xD

🗿I found u again

Nope

Lmao

You have a translation

Positive landing, no flare. Best to cope with these conditions.

​@@apogaeum4313a no flare would be pretty hard maybe a little flare

That was not a hard about that landing. It was a bit firm, but not hard. When are people going to learn that a smooth landing says little about a pilot's skill. There are 100 other things to judge a pilot on but all YT does is judge from a pilot's landing. As a passenger, I actually like firm landings, I always remember them.

Shut up ya nonce

Ikr 😂

ILS

ILS has nothing to do with landing good. ILS provides lateral and vertical guidance from a localizer to keep your glideslope onto the runway intact. It still takes a lot of skill in multiple other aspects.@@ThorfinnKarlsefni1

@@ThorfinnKarlsefni1is a manual landing auto pilot disengage

@@hasithapriyasad see on the console you can see cat 1

@@ThorfinnKarlsefni1 cat 1 means manual landing. You can also hear the autopilot disengage.

That wasn't hard, it was a bit firm. There is a difference. Even it this was in dry weather conditions, it would have been fine.

I mean if you look at the sink rate the landing was about 400fpm which is hard but at the rain it's good to land a bit harder as you said, so all on all a good landing

@@bread23334maybe it was due to the speed? They were pretty slow, looks around 130-135kts - once they retard the throttle I’d imagine they would start falling like a brick, damn near stall speed. Might’ve been done purposely to ensure they land early and avoid floating and using too much runway in wet weather

​@@taboo0aircraft may have been light

the "five" callout does not necessarily means that it will be a smooth touch down, in fact in this video it proves the opposite, it is less than half a second from "five" to touchdown meaing that vertical speed was very fast at landing. it certainly was a rough landing

In wet conditions it’s easier for a smooth landing…he forgot to flare😂

I was looking for this comment to see if anyone would realize this. And it’s the captain filming. May not have been the one landing but still!

Beautifull❤

2 white and 2 red means rhey fine right

@@beanz5508 right on the glide slope, always a good angle of decent 👍👍

​@@rmaxwell3294wasn't it 1 red and 3 white? Not 2 red 2 white

Flaring a bit too early at 50ft is my conclusion, the wind was pretty much below 5kts so I can say this

RETARD (the thrust levers 😉)

It’s real life genius.

your compilations are nothing short of stupidity and reusing content that's not yours

Finde ich auch!

there's no crash lol

@@mci122 what does that mean? Does there have to be a crash for a situation to be difficult for the pilots? No! Do you know anything about flying? Clearly also no!

@@Crystal-be9ze no unless you are riding a boeing lol (non-sense joke)

That's no butter landing, dangerous. In this case you need positive landing to avoid hydroplaning

Better have your mental health in checked because it's a very stressful job

@@caribbaviator7058I don't suffer from illness, blindness, or poor eyesight. Don't worry.

Too realistic rain for Microsoft.

Yes, they must to relax after that, and 3 beers. Professionals.

Even if it was dry it would have been perfectly fine.

Exactly.

실제입니다. 채널 운영하시는 분은 멕시코 기반 항공사에서 A320 운항 중이신 기장님이세요. 영상 보니까 아마 티후아나 공항 랜딩 장면인듯 합니다.

As always advised in such weather to avoid aqua planing.

Richtig, positive Landung. Alles gut.

Autoland is only utilized for CAT III ILS landings, it's unnecessary if it's just rain, cause the pilots are trained to hand-fly in such a situation

Ага

this is real life...

Bro that is real life not MSFS

@@aero3831 real?

also they're loud as hell

😐

😐

It's a manual landing, autoland is only used on CAT III ILS landings, basically zero visibility landings

It's an ILS CAT I. Look at the minimum.

You think so?@Terminator-

Nope, that is not high pitch. Look at pfd, he did not go over 5. And that is not slow. Its pink, he was on managed speed and its auto thrust on and there is no violent speed vector trend. He didn’t pitch up enough to reduce fpm to around 400 from 700 at 50. And he kinda let go after 30, instead of keep flying the plane and offset 8 seconds of nose drop by pitching up. (Im typed in a320) But its perfectly fine landing. It was centerline and in touch down zone. Smooth landing is 3rd priority.

you ever hear that when you land (specifly on the Company)

that "five" callout does not necessarily means that it will be a smooth touch down, in fact in this video proves the opposite, it is less than half a second from "five" to touchdown meaing that vertical speed was very fast at landing. Quite a rough landing indeed.

At ours, positive landing was even standard procedure in any conditions (4eng turboprop).

Man. Dont be a heater😒 is that all u do?

Calm down bro.

That was a -400FPM landing lol. It was definitely a hard one

@@blumac9801 and in person, the landing probably felt incredibly hard. The video makes it look smoother than it really was

Reverse green

For real. Very unprofessional

Sometimes I feel like people forget GoPros that can be strapped to your chest exists.

Nah that was perfect for the conditions

id like to see you try better

A positive landing, if the pilots tried to land smoothly, there's a chance the wheels would hydroplane reducing the braking power of the plane

One of our aircraft (4eng turboprop) tended to land hard on port mains. We never found out, why.😂😂