Sorry tory rory, wenger has more of a right to have input in a game then someone who got bullied by Ian Beal

No matter what you think about the “day light” rule it is soooo much easier than what we have now.

Jennings is a clown 🤡

Offside is the only VAR rule that works. There's no issue with it. So I don't get why you guys think it sounds like a good idea. The only issue is they take 25 years to measure it.

This was the offside rule previously. There always had to be daylight between attacker and tye 2nd to last defender including goalkeeper. This is how it was

I like this rule. Rory speaks nonsense a lot of time. Am beginning to follow him less.

I slam the decision for keeping Rory on talk sport

We are still going to have the exact same issues as we have with the current rule. The only difference is we will now be arguing over whether or not there is a fraction of daylight between the attacker and defender VS arguing about whether or not a fraction of the attackers toe is beyond the defender. Marginal decisions will still exist. I don't see how this rule change fixes anything. What does it improve ? My concern would also be that teams would end up setting up their defence deeper than they do now to counter the increased threat of fast players getting in behind due to the rule change..

People who say all this does is change the lines need to study the offside rule a little more. It will give the forward an advantage and save time with VAR. When a forward makes a run his head or chest would be much further forward than there own back foot. If any part of the back foot is behind any of the defender then they would be onside. Defenders would suffer from it though as the forward has more room for error when making a run.

Love the idea of daylight. Actual advantage over having a toe off side. Let’s do this now

Rory : "sack poch" *Poch getting sacked* Rory: "what are they doing? They sacked pooch!? How could they"

Ugh, who put this guy on the show again? Bro dont know what he's on abt.

The whole daylight rule all depends what angle you watch it at 😂 If i was a defender i would not like this rule. Teams will just defend deeper.

6:32 that's why automated offside is better but leagues are too greedy they don't want to buy it

Close games are more entertaining than one team getting battered. A hard fought 2-1 is more entertaining to watch than a one sided 5-1. The fact football is a low scoring sport means each goal really matters. In other high scoring sports, basketball for example, they score so often it’s barely worth celebrating when they do

How about the rules don’t change. But instead if zooming and lines drawn. Just a still image, and if they look offsides they are, if they don’t then they aren’t. We don’t need microscopic, frame rate, shutter speed and incompetence of officials drawing are not good enough.

What happens if its a night game?

Scrap VAR altogether and put those VAR refs on the sidelines to use their eyes and check offside the old school way.

It's a good rule, If you don't like it then you are own your own

I have no idea why people make this so complicated. its the way the offside is policed that is the problem not the offside rule. Players dont have goggles with lines to see if he has gone a millisecond early or is 1 cm offside from a player 30 yards away, while all the time looking at the ball being played from behind him and shaping his run. So, VAR gets to look at the replay 3 times at normal speed, and perhaps once in slow motion, and if you cant tell if he is on or offside, then the forward has done his job to perfection and is considered onside. This would make it fair, sligthly in favour of the forward,realistic to the spirit of the game, and crucially quicker to police. come on save the game

wenger's proposal for offside is the best version of offside, so of course rory doesn't like it lol these fool are just afraid if evolution and progress

Change it from a throw in to a kick in

What is "daylight" in terms of offside? It will just be the same. Let's just have a referee, 2 linesman and a 4th official and what they give stands, regardless of whether it's 100% right or not 🙏

Disagree it will make defenders defend more. It could make defenders run forward when an opposing ball is played so they can get daylight between them and the striker

I'm pretty sure a few seasons before VAR came in Refs were using the 'daylight rule' to call offsides then it stopped when VAR came in now someone's elbow can be offside

The new offside is insanity.. im an arsenal fan.

TalkSport producer: Rory, we know every week on the Club you bang on about bringing the daylight rule back for offsides back but can you pretend to not like it so we can get a clip? Rory: Of course, who needs integrity anyway?

Rory is finally right deep defences = less goals

Rory is capable of saying a lot of really dumb things in such a short space of time. He says this new rule "encourages negativity". First it's not a new rule, it's the way offside was ruled for decades. The offside rule being slightly tweaked would have very little bearing on the way players and teams defend. Then he brings out this banger "football is not about entertainment, it's about winning." And then this one, "the priority shouldn't be the neutral viewer," as if the FA only want United and City fans to watch the FA Cup Final. Then he torches his own argument by saying "we need to remember that the offside rule is there to stop goal hanging, but has now become the Frankenstein of Football." Yeah bro, because we have these silly lines and players are offside by a nostril. So what's your bloody point anyway?

Does Rory think before speaking 😂😂😂

What about 4 linesmen, 2 each side the pitch,

You could write what this guy knows about football on the back of a postage stamp, if Rory says it wouldn’t work that’s a sure fire sign it will work and needs bringing in asap.

Rory is correct. Offside law doesn’t is simple

VAR should only be able to intervene 6 times a game. And that between referee requests for var and var intervention from the booth. If every one knows it’s can only be used 3 times a half, they’ll stop checking everything and save it for very important decisions.

Great idea

Best offside ammendment EVER!!!

Tell me what this guy doesn't slams😅😢

I get it if you don't agree with Rory but some of the comments I'm seeing are utterly horendous. Sure he does have some outlandish takes but just because you disagree with him does not mean that his arguments are invalid.

So many problems to fix in football. Why try and change something that will get better with tech?

Rory Watch your mouth when you bring up Le professor.

2:13 you mean you, and most of talksport

L take. whoever says the proposal is not more natural and fair doesn't know ball. i can tell this soft estrogenated kid never played ball. it would not make it easy for attackers, it would just more consistently punish defenders for the the things they get punished for anyway. goals should not come primarily out of mistakes and penalties like they often often do now.

What happened to the blue card

Once again Arsene trying to justify his massive salary.

Wenger a principal turncoat bruv

Is Rory a disability hire?

Nonsense.

How is this guy still in a job?

Who's Rory Jennings !!!!!!!

Premier League refs will still find a way to truck it up!

Rory again proving to know nothing. The difference between the current rule and "daylight" is literally a couple of inches. It simply makes the rule clearer to judge on; in no way does it change how a team defends. It's inches

The reason it will save time with VAR is because the forward has more room for error. If you play as if the rule has not changed, you will be onside more often than not and obviously more clearly.

Completely removed offside from the game

rent boy jennings

Rory the 🤡

Ridiculous. How is ‘daylight’ defined then?? More goals won’t make the game more entertaining because the value of a goal gets diminished. The sport is almost perfect as it is, biggest and most popular in the world by far. There need to be no more rule changes and tinkering.

time for wengr go old folks home

Fully agree with Rory.

It doesn't make it more clear though, there are still gonna be subjective/unresolved situations. leave it out arsene!

Wenger is the most overrated manager in Premier League history. Here's why; - Arsenal are a big club, and he only won 3 Premier League Titles in 22 years. - Wenger only reached ONE Champions League Final despite having 22 attempts. - Wenger only won the Premier League whilst it was a 2 horse race 98, 02, 04. As soon as Chelsea came along, then Man City, he won 0 Premier League Titles. - He was apparently famous for finding unknown talent for cheap, which he did with Henry, Anelka etc. Yet as soon as the stadium was built, Wenger FAILED to repeat this, and the stadium was blamed for him not winning the Premier League. Why couldn't Wenged find the next Henry, Viera etc during the stadium building years? Oh, yes, he couldn't handle a Title race that was more than 2 horses. - Wenger actually went 9 whole years with ZERO trophies. - Big clubs are measured on winning two things. Domestic League Title and Champions League. Nothing else. So, yes it was good for Wenger to win a few FA Cups, that isn't the ultimate aim of a big club and a so called world class manager. - Apparently Wenger invented fitness, diet and nutrition. Big Sam was already using sports science and nutrition in the 90s, whilst he was in the lower leagues. - 1971 - 1995 was 24 years BEFORE Wenger. Arsenal won 3 League Title and 0 Champions League Titles. 1996 - 2018 was 22 years (almost an identical time frame). Wenger years. Arsenal won 3 Premier League Titles and 0 Champions League Titles. Did Wenger really improve Arsenal? Or did he just win what the club had already been used to wining in an almost identical timeframe. Yes, I know. The Truth Hurts.