When the Serbs shot down the f117 in 1999, they said, sorry, but we didn't know it was invisible. They shot it down with a system that was produced in 1961, the S125 NEVA system.

Russia is wining in Ukraine even though is fighting against all NATO . 40 against 1

This guy has no clue about military aircraft. He should be commenting on Mickey Mouse cartoons.

Ф-117 был сбит старой системой ПВО СССР. Страшно подумать какие самолёты США способна сбить система С-400! Россия сила!

Оружие России самое хорошее в мире и у нас есть вера и дух!!! Слава России 🇷🇺💪

A couple of Su-57 aircraft, turning on the turning on electronic warfare flew near the US base somewhere in Europe, the air defense system could not notice them, in order to show their presence, the pilots deliberately turned off the electronic warfare system, which the ground services were shocked...and later they complained to the Russian Foreign Ministry that the Russian pilots behaved brazenly, thereby shaming the air defense systems of NATO and the United States

You really don't know anything about the SU-57 and yet you put up a video supposedly analyzing it.

and I also want to add that the Ukrainians themselves shared videos they filmed of a Su-57 attacking targets in Ukraine, but the most interesting thing is that American radars were never able to detect it!!!

My friend, please 🙏 don't confuse the Soviet Union with Russia. They are 2 different things. I don't understand why u Westerners do that, us Africans the rest of the world, don't do that

Очень глупо сравнивать, пытаться выяснить что лучше Су-57 или F-22. Почему глупо? Да потому, что это машины разных концепций с разным техническим заданием. Это не конкурс, и уж простите, но стерильных дуэльных боёв этих самолётов в реальной жизни не будет. А на поле боя всё зависит от множества факторов. Письками мериться глупо. Для адептов сверхнизкого показателя малозаметности F-22 хочу сказать только одно, включите голову и хоть немного погрузитесь в тему. Есть профильные статьи и целые учебники по радиотехнике, селекции, волнам и т.д. Супер оружия не существует, любую технику можно уничтожить, вывести из строя и даже сделать так, что она полностью потеряет актуальность. Такова жизнь.

F-35 is crap, how many lost by now without a fight? SU-57 is 2 times bigger, better armed, faster and more maneuverable. Russians also have missiles of much longer range then any western aircraft, up to 400km while western max range is 200km. And you are right about MIG-25 but he was fallowed by MIG-31 that broke many records, and does not even have western counterpart, not to mention the SU-27 that just humiliated western competition of that time. And in UA their is no need for that type of aircraft, UA air force has been destroyed, SU-34s and 25s are doing most of the job from the sky and MIG-31 occasionally firing Kinhzal hypersonic missiles.

Do you know which country had developed the thrust vectoring system? It was developed by the USSR and plans were sold to the US when Russia at that time was going bankrupt. So, the Russians have been ahead in innovation. The only thing holding them back was making money to do the things they would like to do.

So many armchair generals in here calling SU-57 Russian junk just because its not tested/combat-proved, that may be true and that’s why we cannot compare these two. What about F-22 and F-35, these two are proclaimed to be the best in the world just because they are tested and have real combat missions against weather balloons and Afghan barefoot peasants living in caves armed with rusty AK-47 and half century old RPG-7s. Last time US Air Force faced formidable air defenses (Vietnam), they lost more than 10,000 airplanes. Now, is it US junk or is it lost planes just operated in hot environment where opponent actually was able to shoot back and defend itself.

This guy doesn't seem to know anything about fighters at all. "This is a big aircraft", duh.

For your information, Russia is a liberal country, only the energy and arms sectors are nationalized. It is thanks to this that a liter of gasoline costs 0.50cts and a 152mm shell costs $600 yours 155mm 6000$ an f35 100,000,000 and a su 57 37,000,000 too much corruption. your manufacturers do not compete in reality it is a cartel which shares the contracts

твой F 35 всего лишь копия советского як 141, живи теперь с этим)

The western proxy war in Ukraine against Russia has proven the west have a huge problem because of their private military contractors; that being that they can't complete against Russia and similarly China when it compares to production. Russia's strategy is Ukraine has seen the west empty their munitions coffers and be unable to compete with Russia's sustained rate of fire. The extremely long durations to replenish western munition stocks says it all. Secondly nothing the western has put forward against Russia has been a game changer; Russia was able to neutralise any perceived advantage quickly with its electronic warfare systems. The west would lose in a war with Russia, and that doesn't even consider the nuclear munitions; against the combined forces of Russia and China, the west will be destroyed, because there is no way they could ever match the combined production of both Russia and China..

Есть такой анекдот:- " Американцы спрашивают у французов, когда лучше нападать на Россию, те только не зимой, ну французы у немцев, когда лучше,- те только не летом, спрашивают у Китайцев, те говорят - сейчас, а по чему? Да они сейчас байкало-амурскую магистраль доделают, космодром "Восточный" тоже, плюс магистраль к нам тянут, им ох как пленные нужны...

Your fighters are only good in the movies, and the Russians are battle-tested.

Yes it has been used in Ukraine and has shot down a MiG-29. Radar is stronger then F-35 and carries longer range weapon then either F-22 and F-35. Main reason everyone thinks su-57 is 4th plus gen is because of the round engine in the rear but same people ignore f-35 has even a much larger heat attractor then the Su-57...so shouldn't F-35 by that standard then be one below Su-57?? Su-57 can supercruise much longer distance and time and is the only 5th gen and really any aircraft thst utilizes oxygen from the outside giving pilot the ability to stay aloft longer then any other compared to tanks on F-22 and F-35 that limit their duration. This system is highly secretive and US tried to make it work and nearly killed one of their own F-22 pilots during test...program was scratched and ended- its still unknown how its done. WVR this thing will eat either of the aircraft for breakfast and BVR it will contend easily if nothing else at the very least use all countermeasures closing the gap until WVR is inevitable. Raptor and Lightning fanboys are pretty much simps onlyfans at this point..the countless upgrades Su-57 has gotten now on its final production line is beyond their scope of comprehension, imagination and understanding that they rather stick their heads in the sand hunting for worms

Soviet way was to make highly specialised budget plane. Americans loved to burn money and create planes for everything with everything. Soviets never had so much money and their planes are made for defense.

The F-22's only confirmed kill was an innocent Chinese weather balloon, a balloon that never harmed a soul. Honestly, I'd rather have zero kills on my record than that one. It's funny though.

S57 is made with metal and electronic board from washing machine. This is why the radar see a washing machine in the air, and not a plane.

your lack of knowledge while reviewing it really concerning.

The F22 has never been involved in combat, I wonder why?

Fundamental to the design anything, particularly aircraft, is the design philosophy. US and Nato aircraft are not built with severe cost constraints. The use of technology is very highly valued. The purpose of these is very often offensive. There is a degree of refinement in the products not very highly valued by their Russian counterparts. These carry a corresponding price premium. Very often these aircraft are required to perform multiple types of missions and the compromises required create aircraft like the F35 (Stealth, VSTOL, fighter, ground attack etc) The Russian philosophy is very different- these aircraft are for defensive purposes only. Building an airframe for a high-speed interceptor is different to building one for a ground attack fighter, no point trying to combine them. They are war machines which in the event of war will have extremely short lives, no point wasting resources on unnecessary features. Better to have more specialised aircraft than fewer more flexible ones for the money. Given that most countries today cannot afford to operate more than a token force of these 5th Gen fighters, I suspect the Russians may have a point. Also with regards to missile technology at the moment, I think the Russians definitely have the edge.

Now USA senate say to Austin only 29% F35 WORK RIGHT😀

Россия применяет СУ-57 для атак по средствам ПВО по типу С-200 и С-300, я пока не знаю, применялись ли СУ-57 для атак по ПВО Патриот и другим противовоздушным системам производства стран НАТО. Также СУ-57 успешно атаковал несколько мобильных систем РЛС и РЭБ с помощью новых ракет, которые еще не имеют названия, а только кодовые маркировки.

I wonder if the USA uses f22 or f35 in Ukraine? So why should Russia use the Su 57?

Your British is so British that my monitor started leaking tea and singing Rule Britannia

У меня над домом когда они на параде пролетают, этот их звук ни с чем не спутаешь, это самый лучший звук во вселенной!!!

Я тут смотрю по коментам и вижу, что собрались одни главные конструкторы ведущих авиостроительных фирм 😂😂😂

4:08 State ownership - fun fact, Lake City Ammunition Plant IS government owned and so were the Royal Navy's dockyards. Besides while Sukhoi is state owned, it has to compete against MiG (Mikoyan-Gurevich and Yak, ie. Yakovlev) design bueraus... Or there is the Rheinmetall Hungary, which is partly state owned (see Kf41 Lynx). So, state ownership in itself is not the problem.

F22 and F35 have the Fentanyl problem from US empire.

you didn’t cover SU-57 drones and networking capabilities, I suggest you look into that

Supposedly they were used in both Syria and Ukraine, and supposedly it was undetected by the Ukrainian radars. That is what I read somewhere

A congress report about 1-2 weeks ago highlighted and intresting point about the F35, only 25% of their F35's are flight capable the rest are being serviced or faulty in some way. It was quoted that for every 1hr flight time it spends 18hrs being serviced. The general consensus is the F35 is CRAP.

the F-22 and F-35 have shit themselves and are no longer the best in the world (I still laugh like the f-22 shot itself down with a rocket) the Su-57 at least does not shoot itself down

F22 is the invincible balloon killer.

The main thing that gives the su-57 an advantage is the long range missiles, they have over double the range of anything F35/F22 can fire. Plus these missiles can be guided from other ISR assets along the way that have better details of the target. This is something Russia ahs shown with the S-400 systems being guided from air assets closer to the intended Ukraine planes - mean Russia has claims kills at 400 Km from the missile launch point. And these missiles can do more than 15G turns while doing around Mach 5~6. So, the pilot has almost no warning that they will be penetrated without consent.

You ask , why we will see not more? I think , they need in the moment no more.🤔 But i think , they have much more. When the Russian , will, Ukraine was gone , long time ago.. Russia is built for defense.

Дошел до места про миг 25. Спасибо, мне достаточно.

watch congressman gaetz grill DOD austin about the F22s and F35s situation right now...

If you originally was confused about the mig-31 vs the two US 5th gen fighters, you shouldn't be doing this blog and shows how up to date you are. The mig 31 is a 20th century design, non stealth interceptor. The su 57, F22, f35 are stealth combat,multi role fighters.

1. There is no need to build many SU-57s if an upgrade is possible. For what? So that later build as many more improved ones. Today Russia has enough aircraft of generations 4++, 4+, 4. The Americans did NOT risk going into battle with any of these aircraft (with a Russian pilot). They only cry about the “dangerous and unprofessional” behavior of Russian pilots. 2. For real tests, 10 units is enough - they are fighting in Ukraine. Unlike the F-35. The USA has already produced more than 3,500 of these aircraft. This happened despite the fact that more than 700 problems with the aircraft were identified. more than 100 of them are critically lethal for the pilot (Wikipedia). And knowing about the US love to hush up its problems, we can safely say that there are many more problems on this plane. 3. F-22. The only combat use is the “war” against a balloon from China. The Chinese balloon (without resisting) was shot down ONLY AFTER THE 3RD ATTEMPT. The first 2 missiles from the F-22 flew “to nowhere”. Efficiency - 33-34%. Let's return now to the SU-57. NEVER, ANYWHERE, has this aircraft been officially declared as a STEALTH fighter. SU-57 is a fighter with LOW VISIBILITY ELEMENTS. This means that it (unlike the F-22, 35) is NOT completely covered with a stealth coating - only partially. The remaining low visibility is achieved due to the geometry of the airframe. Why did it happen? 2 reasons: 1. Reason: At high speeds, the stealth coating peels off the plane, like skin after a sunburn. Therefore, American F22, 35 pilots are ORDERED to turn on the afterburner ONLY FOR SHORT PERIODS OF TIME. no more than 20 seconds. 2. The main reason. Stealth was fully studied in the USSR. It was revealed that stealth works against radar systems on the 1st frequency range and in one direction. As soon as a stealth aircraft begins ANY maneuver, it lights up on the radar like a regular aircraft. As soon as the radar switches to a different frequency range, the stealth aircraft appears on the radar like a regular aircraft.. Therefore, the USSR refused to develop this direction - no prospects. But... the KGB “allowed” spies from the United States to find out about this “super-secret” development. And then the KGB “allowed” spies from the United States to “steal” exactly as many technical documents as were necessary to interest the United States. As a result, the United States spent trillions on the final development and implementation of stealth. Then they built a lot of these aircraft. If they could have simply buried these days, the result would have been the same. The planes are NOT maneuverable, NOT fast. These planes can do NOTHING against Russian detection systems (multi-band).

The russians gave away a lot of its stealth for its maneuverability, but it still has a lot of features.

Also an answer to your question about Su-57 combat usage: it was used in Syrian campaign for ground strikes and in Ukraine for various combat missions so yes, it has some combat record already. What I find funny though is that Su-57 while being deployed in Ukrainian war MISSED a stationary ground target But achieved a 200+ km kill on Ukrainian Su-27 So it can destroy an enemy aircraft (moreover, a fighter - rather small and nimble target) at extreme range but can't hit a large ground target which doesn't even move Why

It doesn’t matter how stealthy the paint is that fighter jet is so big. It has his own ZIP Code.

The F22 is/was a state of the art fighter jet for its time. It is still an exceptional fighter but no longer state of the art. The F35 is not a fighter jet as we think, it is more of a stealth light bomber, designed to be a platform to launch attacks from. but not to dog fight. Drones and AI kill machines are the wave of the future, manned aircraft are old school.

Warning: Here in the comments are experts in armor, aviation, physics, and strategic battle science

The Russians are using GLONASS instead of the outdated GPS (from the 1970s)... Remember GLONASS was brought to fully working in 2014 and uses state of the art communication. Thats one advantage...

There is no video that proves that the f -22 famous in Western propaganda has had a real combat against another fighter plane, it only exists in movies and video games. The F-22 is fantastic at shooting down drones, balloons and stationary targets, so what will it be like when it encounters a manned fighter jet? Well, this is nothing, while the F-22 uses a missile worth several thousand dollars just to shoot down a 100 euro Chinese balloon. Well, the Russians, by just releasing a little fuel from an SU-27, shot down an MQ-9 Reaper drone worth millions of dollars. When the United States tries to build superhero stories linked to its identity, it is almost always fictional characters such as Captain America, Rambo, Spider-Man, The Incredible Hulk, etc. Let's take an example: we have Maverick with his F-14. . Tomcat, a two-seat heavy fighter from the 1980s, easily shot down not one but two Su-57s, one of the most modern in the Russian arsenal. And what about Rambo, who took out an entire battalion of Spetsnaz soldiers with just a bow and arrow? However, in the end Russia decided to do the same by telling stories of triumphs. of feats. linked to your identity. Unlike Washington, however, the Russians do not need to resort to fiction. 👏🤝

Ну, что я могу подумать про это видео? - диванная аналитика на должном уровне. На последний вопрос, который тут прозвучал, я отвечу вопросом: а где эти а американские F16 и F35? Почему не на Украине? Почему посылают, посылают и никак не пришлют? Ответ на оба вопроса одинаковый. Как мужик мужику: раз уж интересно глазеть на самолётики, так поинтересуйся темой пошире.

One look tels me that it sucks for a stealth plane. Just the engine outlet area alone isn't at all stealthy.

Only 29% of ALL F22 are ready for service as most are grounded due to a slew of technical or mechanical issues. Imagine if you buy an incredible expensive car, and you can only drive it two days a week.

About the fighter. All I managed to know: -It's design philosophy indicates it's focused on defense, and not as an invasive platform, as its design is only really stealthy at the front and somewhat at the side aspects. So it was made to intercep incoming air threats, but it wont be invading enemy air defenses and attacking deep withing enemy grounds unnoticed like the F-22 probably can. -Its stealth is far more advanced than most of the "western experts" have said... I sai this now, because some better simulations have been done on the serial production planes, and the numbers are far better. Cuz you see, the biggest complaint bout this craft, is that it had all those exposed screws and gaps, but those pictures and videos you see of this overly screwed up airfract (no pun intended) was of the prototypes, we've seen the polish on the surfaces of the serial production fighters for about a year now, and people still insist in that argument. Other detail about its stealth, is the usage of composites. 70% of the whole fuselage is made by a polymer-ceramic composite material, the rusians developed much thanks to the indian help. This material is resistent, light, but most importantly it is highly dielectric... I won't get into the very quantum physics aspects of this, but let's simplify saying that it is a great radar absorbing material... which means the aircraft isnt just covered in RAM like american fighters, they are made up by RAM itself. -Other detail about the aircraft is the himalayas EW system... it seems they followed the steps of the europeans and developed a quite decent integrated EW system, instead of relying on external pods like the american fighters usually do. like the JAS-39 Gripen which has 6 AESA antennas dedicated to EW, the Su-57 Felon has 4 AESA antennas on the wingtips dedicated to that. -About radars... well for one, people have to stop saying they're bad because they are PESA and not AESA, because they're now using AESA. the fighter has one main Xband radar on the nose, plus 2 side mounted smalled X band ones, intended to increase angle coverage, as the limit for any AESA is of +/- 60º from the tip of the nose (120º total), with those two it can increas that to about 170º. And the infamous L-band arrays, previously though to be only two, but now known to be for, two on the leading edge slats, and two on the ailerons. Those are primarily foccused on IFF... but if it has high enough definition to IFF, it means it can also detect enemy positions. Of course being a low frequency array, it cannot pinpoint targets as its accuracy is in the dozens of meters. But it can however indicate a narrow range in the sky where bandits might be... why using an L-band array if the X-band can both detect and track targets? Well, the X-band is very suceptible to jamming and stealth... for some rather complicated electrodynamics reasons. Low frequency waves, such as VHF and L-band, have an edge against stealth measures due to the bigger wavelength it resist being deflected away by an aircraft as it wont be hitting just a surface of the airframe, but the fuselage as a whole. To summarize, they need L-band to detect the presence of a very low observable bandit, and then the system uses that data to foccus the X-band radar's wave volume into that small spot in the sky. With more waves hitting the enemy aircraft you significantly increase the chances for enough waves to manage a bounce back, and thus get a track. It' s very hard to see and track an stealth fighter... but not impossible. Still, I don't think the Su-57 is all that much of a leap in technology as the Russian propaganda says so. But Im pretty sure it ain't as nearly as bad as the western propaganda leads us to believe.

The radar cross section "RCS" is nowhere near adequate. It is believed Russia posseses around 10 SU57s around this time. They have been deployed in Ukraine but only by lobbing missiles from well within the Russian air defense bubble. When it did weapons were mounted externally on pylons suggesting the internal weapons bays arent as versatile or straight up not fully functional.

it's so stealth....that nobody has never seen it flight !!! Magical ...

There aren't many SU-57 fighters. Russia has used them sparingly according to the news sites I follow. It doesn't want to risk having one shot down and then retrieved by enemy forces. So, they aren't flown regularly in this conflict. Russia is fighting against a country that barely has an air force and inadequate anti-aircraft systems. Its older planes are more than capable of doing the job.

F22 был супер пока не появился СУ 57 , это рождение легенды планер очень крутой на подходе двигатель а затем искусственный интеллект !

BOT COMMENT

I suspect it is better overall designed than an F-35.... since Russia did the opposite what the US did, i.e. they made only one or two models and rigorously tested it BEFORE mass production considerations, whereas the US stupidly started concurrently mass producing different variants only to discover major fundamental design flaws in the BASIC model! AFTER mass production, thereby making those flaws near impossible to correct without costing additional HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars... design flaws that still exist in some shape or form today....

Russian aircraft companies are part private and part state owned, the state owns the majority of shares but they are still a private entity and compete for government contracts just like our companies in the U.S. do. Contracts means revenue for the company and its employees, currently, for military aircraft you have Sukhoi, Russian Aircraft Corporation Mig, Antonov, United Aircraft Corporation, Tupolev, Yakovlev and others. They innovate just like our private corporations do.

the F-22 and F-35 radar cross section is reportedly about 0.001sqm, the SU-57 is more like a 0.5sqm.

It’s not stealth. On its best day it’s “reduced visibility”

SU-57 ist der beste, wo der jetzt noch ein neuen Motor hat!

The Su-57 is being used right now in Ukraine. If you haven't seen it, it means stealth is working.

Favorite fact. A squadron of F22s could not defeat a squadron of SU57s. …. Because there aren’t enough SU57s to make a squadron. :)

So it just a bluff, like the Armata-14.

About the use of SU-57 in Ukraine, my question is, what would be the target for such a machine there? We might see it if there would be F-16s, but even then there would be no point in using it there unless some live testing is needed.

Its interesting that he should mention the MIG25. The MIG was only ever designed to be a very fast interceptor and not fighter jet in the traditional sense.

They have those only 11. Its not real generation 5 plane, only 4, and has got a lot of huge problems. Too expensive too, what is one reason why so low count of them.

The Su-57 isn't actually a true 5th Gen. The newest version of the F-16 has a special paint job that gives it a similar or slightly smaller Radar signature compared to the Su-57. The only reason it gets away with using the term stealth is because it's stealthier than the rest of Russian jets. Hell the old F-117 has a smaller Radar signature. Also, the big plus it does have with it's 3D thrust vectoring is planned to be removed in order to decrease it's Radar signature. It will either end up with none or just 2D thrust vector like the F-22. Also, Russia is scared to use it anywhere because of the fact it's too easy to shoot down.

The F-35 specializes in flying underwater.

Western arrogance VS microchips from refrigerators and washing machines and Russians high velocity army shovels...😉

The SU 57 definitely has some problems. India was involved in the development and pulled out of the deal due to underperformance not to mention only a dozen have been made and three or four of those at least are trainers.

The SU'57 has a same radar crossection as a P51 mustang.

I explain: F 22. Stealth technology - This science is called "Magnetic Wave Diffraction". Developed by Russian scientists led by Ufimtsev. P.Ya. in the 60s. In the USSR it was recognized as unpromising. There is an American film about the creation of the F 117 where chief designer Ben Rich explains everything. Before this work by Ufimtsev, there was no stealth technology and there cannot be. Disadvantages: These technologies do not cover the phased array radar in the nose. This puck, 1 meter in diameter, screams: Here I am, an American stealth fighter. Fuck me. Therefore, the F 22 has an EPR of 0.3 and not 0.00....... A very thick coating that constantly falls off. Phased radar with electronic scanning - Was created and put into mass production in the USSR in 1982 on the MIG 31. Microelectronics - Lithography using inert gases, which gave the world microelectronics, was the discovery of Russian scientists in the 90s. LPI range masks radar operation under external noise. Was on SU radars up to F 22 for 10 years Difference between active and passive radar array. 1 every cell works. 2 have a common transmitter. The only achievement of the F22 is the engine. Controversial issue. Americans can't even write algorithms for a 3D thrust vector. Conclusion: F22 is crap. Maneuverable crap :) SU 57. You only know the export version. Stealth technology - Coating applied. EPR 0.7. Electronic stealth technologies are also used to create a sphere around the fighter that dissipates any wave frequency. Superiority: Can completely block a fighter from radar radar Disadvantages: It will also block your radar and the fighter will not be able to see. Only alternating stealth signals with radar signals makes it possible to combine these two technologies. Now it’s clear why the Russians use passive array radars. Electronic stealth technologies were developed by Russian scientists in 2005. 2019. Discovery of chaos control of quantum particles in Russia In 2021, the Russian company KRET announced the successful testing of a quantum radar. Superiority: Fully compatible with electronic stealth in 2023, in August, Putin announced weapons operating on completely new principles of physics. In November, an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council was held. Initiator USA. The essence of the problem: A demonstration flight of two Russian fighters took place along the borders of NATO countries. After the takeoff of this pair, they completely disappeared from the radars of NATO countries. The United States has declared the use of such technologies inadmissible. And as always they said that Russia is obliged to transfer these technologies to the world community since they pose a potential threat to the whole world.. That is, the USA :) Deliveries of F 16 to Ukraine were stopped. Engine: “Product 30” has completely passed all tests and serial production of the SU 57 began in January 2024. Not export, but serial :)

the howl of that thing is crazy

"its not always about plane its about the pilot"

😂 Russia saying they 6-10 years ahead ! We built the raptor in the 90s and they have made I think 11 su57 which half aren’t combat capable!

I am asking you for the umpteenth time (and you and others with similar videos): DO NOT compare the SU-57 with any other military aircraft. The same applies to the SU-35. They are a completely separate ranking and can possibly be compared with each other. The remaining SU-27, F-22 (which is not approved by the US Department of Defense), EuroFighter, SU-25, Gripen, F-35, the "Chinese Swallow" or the fastest aircraft in the world named MiG-31, can to be compared with each other. Anyone who has looked at aircraft performance (not on paper) should know this. Especially if you claim to be an 'expert'.

The SU-57 has a radar cross section of 0.5 square meters. That makes it low visibility and NOT stealth. A 4th gen F/A-18 with bare wings has the same radar cross section as an SU-57. For comparison, an F-22 Raptor has a radar cross section of 0.0001 square meters.

The SU-57 has a radar cross section equal to that of an F/A-18E Super Hornet. It's not a stealth aircraft. Up against an F-22, the Felon would get shot down before it even knew it was in a fight.

Russia is 5 to 10 years ahead of us if we were still in world War 2 😂😂😂😂😂😂

government dont cut corners for profit unlike private companies

to my knowledge they used the SU57 in Syria and in Ukraine, however, only on limited occasions. Older units are more suitable for that theater.

No it's weapons and missiles are not 5 to 10 years ahead of the US. Nor is this actually a fifth gen fighter. This is more like a 4.5. The radar evasive paint is not comparable to the US, and if you look closely at the construction of the plane there are hundreds of rivets, where the screws are part of the outside structure which will give almost 10 times the RCS

Yeah, but Russia couldn’t even take over Ukraine and that’s just off of some javelin rockets a highest mar a couple of leopard tanks. Russia lies about their stuff. All they got is manpower to fight wars.

Russia only built 10 TOTAL and cancelled production. 4 have crashed, 3 are. Air show demo jets, and 3 are testing new equipment and “combat ready”. Several of the foreign buyers backed out on order and thst killed the keys production.

SU57 is a beautiful looking bird, I'm wondering how much the last Top Gun film researched it although it was CGI. I believe there are 12 to 14 operational. The old USSR kit was pretty clunky and basic, but some of their modern weaponry has not only caught up it's surpassed some of NATOs capabilities.

Regardless of which side of the war you support, the Su-57 is definitely one of the best looking planes in use right now

Russia has a long history of all show no go. They will say it’s a advanced aircraft but the reality is it falls short

The only safe info I can gave you, is that indeed Russia has been using the Su57 in the back line to shoot stealth cruise missiles, the Kh-69, what would be the analogus (kinda) of the British Stormshadow. Other than that I don't really know it they are using it in air to air combat, but we can assume it's also been used for recon. Ukraine has confirmed they couldnt detect them, but due to they flying farther away from frontlines... they know they are Felons, because they can see where the missiles are coming from, but they cant see what launched them, on the contrary to other strikes made by MiG31 and Su35, 30 and 34. NATO AWACS platforms have reportedly detected the Su57 flying in the past.

не слова про то что п.а.к. ф.а. су 57 имеет возможность вести с собой 4 боевых безпилотника который показали в начале видео

My friend was shot down by an F-22, an old C-25 air defense, near a town in Libya, but he landed on an Italian island.

У меня аналогичный вопрос - с чего вы взяли что техника америки лучшая в мире ?! Во всех симуляторах она проигрывает по маневренности и в целом по разумности применения . Начиная от подготовленных полос взлёта и заканчивая тем что они тяжелые и устаревшие где модернизируется только ракетное вооружение и на него же ставят все карты .. К примеру на дружеских соревнованиях в америки русские лётчики летали на Су 30 против ф15 и их мнение было до того завышенное очень а после наоборот - вопрос поддавались ли американцы для вида или нет будет открыт всегда . Но то что американская техника против серьезной армии никогда не выступала это факт , она бомбила крестьян у которых не было даже ПВО и авиации которая могла бы дать отпор .. Суть в том что к примеру идет длительный конфликт - и какой будет ресурс выработки американской техники - сможет ли она каждое утро доставлять ракеты и бомбы как наша в России . У нас техника работает до такой степени что на хвостах вертолетов и самолетов присутствует серьезный нагар от топлива где даже красные звезды не видно - американская техника всегда чистая и не видно серьезных следов эксплуатации . Те же ракеты сможет ли она выпускать каждый день ибо насколько я слышал они очень дорогие и делают их частные компании малыми партиями . Учитывая статистику по высадке в европе где 415 000тыс американцев убито 616 000 ранено и это только одна италия где было сопротивление Франция особо не считается - вывод на мой взгляд такой что американцы так и не научились воевать они лишь могут осыпать бомбами столицу страны третьего мира , уничтожать людей без разбора . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z6mheshy0rzZYX0.htmlsi=PQjcHgCbK6dOEhQ- Может сравним А10 и Су25 ? Вообще это странные сравнения ибо я еще не видел ни одного воздушного боя ф22 или ф35 "я видел только как они падают и загораются около взлетных полос" где статистика падений из за неисправностей ф22 пугает с 2000х годов и нигде в войне тоже не видел , слышал про то что в ф35 скапливается в кабине конденсат то есть вода а это смертельно для любого самолета . Емен бомбили Ф18 что странно , почему не ф35 или ф22 - ответ прост и очевиден . Могу лишь сказать что танки абрамс это редкое дерьмо так же как и леопард где крыша танка всего 20мм и их подбито уже более 20 ... Так же я был свидетелем того как падали ракеты ХАРМ на людей потому что выходили из строя - украинцы их запускали и они не куда не долетая падали в радиусе 10км на собственных граждан это можно проверить по осколкам от ракеты ведь они предназначались для поражения радаров . Кроме как пиар акции и реклама которая делает америка своей технике по факту ничего не имеет , в реальном бою нужна простота и надежность - у нас испытывают технику в разных условиях от +50 до -50 это касается всего что есть в армии . Я забыл сказать про стоимость самолетов , у вас делаеют самолеты частные компании которые повышают их себестоимость четырехкратно у нас же это финансирует государство и оно же производит для своих нужд и себе стоимость в 3-4 раза ниже чем у вас . Вообще мало кто в мире из стран может с нуля сделать самолет где бы все детали были произведены в одной стране - по моему уже таких стран не осталось кроме РФ ибо монополия США посадила всех на свои "агрегатные узлы" . Даже когда смотришь на новый турецкий истребитель вглядываешься и пытаешься понять сколько там американских деталей ) На самом деле это грустно ведь разные подходы дают прогресс а не только псевдо открытый рынок для своих братков - например Як141 сопло которого сегодня америка применяет на ф35 . ) И стелс технологии не делают невидимым самолет для радаров а лишь занижают его облучение . И с этим научились бороться еще в 70-80 точно не помню , достаточно иметь две станции РЛС радиусом в 100-150км что бы облученный самолет со стелс видела две станции облучения и сопровождения - одна облучает вторая видит тень где облучения нет и уже есть автоматика которая всё показывает на экране и станции общаются между собой автоматически это теперь еще один режим работы ПВО. Так что я очень ждут ф35 в бою и их обломки ведь война это не пустить ракету в свадебное мероприятие где нибудь в Афганистане . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jtFoZKSHtK-sp5s.htmlsi=01oOoOr6TkUEwxDH kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nNKpdKehqJeznqM.htmlsi=-A-WRe_ePepJ0XcY kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rs6mqpyev9q7aXk.htmlsi=1CZ5LDu-1LkS8xVa kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a8iTn8mG0dDcqGw.htmlsi=QR_nRAJ2-hNh4LS- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fbGmn9dn19bGZI0.htmlsi=sPahimfAk0Sz-j4R kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d7mceqx1l9TKlHU.htmlsi=3eco0EqhY168ZuF3 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f6eDgLx1s6zaqo0.htmlsi=Ow0YoZq3O_93KLgP kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rLBjfbCIzaevXYE.htmlsi=U_okdKO55NpW-W-X kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZuPm8aavtqmfoU.htmlsi=xBEslx9qTDpW9r-8 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jtJmlseSl9fIdGQ.htmlsi=Ba7M7pKJD-stdW0C kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bpd0fZZ5lpvbdIE.htmlsi=ZBIAkbaJsf5t2Cvo

Американцы считают свои самолеты лучшими. А вы знает сколько нужно времени для после полетного обслуживания 22 и 35? Почитайте, это очень интересно. Самолеты способные взлетать раз в 3 дня, если стоит идеальная погода - это шедевры, тут мне нечего сказать.

And aside from these fighters, they ALL fall short against the Russian S-200 and S-300 ADF, even the Russian airforce in the SMO in Ukraine did not fully join the war until the majority of these systems were taken out. (Not even talking about the S-400, S-500 and S-550 systems)

if older jets are doing the job, you don't need to use the newer ones that Arnt really ready to for use it, plus low supply.