Oh he very much knew. Because he acted exactly the way someone like him would act when told to act. It was atrocious.

he was the best part of the movie

lol this joke has yet to get old for me

@@brockparaf97 literally everyone is making this joke even before the movie was released

You’d think the cameras were a giveaway

T2

🤣🤣🤣

and looking instead like he has a toothache.

Ron De Santis style smile.

Yeah I dont know why he doesn’t like Connor’s character when he adds to the campy aspect so much

i had ambivalent feelings about connor. he was really fun, but also he couldn't turn the act off... it woulda been cool to see conor pull off something naturalistic

@@greghuffman3061that was my take like 85% of the time his craziness works so well it's camp and funny but i wish it was toned down in serious moments a bit

Was looking for this comment! Agree

Yea every time I watch a Stuckmann video these days I question why I just watched it knowing id get nothing from it

Forced ad reads are a plague. I pay for no ads and get stuck with this shit.

@@MegaUtube99 he's sold out now. Greasing the machine now he's part of it.

I miss the old Stuckman!😞

I’m pretty sure the writers of Family Guy will at one point in the series make a joke about the remake

Is Family Guy still airing?

Took the words out my mouth

@@santos8468 Yeah

​@@LeonardoHeredia-hz7wxand they'll be smart if they get Jake to reprise the role.

Lol

I agree

Yeah it was a fun movie to watch especially a little trashed lol

The hate's because it's another mediocre 80's movie that simply can't be remade to the satisfaction of people who think that mediocre 80's movies are as good as cinema ever got. The Critical Drinker is one of primary reasons that 80's nonsense and naked cash grabs are now considered the new golden age of film. It's nonsense but, then again, it's the Critical Drinker.

@Malt454 so you prefer cgi, poor chemistry, and the fact that authentic dialogue and creative writing take a back-seat to the overt push for diversity? The main actress literally came out and praised the diversity in film. An Asian man was shoved into the script for 20 seconds just to complete 'race bingo'. I'm surprised I didn't see an Eskimo at some point.

There are two characters in the film named sam and ellie.The closed restaurant when he first walks up to the book store is also called the double deuce. Just a heads up.@@Drstone-ys6we

I thought he was gonna be the dad locked up in jail but that plot line went nowhere, unless there already eyeing a sequel. 🤔

Who’s that?

Patrick Swayze cameo would have been fun

Sam’s moustache would kill the henchmen.

He is one of the main reasons the film is absolute dogshit.

I agree, his introduction was funny af.

I hated him. 😂

i feel like im the only one who has mixed feelings about Connor. on one side, his "acting" was so fucking corny... he couldnt turn thr act off. but when it came to the actual action, he was fun and made a formidable villain

I think a good compromise is to accept he's not a good actor, but he's an entertaining actor. Kind of like pro wrestlers.@@greghuffman3061

That’s exactly how I felt about it lol

Yeah like couldn’t have put it better myself

Sounds like it did it's job then . So maybe it isn't a critical darling, but it is good.

I had such a great time it was a perfect movie

Its that film 100%

Looney Tunes forever bro

Exactly the description I couldn’t articulate!!

Dude! great way to put it!!

Bull's eye! On point!

Bruh! 🤦‍♂️🤣💀💯

Lmaoooo like bro he disnt have to f crash but he did 😂😂😂😂

Hahahaha Conor played himself an it was funny, Conor was brilliant good work g

If given a completely different title, no one would have watched nor would be talking about it because the trailer wasn't good enough to get me to watch. My brain kept saying to itself, "I wonder how it'll come to the original?" So I watched... Well, I suffered through ten minutes. I then moved on.

You did not. It was awful.

I also did, sorry for having an opinion ​@TheShepdawg9

It was awful, it had no atmosphere. Only good thing were the fights.

@@TheShepdawg9movie was fun y’all jsut love to be negative little Karens offended by every single little thing in cinema that isn’t like fucking the god father

Conor made the movie interesting at least. He makes a fun villain

Ungh.. McGregor was terrible. He can't act for shit and his lines were written by a 10 year old.

I mean the original is shit lol

@@gabe3134 the original was a typical 80’s action movie. Not going to win awards, but still entertaining.

@@skoolynugenator1802 80s movies sucked

@@gabe3134 that’s like, your opinion man.

He could carve a career out in acting yet because he’s got screen presence and is funny as fuck even though he clearly can’t act at all. I hope he does more stuff, who knows maybe some day we’ll see a Batman film with a crazy Irish joker played by McGregor 😂

totally.

I really liked Conor McGregor in this movie 😂❤ But overall such a passable movie at best!

He wasn’t acting they did give him lines of dialogue they just gave some lines of coke

Me too! I don't think I've watched a trailer this many times before. And I'm someone who didn't care for the original at all and had no interest in a remake at all. I seem to be one of very few that found this one to be far more entertaining. I really enjoyed it, I actually found Knox to be very entertaining and wished he had more screentime. I was sorry when it ended.

Exactly what it was, knew what it was and was very fun escapism

Only a throat chop

​@@eugenew6717 and also It was performed on a random henchmen instead of the main antagonist

@@TheDRODORidk, it kind of mirrored the original, he ripped the throat out of the henchman that tried to kill the old man he was friends with. Similar to this henchman and his friend at the bookstore.

Wasn’t that replaced by breaking the henchmen’s hyoid bone and trachea?

@@louisvilleslugger6806 Ya it was cool. But not AS cool. Ya know?

Which video?

i like how before throwing that kick jake said "it's *ROAD HOUSING* time"

You can skip it..?

Agreed that sucks ... But understand that it's a condition when a video is *sponsored* also very little of the KZfaq ad revenue goes to creators so they have to supplement their income.

Pretty sure that was not CGI. The alligator was though.

@@ethanweeter2732the fight scenes were definitely enhanced with CGI - it was used to make it look like the fists were connecting

I thought it was a gator. But it was cool to see a crocodile in a movie about fighting.

I thought I was the only one that caught True Detective vibes from his character in Prisoners... That would be incredible

Legend❤

I think they asked if he could write the score but he was still dead.

I think they gave a weird (maybe unintentional) nod as you hear the first line of "music is blind" or something like that. It's just too much of a coincidence.

The music did suck.

Same here

hah really??

this guy is way too kind to dogshit movies

No. We’re not.

@@AeroDude73why are you even here then dude?

@@jlev20 😂

He lost the right for reviewing until he reviews Madame Web PROPERLY. Thank god for adblockers

Yeah, and he wasn't afraid to review either of them. Pleased to see he was able to muster up some bravery.

Conor is naturally funny and charismatic. That's one of the reasons why he got popular

Agree great comment. I would rather watch these kind of fights than those of John Wick.

@@sebastianvella8992John Wick's fight scenes are brilliant. The issue is everyone is trying to emulate it and it doesn't always work out the same way

@@sebastianvella8992 John Wick is pretty the pinnacle of action scenes Post The Raid, IMO. They've managed to craft 4 incredible movies without losing a step. My comment about John Wick was precisely because it's so good that there's a lot of action scenes trying to emulate it, which can things feel samey.

I love John Wick movies, but those fights are very unrealistic and heavily choerographed@@LightningRaven42

Pretty much every Bouncer trains MMA. Plenty have fought pro or amateur too. Like that's usually an important criteria for bouncers.

@@okay1775 Yeah, I get that. But Dalton was “nice….until it’s time to not be nice…” All Bouncers might be trained in MMA, but not all MMA fighters can be bouncers. They never hinted that the new Dalton had any insight into resolving a problem before it happened. Swayze’s Dalton did.

@@okay1775 it's not about the fighting, there is a way to handle a situation in a bar, club and such that gets the issue removed from the establishment and handled outside or deescalated. I had family that used to work in those types of places. The portrayal of Dalton at least gave that presentation of how to handle things rather than just a fighter who's asked to keep things under control in a bar without knowing the ropes.

@@Samuraith2077 Yeah and what happens when things go south? Obviously bouncers are there to de-escalate through talk mainly but you've still gotta be prepared. That's kinda why learning MMA is seen as a requirement. It gives you more tools so you can de-escalate situations efficiently.

@@okay1775 You're missing the point entirely. No one is contesting the MMA training. What they're saying is that in the original film, Swayze's Dalton was a professional with years of experience in the bar industry. He wasn't just some homeless guy that was formerly a UFC fighter with an anger management issue. The fact that Gyllenhaal's Dalton was a former UFC fighter did not automatically make him a good choice for a bouncer. This movie missed on every level. It was so bad that it makes the original look like a masterpiece (which it definitely was not). The only scene worth watching was the first fight where beats the crap out of those guys then drives them to the hospital, which was kinda funny. However, Secondhand Lions did that concept much better with Robert Duval beating up the group of thugs and then taking them back to his house to tend to their wounds and give them some advice on being a good person.

Actually told him to camp it up though 😂, seems a lot of people didnt get that memo though haha

Conor said he did every take different and gave them a ton to work with and they seemed happy. Conor himself thought his best takes weren’t used. He didn’t say that word for word that’s the impression I got from an interview he did.

There is still just how much he likes it, a-hole.

And still you are watching and helping out with engagement by commenting, awesome :)

He was playing himself

Then it sounds like she wasn't that much a fan of the original.

oh my god, he does!

Confusingly, the film is terrible.

He’s not

@@danbh84 dude his portrayal of Dalton was weak, very half hearted, and with poor cheesy jokes added in. Swayze at least put in some effort to do a part.

@@Samuraith2077 i treated the new one as a wacky cheesy version. But yes Swayze of course was better

Swayze would have loved this.

Ghost 2 - Ghost House

True story. People are getting dumber and dumber every day.

What’s that? People just like to be entertained? That’s not much of a revelation especially considering it’s an 80’s remake. People liked being entertained back then too.

@@nunorocha2601it’s a remake of friggen Road House! Were you expecting Shakespeare? It’s entertainment for entertainments sake released on streaming. Anyone who can’t enjoy a simple movie like this, I honestly pity them.

@@TheJaker5 one thing is entertainment other thing is mindless entertainment. And that is what this abomination is. But if you like it, good for you and no one has nothing to say about it.

What happened?

​@@okay1775 Chris doesn't review bad movies anymore since he's becoming a director. It started with the Madame Web and now he won't address the backlash for it.

He doesn’t criticize movies anymore. The very thing he made his name doing. He doesn’t want to step on any studios toes or burn bridges w industry people so that he may one day get to work with a big budget company. All respect to that, and I’m not saying anything bad about him I respect him and what he has to do ….. but still sad to see

@@johnymashedpotatoes8264 So, he sacrificed honesty for career opportunities?

The writing on the original was not that great. Cannot argue about the casting with Sam Elliott as Wade Garrett though

It had 80s charm though, and people remember it and think of it fondly for the most part. I don't think anyone will remember this but I could be wrong.

That's the thing The classic Roadhouse I can remember all the lines and all of the scenes for good or bad. I don't remember much about this new movie at all nothing stood out.

Thank you. I have no idea why others here seem to rate it

I went back and watched the 1989 movie again to find the "silly and over-the-top" that critics are talking about. I also didn't find it. The 1989 movie took itself seriously.

Critical Drinker ❤