lot about the connections between external stimuli being preinternally defined via single cell neurons, which actually strengthens the God argument in some ways, if you look at it with respect to subjective reality theory.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@Mu5clehead I'd like to see you prove that. 16 billion dollars in bonuses given in 2010. Check the numbers. Some people are just passionate and curious about getting more money. (I think that's most people actually). Whether its beautiful or not remains to be seen
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
As to studying science being similar to studying religion - yes, they are not EXACTLY translatable. However, the fact of the matter is both rely on fundamental systemic "logistical" systems that require a "leap of faith," in that logic has no logical basis, etc. When you study science, you're assuming induction is real/workable, and therefore limiting nature - the same is of religion when you undertake the fundamental assumptions of its operating philosophy. To study religion, is to study the
@ILoveBlackMetal100
@ILoveBlackMetal100 12 жыл бұрын
Flowers are beautiful, why? Seriously, "why", that is the most annoying question in the entire universe.
@stevenvanhulle7242
@stevenvanhulle7242 4 жыл бұрын
"Why" is a question for philosophers, not scientists. Sure, you hear the word all the time, but more often than not they actually mean "how".
@pubuman
@pubuman 12 жыл бұрын
The assumption that induction holds is not a leap of faith that is at all analogous to the leap of faith required for an assumption that religion true (or real). Science requires empirical evidence that is independently verifiable, religion requires no such thing. If it were ever shown that induction does not hold at all, then science would have to abandon it. Furthermore science is falsifiable, religious ideas for the most part are not, especially since there is a habit of goal post moving.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
i never knew being too abstract meant that my argument was suddenly invalid. Why should I keep my philosophy out of physics? Now you're just being silly. I do agree with the Galileo thing, but saying physics is the best candidate for an accurate description of the way the universe operates is definitely not a viable statement.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
i'd appreciate it if 1) you did some research and 2) you provided logical backup to your claims. It makes arguing much easier. The God thing is a western conception - India, China, Tibet, Japan and the like do not concern themselves with creation stories and "gods" in those areas (at least back when religion was more prominent) obeyed similar mortality rules to humans (similar to Greek Mythology except they weren;t immortal). The easiest examples are Buddhism/Hinduism/Daoism, which have no "God"
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@ThereIsCake matter of fact is that you simply just don't know enough. Maybe if you studied a little more in school you might have taken a metaphysics class or even a high level physics course (probably Quantum intro) that actually acknowledges that science and logic have no fundamental logical basis, except the assumption that induction is a valid way of seeing things. There are entire wikipedia pages on this. Cmon man Anyone who denies this is delusional. I hope you can learn more someday.
@parispeter2
@parispeter2 15 жыл бұрын
So do you think you have nothing to learn from others? Or that they have nothing to learn from you? What you say implies that there is no such thing as shareable wisdom - something that I know is not true because I have learned a great deal from authors, though I wouldn't have chosen the ones you mentioned, but rather Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza and Nietzsche. Of course we have to relate their lessons to our lives, but that doesn't mean they - or the living wise - have nothing to say to us.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@ThereIsCake I'm sorry you feel that way. But I'm even more sorry that you can't see your own fundamental way of seeing the world falls under the same category. Your beliefs are antithetical to what you just slammed. So, as you said, please refrain from discussion of such.
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@ThereIsCake Stop thinking of it in terms of better and worse. You're looking at beauty in the sense that its creation is something wonderful, effectively separating, something Plato referred to as true immortality, from the wonderment of a possible creator. The complex nature of science and god are both just that - complex. Seeing one being better than the other is some silly modern conception that scientists and religious folk can use to have claims to elitism.
@kedarbarak
@kedarbarak 14 жыл бұрын
@Baphomet3110 Isn´t it quite naive to suspect yourself of being completely untouched by the influence of other people? I believe only autistic people are so unlucky to live in the state of total mental independence... On the other hand originality is very important, but I don´t think it is a matter of internal powers alone. Any relation would be pointless then for a "really original and creative" personality, wouldn´t it?
@parispeter2
@parispeter2 16 жыл бұрын
Don't forget philosophy :)
@flumpyhumpy
@flumpyhumpy 4 жыл бұрын
Which Feynman described as "dippy". :D
@1man1bike1road
@1man1bike1road 3 жыл бұрын
its a dead science
@Kbiz178
@Kbiz178 9 ай бұрын
Criticism of Romanticism 😂 shortly
@kirbykidsmith
@kirbykidsmith 12 жыл бұрын
@ThereIsCake Again wrong. You've accepted rationality as the fundamental workings of the universe, which is already flawed. That you think you have actually found a system that explains everything is completely delusional, especially because the system itself upholds the theory that a system cannot be consistent and complete. Not only this, but you cannot prove the foundations of logic - they require fundamental assumptions about the nature of things that is inherently illogical.
@Raison_d-etre
@Raison_d-etre 15 жыл бұрын
Anyone going into science for the money is deluded.
@1man1bike1road
@1man1bike1road 3 жыл бұрын
anyone going into anything for money is deluded
@pubuman
@pubuman 12 жыл бұрын
Er ... the fact that you think Hinduism has no god, and the fact that you think Eastern cultures don't have creation stories is a prime example of your ignorance. What exactly is a fundamental systemic "logistical" system? Logistics refers to "the detailed coordination of a complex operation involving many people, facilities, or supplies" - If you are going to use unnecessarily superfluous language, at least learn what the words mean!
@cerevor
@cerevor 10 жыл бұрын
It's less the what than the how. That's all.
@michaelsmith1262
@michaelsmith1262 5 жыл бұрын
What bothers me about this clip is this man said "the flower's colors evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it". That's not how it works. Natural selection is random mutations that are passed on because those mutations assist in the survival of that organism. The way he says and the way most people say it, the mutations are voluntary in order to make the organism survive. That takes away the random chance aspect of selection. How does a scientist make that mistake?
@waltmagic
@waltmagic 5 жыл бұрын
Are you being serious?...He wasn't making that point and you're being quite ridiculous if you interpreted it that way. The flowers' colors DID evolve to attract insects. They (the plants) didn't make a conscious decision to do so but those mutations over time expressed colors never-the-less because animal life developed eyes (very early on I might add) and could see color. Geez lighten up...I mean the guy was one of the most brilliant theoretical physicists and mathematicians in history and well known for his humility...
@stijnnevens2963
@stijnnevens2963 5 жыл бұрын
Because otherwise you live with footnotes the whole time. Don't get me wrong, you are 100% right. But we all use these kind of shortcuts every now and then. That does not mean we don't know or understand the deeper layer beneath it. And yes, it is sometimes unfortunate or plain incorrect.
@theresaanderson2922
@theresaanderson2922 5 жыл бұрын
I would add his notion is not true unless the scientific knowledge is deep, sustained and not merely descriptive. Dabbling in scientific description and knowledge leads to simply prosaic descriptions using scientific terminology -not very unsatisfying.
@pubuman
@pubuman 12 жыл бұрын
That's utter nonsense ... studying a science is not exactly like studying a religion ... and the God thing is not a western conception, that's pure ignorance.
Richard Feynman - The World from another point of view
36:42
mrtp
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
THE FEYNMAN SERIES - Beauty
5:11
Reid Gower
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
HOW DID HE WIN? 😱
00:33
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН
I Can't Believe We Did This...
00:38
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 76 МЛН
Каха ограбил банк
01:00
К-Media
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Children deceived dad #comedy
00:19
yuzvikii_family
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
The Power of Flowers | Lewis Miller | TEDxCharlottesville
15:35
TEDx Talks
Рет қаралды 28 М.
On religion
2:42
Richard Feynman
Рет қаралды 474 М.
CNN, Feynman and the Challenger disaster
11:50
vsrr83
Рет қаралды 627 М.
Lessons from my Father - Richard Feynman
11:41
KK Baidoo MInistries
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Imagination, Physics, Fire & Trees - Richard Feynman
6:44
chasefukuoka61
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Richard Feynman. Why.
7:33
firewalker
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
Richard Feynman - Problem Solving Methods
14:24
Muon Ray
Рет қаралды 624 М.
On teaching
2:58
Richard Feynman
Рет қаралды 381 М.
Feynman: Take the world from another point of view (1/4)
9:01
Aaron Scher
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
My family Orchestra groups performs
0:10
Super Max
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
POR QUEEE DIVERTIDAMENTE !!! #shorts
0:15
Figuritalo
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Cute ❤️🍭💕🍕🥛🍧🤣
0:11
Koray Zeynep
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Which water gun won??
0:30
toys AS
Рет қаралды 83 МЛН